e10v12b
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 11, 2011
File
No. 001-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10
|
|
|
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES PURSUANT TO
SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
ITT WCO, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Indiana
|
|
45-2080495
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite 2000
White Plains, New York
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
10604
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(914) 304-1700
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
|
Title of Each Class to be so Registered
|
|
Each Class is to be Registered
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities
to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer, and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
INFORMATION
REQUIRED IN REGISTRATION STATEMENT
CROSS-REFERENCE
SHEET BETWEEN INFORMATION STATEMENT AND ITEMS OF
FORM 10
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Summary, Risk Factors,
Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements,
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Business, Management, Executive
Compensation and Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions of the Information Statement filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to this Registration Statement on Form 10
(the Information Statement). Those sections are
incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this item is contained under the
section Risk Factors of the Information Statement.
That section is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Financial
Information
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Summary Summary Historical and
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data,
Capitalization, Selected Historical Condensed
Combined Financial and Other Data, Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of the Information
Statement. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this item is contained under the
section Business Properties of the
Information Statement. That section is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
section Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management of the Information Statement. That section
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
section Management of the Information Statement.
That section is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Management and Executive
Compensation of the Information Statement. Those sections
are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 7.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Management, Executive
Compensation and Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions of the Information Statement. Those
sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
section Business Legal Proceedings of
the Information Statement. That section is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Market
Price of and Dividends on the Registrants Common Equity
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Risk Factors, The Spin-Off,
Dividend Policy, Executive Compensation
and Description of Capital Stock of the Information
Statement. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Description
of Registrants Securities to be Registered
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our
Common Stock, Dividend Policy and
Description of Capital Stock of the Information
Statement. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with ITT and DCO Related to
the Spin-Off Distribution Agreement
Indemnification and Description of Capital
Stock Provisions of Our Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-Laws That
Could Delay or Prevent a Change in Control
Directors Duties and Liability of the Information
Statement. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
sections Description of Capital Stock,
Selected Historical Condensed Combined Financial and Other
Data, Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and Index to Financial Statements
and the statements referenced therein of the Information
Statement. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Financial
Statements and Exhibits
|
The information required by this item is contained under the
section Index to Financial Statements beginning on
page F-1
of the Information Statement. That section is incorporated
herein by reference.
The following documents are filed as exhibits hereto:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of Distribution Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT DCO,
Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of ITT
WCO, Inc.*
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated By-Laws of ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Employee Matters Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT
DCO, Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Form of Tax Matters Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT DCO,
Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Transition Services Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT
DCO, Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Master Real Estate Lease between ITT Corporation and ITT
WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of ITT Transitional Trademark License Agreement between ITT
Corporation and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Technology License Agreement among ITT Corporation, ITT
DCO, Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of GOULDS Trademark License Agreement between ITT
Corporation and ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of ITT WCO, Inc.*
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Information Statement, dated July 11, 2011.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ITT WCO, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Gretchen
W. McClain
|
Chief Executive Officer
Date: July 11, 2011
exv99w1
Exhibit 99.1
,
2011
Dear ITT Corporation Shareholder:
I am pleased to inform you that on January 11, 2011, the
Board of Directors of ITT Corporation (ITT) approved
a plan to separate ITT into three independent, publicly traded
companies. Under the plan, ITT would execute tax-free spin-offs
of its water-related businesses, ITT WCO, Inc.
(WCO), and its Defense and Information Solutions
business, ITT DCO, Inc. (DCO). Following completion
of the transaction, ITT will continue to trade on the New York
Stock Exchange as a highly engineered industrial products
company that supplies solutions in the aerospace, transportation
and energy markets. Immediately following the completion of the
spin-offs, ITT shareholders will own all of the outstanding
shares of common stock of WCO and DCO. We believe that this
separation is in the best interest of our company and its
constituents, as these three businesses are well-positioned to
create significant value for shareholders as standalone
companies.
ITT has a long history of knowing when the time is right to take
transformational steps to create more value for our
shareholders. We did this in 1995, and we are doing it again. We
are taking the actions necessary to turn one powerful
multi-industrial into three strong standalone
businesses each with a mandate to grow and each with
the ability and the resources to make that happen. I am
confident that each of these businesses will leave the gate with
all it needs to succeed first and foremost, talented
leadership teams who know what it takes to excel; second, an
employee base that always puts our customers first, and that
takes a proud tradition of engineering excellence and innovation
very seriously; and third, a will to win in the marketplace that
is second to none. I am confident in the CEOs we have chosen to
take us forward. They are all seasoned ITT executives. They are
all ready, willing and able. They are all motivated by our
history and have a keen focus on the future. They are ready to
launch these companies, and they are ready to take them to the
next level.
The spin-offs will be completed by way of a pro rata
distribution of WCO and DCO common stock to our shareholders of
record as of 5:00 p.m., New York time,
on ,
2011, the spin-off record date. Each ITT shareholder will
receive shares
of WCO common stock,
and shares
of DCO common stock, for each share of ITT common stock held by
such shareholder on the record date. The distribution of these
shares will be made in book-entry form, which means that no
physical share certificates will be issued. Following the
spin-offs, shareholders may request that their shares of WCO and
DCO common stock be transferred to a brokerage or other account
at any time.
The spin-off is subject to certain customary conditions.
Shareholder approval of the distribution is not required, nor
are you required to take any action to receive your shares of
WCO and DCO common stock.
Immediately following the spin-offs, you will own common stock
in ITT, WCO and DCO. ITTs common stock will continue to
trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
ITT. Both WCO and DCO intend to have their common
stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols
and
,
respectively.
We expect the spin-offs to be tax-free to the shareholders of
ITT. The spin-offs are conditioned on, among other things, the
receipt of a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service and an
opinion of counsel confirming that the spin-offs will not result
in the recognition, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes,
of income, gain or loss to ITT or its shareholders.
The enclosed Information Statements, which are being mailed to
all ITT shareholders, describe the spin-offs in great detail and
contain important information about WCO and DCO, including
historical combined financial statements. We urge you to read
the Information Statements carefully.
I want to thank you for your continued support of ITT. We look
forward to your support of all three companies in the future. We
aim to continue earning your trust by delivering excellent
results that will propel our companies and your
investment into a very bright future.
Yours sincerely,
Steven R. Loranger
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
ITT Corporation
[WCO Logo]
ITT WCO,
Inc.
,
2011
Dear ITT WCO, Inc. Shareholder:
It is our pleasure to welcome you as a shareholder of our
company, ITT WCO, Inc., a world leader in the design,
manufacturing, and application of highly engineered technologies
for the water industry.
As an independent, publicly traded company, we will have the
flexibility and focus to pursue growth opportunities within our
industry, and thus bring more value to you as a shareholder,
than we could as an important business within ITT Corporation.
We expect to have WCO common stock listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol
in connection with
the distribution of WCO common stock by ITT.
Our teams across the globe are excited about the launch of our
new business. We never forget the importance of what we do.
Water is our business. And water is essential to life. We are
meeting the most critical water challenges by engineering the
broadest portfolio of products and applications to create
efficient systems and sustainable solutions. We are energized by
the breadth of our product line and about our singular ability
to transport, treat and test water. We care about our customers,
our constituencies and our communities. And we want to make a
difference.
We invite you to learn more about WCO by reviewing the enclosed
Information Statement. We look forward to our future as an
independent, publicly traded company and to your support as a
holder of WCO common stock.
Very truly yours,
Gretchen W. McClain
Chief Executive Officer
ITT WCO, Inc.
Information
contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
Registration Statement on Form 10 relating to these
securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
JULY 11, 2011
INFORMATION STATEMENT
ITT WCO, INC.
1133 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, New York 10604
Common Stock
(par value $0.01 per share)
This Information Statement is being sent to you in connection
with the separation of ITT WCO, Inc. (WCO) from ITT
Corporation (ITT), following which WCO will be an
independent, publicly traded company. As part of the separation,
ITT will undergo an internal reorganization, after which it will
complete the separation by distributing all of the shares of WCO
common stock on a pro rata basis to the holders of ITT common
stock. We refer to this pro rata distribution as the
distribution and we refer to the separation,
including the internal reorganization and distribution, as the
spin-off. We expect that the spin-off will be
tax-free to ITT shareholders for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes. Each share of ITT common stock outstanding as of
5:00 p.m., New York time,
on ,
2011, the record date for the distribution, will entitle the
holder thereof to
receive shares
of WCO common stock. The distribution of shares will be made in
book-entry form. The distribution will be effective as of
8:00 a.m., New York time,
on ,
2011. Immediately after the distribution becomes effective, we
will be an independent, publicly traded company.
No vote or other action of ITT shareholders is required in
connection with the spin-off. We are not asking you for a proxy
and you should not send us a proxy. ITT shareholders will
not be required to pay any consideration for the shares of WCO
common stock they receive in the spin-off, and they will not be
required to surrender or exchange shares of their ITT common
stock or take any other action in connection with the spin-off.
Concurrently with the WCO spin-off, ITT will spin-off its
Defense and Information Solutions business into a separate
independent, publicly traded company to be called ITT DCO, Inc.
(DCO). You are invited to also read the detailed
information about DCO in the accompanying Information Statement
for DCO.
All of the outstanding shares of WCO common stock are currently
owned by ITT. Accordingly, there is no current trading market
for WCO common stock. We expect, however, that a limited trading
market for WCO common stock, commonly known as a
when-issued trading market, will develop at least
two trading days prior to the record date for the distribution,
and we expect regular-way trading of WCO common
stock will begin the first trading day after the distribution
date. We intend to list WCO common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange under the ticker symbol
.
In reviewing this Information Statement, you should carefully
consider the matters described in Risk Factors
beginning on page 17 of this Information Statement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this Information Statement is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
This Information Statement is not an offer to sell, or a
solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities.
This Information Statement was first mailed to ITT shareholders
on or
about ,
2011.
The date of this Information Statement
is ,
2011.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained in this
Information Statement and provides an overview of our company,
our separation from ITT and the distribution of WCO common stock
by ITT to its shareholders. For a more complete understanding of
our business and the spin-off, you should read the entire
Information Statement carefully, particularly the discussion set
forth under Risk Factors and our audited historical
combined financial statements, our unaudited interim historical
condensed combined financial statements, our unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements and the respective notes
to those statements appearing in this Information Statement.
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise
requires, WCO, we, us and
our refer to ITT WCO, Inc. and its subsidiaries
after giving effect to the internal reorganization preceding the
distribution described in this Information Statement. Except as
otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires,
the information included in this Information Statement assumes
the completion of the internal reorganization preceding the
distribution.
Unless otherwise indicated, references in this Information
Statement to fiscal years are to WCOs fiscal years ended
December 31. WCOs quarterly financial periods end on
the Saturday closest to the last day of the calendar quarter,
except for the last quarterly period of the fiscal year, which
ends on December 31st. For ease of presentation, the
quarterly financial statements included herein are described as
ending on the last day of the calendar quarter.
Our
Company
Our Company is a world leader in the design, manufacturing, and
application of highly engineered technologies for the water
industry. We are a leading equipment and service provider for
water and wastewater applications with a broad portfolio of
products and services addressing the full cycle of water, from
collection, distribution and use to the return of water to the
environment. Our Companys brands, such as Bell &
Gossett and Flygt, are well known throughout the industry and
have served the water market for many years. Over the years, we
have leveraged our heritage strength in wastewater pumping
technologies to expand into wastewater treatment, and later into
clean water treatment and water quality analysis. We believe we
are strongly positioned to use our deep applications expertise
and offer our customers a full spectrum of service offerings in
the transportation, treatment and testing of water. Net sales
and operating income for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 were $3.2 billion and
$388 million, respectively, and for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 were $890 million and
$100 million, respectively.
We operate in two segments, Water Infrastructure and Applied
Water. The Water Infrastructure segment focuses on the
transportation, treatment and testing of water, offering a range
of products including water and wastewater pumps, treatment and
testing equipment, and controls and systems. Key brands include
Flygt, Wedeco, Godwin Pumps, WTW, Sanitaire, AADI and Leopold.
The Applied Water segment encompasses all the uses of water and
focuses on the residential, commercial, industrial and
agricultural markets. The segments major products include
pumps, valves, heat exchangers, controls and dispensing
equipment. Key brands in this segment include Goulds,
Bell & Gossett, AC Fire, Standard, Flojet, Lowara,
Jabsco and Flowtronex. In both our segments, we benefit from a
large and growing installed base of products driving growth in
aftermarket sales for replacement parts and services.
Our global manufacturing footprint enables us to optimize
sourcing, lower production costs and localize products. We serve
a global customer base across diverse end markets while offering
localized expertise. We sell our products in more than 140
countries through a balanced distribution network consisting of
our direct sales force and independent channel partners. In
2010, approximately 65% of our revenues were generated outside
the United States.
We believe our companys operational structure and strategy
will drive sustained, profitable growth in the markets we serve.
We have a seasoned management team that has demonstrated its
ability to strategically grow a global engineering and
manufacturing enterprise while expanding positions throughout
the global water
1
industry. We believe our businesses are well positioned to
continue to grow by enhancing our product and application
offerings and expanding our customer base in each of our
strategic markets.
Our
Competitive Strengths
Our leading positions in the markets we serve result from the
following competitive strengths:
Leading
Brands in a Diversified Product Portfolio
We are among the worlds largest water equipment and
services companies and have global leading product positions in
core applications across the water cycle, from the manufacturing
of submersible pumps under our Flygt brand to the key products
used in plumbing and water-based heating and air conditioning
markets manufactured through our Bell & Gossett brand.
Although other equipment and services companies are diversified,
in that they serve markets outside of water as well, we are one
of the largest water companies in the industry that is
exclusively focused on water equipment and services. In
addition, we have capabilities in transport, treatment and
testing of water and have consistently demonstrated the ability
to develop new offerings that anticipate the manufacturing,
installation and servicing needs of our customers, such as the
innovative water collection and distribution systems that used
Goulds pumps and a Bell & Gossett pumping package to
conserve clean water at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, and the
Lowara water booster sets used to even water supply pressure in
the worlds tallest building, Burj Dubai, in
the United Arab Emirates. Our brands, such as Flygt,
Bell & Gossett, Wedeco, Sanitaire, Lowara, Godwin
Pumps, Goulds, WTW and Jabsco, among others, have been in
existence in some cases for as many as 150 years and are
globally recognized as leading brands for quality in the markets
they serve.
Culture
of Innovation and Strong Application Expertise
Our business invented the first submersible sewage pump, and we
remain the worlds largest manufacturer of submersible
wastewater pumps. We have built upon this deep legacy and
expertise by developing new, more efficient designs and more
advanced application solutions. In 1999, we led the industry in
wastewater pumps with the launch of the Flygt N-pump,
guaranteeing at least a 25% improvement in energy consumption
compared to any installed, non-Flygt system. In recent years, we
designed a standardized range of lift stations, called The
Optimal Pumping (TOP) Station, to quickly and simply install
full lift stations, rather than design, order, and assemble all
the components needed at various pipeline locations. The TOP
Station is now a staple of our product line. In 2009, we
launched the next generation N-pump, called the Adaptive N-pump,
which eliminates virtually all forms of clogging, and therefore
improves maintenance and efficiency costs, even under the most
difficult conditions. Similarly, we also launched the next
generation vertical multi-stage pump in 2011, called eSV, which
brings benefits in energy efficiency and maintenance costs to
water boosting in multiple end uses. This innovation around new
technology and application solutions is an expertise we deploy
across all product lines and brands, and we continuously seek to
improve our products and invest in the development of new,
differentiated technologies to best fit our customers
needs.
Large
Installed Base Driving Strong Aftermarket Revenues
By virtue of our global scale and tenure, we have one of the
largest installed bases in the water equipment market. This
provides us with a highly profitable and recurring revenue
stream from the sale of parts, repair services, and end of
lifecycle product replacements. During their lifecycle,
installed products require maintenance, repair services and
parts due to the harsh environments in which they operate. In
2010, 16% of our total revenue was derived from sales of repair
parts and services. In addition, depending on the type of
product, median lifecycles range from 5 years to over
50 years, at which time the products must be replaced. Many
of our products are precisely selected and applied within a
larger network of equipment, driving a strong preference by
customers and installers to replace them with the same exact
brand and model when they reach the end of their lifecycle. This
dynamic establishes a large recurring revenue stream for our
business.
2
Diverse
Customer Base and Established International Distribution
Channels
Our customer base spans numerous industries and regions, with no
single customer representing more than 2% of our revenue and
approximately 65% of our 2010 revenues derived from operations
outside of the United States, including 18% from emerging market
countries. We sell our products through a balanced distribution
network, with more than 1,800 direct sales employees and more
than 2,700 independent distributors in more than 140 countries.
Our global reach within the highly fragmented global water
industry allows us to align our sales strategy to meet the needs
of our customers in specific end markets, as we are better able
to optimize sourcing, lower our production costs, and enable
product localization and application expertise. In our Water
Infrastructure segment, we maintain close customer relationships
through our direct sales force, allowing us to quickly respond
to a dynamic and highly regulated environment in which some of
our customers operate, including public utility and industrial
clients. In our Applied Water segment, we use distributors from
our global independent distribution network, several of whom are
exclusive distributors, to sell our products.
Proven
Operating Performance
Our strong profit margins, combined with our disciplined
approach to investing and managing our capital and our focus on
higher-margin business opportunities, enable us to generate
strong and recurring cash flow. Following our 2008
restructuring, implemented prior to the recent economic
downturn, we positioned the cost structure of our company to
realize strong margin improvements driven by robust sales
growth. For instance, in 2010, our operating margin increased
240 basis points to 12.1% as compared to the prior year. We
focus on productivity and efficiency within our manufacturing
facilities by driving operational efficiencies through the
application of Lean Six Sigma and other continuous improvement
programs.
Experienced
Management Team
Our senior management team is highly regarded in the water
equipment and services industry and has significant experience
in leadership roles. Collectively, the top nine senior
executives have an average of 20 years of experience in
managing large global industrial businesses. They have a
successful track record of enabling our company to recognize and
capitalize upon attractive opportunities in the key markets we
serve, and our executive management teams have a strong record
of winning new business, reducing costs, improving working
capital and executing operating efficiencies.
Our
Growth Strategy
Our strategy is focused on enhancing shareholder value by
providing solutions for our customers, and by growing revenues,
both organically and through strategic acquisitions. Key
elements of our strategy are summarized below:
Grow
Our Product Offerings and Solutions through Portfolio
Differentiation
We will continue to extend leading market positions where we
have a strong competitive position, cost leadership and proven
technology. In addition, we will invest in the differentiation
of our core product lines to build on our strong product and
application expertise. We also plan to expand into adjacent and
complementary technologies as demonstrated by the recent
acquisitions of analytical instrumentation and dewatering
solutions businesses.
Focus
on Organic Growth Initiatives
We have launched a global commercial excellence initiative,
deploying people, processes and tools to make our sales and
marketing teams more effective and efficient. We have trained
over 500 front-line sales agents under this initiative and have
30 dedicated commercial excellence leaders to service our most
profitable accounts. In addition, we have launched digital
selling tools, which improve our value propositions, and have
built a strategic accounts program to focus on our most
important customers. These efforts have already
3
improved the revenues generated per sales agent across our
businesses. We will continue to make investments in customer
relationship management, mobile technologies, customer
applications and other technologies that improve our knowledge
of customers and the critical activities that drive growth.
Investing
in New Technology and Innovation
We will continue to make targeted investments in research and
development activities to develop breakthrough products and
solutions. We will pursue and execute a robust pipeline of
opportunities in core and emerging markets. We have established
a wastewater Center of Excellence, in Stockholm, Sweden, with
over 100 research, development and engineering employees. We
have launched engineering Centers of Excellence in India and
China, where we are accelerating the customization of our
application expertise to local needs. Our engineers will
continue to work closely with our customers in an effort to
identify new applications for our products and develop new
technologies and solutions to expand our current portfolio
further.
Build
on Our Presence in Fast-Growing Emerging Markets
Urbanization trends and growth in the middle class in developing
countries are generating significant demand for water
applications. We intend to continue to capture this growth by
further expanding into emerging markets, such as China, India
and Brazil, increasing our existing presence of over 40
facilities. We plan to leverage our strong global reach,
manufacturing footprint and extensive distribution network to
capitalize on growth opportunities in these regions. We will
continue to establish and reinforce local capabilities by
growing our local presence in these markets with investments in
sales, marketing and manufacturing capabilities globally.
Growth
through Disciplined Acquisitions
Acquisitions are an important part of our growth strategy.
Certain segments of the global water industry we serve are
highly fragmented, providing numerous acquisition opportunities.
We have successfully completed and integrated 20 acquisitions
over the past five years, including Godwin Pumps, Nova
Analytics, and OI Corporation, and we will selectively pursue
highly targeted acquisitions that will broaden our core product
portfolio, expand our geographic footprint and enhance our
position in strategic markets.
Recent
Developments
On July 5, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire YSI Incorporated (YSI) for an aggregate
purchase price of $310 million. YSI is a leading developer
and manufacturer of sensors, instruments, software, and data
collection platforms for environmental water monitoring. YSI
reported 2010 global revenues of $101 million and employs 390
people at several facilities in the United States, Europe and
Asia. We expect to raise $310 million of indebtedness in
connection with the acquisition. The transaction is expected to
close in the third quarter of 2011, pending customary closing
conditions and approval of YSIs shareholders.
Other
Information
ITT WCO, Inc. was incorporated in Indiana on May 4, 2011.
Our principal executive offices are located at
1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, New York 10604. Our
telephone number is (914)
304-1700.
The
Spin-Off
Overview
On January 11, 2011, the Board of Directors of ITT
Corporation (ITT) approved a plan to spin-off WCO
and DCO from ITT, following which WCO and DCO will be
independent, publicly traded companies.
Before our spin-off from ITT, we will enter into a Distribution
Agreement and several other agreements with ITT and DCO related
to the spin-off. These agreements will govern the relationship
between and among
4
us, ITT and DCO after completion of the spin-off and provide for
the allocation between us and ITT and DCO of various assets,
liabilities, rights and obligations (including employee
benefits, intellectual property, information technology,
insurance and tax-related assets and liabilities). These
agreements will also govern WCOs relationship with ITT and
DCO following the spin-off and will provide arrangements for
employee matters, tax matters, intellectual property matters,
insurance matters and other specified liabilities, rights and
obligations attributable to periods before and, in some cases,
after the spin-off. These agreements will also include
arrangements with respect to transitional services to be
provided by any of ITT, WCO or DCO to any other of them. See
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with ITT and DCO Related to
the Spin-Off. Additionally, at or before the spin-off, we
will raise indebtedness in an amount estimated at
$1,200 million, which includes indebtedness to be raised in
connection with the YSI acquisition.
The distribution of WCO common stock as described in this
Information Statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of certain conditions. In addition, ITT has the right not to
complete the spin-off if, at any time prior to the distribution,
the Board of Directors of ITT determines, in its sole
discretion, that the spin-off is not in the best interests of
ITT or its shareholders or other constituents, that a sale or
other alternative is in the best interests of ITT or its
shareholders or other constituents, or that it is not advisable
at that time for WCO to separate from ITT. See The
Spin-Off Conditions to the Spin-Off.
Questions
and Answers About the Spin-Off
The following provides only a summary of the terms of the
spin-off. For a more detailed description of the matters
described below, see The Spin-Off.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
The spin-off is the series of transactions by which WCO will
separate from ITT. To complete the spin-off, ITT will distribute
to its shareholders all of the shares of WCO common stock. We
refer to this as the distribution. Following the spin-off, WCO
will be a separate company from ITT, and ITT will not retain any
ownership interest in WCO. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
As a holder of ITT stock, you will retain your ITT shares and
will
receive shares
of WCO common stock for each share of ITT common stock you own
as of the record date. You will also
receive shares
of common stock of ITT DCO, Inc. in connection with the
concurrent spin-off of that company. Your proportionate interest
in ITT will not change as a result of the spin-off. See
The Spin-Off. |
|
Q: |
|
What is WCO? |
|
A: |
|
WCO is a world leader in the design, manufacturing, and
application of highly engineered technologies for the water
industry. WCO is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of ITT
whose shares will be distributed to ITT shareholders if the
spin-off is completed. After the spin-off is completed, WCO will
be a public company. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is the separation of WCO structured as a
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
On January 11, 2011, the Board of Directors of ITT approved
a plan to spin off its water-related businesses, which we refer
to as ITTs Water business, and its Defense and Information
Solutions segment, which we refer to as ITTs Defense
business. ITT currently believes a spin-off is the most
efficient way to accomplish a separation of the Water business
for various reasons, including: (i) a spin-off would be a
tax-free distribution of WCO common stock to shareholders;
(ii) a spin-off offers a higher degree of certainty of
completion in a timely manner, lessening disruption to current
Water business operations; and (iii) a spin-off provides
greater assurance that decisions regarding WCOs capital
structure support future financial stability. After
consideration of strategic alternatives, including a sale, ITT
believes that a tax-free spin-off will enhance the long-term
value of both ITT and WCO. See The Spin-Off
Reasons for the Spin-Off. |
5
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can ITT decide to cancel the distribution of the WCO
common shares even if all the conditions have been met? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The distribution of WCO common stock is subject to the
satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. See The
Spin-Off Conditions to the Spin-Off. ITT has
the right not to complete the spin-off if, at any time prior to
the distribution, the Board of Directors of ITT determines, in
its sole discretion, that the spin-off is not in the best
interests of ITT or its shareholders or other constituents, that
a sale or other alternative is in the best interests of ITT or
its shareholders or other constituents, or that it is not
advisable at that time for WCO to separate from ITT. |
|
Q: |
|
What is being distributed in the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Approximately shares
of WCO common stock will be distributed in the spin-off, based
on the number of shares of ITT common stock expected to be
outstanding as
of ,
2011, the record date. The exact number of shares of WCO common
stock to be distributed will be calculated on the record date,
and assuming a distribution ratio
of .
The shares of WCO common stock to be distributed by ITT will
constitute all of the issued and outstanding shares of WCO
common stock immediately prior to the distribution. For more
information on the shares being distributed in the spin-off, see
Description of Capital Stock Common
Stock. |
|
Q: |
|
How will options and stock held by WCO employees be
affected as a result of the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
At the time of the distribution, the exercise price of and
number of shares subject to any outstanding option to purchase
ITT stock, as well as the number of shares subject to any
restricted stock right or other ITT equity award held by
WCOs current and former employees on the distribution
date, will be adjusted to reflect the value of the distribution
such that the intrinsic value of such awards at the time of
separation is held constant. In addition, existing performance
criteria applicable to such awards will be modified
appropriately to reflect the spin-off. |
|
|
|
Additionally, WCOs current and former employees who hold
accounts in the ITT 401(k) Plan
on , 2011 will have their accounts
transferred to the WCO 401(k) Plan, as
of ,
2011, including any shares of ITT common stock held in the ITT
Stock Fund under the ITT 401(k) Plan. On the distribution date,
shares of WCO common stock (as well as shares of DCO common
stock), based on the distribution ratio for each share of ITT
common stock held in such employees ITT stock fund
account, will be included in a new WCO stock fund account under
the WCO 401(k) Plan. However, in conformity with the fiduciary
responsibility requirements of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), remaining shares of
ITT common stock held in WCOs employees ITT stock
fund accounts following the distribution will be disposed of and
allocated to another investment alternative available under the
WCO 401(k) Plan if and when directed by participants, and any
such shares remaining as
of ,
2012 will be automatically disposed of and the proceeds invested
in another such investment alternative (but this will not
prohibit diversified, collectively managed investment
alternatives available under the WCO 401(k) Plan from holding
ITT common stock or prohibit employees who use self-directed
accounts in the WCO 401(k) Plan from investing their accounts in
ITT common stock). |
|
|
|
In addition, current and former ITT employees who hold shares of
ITT common stock in their ITT 401(k) Plan account as of the
record date will receive shares of our common stock (as well as
shares of DCO common stock) in the distribution. Our shares (as
well as shares of DCO common stock) will be included in new,
temporary stock funds under the ITT 401(k) Plan. In conformity
with the fiduciary responsibility requirements of ERISA,
remaining shares of our common stock (as well as shares of DCO
common stock) held in these temporary stock funds following the
distribution will be disposed of and allocated to another
investment alternative available under the ITT 401(k) Plan when
directed by participants, and any such shares remaining as
of ,
2012 will be automatically disposed of and the proceeds invested
in another such investment alternative (but this will not
prohibit diversified, collectively managed investment
alternatives available under the ITT 401(k) Plan from holding
our common stock or prohibit employees who use self-directed
accounts in the ITT 401(k) Plan from investing their accounts in
our common stock). |
6
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When is the record date for the distribution? |
|
A: |
|
The record date will be 5:00 p.m., New York time,
on ,
2011. |
|
Q: |
|
When will the distribution occur? |
|
A: |
|
The distribution date of the spin-off
is ,
2011. WCO expects that it will take the distribution agent,
acting on behalf of ITT, up to two weeks after the distribution
date to fully distribute the shares of WCO common stock to ITT
shareholders. The ability to trade WCO shares will not be
affected during that time. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I have to do to participate in the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Nothing. You are not required to take any action, although you
are urged to read this entire document carefully. No shareholder
approval of the distribution is required or sought. You are not
being asked for a proxy. No action is required on your part to
receive your shares of WCO common stock. You will neither be
required to pay anything for the new shares nor be required to
surrender any shares of ITT common stock to participate in the
spin-off. |
|
Q: |
|
What are ITTs reasons for the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
ITTs Board of Directors has determined that the spin-off
is in the best interests of ITT and its shareholders and other
constituents because the spin-off will provide the following key
benefits: |
|
|
|
Greater Strategic Focus of Financial Resources
and Managements Efforts. ITTs Water
business represents a discrete portion of ITTs overall
businesses. It has historically exhibited different financial
and operating characteristics than ITTs other businesses.
The spin-off will allow us to better align managements
attention, compensation and resources to pursue opportunities in
the water technology market and to manage our cost structure
more actively.
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Customer Focus. Both ITT
and we believe that, as a unified, commonly managed, stand-alone
water technology business, our management will be able to focus
solely on the needs of our own customers, without dilution
arising from a connection to a larger parent with diverse goals
and incentives.
|
|
|
|
Direct and Differentiated Access to Capital
Resources. After the spin-off, we will no longer
need to compete with ITTs other businesses for capital
resources. As a long-cycle global industrial business with
strong global cash flow generation, our business has different
financial and operating characteristics from ITTs other
businesses.
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Investor Choices by Offering Investment
Opportunities in Separate Entities. After the
spin-off, investors should be better able to evaluate our
financial performance, as well as our strategy within the
context of our markets, thereby enhancing the likelihood that we
will achieve an appropriate market valuation.
|
|
|
|
Improved Management Incentive
Tools. It is expected that we will use our equity
to compensate current and future employees. In multi-business
companies such as ITT, it is difficult to structure incentives
that reward managers in a manner directly related to the
performance of their respective business units. By granting
equity linked to a specific business, equity compensation will
be more in line with the financial results of the managers
direct work product. In addition, reducing the conglomerate
discount that currently impacts ITT stock may provide our
business with a more attractive currency for equity-based
compensation.
|
|
|
|
Utilization of Stock as an Acquisition
Currency. Although we are not currently
evaluating any acquisitions involving the use of our stock, the
spin-off will enable us to use our stock as currency to pursue
certain financial and strategic objectives, including tax-free
merger transactions. In addition, future strategic transactions
with similar businesses will be more easily facilitated through
the use of our stand-alone stock as consideration.
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
The spin-off is conditioned on the receipt by ITT of a ruling
(IRS Ruling) from the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) and an opinion from its tax counsel that, for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the distribution will be
tax-free to ITT and ITTs shareholders under
Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1986 (the Code). The tax consequences of the
distribution are described in more detail under The
Spin-Off U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Spin-Off. |
|
Q: |
|
Will the WCO common stock be listed on a stock
exchange? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Although there is not currently a public market for WCO
common stock, before completion of the spin-off, WCO will apply
to list its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol
.
It is anticipated that trading of WCO common stock will commence
on a when-issued basis at least two trading days
prior to the record date. When-issued trading refers to a sale
or purchase made conditionally because the security has been
authorized but not yet issued. When-issued trades generally
settle within four trading days after the distribution date. On
the first trading day following the distribution date, any
when-issued trading with respect to WCO common stock will end
and regular-way trading will begin.
Regular-way trading refers to trading after a
security has been issued and typically involves a transaction
that settles on the third full trading day following the date of
the transaction. See Trading Market. |
|
Q: |
|
Will my shares of ITT common stock continue to
trade? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. ITT common stock will continue to be listed and trade on
the NYSE under the symbol ITT. |
|
Q: |
|
If I sell, on or before the distribution date, shares of
ITT common stock that I held on the record date, am I still
entitled to receive shares of WCO common stock distributable
with respect to the shares of ITT common stock I sold? |
|
A: |
|
Beginning on or shortly before the record date and continuing
through the distribution date for the spin-off, ITTs
common stock will begin to trade in two markets on the NYSE: a
regular-way market and an
ex-distribution market. If you hold shares of ITT
common stock as of the record date for the distribution and
choose to sell those shares in the regular-way market after the
record date for the distribution and on or before the
distribution date, you also will be selling the right to receive
the shares of WCO common stock in connection with the spin-off.
However, if you hold shares of ITT common stock as of the record
date for the distribution and choose to sell those shares in the
ex-distribution market after the record date for the
distribution and on or before the distribution date, you will
still receive the shares of WCO common stock in the spin-off. |
|
Q: |
|
Will the spin-off affect the trading price of my ITT
stock? |
|
A: |
|
Yes, the trading price of shares of ITT common stock immediately
following the distribution is expected to be lower than
immediately prior to the distribution because its trading price
will no longer reflect the value of the Water and Defense
businesses. However, we cannot provide you with any guarantees
as to the price at which the ITT shares will trade following the
spin-off. |
|
Q: |
|
What indebtedness will WCO have following the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
It is anticipated that, prior to the completion of the spin-off,
WCO will raise indebtedness in an amount estimated at
$1,200 million, which includes indebtedness to be raised in
connection with the YSI acquisition. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the Contribution? |
|
A: |
|
As part of the internal reorganization, we will transfer
$833 million to ITT (the Contribution). The
Contribution is primarily intended to assist in the creation of
appropriate capital structures for both ITT and us. |
|
Q: |
|
What will be the relationship between ITT and WCO after
the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Following the spin-off, WCO will be an independent, publicly
traded company and ITT will have no continuing stock ownership
interest in WCO. WCO will have entered into a Distribution
Agreement with ITT and DCO and will enter into several other
agreements for the purpose of allocating between WCO, DCO and
ITT various assets, liabilities, rights and obligations
(including employee benefits, intellectual property, insurance
and tax-related assets and liabilities). These agreements will
also govern WCOs relationship with ITT and DCO following
the spin-off and will provide arrangements for employee matters,
tax matters, intellectual property matters, insurance matters
and other specified liabilities, rights and obligations
attributable to periods before and, in some cases, after the
spin-off. These agreements will also include |
8
|
|
|
|
|
arrangements with respect to transitional services to be
provided by one or more of ITT, WCO or DCO to any other of them.
The Distribution Agreement will provide, in general, that WCO
will indemnify ITT and DCO, as the case may be, against any and
all liabilities arising out of WCOs business as
constituted in connection with the spin-offs and any other
liabilities and obligations assumed by WCO, and that ITT and DCO
will indemnify WCO against any and all liabilities arising out
of the businesses of ITT or DCO, as the case may be, as
constituted in connection with the spin-offs and any other
liabilities and obligations assumed by ITT or DCO, respectively. |
|
Q: |
|
What will WCOs dividend policy be after the
spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Following the distribution, we expect that initially WCO will
pay a dividend, although the timing, declaration, amount and
payment of future dividends to our shareholders fall within the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors, including our financial condition, results of
operations and capital requirements, industry practice and other
business considerations that WCOs Board of Directors
considers relevant from time to time. In addition, the terms of
the agreements governing our new debt or debt that we may incur
in the future may limit or prohibit the payments of dividends.
See Dividend Policy. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the anti-takeover effects of the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
Some provisions of the amended and restated articles of
incorporation of WCO and the amended and restated by-laws of
WCO, Indiana law and possibly the agreements governing
WCOs new debt, as each will be in effect immediately
following the spin-off, may have the effect of making more
difficult an acquisition of control of WCO in a transaction not
approved by WCOs Board of Directors. See Description
of Capital Stock Provisions of Our Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated
By-Laws That Could Delay or Prevent a Change in Control.
In addition, under the Tax Matters Agreement, WCO will agree not
to enter into any transaction for a period of two years
following the distribution involving an acquisition (including
issuance) of WCO common stock or any other transaction (or, to
the extent WCO has the right to prohibit it, to permit any such
transaction) that could cause the distribution to be taxable to
ITT. WCO will also agree to indemnify ITT for any tax resulting
from any such transaction. Generally, ITT will recognize a
taxable gain on the distribution if there are one or more
acquisitions (including issuances) of WCO capital stock
representing 50% or more of WCOs then-outstanding stock,
measured by vote or value, and the acquisitions are deemed to be
part of a plan or series of related transactions that include
the distribution. Any such acquisition of WCO common stock
within two years before or after the distribution (with
exceptions, including public trading by less-than-5%
shareholders and certain compensatory stock issuances) generally
will be presumed to be part of such a plan unless that
presumption is rebutted. As a result, WCOs obligations may
discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of WCO. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the risks associated with the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
There are a number of risks associated with the spin-off and
ownership of WCO common stock. These risks are discussed under
Risk Factors. |
|
Q: |
|
How will the spin-off affect WCOs relationship with
its customers? |
|
A: |
|
We believe we have well-established relationships with our
principal customers. We believe the spin-off will enable us to
better focus on those customers and to align our resources with
their priorities. As we seek to enter into new contracts with
our customers, we expect to continue to provide information to
enable them to have ongoing confidence in our management, our
workforce and our ability to perform, including our financial
stability. |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I get more information? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions relating to the mechanics of the
distribution, you should contact the distribution agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon, at: |
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Corporation
c/o BNY Mellon Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 358015
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8015
Phone: 800 254 2823 |
|
|
|
|
|
Before the spin-off, if you have any questions relating to the
spin-off, you should contact ITT at: |
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Corporation
Investor Relations
Phone: +1 914 641 2030
Email: thomas.scalera@itt.com
www.itt.com |
|
|
|
|
|
After the spin-off, if you have any questions relating to WCO,
you should contact WCO at: |
|
|
|
|
|
ITT WCO, Inc.
Investor Relations
Phone: +1 914 641 2093
Email: phil.desousa@itt.com
|
10
Summary
of the Spin-Off
|
|
|
Distributing Company |
|
ITT Corporation, an Indiana corporation. After the distribution,
ITT will not own any shares of WCO common stock. |
|
Distributed Company |
|
ITT WCO, Inc., an Indiana corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of ITT. After the spin-off, WCO will be an
independent, publicly traded company. |
|
Distributed Securities |
|
All of the shares of WCO common stock owned by ITT, which will
be 100% of WCO common stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the distribution. |
|
Record Date |
|
The record date for the distribution is 5:00 p.m., New York
time,
on ,
2011. |
|
Distribution Date |
|
The distribution date
is ,
2011. |
|
Internal Reorganization |
|
As part of the spin-off, ITT will undergo an internal
reorganization, which we refer to as the internal
reorganization, that will, among other things and subject
to limited exceptions: |
|
|
|
allocate and transfer to each of WCO and DCO and
their respective subsidiaries, as applicable, those assets, and
to allocate and assign responsibility for those liabilities, in
respect of the activities of the applicable businesses of such
entities; and
|
|
|
|
allocate, transfer and assign, as applicable, those
assets and liabilities in respect of other current and former
businesses and activities of ITT and its current and former
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
After completion of the spin-off: |
|
|
|
WCO will own and operate ITTs water
infrastructure and applied water businesses;
|
|
|
|
DCO will own and operate ITTs command,
control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance
and reconnaissance (C4ISR) electronics and systems, and
informational and technical services businesses; and
|
|
|
|
ITT will own and operate its industrial process,
motion technologies, interconnect solutions and control
technologies businesses.
|
|
|
|
See The Spin-Off Manner of Effecting the
Spin-Off Internal Reorganization. |
|
Incurrence of Debt |
|
It is anticipated that, at or prior to completion of the
spin-off, WCO will raise indebtedness in an amount estimated at
$1,200 million, which includes indebtedness to be raised in
connection with the YSI acquisition. |
|
Distribution Ratio |
|
Each holder of ITT common stock will
receive shares
of WCO common stock for each share of ITT common stock held
on ,
2011. |
|
The Distribution |
|
On the distribution date, ITT will release the shares of WCO
common stock to the distribution agent to distribute to ITT
shareholders. The distribution of shares will be made in
book-entry form, which means that no physical share certificates
will be issued. It is expected that it will take the
distribution agent up to two weeks to |
11
|
|
|
|
|
issue shares of WCO common stock to you or to your bank or
brokerage firm electronically on your behalf by way of direct
registration in book-entry form. Trading of our shares will not
be affected during that time. Following the spin-off,
shareholders whose shares are held in book-entry form may
request that their shares of WCO common stock be transferred to
a brokerage or other account at any time. You will not be
required to make any payment, surrender or exchange your shares
of ITT common stock, or take any other action to receive your
shares of WCO common stock. |
|
Conditions to the Spin-Off |
|
Completion of the spin-off is subject to the satisfaction or
waiver by ITT of the following conditions: |
|
|
|
our Registration Statement on Form 10, of which
this Information Statement forms a part, shall have been
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC), no stop order suspending the
effectiveness thereof shall be in effect, no proceedings for
such purpose shall be pending before or threatened by the SEC,
and this Information Statement shall have been mailed to the ITT
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
WCO common stock shall have been approved for
listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of distribution;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have obtained an opinion from its tax
counsel, in form and substance satisfactory to ITT,
substantially to the effect that, among other things, the
distribution, together with certain related transactions, will
qualify as a reorganization under Sections 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have obtained a private letter ruling from
the Internal Revenue Service, in form and substance satisfactory
to ITT, and such ruling shall remain in effect as of the
distribution date, to the effect, among other things, that the
distribution, together with certain related transactions, will
qualify as a reorganization under Sections 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
the Board of Directors of ITT shall have obtained
opinions from a nationally recognized valuation firm, in form
and substance satisfactory to ITT, with respect to the capital
adequacy and solvency of each of ITT, DCO and WCO;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have obtained all government approvals and
other consents necessary to consummate the distribution;
|
|
|
|
no order, injunction or decree issued by any
governmental entity of competent jurisdiction or other legal
restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of all or
any portion of the distribution shall be pending, threatened,
issued or in effect, and no other event outside the control of
ITT shall have occurred or failed to occur that prevents the
consummation of all or any portion of the distribution;
|
|
|
|
no other events or developments shall have occurred
or failed to occur that, in the judgment of the Board of
Directors of ITT, would result in the distribution having a
material adverse effect on ITT or its shareholders;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
the financing transactions described in this
Information Statement as having occurred prior to the
distribution shall have been consummated on or prior to the
distribution;
|
|
|
|
the internal reorganization shall have been
completed, except for such steps as ITT in its sole discretion
shall have determined may be completed after the distribution
date;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have taken all necessary action, in the
judgment of the Board of Directors of ITT, to cause the Board of
Directors of WCO to consist of the individuals identified in
this Information Statement as directors of WCO;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have taken all necessary action, in the
judgment of the Board of Directors of ITT, to cause the officers
of WCO to be the individuals identified as such in this
Information Statement;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have caused all its employees and any
employees of its subsidiaries (excluding any employees of any of
WCO and its subsidiaries after the internal reorganization (the
WCO Group)) to resign, effective as of the
distribution date, from all positions as officers or directors
of any member of the WCO Group in which they serve, and WCO
shall have caused all its employees and any employees of its
subsidiaries to resign, effective as of the distribution date,
from all positions as officers or directors of any of ITT, DCO
or any of their respective subsidiaries after the internal
reorganization, in which they serve;
|
|
|
|
all necessary actions shall have been taken to adopt
the form of amended and restated articles of incorporation and
amended and restated by-laws filed by WCO with the SEC as
exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form 10, of which
this Information Statement forms a part;
|
|
|
|
the Board of Directors of ITT shall have approved
the distribution, which approval may be given or withheld at its
absolute and sole discretion; and
|
|
|
|
each of the Distribution Agreement, the Tax Matters
Agreement, the Employee Matters Agreement, the Intellectual
Property License Agreements, the Transition Services Agreements
and the other ancillary agreements shall have been executed by
each party.
|
|
|
|
Completion of the spin-off of DCO will be subject to similar
conditions as those listed above. The fulfillment of the
foregoing conditions will not create any obligation on
ITTs part to effect the spin-off. We are not aware of any
material federal, foreign or state regulatory requirements that
must be complied with or any material approvals that must be
obtained, other than compliance with SEC rules and regulations,
the receipt of a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service, approval for listing on the NYSE and the declaration of
effectiveness of the Registration Statement on Form 10 by
the SEC, in connection with the distribution. ITT has the right
not to complete the spin-off if, at any time prior to the
distribution, the Board of Directors of ITT determines, in its
sole discretion, that the spin-off is not then in the best
interests of ITT or its shareholders or other constituents, that
a sale or other |
13
|
|
|
|
|
alternative is in the best interests of ITT or its shareholders
or other constituents, or that it is not advisable for WCO to
separate from ITT at that time. For more information, see
The Spin-Off Conditions to the Spin-Off. |
|
Trading Market and Symbol |
|
We intend to file an application to list WCO common stock on the
NYSE under the ticker symbol
. We anticipate that,
at least two trading days prior to the record date, trading of
shares of WCO common stock will begin on a
when-issued basis and will continue up to and
including the distribution date, and we expect
regular-way trading of WCO common stock will begin
the first trading day after the distribution date. We also
anticipate that, at least two trading days prior to the record
date, there will be two markets in ITT common stock: a
regular-way market on which shares of ITT common stock will
trade with an entitlement for the purchaser of ITT common stock
to shares of WCO common stock to be distributed pursuant to the
distribution, and an ex-distribution market on which
shares of ITT common stock will trade without an entitlement for
the purchaser of ITT common stock to shares of WCO common stock.
For more information, see Trading Market. |
|
Tax Consequences |
|
As a condition to the spin-off, ITT will receive an IRS Ruling
and an opinion of counsel stating that ITT and ITTs
shareholders will not recognize any taxable income, gain or loss
for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a result of the
spin-off. See The Spin-Off U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off. |
|
|
|
Each shareholder is urged to consult his, her or its tax
advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the spin-off to
such shareholder, including the effect of any state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws and of changes in applicable tax laws. |
|
Relationship with ITT after the Spin-Off |
|
We will enter into a Distribution Agreement and other agreements
with ITT and DCO related to the spin-off. These agreements will
govern the relationship between us, DCO and ITT after completion
of the spin-off and provide for the allocation between us, DCO
and ITT of various assets, liabilities, rights and obligations
(including employee benefits, intellectual property, insurance
and tax-related assets and liabilities). The Distribution
Agreement will provide for the allocation of assets and
liabilities among ITT, DCO and WCO and will establish the rights
and obligations between and among the parties following the
distribution. We intend to enter into one or more Transition
Services Agreements with ITT and DCO pursuant to which certain
services will be provided on an interim basis following the
distribution. We also intend to enter into an Employee Matters
Agreement that will set forth the agreements between us, DCO and
ITT concerning certain employee compensation and benefit
matters. Further, we intend to enter into a Tax Matters
Agreement with DCO and ITT regarding the sharing of taxes
incurred before and after completion of the spin-off, certain
indemnification rights with respect to tax matters and certain
restrictions to preserve the tax-free status of the spin-off. In
addition, to facilitate the ongoing use of various intellectual
property, |
14
|
|
|
|
|
we intend to enter into a Technology License Agreement that will
provide for certain reciprocal licensing arrangements with ITT
and DCO and certain trademark license agreements with ITT. We
describe these arrangements in greater detail under
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with ITT and DCO Related to
the Spin-Off, and describe some of the risks of these
arrangements under Risk Factors Risks Relating
to the Spin-Off. |
|
Dividend Policy |
|
Following the distribution, we expect that initially WCO will
pay a dividend, although, the timing, declaration, amount and
payment of future dividends to our shareholders fall within the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors, including our financial condition, results of
operations and capital requirements, as well as applicable law,
regulatory constraints, industry practice and other business
considerations that WCOs Board of Directors considers
relevant. In addition, the terms of the agreements governing our
new debt or debt that we may incur in the future may limit or
prohibit the payments of dividends. See Dividend
Policy. |
|
Transfer Agent |
|
The Bank of New York Mellon |
|
Risk Factors |
|
We face both general and specific risks and uncertainties
relating to our business, our relationship with ITT and DCO and
our being an independent, publicly traded company. We also are
subject to risks relating to the spin-off. You should carefully
read the risk factors set forth in the section entitled
Risk Factors in this Information Statement. |
15
Summary
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Data
The following table presents the summary historical condensed
combined financial data for WCO. The condensed combined
statement of operations data for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010 and the condensed
combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and
2009 set forth below are derived from WCOs audited
combined financial statements included in this Information
Statement. The condensed combined financial data for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are derived from
WCOs unaudited condensed combined financial statements
included in this Information Statement. The condensed combined
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 is derived from
WCOs unaudited combined financial statements that are not
included in this Information Statement. The unaudited combined
financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the
audited combined financial statements and, in the opinion of our
management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the information set forth herein.
The summary unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
data for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the year
ended December 31, 2010 have been prepared to reflect the
acquisition of Godwin Pumps on August 3, 2010 and the
spin-off, including: (i) the distribution of WCO common
stock by ITT to its shareholders; (ii) the incurrence of
indebtedness in an amount estimated at $890 million, the
net proceeds of which are expected to fund a cash transfer of
approximately $833 million to ITT, with the balance to be
used for general corporate purposes; and (iii) the impact
of the transactions contemplated by the Tax Matters Agreement.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement data
presented for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the
year ended December 31, 2010 assumes the spin-off occurred
on January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet data assumes the spin-off occurred on
March 31, 2011. The summary unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial data do not give effect to the YSI
acquisition or $310 million of indebtedness to be raised in
connection with the YSI acquisition, because such acquisition is
not considered significant. The assumptions used and pro forma
adjustments derived from such assumptions are based on currently
available information and we believe such assumptions are
reasonable under the circumstances.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are not necessarily indicative of our results of operations or
financial condition had the distribution and our anticipated
post-spin-off capital structure been completed on the dates
assumed. Also, they may not reflect the results of operations or
financial condition that would have resulted had we been
operating as an independent, publicly traded company during such
periods. In addition, they are not necessarily indicative of our
future results of operations or financial condition.
You should read this summary financial data together with
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements, Capitalization, Selected
Historical Condensed Combined Financial and Other Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the condensed
combined financial statements and accompanying notes included in
this Information Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
3,347
|
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,962
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
2,911
|
|
|
|
N/A*
|
|
|
|
3,735
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
N/A*
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
*N/A = Not applicable
16
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider each of the following risks,
which we believe are the principal risks that we face and of
which we are currently aware, and all of the other information
in this Information Statement. Some of the risks described below
relate to our business, while others relate to the spin-off.
Other risks relate principally to the securities markets and
ownership of our common stock.
Should any of the following risks and uncertainties develop
into actual events, our business, financial condition or results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected, the
trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could
lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
We face the following risks in connection with the general
conditions and trends of the industry in which we operate:
Demand
for our products and services is significantly affected by U.S.
and European economic conditions.
We compete around the world in various geographic and product
markets. In 2010, 35% and 39% of our total sales were to
customers located in the United States and Europe, respectively.
We expect sales into these markets to be significant for the
foreseeable future. Important factors impacting our businesses
include the overall strength of these economies and our
customers confidence in both local and global macro
economic conditions; industrial and federal, state, local and
municipal governmental spending; the strength of the residential
and commercial real estate markets; interest rates; availability
of commercial financing for our customers and end-users; and
unemployment rates. A slowdown or downturn in these financial or
macro economic conditions could have a significant adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flow.
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience
fluctuations in revenues and operating results due to economic
and business cycles, particularly within the portion of our
business that provides products and services used in residential
and commercial buildings. We believe our level of business
activity is influenced by residential and commercial building
starts, and renovations, which are heavily influenced by
interest rates, consumer debt levels, changes in disposable
income, employment growth and consumer confidence. Credit market
conditions greatly affect the ability of residential and
commercial builders to obtain the necessary capital to complete
and begin new projects. We closely monitor the credit worthiness
of our customers, and evaluate their financial ability to pay
for those products and services we provide to them. As it
relates to our customers ability to pay for products and
services, we have not experienced any significant negative
impact as a result of the recent economic downturn. If market
conditions worsen, it may result in the delay or cancellation of
orders from our customers or potential customers and adversely
affect our revenues and our ability to manage inventory levels,
collect customer receivables and maintain current levels of
profitability.
Economic
and other risks associated with international sales and
operations could adversely affect our business.
In 2010, 65% of our total sales was to customers outside the
United States. We expect our international operations and export
sales to continue to be a significant portion of our revenue.
Both our sales from international operations and export sales
are subject in varying degrees to risks inherent to doing
business outside the United States. These risks include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Possibility of unfavorable circumstances arising from host
country laws or regulations;
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations and restrictions on currency
repatriation;
|
|
|
|
Potential negative consequences from changes to taxation
policies;
|
|
|
|
The disruption of operations from labor and political
disturbances;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in tariff and trade barriers and import and export
licensing requirements; and
|
|
|
|
Insurrection or war.
|
Following the spin-off, we expect that a majority of our cash
will continue to be generated by our foreign subsidiaries and
repatriation of that cash to the United States may be
inefficient from a tax perspective. Any payment of
distributions, loans or advances to us by our foreign
subsidiaries could be subject to restrictions on, or taxation
of, dividends on repatriation of earnings under applicable local
law, monetary transfer restrictions and foreign currency
exchange regulations in the jurisdictions in which our
subsidiaries operate. In addition to the general risks that we
face outside the United States, we now conduct more of our
operations in emerging markets than we have in the past, which
could involve additional uncertainties for us, including risks
that governments may impose limitations on our ability to
repatriate funds; governments may impose withholding or other
taxes on remittances and other payments to us, or the amount of
any such taxes may increase; an outbreak or escalation of any
insurrection or armed conflict may occur; governments may seek
to nationalize our assets; or governments may impose or increase
investment barriers or other restrictions affecting our
business. In addition, emerging markets pose other
uncertainties, including the protection of our intellectual
property, pressure on the pricing of our products, and risks of
political instability. We cannot predict the impact such future,
largely unforeseeable events might have on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
Failure
to compete successfully in our markets could adversely affect
our business.
We provide products and services into competitive markets. We
believe the principal points of competition in our markets are
product performance, reliability and innovation, application
expertise, brand reputation, energy efficiency, product life
cycle cost, timeliness of delivery, proximity of service
centers, effectiveness of our distribution channels and price.
Maintaining and improving our competitive position will require
continued investment by us in manufacturing, research and
development, engineering, marketing, customer service and
support, and our distribution networks. We may not be successful
in maintaining our competitive position. Our competitors may
develop products that are superior to our products, or may
develop more efficient or effective methods of providing
products and services or may adapt more quickly than we do to
new technologies or evolving customer requirements. Pricing
pressures also could cause us to adjust the prices of certain
products to stay competitive. We may not be able to compete
successfully with our existing or new competitors. Failure to
continue competing successfully could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flow.
Our
strategy includes acquisitions, and we may not be able to make
acquisitions of suitable candidates or integrate acquisitions
successfully.
Our historical growth has included acquisitions. As part of our
growth strategy, we plan to pursue the acquisition of other
companies, assets and product lines that either complement or
expand our existing business. We cannot assure you, however,
that we will be able to identify suitable candidates
successfully, negotiate appropriate acquisition terms, obtain
financing that may be needed to consummate those acquisitions,
complete proposed acquisitions, successfully integrate acquired
businesses into our existing operations or expand into new
markets. In addition, we cannot assure you that any acquisition,
once successfully integrated, will perform as planned, be
accretive to earnings, or prove to be beneficial to our
operations or cash flow.
Acquisitions involve a number of risks and present financial,
managerial and operational challenges, including: diversion of
management attention from existing businesses and operations;
integration of technology, operations personnel, and financial
and other systems; potentially insufficient internal controls
over financial activities or financial reporting at an acquired
entity that could impact us on a combined basis; the failure to
realize expected synergies; the possibility that we have
acquired substantial undisclosed liabilities; and the loss of
key employees of the acquired businesses.
18
Our
business could be adversely affected by the inability of
suppliers to meet delivery requirements.
Our business relies on third-party suppliers, contract
manufacturing and commodity markets to secure raw materials,
parts and components used in our products. Parts and raw
materials commonly used in our products include motors,
fabricated parts, castings, bearings, seals, nickel, copper,
aluminum, and plastics. We are exposed to the availability of
these materials, which may be subject to curtailment or change
due to, among other things, interruptions in production by
suppliers, labor disputes, the impaired financial condition of a
particular supplier, suppliers allocations to other
purchasers, changes in exchange rates and prevailing price
levels, ability to meet regulatory requirements, weather
emergencies or acts of war or terrorism. Any delay in our
suppliers abilities to provide us with necessary materials
could impair our ability to deliver products to our customers
and, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flow.
Our
business could be adversely affected by inflation and other
manufacturing and operating cost increases.
Our operating costs are subject to fluctuations, particularly
due to changes in commodity prices, raw materials, energy and
related utilities, freight, and cost of labor. In order to
remain competitive, we may not be able to recuperate all or a
portion of these higher costs from our customers through product
price increases. Further, our ability to realize financial
benefits from Six Sigma and Lean projects may not be able to
mitigate fully or in part these manufacturing and operating cost
increases and, as a result, could negatively impact our
profitability.
Our
business could be adversely affected by significant movements in
foreign currency exchange rates.
With 65% of our total sales to customers outside the United
States for the year ended December 31, 2010, we are exposed
to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly
with respect to the Euro, Swedish Krona, British Pound,
Australian Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Polish Zloty, and Hungarian
Forint. Any significant change in the value of currencies of the
countries in which we do business relative to the value of the
U.S. Dollar could affect our ability to sell products
competitively and control our cost structure, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flow.
Long-lived
assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets,
represent a significant portion of our assets and any impairment
of these assets could negatively impact our results of
operations.
At December 31, 2010, our long-lived assets, including
goodwill and other intangible assets, were approximately
$2.3 billion, net of accumulated amortization, which
represented approximately 64% of our total assets. Goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment on
an annual basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. We also review the carrying value of finite-lived
tangible and intangible assets for impairment when impairment
indicators arise. We estimate the fair value of reporting units
used in the goodwill impairment test and indefinite-lived
intangible assets using an income approach, and as a result the
fair value measurements depend on revenue growth rates, future
operating margin assumptions, risk-adjusted discount rates,
assumed royalty rates, future economic and market conditions,
and identification of appropriate market comparable data.
Because of the significance of our long-lived assets, including
goodwill and other intangible assets, any future impairment of
these assets could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and financial condition.
Failure
to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or other
applicable anti-corruption legislation could result in fines,
criminal penalties and an adverse effect on our
business.
We operate in a number of countries throughout the world,
including countries known to have a reputation for corruption.
We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable
anti-corruption laws. We are subject, however, to the risk that
we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers,
directors, employees and agents may take action determined to be
in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including
19
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the U.K.
Bribery Act of 2010 and others. Any such violation could result
in substantial fines, sanctions, civil
and/or
criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain
jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results
of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or
alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do
business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving
actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume
significant time and attention of our senior management.
We may
be negatively impacted by litigation and regulatory
proceedings.
We are subject to laws, regulations and potential liability
relating to claims, complaints and proceedings, including those
related to antitrust, environmental, product, and other matters.
We are subject to various laws, ordinances, regulations and
other requirements of government authorities in foreign
countries and in the United States, any violations of which
could potentially create a substantial liability for us, and
also could cause harm to our reputation. Changes in laws,
ordinances, regulations or other government policies, the
nature, timing, and effect of which are uncertain, may
significantly increase our expenses and liabilities.
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings that are
incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these
proceedings seek remedies relating to environmental matters,
product liability, personal injury claims, employment and
pension matters, government contract issues and commercial or
contractual disputes, sometimes related to acquisitions or
divestitures. We may become subject to significant claims of
which we are currently unaware, or the claims of which we are
aware may result in our incurring a significantly greater
liability than we anticipate or can estimate. Additionally, we
may receive fines or penalties or be required to change or cease
operations at one or more facilities if a regulatory agency
determines that we have failed to comply with laws, regulations
or orders applicable to our business.
Changes
in our effective tax rates may adversely affect our financial
results.
We sell our products in more than 140 countries and
approximately 65% of our revenues were generated outside the
United States in 2010. Given the global nature of our business,
a number of factors may increase our future effective tax rates,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
our decision to repatriate
non-U.S. earnings
for which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes;
|
|
|
|
the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned
and taxed;
|
|
|
|
sustainability of historical income tax rates in the
jurisdictions in which we conduct business;
|
|
|
|
the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various
tax authorities; and
|
|
|
|
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities, and changes in deferred tax valuation allowances.
|
Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could
reduce net income for future periods.
Our
business could be adversely affected by interruptions in
information technology, communications networks and
operations.
Our business operations rely on information technology and
communications networks, and operations that are vulnerable to
damage or disturbance from a variety of sources. Regardless of
protection measures, essentially all systems are susceptible to
disruption due to failure, vandalism, computer viruses, security
breaches, natural disasters, power outages and other events. We
also have a concentration of operations on certain sites, e.g.
production, and shared services centers, where business
interruptions could cause material damage and costs. Transport
of goods from suppliers, and to customers, could also be
hampered for the reasons stated above. Although we have assessed
these risks, implemented controls, and performed business
continuity planning, we cannot be sure that interruptions with
material adverse effects will not occur.
20
Weather
conditions may adversely affect our financial
results.
Demand for residential and agricultural water systems is
impacted by weather patterns, particularly by heavy flooding and
droughts. During 2010, Residential and Irrigation application
revenues were $292 and $95, respectively. Dewatering service
demand can also fluctuate as a result of the same weather
patterns. We cannot assure you that seasonality and weather
conditions will not have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Risks
Relating to the Spin-Off
We face the following risks in connection with the spin-off:
We may
incur greater costs as an independent company than we did when
we were part of ITT.
As a current part of ITT, we take advantage of ITTs size
and purchasing power in procuring certain goods and services
such as insurance and health care benefits, and technology such
as computer software licenses. We also rely on ITT to provide
various corporate functions. After the spin-off, as a separate,
independent entity, we may be unable to obtain these goods,
services and technologies at prices or on terms as favorable to
us as those we obtained prior to the distribution. We may also
incur costs for functions previously performed by ITT that are
higher than the amounts reflected in our historical financial
statements, which could cause our profitability to decrease.
We
expect to incur new indebtedness at or prior to consummation of
the spin-off, and the degree to which we will be leveraged
following completion of the spin-off may have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
We have historically relied upon ITT for working capital
requirements on a short-term basis and for other financial
support functions. After the spin-off, we will not be able to
rely on the earnings, assets or cash flow of ITT, and we will be
responsible for servicing our own debt, and obtaining and
maintaining sufficient working capital. At or prior to the
completion of the spin-off, we expect to raise
$1,200 million of indebtedness, which includes indebtedness
to be raised in connection with the YSI acquisition. At or prior
to the spin-off, we also expect to enter into the Credit
Facility with revolving credit availability of
$ . It is anticipated that this
credit facility will be undrawn at the time of the spin-off.
Given the smaller relative size of the company as compared to
ITT, after the spin-off we may incur higher debt servicing costs
on the new indebtedness than we would have incurred otherwise as
a subsidiary of ITT or not have access to other less expensive
sources of capital from short-term debt markets.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our
indebtedness, including the debt incurred pursuant to the
spin-off as well as any future debt that we may incur, will
depend on our ability to generate cash in the future from
operations, financings or asset sales. Our ability to generate
cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control. If we are not able to repay or refinance our debt as it
becomes due, we may be forced to sell assets or take other
disadvantageous actions, including (i) reducing financing
in the future for working capital, capital expenditures and
general corporate purposes or (ii) dedicating an
unsustainable level of our cash flow from operations to the
payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness. In
addition, our ability to withstand competitive pressures and to
react to changes in the water technology industry could be
impaired. The lenders who hold such debt could also accelerate
amounts due, which could potentially trigger a default or
acceleration of any of our other debt.
We may
be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect
to achieve from the spin-off.
As an independent, publicly traded company, we believe that our
business will benefit from, among other things, (i) greater
strategic focus of financial resources and managements
efforts, (ii) enhanced customer focus, (iii) direct
and differentiated access to capital resources,
(iv) enhanced investor choices by offering investment
opportunities in a separate entity from ITT, (v) improved
management incentive tools, and (vi) utilization of stock
as an acquisition currency. However, by separating from ITT, we
may be more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse
events than we would have been were we still a part of
21
ITT. In addition, we may not be able to achieve some or all of
the benefits that we expect to achieve as an independent company
in the time we expect, if at all.
We may
increase our debt or raise additional capital in the future,
which could affect our financial health, and may decrease our
profitability.
We may increase our debt or raise additional capital in the
future, subject to restrictions in our debt agreements. If our
cash flow from operations is less than we anticipate, or if our
cash requirements are more than we expect, we may require more
financing. However, debt or equity financing may not be
available to us on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we
incur additional debt or raise equity through the issuance of
our preferred stock, the terms of the debt or our preferred
stock issued may give the holders rights, preferences and
privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock,
particularly in the event of liquidation. The terms of the debt
may also impose additional and more stringent restrictions on
our operations than we currently have. If we raise funds through
the issuance of additional equity, your percentage ownership in
us would decline. If we are unable to raise additional capital
when needed, it could affect our financial health, which could
negatively affect your investment in us. Also, regardless of the
terms of our debt or equity financing, the amount of our stock
that we can issue may be limited because the issuance of our
stock may cause the distribution to be a taxable event for ITT
under Section 355(e) of the Code, and under the Tax Matters
Agreement, we could be required to indemnify ITT for that tax.
See We may be responsible for
U.S. Federal income tax liabilities that relate to the
distribution.
We may
be responsible for U.S. Federal income tax liabilities that
relate to the distribution.
We expect to receive an IRS Ruling and an opinion of counsel
stating that ITT and its shareholders will not recognize any
taxable income, gain or loss for U.S. Federal income tax
purposes as a result of the spin-off. Receipt of the IRS Ruling
and opinion of counsel will satisfy a condition to completion of
the spin-off. See The Spin-Off
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off.
The IRS Ruling, while generally binding upon the IRS, will be
based on certain factual statements and representations. If any
such factual statements or representations were incomplete or
untrue in any material respect, or if the facts on which the IRS
Ruling will be based are materially different from the facts at
the time of the spin-off, the IRS could modify or revoke the IRS
Ruling retroactively.
Certain requirements for tax-free treatment that are not covered
in the IRS Ruling will be addressed in the opinion of counsel.
An opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS. Accordingly,
the IRS may reach conclusions with respect to the spin-off that
are different from the conclusions reached in the opinion. Like
the IRS Ruling, the opinion will be based on certain factual
statements and representations, which, if incomplete or untrue
in any material respect, could alter counsels conclusions.
ITT is not aware of any facts or circumstances that would cause
any such factual statements or representations in the IRS Ruling
or the legal opinion to be incomplete or untrue or cause the
facts on which the IRS Ruling is based, or the legal opinion
will be based, to be materially different from the facts at the
time of the spin-off.
If all or a portion of the spin-off does not qualify as a
tax-free transaction because any of the factual statements or
representations in the IRS Ruling or the legal opinion are
incomplete or untrue, or because the facts upon which the IRS
Ruling is based are materially different from the facts at the
time of the spin-off, ITT would recognize a substantial gain for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In such case, under
U.S. Treasury regulations each member of the ITT
consolidated group at the time of the spin-off (including us and
our subsidiaries) would be severally liable for the resulting
U.S. Federal income tax liability.
Even if the spin-off otherwise qualifies as a tax-free
transaction for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the
distribution will be taxable to ITT (but not to ITT
shareholders) pursuant to Section 355(e) of the Code if
there are one or more acquisitions (including issuances) of the
stock of either us or ITT, representing 50% or more, measured by
vote or value, of the then-outstanding stock of either
corporation and the acquisition or acquisitions are deemed to be
part of a plan or series of related transactions that include
the distribution. Any acquisition of our common stock within two
years before or after the distribution (with exceptions,
including
22
public trading by less-than-5% shareholders and certain
compensatory stock issuances) generally will be presumed to be
part of such a plan unless that presumption is rebutted. The tax
liability resulting from the application of Section 355(e)
would be substantial. In addition, under U.S. Treasury
regulations, each member of the ITT consolidated group at the
time of the spin-off (including us and our subsidiaries) would
be severally liable for the resulting U.S. Federal income
tax liability.
We will agree not to enter into any transaction that could cause
any portion of the spin-off to be taxable to ITT, including
under Section 355(e). We will also agree to indemnify ITT
for any tax liabilities resulting from such transactions. These
obligations may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control
of our company. For additional detail, see Description of
Capital Stock Provisions of Our Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-Laws That
Could Delay or Prevent a Change in Control and
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with ITT and DCO Related to
the Spin-Off Tax Matters Agreement.
Our
accounting and other management systems and resources may not be
adequately prepared to meet the financial reporting and other
requirements to which we will be subject following the
distribution.
Our financial results previously were included within the
consolidated results of ITT, and we believe that our financial
reporting and internal controls were appropriate for those of
subsidiaries of a public company. However, we were not directly
subject to the reporting and other requirements of the Exchange
Act. As a result of the distribution, we will be directly
subject to reporting and other obligations under the Exchange
Act. Beginning with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2012, we will be required
to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) which will require
annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting and a report by our
independent registered public accounting firm addressing these
assessments. These reporting and other obligations may place
significant demands on our management, administrative and
operational resources, including accounting systems and
resources.
The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and
current reports with respect to our business and financial
condition. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting. To comply with these
requirements, we may need to upgrade our systems; implement
additional financial and management controls, reporting systems
and procedures; and hire additional accounting and finance
staff. We expect to incur additional annual expenses for the
purpose of addressing these requirements, and those expenses may
be significant. If we are unable to upgrade our financial and
management controls, reporting systems, information technology
systems and procedures in a timely and effective fashion, our
ability to comply with our financial reporting requirements and
other rules that apply to reporting companies under the Exchange
Act could be impaired. Any failure to achieve and maintain
effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We do
not have a recent operating history as an independent company
and our historical financial information may not be a reliable
indicator of our future results.
The historical financial information we have included in this
Information Statement has been derived from ITTs
consolidated financial statements and does not necessarily
reflect what our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows would have been as a separate, stand-alone entity
during the periods presented. ITT did not account for us, and we
were not operated, as a single stand-alone entity or segment for
the periods presented. In addition, the historical information
is not necessarily indicative of what our results of operations,
financial position and cash flows will be in the future. For
example, following the spin-off, changes will occur in our cost
structure, funding and operations, including changes in our tax
structure, increased costs associated with reduced economies of
scale and increased costs associated with becoming a public,
stand-alone company. While we have been profitable as part of
ITT, we cannot assure you that as a stand-alone company our
profits will continue at a similar level.
23
Our
customers, prospective customers and suppliers will need
assurances that our financial stability on a stand-alone basis
is sufficient to satisfy their requirements for doing or
continuing to do business with them.
Some of our customers, prospective customers, and suppliers will
need assurances that our financial stability on a stand-alone
basis is sufficient to satisfy their requirements for doing or
continuing to do business with them. If our customers,
prospective customers or suppliers are not satisfied with our
financial stability, it could have a material adverse effect on
our ability to bid for and obtain or retain projects, our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
The
spin-off may expose us to potential liabilities arising out of
state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws and legal
distribution requirements.
The spin-off could be challenged under various state and federal
fraudulent conveyance laws. An unpaid creditor or an entity
vested with the power of such creditor (such as a trustee or
debtor-in-possession
in a bankruptcy) could claim that the spin-off left ITT
insolvent or with unreasonably small capital or that ITT
intended or believed it would incur debts beyond its ability to
pay such debts as they mature and that ITT did not receive fair
consideration or reasonably equivalent value in the spin-off. If
a court were to agree with such a plaintiff, then such court
could void the spin-off as a fraudulent transfer and could
impose a number of different remedies, including without
limitation, returning our assets or your shares in our company
to ITT, voiding our liens and claims against ITT, or providing
ITT with a claim for money damages against us in an amount equal
to the difference between the consideration received by ITT and
the fair market value of our company at the time of the spin-off.
The measure of insolvency for purposes of the fraudulent
conveyance laws will vary depending on which jurisdictions
law is applied. Generally, however, an entity would be
considered insolvent if either the fair saleable value of its
assets is less than the amount of its liabilities (including the
probable amount of contingent liabilities), or it is unlikely to
be able to pay its liabilities as they become due. No assurance
can be given as to what standard a court would apply to
determine insolvency or that a court would determine that ITT
was solvent at the time of or after giving effect to the
spin-off, including the distribution of our common stock.
The distribution by ITT of the WCO common stock in the spin-off
could also be challenged under state corporate distribution
statutes. Under the Indiana Business Corporation Law (the
Indiana Corporation Law), a corporation may not make
distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect to the
distribution, (i) the corporation would not be able to pay
its debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or
(ii) the corporations total assets would be less than
the sum of its total liabilities. No assurance can be given that
a court will not later determine that the distribution by ITT of
WCO common stock in the spin-off was unlawful.
Under the Distribution Agreement, from and after the spin-off,
we will be responsible for the debts, liabilities and other
obligations related to the business or businesses which we own
and operate following the consummation of the spin-off. Although
we do not expect to be liable for any of these or other
obligations not expressly assumed by us pursuant to the
Distribution Agreement, it is possible that we could be required
to assume responsibility for certain obligations retained by ITT
or DCO should ITT or DCO fail to pay or perform its retained
obligations (for example, tax, asbestos
and/or
environmental liabilities). See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreements with ITT and
DCO Related to the Spin-Off Distribution
Agreement.
We may
have been able to receive better terms from unaffiliated third
parties than the terms we receive in our agreements related to
the spin-off.
We expect that the agreements related to the spin-off, including
the Distribution Agreement, Employee Matters Agreement,
Technology License Agreement, Tax Matters Agreement, Transition
Services Agreements and any other agreements, will be negotiated
in the context of our separation from ITT while we are still
part of ITT. Accordingly, these agreements may not reflect terms
that would have resulted from arms-length
24
negotiations among unaffiliated third parties. The terms of the
agreements being negotiated in the context of our separation are
related to, among other things, allocations of assets,
liabilities, rights, indemnifications and other obligations
among ITT, DCO and us. We may have received better terms under
the agreements related to the spin-off from third parties
because third parties may have competed with each other to win
our business. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Agreements with ITT and DCO Related to
the Spin-Off.
Risks
Relating to Our Common Stock
You face the following risks in connection with ownership of our
common stock:
There
is no existing market for our common stock and we cannot be
certain that an active trading market will develop or be
sustained after the spin-off, and following the spin-off, our
stock price may fluctuate significantly.
There currently is no public market for our common stock. We
intend to list our common stock on the NYSE. See Trading
Market. It is anticipated that before the distribution
date for the spin-off, trading of shares of our common stock
will begin on a when-issued basis and such trading
will continue up to and including the distribution date.
However, there can be no assurance that an active trading market
for our common stock will develop as a result of the spin-off or
be sustained in the future. The lack of an active market may
make it more difficult for you to sell our common stock and
could lead to the price of our common stock being depressed or
more volatile. We cannot predict the prices at which our common
stock may trade after the spin-off. The market price of our
common stock may fluctuate widely, depending on many factors,
some of which may be beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of our shares by some ITT shareholders after the
distribution because our business profile and market
capitalization may not fit their investment objectives;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results due
to factors related to our business;
|
|
|
|
success or failure of our business strategy;
|
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financing as needed;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant new
business awards;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions or dispositions;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock
after the spin-off;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or our
ability to meet those estimates;
|
|
|
|
the operating and stock price performance of other comparable
companies;
|
|
|
|
investor perception of our company and the water technology
industry;
|
|
|
|
natural or environmental disasters that investors believe may
affect us;
|
|
|
|
overall market fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the budget of federal, state and local
governmental entities around the world;
|
|
|
|
results from any material litigation or government investigation;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations affecting our business; and
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and other external factors.
|
25
Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has
often been unrelated to the operating performance of a
particular company. These broad market fluctuations could
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Substantial
sales of our common stock may occur in connection with the
spin-off, which could cause the price of our common stock to
decline.
The shares of our common stock that ITT distributes to its
shareholders generally may be sold immediately in the public
market. It is possible that some ITT shareholders, which could
include some of our larger shareholders, will sell our common
stock received in the distribution if, for reasons such as our
business profile or market capitalization as an independent
company, we do not fit their investment objectives,
or in the case of index funds we are not
a participant in the index in which they are investing. The
sales of significant amounts of our common stock or the
perception in the market that this will occur may reduce the
market price of our common stock.
We
cannot assure you that we will pay dividends on our common
stock, and our indebtedness could limit our ability to pay
dividends on our common stock.
Following the distribution, we expect that initially WCO will
pay a dividend, although the timing, declaration, amount and
payment of future dividends to our shareholders fall within the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors, including our financial condition, results of
operations and capital requirements, as well as applicable law,
regulatory constraints, industry practice and other business
considerations that WCOs Board of Directors considers
relevant. In addition, the terms of the agreements governing our
new debt or debt that we may incur in the future may limit or
prohibit the payments of dividends. See Dividend
Policy. There can be no assurance that we will pay a
dividend in the future or continue to pay any dividend if we do
commence the payment of dividends. There can also be no
assurance that the combined annual dividends on ITT common
stock, DCO common stock and our common stock after the spin-off,
if any, will be equal to the annual dividends on ITT common
stock prior to the spin-off.
Additionally, indebtedness that we expect to incur in connection
with the spin-off could have important consequences for holders
of our common stock. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow
from operations to meet our debt-payment obligations, then our
ability to pay dividends, if so determined by the Board of
Directors, will be impaired and we may be required to attempt to
restructure or refinance our debt, raise additional capital or
take other actions such as selling assets, reducing or delaying
capital expenditures or reducing our dividend. There can be no
assurance, however, that any such actions could be effected on
satisfactory terms, if at all, or would be permitted by the
terms of our new debt or our other credit and contractual
arrangements.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our organizational documents and Indiana law could
delay or prevent a change in control.
Prior to completion of the spin-off, we will adopt the amended
and restated articles of incorporation and the amended restated
by-laws. Certain provisions of the amended and restated articles
of incorporation and the amended and restated by-laws may delay
or prevent a merger or acquisition that a shareholder may
consider favorable. For example, the amended and restated
articles of incorporation and the amended and restated by-laws,
among other things, provide for a classified board and require
advance notice for shareholder proposals and nominations, do not
permit shareholders to convene special meetings and do not
permit action by written consent of the shareholders. In
addition, the amended and restated articles of incorporation
authorizes our Board of Directors to issue one or more series of
preferred stock. These provisions may also discourage
acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control,
which could harm our stock price. Indiana law also imposes some
restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between
any holder of 10% or more of our outstanding common stock and us
as well as certain restrictions on the voting rights of
control shares of an issuing public
corporation. See Description of Capital Stock.
26
Under the Tax Matters Agreement, we will agree not to enter into
any transaction involving an acquisition (including issuance) of
WCO common stock or any other transaction (or, to the extent we
have the right to prohibit it, to permit any such transaction)
that could cause the distribution to be taxable to ITT. We will
also agree to indemnify ITT for any tax resulting from any such
transactions. Generally, ITT will recognize taxable gain on the
distribution if there are one or more acquisitions (including
issuances) of our capital stock, directly or indirectly,
representing 50% or more, measured by vote or value, of our
then-outstanding capital stock, and the acquisitions or
issuances are deemed to be part of a plan or series of related
transactions that include the distribution. Any such shares of
our common stock acquired, directly or indirectly, within two
years before or after the distribution (with exceptions,
including public trading by less-than-5% shareholders and
certain compensatory stock issuances) will generally be presumed
to be part of such a plan unless that presumption is rebutted.
As a result, our obligations may discourage, delay or prevent a
change of control of our company.
27
SPECIAL
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made forward-looking statements in this Information
Statement, including in the sections entitled
Summary, Risk Factors, Questions
and Answers About the Spin-Off, The Spin-Off,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, that are based on our managements
beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available
to our management. Forward-looking statements include the
information concerning our possible or assumed future results of
operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive
position, potential growth opportunities, potential operating
performance improvements, benefits resulting from our separation
from ITT, the effects of competition and the effects of future
legislation or regulations. Forward-looking statements include
all statements that are not historical facts and can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the
words believe, expect, plan,
intend, anticipate,
estimate, predict,
potential, continue, may,
might, should, could or the
negative of these terms or similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those
expressed in these forward-looking statements. You should not
put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this
Information Statement. We do not have any intention or
obligation to update forward-looking statements after we
distribute this Information Statement.
The risk factors discussed in Risk Factors could
cause our results to differ materially from those expressed in
forward-looking statements. There may be other risks and
uncertainties that we are unable to predict at this time or that
we currently do not expect to have a material adverse effect on
our business. Any such risks could cause our results to differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.
28
THE
SPIN-OFF
Background
On January 11, 2011, the Board of Directors of ITT approved
a plan to spin-off WCO and DCO from ITT, following which WCO and
DCO will be independent, publicly traded companies. Immediately
prior to the spin-off, ITT will effect an internal
reorganization in order to properly align the appropriate
businesses within each of the WCO and DCO parent companies.
To complete the spin-off, ITT will, following the internal
reorganization, distribute to its shareholders all of the shares
of our common stock and the common stock of DCO. The
distribution will occur on the distribution date, which is
expected to
be ,
2011. Each holder of ITT common stock will
receive shares
of our common stock,
and shares
of DCO common stock, for each share of ITT common stock held
on ,
2011, the record date. After completion of the spin-off:
|
|
|
|
|
we will be an independent, publicly traded company
(NYSE: ), and will own and operate
ITTs water infrastructure and applied water businesses;
|
|
|
|
DCO will be an independent, publicly traded company
(NYSE: ) and will own and operate
ITTs C4ISR electronics and systems, and informational and
technical services businesses; and
|
|
|
|
ITT will continue to be an independent, publicly traded company
(NYSE: ITT) and will continue to own and operate its industrial
process, motion technologies, interconnect solutions and control
technologies businesses.
|
Each holder of ITT common stock will continue to hold his, her
or its shares in ITT. No vote of ITTs shareholders is
required or is being sought in connection with the spin-off, and
ITTs shareholders will not have any appraisal rights in
connection with the spin-off, including the internal
reorganization.
The distribution of our common stock as described in this
Information Statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of certain conditions. In addition, ITT has the right not to
complete the spin-off if, at any time prior to the distribution,
the Board of Directors of ITT determines, in its sole
discretion, that the spin-off is not then in the best interests
of ITT or its shareholders or other constituents, that a sale or
other alternative is in the best interests of ITT or its
shareholders or other constituents, or that it is not advisable
for us to separate from ITT at that time. See
Conditions to the Spin-Off.
Reasons
for the Spin-Off
ITTs Board of Directors has determined that the spin-off
is in the best interests of ITT and its shareholders because the
spin-off will provide the following key benefits:
(i) greater strategic focus of financial resources and
managements efforts, (ii) enhanced customer focus,
(iii) direct and differentiated access to capital
resources, (iv) enhanced investor choices by offering
investment opportunities in separate entities, (v) improved
management incentive tools, and (vi) utilization of stock
as an acquisition currency.
Greater Strategic Focus of Financial Resources and
Managements Efforts. ITTs Water
business represents a discrete portion of ITTs overall
business. It has historically exhibited different financial and
operating characteristics than ITTs other businesses. In
particular, the Defense business is generally characterized by
cycles that are comparatively lengthy relative to those of the
Water business and ITTs Industrial Process, Motion
Technologies, Interconnect Solutions and Control Technologies
businesses, which necessitates different capital expenditure and
acquisition strategies than would be otherwise employed.
ITTs and our management believe that ITTs
management resources would be more efficiently utilized if
ITTs management concentrated solely on its Industrial
Process, Motion Technologies, Interconnect Solutions and Control
Technologies businesses, that DCOs management resources
would be more efficiently utilized if its management
concentrated solely on the Defense business, and that our
management resources would be more efficiently utilized if our
management concentrated solely on the Water business.
Consequently, ITT has determined that its current structure may
not be the most effective to design and implement the distinct
strategies necessary to operate in a manner that maximizes the
long-term value of each company.
29
Both ITT and we expect to have better use of management and
financial resources as a result of having board and management
teams solely focused on their respective businesses. The
spin-off will allow us to better align managements
attention, compensation and resources to pursue opportunities in
the water technology market and to manage our cost structure
more actively. ITT and DCO will similarly benefit from their
respective managements ability to focus on the management
and operation of their respective businesses.
Enhanced Customer Focus. Both ITT and we
believe that, as a unified, commonly managed, stand-alone water
technology business, our management will be able to focus solely
on the needs of our own customers, without dilution arising from
a connection to a larger parent with tangential goals and
incentives.
Direct and Differentiated Access to Capital
Resources. After the spin-off, we will no longer
need to compete with ITTs other businesses for capital
resources. As a long-cycle global industrial business with
strong global cash flow generation, our business has different
financial and operating characteristics from ITTs other
businesses. Both ITT and we believe that direct and
differentiated access to capital resources will allow each of us
to better optimize the amounts and terms of the capital needed
for each of the respective businesses, aligning financial and
operational characteristics with investor and market
expectations. ITTs management also believes that, as a
separate entity, we will have ready access to capital because we
will attract investors who are interested in the characteristics
of the Water business.
Enhanced Investor Choices by Offering Investment
Opportunities in Separate Entities. After the
spin-off, investors should be better able to evaluate our
financial performance, as well as our strategy within the
context of our markets, thereby enhancing the likelihood that we
will achieve an appropriate market valuation. ITTs
management and financial advisors believe that the investment
characteristics of the Water business may appeal to different
types of investors. As a result of the spin-off, our management
should be able to implement goals and evaluate strategic
opportunities in light of investor expectations within our
specialties without undue attention to investor expectations in
other specialties. In addition, we should be able to focus our
public relations efforts on cultivating our own separate
identity.
Improved Management Incentive Tools. It is
expected that we will use our equity to compensate current and
future employees. In multi-business companies such as ITT, it is
difficult to structure incentives that reward managers in a
manner directly related to the performance of their respective
business units. By granting stock linked to a specific business,
equity compensation will be more in line with the financial
results of the managers direct work product. As a result,
the incentives offered by the compensation plan will be less
diluted. In addition, reducing the conglomerate discount that
currently impacts ITT stock may provide each business with a
more attractive currency for equity-based compensation.
Utilization of Stock as an Acquisition
Currency. Although we are not currently
evaluating any acquisitions involving the use of our stock, the
spin-off will enable us to use our stock as currency to pursue
certain financial and strategic objectives, including tax-free
merger transactions. In addition, future strategic transactions
with similar businesses will be more easily facilitated through
the use of our stand-alone stock as consideration.
Manner of
Effecting the Spin-Off
The general terms and conditions relating to the spin-off will
be set forth in a Distribution Agreement among us, ITT and DCO.
Internal
Reorganization
As part of the spin-off, ITT will undergo an internal
reorganization that will, among other things and subject to
limited exceptions: (i) allocate and transfer to each of
WCO and DCO and their respective subsidiaries, as applicable,
those assets, and to allocate and assign responsibility for
those liabilities, in respect of the activities of the
applicable businesses of such entities and (ii) allocate,
transfer and assign, as applicable, those assets and liabilities
in respect of other current and former businesses and activities
of ITT and its current and former subsidiaries.
30
Distribution
of Shares of Our Common Stock
Under the Distribution Agreement, the distribution will be
effective as of 8:00 a.m., New York time,
on ,
2011, the distribution date. As a result of the spin-off, on the
distribution date, each holder of ITT common stock will
receive shares
of our common stock for each share of ITT common stock that he,
she or it owns. In order to receive shares of our common stock
in the spin-off, an ITT shareholder must be a shareholder at
5:00 p.m., New York time,
on ,
2011, the record date.
Following completion of the
spin-off,
ITT Corporations global platform will include ITTs
Industrial Process business, as well as its Motion Technologies,
Interconnect Solutions and Control Technologies businesses; WCO
will be formed through the combination of three of ITTs
businesses: Residential & Commercial Water, Flow
Control and Water & Wastewater (including biological,
filtration and disinfection treatment and analytics); and DCO
will comprise ITTs existing Defense and Information
Solutions segment. The diagram below shows the structure,
simplified for illustrative purposes only, of ITT, WCO and DCO
after completion of the spin-off:
On the distribution date, ITT will release the shares of our
common stock (as well as the DCO common stock) to our
distribution agent to distribute to ITT shareholders. For most
of these ITT shareholders, our distribution agent will credit
their shares of our common stock to book-entry accounts
established to hold their shares of our common stock. Our
distribution agent will send these shareholders, including any
ITT shareholder that holds physical share certificates of ITT
common stock and is the registered holder of such shares of ITT
common stock represented by those certificates on the record
date, a statement reflecting their ownership of our common stock
and DCO common stock. Book-entry refers to a method of recording
stock ownership in our records in which no physical certificates
are used. For shareholders who own ITT common stock through a
broker or other nominee, their shares of our common stock will
be credited to these shareholders accounts by the broker
or other nominee. It is expected that it will take the
distribution agent up to two weeks to issue shares of our common
stock to ITT shareholders or their bank or brokerage firm
electronically by way of direct registration in book-entry form.
Trading of our stock will not be affected by this delay in
issuance by the distribution agent. Following the spin-off,
shareholders whose shares are held in book-entry form may
request that their shares of our common stock be transferred to
a brokerage or other account at any time.
31
ITT shareholders will not be required to make any payment or
surrender or exchange their shares of ITT common stock or take
any other action to receive their shares of our common stock. No
vote of ITT shareholders is required or sought in connection
with the spin-off, including the internal reorganization, and
ITT shareholders have no appraisal rights in connection with the
spin-off.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off
As a condition to the spin-off, ITT will receive the IRS Ruling
and a legal opinion substantially to the effect that, among
other things, the distribution will qualify under
Section 355 of the Code as a tax-free spin-off to the
holders of ITT common stock and will be tax-free to ITT.
Assuming the distribution qualifies under Section 355 of
the Code as tax-free:
|
|
|
|
|
no gain or loss will be recognized by, and no amount will be
included in the income of, holders of ITT common stock upon
their receipt of shares of our common stock (as well as DCO
common stock) in the distribution;
|
|
|
|
the basis of ITT common stock immediately before the
distribution will be allocated between the ITT common
stock, the DCO common stock and our common stock received in the
distribution, in proportion with relative fair market values at
the time of the distribution;
|
|
|
|
the holding period of the DCO common stock and our common stock
received by each ITT shareholder will include the period during
which the shareholder held the ITT common stock on which the
distribution is made, provided that the ITT common stock is held
as a capital asset on the distribution date; and
|
|
|
|
no gain or loss will be recognized by ITT upon the distribution
of our common stock.
|
U.S. Treasury regulations require certain shareholders that
receive stock in a spin-off to attach to their respective
U.S. Federal income tax returns, for the year in which the
spin-off occurs, a detailed statement setting forth certain
information relating to the spin-off. Shortly after the
distribution, ITT will provide shareholders who receive our
common stock in the distribution with the information necessary
to comply with that requirement, as well as information to help
shareholders allocate their stock basis between their
ITT common stock, the DCO common stock and the WCO common
stock.
The IRS Ruling and the opinion of counsel will be conditioned on
the truthfulness and completeness of certain factual statements
and representations provided by ITT and us. If those factual
statements and representations are incomplete or untrue in any
material respect, the IRS Ruling could become inoperative and
counsels conclusions may be altered. ITT and we have
reviewed the statements of fact and representations on which the
IRS Ruling is, and the opinion of counsel will be, based, and
neither ITT nor we are aware of any facts or circumstances that
would cause any of the statements of fact or representations to
be incomplete or untrue. Each of ITT, DCO and us have agreed to
some restrictions on our future actions to provide further
assurance that the distribution will qualify as a tax-free
distribution under Section 355 of the Code.
Certain requirements for tax-free treatment that are not covered
in the IRS Ruling will be addressed in the opinion of counsel.
An opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS. Accordingly,
the IRS may reach conclusions with respect to the spin-off that
are different from the conclusions reached in the opinion.
If the distribution does not qualify under Section 355 of
the Code, each holder of ITT common stock receiving our common
stock in the distribution would be treated as receiving a
taxable distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value
of our common stock received, which would result in:
|
|
|
|
|
a taxable dividend to the extent of the shareholders pro
rata share of ITTs current and accumulated earnings and
profits;
|
|
|
|
a reduction in the shareholders basis in ITT common stock
to the extent the amount received exceeds such
shareholders share of earnings and profits;
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
taxable gain from the exchange of ITT common stock to the extent
the amount received exceeds both the shareholders share of
earnings and profits and the shareholders basis in ITT
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
basis in our stock equal to its fair market value on the date of
the distribution.
|
Under certain circumstances, ITT would recognize taxable gain on
the distribution. These circumstances would include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the distribution does not qualify as tax-free under
Section 355 of the Code; and
|
|
|
|
there are one or more acquisitions (including issuances) of
either our stock, the stock of DCO, or the stock of ITT,
representing 50% or more, measured by vote or value, of the
then-outstanding stock of that corporation, and the acquisition
or acquisitions are deemed to be part of a plan or series of
related transactions that include the distribution. Any such
acquisition of our stock, the stock of DCO, or the stock of ITT
within two years before or after the distribution (with
exceptions, including public trading by less-than-5%
shareholders and certain compensatory stock issuances) generally
will be presumed to be part of such a plan unless that
presumption is rebutted.
|
The amount of such gain would result in a significant federal
income tax liability to ITT.
We will agree to indemnify ITT for any tax liabilities of ITT
resulting from the distribution under certain circumstances. Our
obligation to indemnify ITT may discourage, delay or prevent a
change of control of our company. In addition, under
U.S. Treasury regulations, each member of the ITT
consolidated tax return group at the time of the spin-off
(including us and our subsidiaries) would be severally liable to
the IRS for such tax liability. The resulting tax liability may
have a material adverse effect on both our and ITTs
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
The preceding summary of certain anticipated U.S. Federal
income tax consequences of the spin-off is for general
informational purposes only. ITT shareholders should consult
their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences of
the spin-off to them, including the application and effect of
state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws and of changes in applicable tax laws.
Results
of the Spin-Off
After the spin-off, we will be an independent, publicly traded
company. Immediately following the spin-off, we expect to have
approximately
holders of shares of our common stock and
approximately shares
of our common stock outstanding, based on the number of
shareholders and outstanding shares of ITT common stock
on ,
2011. The figures assume no exercise of outstanding options and
exclude shares of ITT common stock held directly or indirectly
by ITT, if any. The actual number of shares to be distributed
will be determined on the record date and will reflect any
exercise of ITT options between the date the ITT Board of
Directors declares the dividend for the distribution and the
record date for the distribution.
For information regarding options to purchase shares of our
common stock that will be outstanding after the distribution,
see Capitalization, Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreements with ITT and
DCO Related to the Spin-Off Employee Matters
Agreement and Management.
Before the spin-off, we will enter into several agreements with
ITT to effect the spin-off and provide a framework for our
relationship with ITT and DCO after the spin-off. These
agreements will govern the relationship between us, DCO and ITT
after completion of the spin-off and provide for the allocation
between us, DCO and ITT of ITTs assets, liabilities,
rights and obligations. See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Agreements with ITT and
DCO Related to the Spin-Off.
Trading
Prior to the Distribution Date
It is anticipated that, at least two trading days prior to the
record date and continuing up to and including the distribution
date, there will be a when-issued market in our
common stock. When-issued trading refers to a sale or purchase
made conditionally because the security has been authorized but
not yet issued. The
33
when-issued trading market will be a market for shares of our
common stock that will be distributed to ITT shareholders on the
distribution date. Any ITT shareholder who owns shares of ITT
common stock at the close of business on the record date will be
entitled to shares of our common stock distributed in the
spin-off. ITT shareholders may trade this entitlement to shares
of our common stock, without the shares of ITT common stock they
own, on the when-issued market. On the first trading day
following the distribution date, we expect when-issued trading
with respect to our common stock will end and
regular-way trading will begin. See Trading
Market.
Following the distribution date, we expect shares of our common
stock to be listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol
. We will announce the
when-issued ticker symbol when and if it becomes available.
It is also anticipated that, at least two trading days prior to
the record date and continuing up to and including the
distribution date, there will be two markets in ITT common
stock: a regular-way market and an
ex-distribution market. Shares of ITT common stock
that trade on the regular-way market will trade with an
entitlement to shares of our common stock (as well as shares of
DCO common stock) distributed pursuant to the distribution.
Shares that trade on the ex-distribution market will trade
without an entitlement to shares of our common stock (as well as
shares of DCO common stock) distributed pursuant to the
distribution. Therefore, if shares of ITT common stock are sold
in the regular-way market up to and including the distribution
date, the selling shareholders right to receive shares of
our common stock (as well as shares of DCO common stock) in the
distribution will be sold as well. However, if ITT shareholders
own shares of ITT common stock at the close of business on the
record date and sell those shares on the ex-distribution market
up to and including the distribution date, the selling
shareholders will still receive the shares of our common stock
(as well as shares of DCO common stock) that they would
otherwise receive pursuant to the distribution. See
Trading Market.
Treatment
of 401(k) Shares for Current and Former Employees
Our
Employees Invested in the ITT Stock Fund of the ITT 401(k)
Plan.
Our current and former employees who hold accounts in the ITT
401(k) Plan
on ,
2011 will have their accounts transferred to the WCO 401(k)
Plan, as
of ,
2011, including any shares of ITT common stock held in the ITT
Stock Fund under the ITT 401(k) Plan. On the distribution date,
shares of our common stock (as well as shares of DCO common
stock), based on the distribution ratio for each share of ITT
common stock held in such employees ITT stock fund
account, will be included in a new WCO stock fund account under
the WCO 401(k) Plan. However, in conformity with the fiduciary
responsibility requirements of ERISA, remaining shares of ITT
common stock held in our employees ITT stock fund accounts
following the distribution will be disposed of and allocated to
another investment alternative available under the WCO 401(k)
Plan if and when directed by participants, and any such shares
remaining as
of ,
2012 will be automatically disposed of and the proceeds invested
in another such investment alternative (but this will not
prohibit diversified, collectively managed investment
alternatives available under the WCO 401(k) Plan from holding
ITT common stock or prohibit employees who use self-directed
accounts in the WCO 401(k) Plan from investing their accounts in
ITT common stock).
ITT
Employees Invested in the ITT Stock Fund of the ITT 401(k)
Plan.
Current and former ITT employees who hold shares of ITT common
stock in their ITT 401(k) Plan account as of the record date
will receive shares of our common stock (as well as shares of
DCO common stock) in the distribution. Our shares (as well as
shares of DCO common stock) will be included in new, temporary
stock funds under the ITT 401(k) Plan. In conformity with the
fiduciary responsibility requirements of ERISA, remaining shares
of our common stock (as well as shares of DCO common stock) held
in these temporary stock funds following the distribution will
be disposed of and allocated to another investment alternative
available under the ITT 401(k) Plan when directed by
participants, and any such shares remaining as
of ,
2012 will be automatically disposed of and the proceeds invested
in another such investment alternative (but this will not
prohibit diversified, collectively managed investment
alternatives available under
34
the ITT 401(k) Plan from holding our common stock or prohibit
employees who use self-directed accounts in the ITT 401(k) Plan
from investing their accounts in our common stock).
Incurrence
of Debt
It is anticipated that, at or prior to the completion of the
spin-off, WCO will raise indebtedness in an amount estimated at
$1,200 million, which includes indebtedness to be raised in
connection with the YSI acquisition. See Description of
Material Indebtedness.
Conditions
to the Spin-Off
We expect that the spin-off will be effective as of
8:00 a.m., New York time,
on ,
2011, the distribution date, provided that the following
conditions shall have been satisfied or waived by ITT:
|
|
|
|
|
our Registration Statement on Form 10, of which this
Information Statement forms a part, shall have been declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC), no stop order suspending the effectiveness
thereof shall be in effect, no proceedings for such purpose
shall be pending before or threatened by the SEC, and this
Information Statement shall have been mailed to the ITT
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
WCO common stock shall have been approved for listing on the
NYSE, subject to official notice of distribution;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have obtained an opinion from its tax counsel, in form
and substance satisfactory to ITT, substantially to the effect
that, among other things, the distribution, together with
certain related transactions, will qualify as a reorganization
under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have obtained a private letter ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service, in form and substance satisfactory to
ITT, and such ruling shall remain in effect as of the
distribution date, to the effect, among other things, that the
distribution, together with certain related transactions, will
qualify as a reorganization under Sections 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
the Board of Directors of ITT shall have obtained opinions from
a nationally recognized valuation firm, in form and substance
satisfactory to ITT, with respect to the capital adequacy and
solvency of each of ITT, DCO and WCO;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have obtained all government approvals and other
consents necessary to consummate the distribution;
|
|
|
|
no order, injunction or decree issued by any governmental entity
of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or
prohibition preventing the consummation of all or any portion of
the distribution shall be pending, threatened, issued or in
effect, and no other event outside the control of ITT shall have
occurred or failed to occur that prevents the consummation of
all or any portion of the distribution;
|
|
|
|
no other events or developments shall have occurred or failed to
occur that, in the judgment of the Board of Directors of ITT,
would result in the distribution having a material adverse
effect on ITT or its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the financing transactions described in this Information
Statement as having occurred prior to the distribution shall
have been consummated on or prior to the distribution;
|
|
|
|
the internal reorganization shall have been completed, except
for such steps as ITT in its sole discretion shall have
determined may be completed after the distribution date;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have taken all necessary action, in the judgment of
the Board of Directors of ITT, to cause the Board of Directors
of WCO to consist of the individuals identified in this
Information Statement as directors of WCO;
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have taken all necessary action, in the judgment of
the Board of Directors of ITT, to cause the officers of WCO to
be the individuals identified as such in this Information
Statement;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
ITT shall have caused all its employees and any employees of its
subsidiaries (excluding any employees of any of WCO and its
subsidiaries after the internal reorganization (the WCO
Group)) to resign, effective as of the distribution date,
from all positions as officers or directors of any member of the
WCO Group in which they serve, and WCO shall have caused all its
employees and any employees of its subsidiaries to resign,
effective as of the distribution date, from all positions as
officers or directors of any of ITT, DCO or any of their
respective subsidiaries after the internal reorganization, in
which they serve;
|
|
|
|
all necessary actions shall have been taken to adopt the form of
amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and
restated by-laws filed by WCO with the SEC as exhibits to the
Registration Statement on Form 10, of which this
Information Statement forms a part;
|
|
|
|
the Board of Directors of ITT shall have approved the
distribution, which approval may be given or withheld at its
absolute and sole discretion; and
|
|
|
|
each of the Distribution Agreement, the Tax Matters Agreement,
the Employee Matters Agreement, the Intellectual Property
License Agreements, the Transition Services Agreements and the
other ancillary agreements shall have been executed by each
party.
|
Completion of the spin-off of DCO will be subject to similar
conditions as those listed above. The fulfillment of the
foregoing conditions will not create any obligation on
ITTs part to effect the spin-off. We are not aware of any
material federal, foreign or state regulatory requirements that
must be complied with or any material approvals that must be
obtained, other than compliance with SEC rules and regulations,
the receipt of a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service, approval for listing on the NYSE and the declaration of
effectiveness of the Registration Statement on Form 10 by
the SEC, in connection with the distribution. ITT has the right
not to complete the spin-off if, at any time prior to the
distribution, the Board of Directors of ITT determines, in its
sole discretion, that the spin-off is not then in the best
interests of ITT or its shareholders or other constituents, that
a sale or other alternative is in the best interests of ITT or
its shareholders or other constituents or that it is not
advisable for WCO to separate from ITT at that time.
Reason
for Furnishing this Information Statement
This Information Statement is being furnished solely to provide
information to ITTs shareholders that are entitled to
receive shares of our common stock in the spin-off. This
Information Statement is not, and is not to be construed as, an
inducement or encouragement to buy, hold or sell any of our
securities. We believe that the information in this Information
Statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover.
Changes may occur after that date and neither ITT nor we
undertake any obligation to update the information except in the
normal course of our respective public disclosure obligations.
36
TRADING
MARKET
Market
for Our Common Stock
There has been no public market for our common stock. An active
trading market may not develop or may not be sustained. We
anticipate that trading of our common stock will commence on a
when-issued basis at least two trading days prior to
the record date and continue through the distribution date.
When-issued trading refers to a sale or purchase made
conditionally because the security has been authorized but not
yet issued. When-issued trades generally settle within four
trading days after the distribution date. If you own shares of
ITT common stock at the close of business on the record date,
you will be entitled to shares of our common stock (as well as
shares of DCO common stock) distributed pursuant to the
spin-off. You may trade this entitlement to shares of our common
stock, without the shares of ITT common stock you own, on the
when-issued market. On the first trading day following the
distribution date, any when-issued trading with respect to our
common stock will end and regular-way trading will
begin. We intend to list our common stock on the NYSE under the
ticker symbol . We
will announce our when-issued trading symbol when and if it
becomes available.
It is also anticipated that, at least two trading days prior to
the record date and continuing up to and including the
distribution date, there will be two markets in ITT common
stock: a regular-way market and an
ex-distribution market. Shares of ITT common stock
that trade on the regular-way market will trade with an
entitlement to shares of our common stock (as well as shares of
DCO common stock) distributed pursuant to the distribution.
Shares that trade on the ex-distribution market will trade
without an entitlement to shares of our common stock (as well as
shares of DCO common stock) distributed pursuant to the
distribution. Therefore, if you sell shares of ITT common stock
in the regular-way market up to and including the distribution
date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of our
common stock (as well as shares of DCO common stock) in the
distribution. However, if you own shares of ITT common stock at
the close of business on the record date and sell those shares
on the ex-distribution market up to and including the
distribution date, you will still receive the shares of our
common stock (as well as shares of DCO common stock) that you
would otherwise receive pursuant to the distribution.
We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade
before the spin-off on a when-issued basis or after
the spin-off. Those prices will be determined by the
marketplace. Prices at which trading in our common stock occurs
may fluctuate significantly. Those prices may be influenced by
many factors, including anticipated or actual fluctuations in
our operating results or those of other companies in our
industry, investor perception of our company and the water
technology industry, market fluctuations and general economic
conditions. In addition, the stock market in general has
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
affected the performance of many stocks and that have often been
unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
these companies. These are just some factors that may adversely
affect the market price of our common stock. See Risk
Factors Risks Relating to Our Common Stock.
Transferability
of Shares of Our Common Stock
On ,
2011, ITT
had shares
of its common stock issued and outstanding. Based on this
number, we expect that upon completion of the spin-off, we will
have shares
of common stock issued and outstanding. The shares of our common
stock that you will receive in the distribution will be freely
transferable, unless you are considered an affiliate
of ours under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act). Persons who can be
considered our affiliates after the spin-off generally include
individuals or entities that directly, or indirectly through one
or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under
common control with, us and may include certain of our officers
and directors. As of the distribution date, we estimate that our
directors and officers will beneficially
own shares
of our common stock. In addition, individuals who are affiliates
of ITT on the distribution date may be deemed to be affiliates
of ours. Our affiliates may sell shares of our common stock
received in the distribution only:
|
|
|
|
|
under a registration statement that the SEC has declared
effective under the Securities Act; or
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
under an exemption from registration under the Securities Act,
such as the exemption afforded by Rule 144.
|
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, an
affiliate will be entitled to sell, within any three-month
period commencing 90 days after the date that the
registration statement of which this Information Statement is a
part is declared effective, a number of shares of our common
stock that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1.0% of our common stock then outstanding; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock on the
NYSE during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a
notice on Form 144 with respect to the sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to restrictions
relating to manner of sale and the availability of current
public information about us.
In the future, we may adopt new stock option and other
equity-based compensation plans and issue options to purchase
shares of our common stock and other stock-based awards. We
currently expect to file a registration statement under the
Securities Act to register shares to be issued under these stock
plans. Shares issued pursuant to awards after the effective date
of the registration statement, other than shares issued to
affiliates, generally will be freely tradable without further
registration under the Securities Act.
Except for our common stock distributed in the distribution,
none of our equity securities will be outstanding immediately
after the spin-off and there are no registration rights
agreements existing with respect to our common stock.
38
DIVIDEND
POLICY
Following the distribution, we expect that initially WCO will
pay a dividend, although the timing, declaration, amount and
payment of future dividends to our shareholders fall within the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors, including our financial condition, results of
operations and capital requirements, as well as applicable law,
regulatory constraints, industry practice and other business
considerations that WCOs Board of Directors considers
relevant. In addition, the terms of the agreements governing our
new debt or debt that we may incur in the future may limit or
prohibit the payments of dividends. There can be no assurance
that we will pay a dividend in the future or continue to pay any
dividend if we do commence the payment of dividends. There can
also be no assurance that the combined annual dividends on ITT
common stock, DCO common stock and our common stock after the
spin-off, if any, will be equal to the annual dividends on ITT
common stock prior to the spin-off.
39
CAPITALIZATION
The following table presents WCOs historical
capitalization at March 31, 2011 and our pro forma
capitalization at that date reflecting the spin-off and the
related transactions and events described in the notes to our
unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as if the
spin-off and the related transactions and events, including our
financing transaction, had occurred on March 31, 2011. The
capitalization table below should be read together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and WCOs
historical combined financial statements, our unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements and the notes to
those financial statements included in this Information
Statement.
We are providing the capitalization table below for
informational purposes only. It should not be construed to be
indicative of our capitalization or financial condition had the
spin-off and the related transactions and events been completed
on the date assumed. The capitalization table below may not
reflect the capitalization or financial condition that would
have resulted had we been operated as a separate, independent
entity at that date and is not necessarily indicative of our
future capitalization or financial condition.
On July 5, 2011, we signed an agreement to acquire YSI and
we expect to issue $310 million of indebtedness to fund the
acquisition. The pro forma long term debt amount in the table
below does not include the $310 million of indebtedness to
be raised in connection with the YSI acquisition. See
Summary Recent Developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents(1)
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including capital lease obligations)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Parent company investment(1)
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
$
|
2,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Historically, cash received by us has been transferred to ITT,
and ITT has funded our disbursement accounts on an as-needed
basis. The net effect of transfers of cash to and from the ITT
cash management accounts is reflected in parent company
investment in the combined balance sheets. |
40
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following table presents the selected historical condensed
combined financial data for WCO. The condensed combined
statement of operations data for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010 and the condensed
combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and
2009 set forth below are derived from WCOs audited
combined financial statements included in this Information
Statement. The condensed combined financial data for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are derived from
WCOs unaudited condensed combined financial statements
included in this Information Statement. The condensed combined
statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the condensed combined
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
are derived from WCOs unaudited combined financial
statements that are not included in this Information Statement.
The unaudited combined financial statements have been prepared
on the same basis as the audited combined financial statements
and, in the opinion of our management, include all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the information set forth
herein.
The selected historical condensed combined financial and other
data presented below should be read in conjunction with
WCOs combined financial statements and accompanying notes
and Capitalization and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in this Information Statement.
WCOs condensed combined financial data may not be
indicative of our future performance and do not necessarily
reflect what our financial position and results of operations
would have been had we been operating as an independent,
publicly traded company during the periods presented, including
changes that will occur in our operations and capitalization as
a result of the spin-off from ITT. See Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Financial Statements for a further
description of the anticipated changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
As of and for Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2011(1)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
$
|
3,068
|
|
|
$
|
2,710
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
2,911
|
|
|
|
3,735
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The increase in total assets as of March 31, 2011 as
compared to March 31, 2010 is primarily attributable to the
August 3, 2010 acquisition of Godwin Pumps. The increase in
total assets as of December 31, 2010 as compared to
December 31, 2009 is primarily attributable to the Godwin
Pumps acquisition and the March 23, 2010 acquisition of
Nova Analytics. The Godwin Pumps and Nova Analytics acquisitions
also benefited net sales, operating income, and net income in
the first quarter of 2011 and for the year ended 2010. See
Note 3, Acquisitions, in the Notes to the
Combined Financial Statements. |
41
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
of WCO consist of unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations for the quarter ended March 31,
2011 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and
an unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of
March 31, 2011. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our historical
combined financial statements included in this Information
Statement.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
have been derived from our historical combined financial
statements included in this Information Statement and are not
intended to be a complete presentation of our financial position
or results of operations had the transactions contemplated by
the Distribution Agreement and related agreements occurred as of
and for the periods indicated. In addition, they are provided
for illustrative and informational purposes only and are not
necessarily indicative of our future results of operations or
financial condition as an independent, publicly traded company.
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information
and assumptions that management believes are reasonable, that
reflect the expected impacts of events directly attributable to
the distribution and related transaction agreements, and that
are factually supportable and for purposes of the statements of
operations, are expected to have a continuing impact on us.
However, such adjustments are subject to change based on the
finalization of the terms of the Distribution Agreement and
related agreements.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and fiscal
year ended December 31, 2010 reflect our results as if the
separation and related transactions described below had occurred
as of January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 reflects our
results as if the separation and related transactions described
below had occurred as of such date.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
give effect to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the contribution by ITT to us, pursuant to the Distribution
Agreement, of all the assets and liabilities that comprise our
business;
|
|
|
|
the expected transfer to us, upon the spin-off, of certain
assets and liabilities that were not reflected in our historical
combined financial statements;
|
|
|
|
the results of operations for the period prior to our
acquisition of Godwin Pumps on August 3, 2010;
|
|
|
|
our anticipated post-separation capital structure, including
(i) the issuance of up to
approximately million
shares of our common stock to holders of ITT common shares (this
number of shares is based upon the number of ITT common shares
outstanding on March 31, 2011 and an assumed distribution
ratio
of shares
of WCO common stock for each ITT common share) and (ii) the
incurrence of $890 million of indebtedness and the making
of the $833 million Contribution.
|
|
|
|
the impact of, and transactions contemplated by, a Tax Matters
Agreement between us and ITT and the provisions contained
therein; and
|
|
|
|
settlement of intercompany account balances between us and ITT.
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
do not give effect to the probable acquisition of YSI, or
$310 million of indebtedness to be raised in connection
with the acquisition, because such acquisition is not considered
significant. See Summary Recent
Developments.
The operating expenses reported in our carve-out historical
combined statements of operations include allocations of certain
ITT costs. These costs include allocation of all ITT corporate
costs, shared services, and other SG&A and non-SG&A
related costs that benefit us.
As a stand-alone public company, we expect to incur additional
recurring costs. Our preliminary estimates of the additional
recurring costs expected to be incurred annually are
approximately $25 million to $35 million higher than
the expenses historically allocated to us from ITT.
42
The significant assumptions involved in determining our
estimates of recurring costs of being a stand-alone public
company include:
|
|
|
|
|
costs to perform financial reporting, tax, regulatory
compliance, corporate governance, treasury, legal, internal
audit and investor relations activities;
|
|
|
|
compensation, including equity-based awards, and benefits with
respect to new and existing positions;
|
|
|
|
insurance premiums;
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization related to information technology
infrastructure investments; and
|
|
|
|
the type and level of other costs expected to be incurred.
|
No pro forma adjustments have been made to our financial
statements to reflect the additional costs and expenses
described above because they are projected amounts based on
judgmental estimates.
We currently estimate expenses that we will incur during our
transition to being a stand-alone public company to range from
approximately $20 million to $30 million. We have not
adjusted the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations for these estimated expenses as they
are not expected to have an ongoing impact on our operating
results. We anticipate that substantially all of these expenses
will be incurred within 18 months of the distribution.
These expenses primarily relate to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
accounting, tax and other professional costs pertaining to our
separation and establishment as a stand-alone public company;
|
|
|
|
compensation, such as modifications to certain bonus awards,
upon completion of the separation;
|
|
|
|
relocation costs;
|
|
|
|
recruiting and relocation costs associated with hiring key
senior management personnel new to our company;
|
|
|
|
costs related to establishing our new brand in the marketplace;
and
|
|
|
|
costs to separate information systems.
|
Due to the scope and complexity of these activities, the amount
of these costs could increase or decrease materially and the
timing of incurrence could change.
43
PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for the
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
Separation and
|
|
|
Financing and the
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Other Adjustments
|
|
|
Separation
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)(c)
|
|
|
210
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)(e)
|
|
|
1
|
(e)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(k)
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(l)
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
44
PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Godwin Pumps as
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
Godwin Pumps and the
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,347
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)(d)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
372
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)(e)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(k)
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
(l)
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
45
PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF MARCH 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for the
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
Separation and
|
|
|
Financing and the
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Other Adjustments
|
|
|
Separation
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
879
|
(f)
|
|
$
|
(833
|
)(h)
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)(g)
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
(g)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, net
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
(g)
|
|
|
470
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
11
|
(f)
|
|
|
67
|
(g)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
(777
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
(g)
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
(g)
|
|
|
264
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
(g)
|
|
|
118
|
|
Long-term obligations, less current portion
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
890
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
(g)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
(j)
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Parent company investment
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(833
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)(j)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)(g)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(884
|
)
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
(777
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
NOTES TO
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our historical combined financial statements reflect the
historical financial position and results of operations of the
water equipment and services businesses of ITT, and do not
reflect the impact of certain assets and liabilities that will
be contributed to us by ITT in the spin-off and that are
discussed separately in footnote (g). |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects the historical pre-acquisition results of Godwin Pumps
during the period from January 1, 2010 to August 2,
2010, as adjusted by $10 million for depreciation and
amortization related to the increase of property, plant and
equipment and finite-lived identifiable intangible assets to
their estimated fair value upon purchase. The estimated useful
lives of the property, plant and equipment range from 3 to
10 years and the finite-lived intangible assets range from
10 to 20 years. The as-adjusted amounts also include the
reversal of transaction costs incurred by us of $3 million
directly related to the acquisition of Godwin Pumps and $6
million for the income tax impact of these pro forma adjustments
and for the effect of the change in tax status of Godwin Pumps
of America, Inc (GPA). Prior to the acquisition, GPA
was taxed as a subchapter S-corporation under the Internal
Revenue Code and following the acquisition became a
C-corporation. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects the removal of separation costs directly related to the
spin-off transaction that were incurred during the historical
period. These costs were primarily for tax, accounting, and
other professional fees. |
|
(d) |
|
The adjustment of $9 million and $35 million in the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 and the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010, respectively, represents interest
expense and amortization of debt issuance costs in connection
with debt securities we are planning to issue as described in
note (f) below. The pro forma impact was based on the
incurrence of $890 million of indebtedness issued with an
assumed weighted average interest rate of 3.75%, and an assumed
weighted average life of approximately 7 years. We expect
to capitalize debt issuance costs of approximately
$11 million in connection with these debt arrangements. Not
reflected in the adjustments is the debt we expect to incur of
$310 million in connection with the YSI acquisition. See
Summary Recent Developments. |
|
|
|
A
1/8%
variance in the assumed interest rate on the new debt securities
would change annual interest expense by $1 million. |
|
(e) |
|
The provision for income taxes reflected in our historical
financial statements was determined as if WCO filed a separate,
stand-alone consolidated income tax return. The pro forma
adjustments were determined using the statutory tax rate in
effect in the respective tax jurisdictions during the periods
presented. Our effective tax rate reflects the historical
assumption that we do not intend to repatriate
non-U.S. earnings.
The Company is in the process of evaluating its future expected
tax rate, including tax implications resulting from its spin-off
and any potential changes to our intention in repatriating
non-U.S. earnings. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Reflects the incurrence of $890 million of indebtedness,
net of debt issuance costs of $11 million. The $890 million
of indebtedness consists of
$ % senior
notes due in
and . The target debt balance at
the time of separation was determined by senior management based
on a review of a number of factors including credit ratings
consideration, forecast liquidity and capital requirements,
expected operating results, and general economic conditions.
Cash on hand following the spin-off transaction is expected to
be used for general corporate purposes. Not reflected in the
adjustments is the debt we expect to incur of $310 million
in connection with the YSI acquisition. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Reflects the impact of assets and liabilities that are expected
to be contributed to us by ITT, primarily related to
international postretirement benefit plans and associated
deferred tax positions. Effective as of the distribution date,
ITT expects to transfer to WCO certain defined benefit pension
and other postretirement benefit plans and WCO expects to assume
all liabilities and assets associated with such plans and become
the plans sponsor. The net liabilities associated with
such plans to be assumed by WCO are approximately
$82 million, excluding net deferred tax assets of
$25 million. |
|
(h) |
|
Reflects the net Contribution to ITT of $833 million based
upon the anticipated post-separation capital structure. |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Reflects adjustments to deferred income taxes and other
liabilities including an adjustment of ($42 million) comprising
contingent tax liabilities related to unresolved tax matters
that will be retained by ITT in connection with the separation
as set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement that will be entered
into with ITT and an |
47
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment of ($57 million) related to tax attributes reflected
in our historical financial statements that will not be retained
after the distribution. Additionally, there will be certain
indemnifications extended between ITT and us in accordance with
the terms of the Tax Matters Agreement. At the time of
separation, we will record a liability necessary to recognize
the fair value of such indemnifications. The pro forma
adjustment does not include such liability. We are currently in
the process of determining the impact, if any, on the amount of
any liability that may be recognized at the time of the
separation. |
|
(j) |
|
Represents the reclassification of ITTs net investment in
us, which was recorded in parent company equity, into additional
paid-in-capital
and the balancing entry to reflect the par value of
approximately million
outstanding shares of common stock at a par value of $0.01
outstanding common stock. We have assumed the number of
outstanding shares of common stock based on the number of ITT
common shares outstanding at March 31, 2011, which would
result in
approximately million
shares being distributed to holders of ITT common shares, at an
assumed distribution ratio
of shares
of WCO common stock for each ITT common share. |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share and pro forma
weighted-average basic shares outstanding are based on the
number of ITT common shares outstanding on March 31, 2011,
adjusted for an assumed distribution ratio
of shares
of WCO common stock for each ITT common share. |
|
|
|
(l) |
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share and pro forma
weighted-average diluted shares outstanding reflect potential
common shares from ITT equity plans in which our employees
participate based on the distribution ratio. While the actual
impact on a go-forward basis will depend on various factors,
including employees who may change employment from one company
to another, we believe the estimate yields a reasonable
approximation of the future dilutive impact of WCO equity plans. |
48
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our results of
operations and financial condition together with the audited and
unaudited historical combined financial statements and the notes
thereto included in this Information Statement as well as the
discussion in the section of this Information Statement entitled
Business. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The
forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather
are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and
projections about our industry, business and future financial
results. Our actual results could differ materially from the
results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to
a number of factors, including those discussed in the sections
of this Information Statement entitled Risk Factors
and Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements.
The financial information discussed below and included in this
Information Statement may not necessarily reflect what our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flow would
have been had we been a stand-alone company during the periods
presented or what our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows may be in the future.
Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise
requires, the information included in this discussion and
analysis assumes the completion of all the transactions referred
to in this Information Statement in connection with the
separation and distribution. Unless the context otherwise
requires, references in this Information Statement to
WCO, we, us, our
and our company refer to ITT WCO, Inc. and its
combined subsidiaries. References in this Information Statement
to ITT or parent refer to ITT
Corporation, an Indiana corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. Amounts in
millions unless otherwise stated.
Separation
from ITT Corporation
On January 12, 2011, ITT announced a plan to separate its
water equipment and services business (WCO) from the remainder
of its businesses through a pro rata distribution of common
stock of an entity holding the assets and liabilities associated
with the water equipment and services business. We were
incorporated in Indiana on May 4, 2011 to be the entity to
hold such businesses subject to approval by the board of
directors of ITT and other conditions described below.
The combined financial statements presented in this Information
Statement and discussed below have been prepared on a
stand-alone basis and are derived from the consolidated
financial statements and accounting records of the water
equipment and services business of ITT. The water-related
business includes the following divisions of ITT:
Water & Wastewater, Residential & Commercial
Water, and Flow Control. The combined financial statements
reflect our financial position, results of operations and cash
flows as we were historically managed, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, or GAAP.
Subsequent to the distribution, we expect to incur expenditures
consisting primarily of employee-related costs, costs to start
up certain stand-alone functions and information technology
systems, and other transaction-related costs. Additionally, we
will incur increased costs as a result of becoming an
independent publicly-traded company, primarily from higher
charges than in the past from ITT for transition services and
from establishing or expanding the corporate support for our
businesses, including information technology, human resources,
treasury, tax, risk management, accounting and financial
reporting, investor relations, governance, legal, procurement
and other services. We believe our cash flow from operations
will be sufficient to fund these additional corporate expenses.
Executive
Summary
Our Company is a world leader in the design, manufacturing, and
application of highly engineered technologies for the water
industry. We are a leading equipment and service provider for
water and wastewater applications with a broad portfolio of
products and services addressing the full cycle of water, from
collection, distribution and use to the return of water to the
environment. Our Companys brands, such as Bell &
Gossett and Flygt, are well known throughout the industry and
have served the water market for many years. Over the
49
years, we have leveraged our heritage strength in wastewater
pumping technologies to expand into wastewater treatment, and
later into clean water treatment and water quality analysis. We
believe we are strongly positioned to use our deep applications
expertise and offer our customers a full spectrum of service
offerings in the transportation, treatment and testing of water.
Net sales and operating income for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 were $3.2 billion and $388,
respectively, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011
were $890 and $100, respectively.
We operate in two segments, Water Infrastructure and Applied
Water. The Water Infrastructure segment focuses on the
transportation, treatment and testing of water, offering a range
of products including water and wastewater pumps, treatment and
testing equipment, and controls and systems. Key brands include
Flygt, Wedeco, Godwin Pumps, WTW, Sanitaire, AADI and Leopold.
The Applied Water segment encompasses all the uses of water and
focuses on the residential, commercial, industrial and
agricultural markets. The segments major products include
pumps, valves, heat exchangers, controls and dispensing
equipment. Key brands in this segment include Goulds,
Bell & Gossett, AC Fire, Standard, Flojet, Lowara,
Jabsco and Flowtronex. In both our segments, we benefit from a
large and growing installed base of products driving growth in
aftermarket sales for replacement parts and services.
Financial highlights for the three months ended March 31,
2011 include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Order growth of 27.2% over the prior year; organic orders were
up 10.3%
|
|
|
|
Revenue increase of 29.7% from 2010; organic revenue was up 11.7%
|
|
|
|
Operating margin expansion of 110 bps to 11.2% as compared
with 2010
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income of $80, an increase of $24 from 2010
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow generation of $52, up $20 from 2010
|
Financial highlights for 2010 include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Order growth of 13.7% over the prior year; organic orders were
up 4.7%
|
|
|
|
Revenue increase of 12.4% from 2010; organic revenue was up 3.4%
|
|
|
|
Operating margin expansion of 240 bps to 12.1% as compared
with 2009
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income of $329, an increase of $124 from 2009
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow generation of $301, up $6 from 2009
|
|
|
|
Deployment of more than $1 billion of capital into a number
of strategic acquisitions in growth markets, most notably the
acquisitions of Nova Analytics (Nova) and Godwin
Pumps of America and Godwin Holdings Limited (collectively
referred to as Godwin)
|
Further details related to these results are described below.
See Key Performance Indicators and
Non-GAAP Measures below for a reconciliation of the
non-GAAP measures.
Key
Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Measures
Management reviews key performance indicators including revenue,
segment operating income and margins, orders growth, and
backlog, among others. In addition, we consider certain measures
to be useful to management and investors evaluating our
operating performance for the periods presented, and provide a
tool for evaluating our ongoing operations, liquidity and
management of assets. This information can assist investors in
assessing our financial performance and measures our ability to
generate capital for deployment among competing strategic
alternatives and initiatives. These metrics, however, are not
measures of financial performance under GAAP and should not be
considered a substitute for revenue, operating income, net
income, or net cash from continuing operations as determined in
accordance with GAAP. We consider the
50
following non-GAAP measures, which may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures reported by other companies, to be key
performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
organic revenue and organic orders
defined as revenue and orders, respectively, excluding the
impact of foreign currency fluctuations and contributions from
acquisitions and divestitures. Divestitures include sales of
portions of our business that did not meet the criteria for
classification as a discontinued operation or insignificant
portions of our business that we did not classify as a
discontinued operation. The
period-over-period
change resulting from foreign currency fluctuations assumes no
change in exchange rates from the prior period.
|
|
|
|
adjusted net income defined as net income, adjusted
to exclude items that may include, but are not limited to,
significant charges or credits that impact current results but
are not related to our ongoing operations, unusual and
infrequent non-operating items and non-operating tax settlements
or adjustments. A reconciliation of adjusted net income is
provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
Tax-related special item(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Separation costs, net of tax
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The 2009 tax-related special item is primarily attributable to
the completion of a restructuring of certain international legal
entities. |
|
|
|
|
|
free cash flow defined as net cash provided by
operating activities, as reported in the Statement of Cash
Flows, less capital expenditures and other significant items
that impact current results which management believes are not
related to our ongoing operations and performance. Our
definition of free cash flow does not consider certain
non-discretionary cash payments, such as debt. A reconciliation
of free cash flow is provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Known
Trends and Uncertainties
The following list represents a summary of trends and
uncertainties which could have a significant impact on our
results of operations, financial position
and/or cash
flows:
|
|
|
|
|
The global economic environment remains in a relative state of
uncertainty. Although financial markets have recovered from
their lows in 2009, we consider the overall global economic
recovery to be a gradual, long-term process. In the United
States, gradual improvements in credit availability, solid
consumer spending, moderate job creation and less uncertainty
about new regulations should work to reinforce the economic
recovery. However, downside factors such as the challenges
facing local, state and federal government finance and possible
spillover of Europes sovereign debt crisis could limit or
delay U.S. growth. Within Europe, the sovereign debt crisis
has weakened the recovery process and created the potential for
significant volatility during 2011. The potential for unforeseen
adverse macroeconomic events remains a concern and the
occurrence of such events could have a significant unfavorable
effect on our business.
|
|
|
|
A portion of our Water Infrastructure segments revenue is
derived from municipal projects and services. European austerity
measures and budget pressures within the United States have
forced
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
governments to plan for reductions in spending, reevaluate their
priorities and postpone wastewater infrastructure projects.
These actions have led to a reduction in demand, increased
competition and pricing pressures. Our ability or inability to
secure project orders in this challenging environment could
significantly affect our Water Infrastructure segment results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the Applied Water segments revenue is derived
from U.S. commercial construction spending and residential
real estate activity. Commercial construction build rates are
expected to remain low during the majority of 2011 as the build
versus buy indicator for real estate investors continues to
favor investing in existing buildings due to depressed asset
prices. Similarly, consensus expectations for residential
homebuilding are mixed, reflecting uncertainty around the
likelihood and magnitude of a recovery. The continued
uncertainty and volatility within these markets could
significantly affect the results of our Applied Water segment.
|
|
|
|
A portion of our business provides pumps for the general
industrial market. Emerging markets have led a recovery in the
global industrial market, most significantly within the mining
industry as high metal prices have promoted robust demand for
mining equipment. However, as long as global economic
uncertainty remains it will be difficult to predict how the
trends in industrial orders may be impacted.
|
|
|
|
We anticipate significant expenditures associated with the
planned spin-off transaction primarily consisting of
employee-related costs, costs to start up certain stand-alone
functions and information technology systems, and other
transaction-related costs.
|
The information provided above does not represent a complete
list of trends and uncertainties that could impact our business
in either the near or long-term. It should, however, be
considered along with the risk factors and our disclosure on
forward-looking statements identified in this Information
Statement.
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to three
months ended March 31, 2010, and year ended
December 31, 2010 compared to year ended December 31,
2009
Revenue
Our quarter ended March 31, 2011 and annual 2010 revenue
was marked by growth from strategic acquisitions as well as a
level of economic recovery within the majority of our served
markets. Although revenue has not yet reached the levels
achieved during 2008, we believe that our competitive position
and portfolio of highly engineered products will continue to be
strengthened by a gradual economic improvement and contributions
from acquisitions. The following table illustrates the revenue
of our business segments for the quarter ended March 31,
2011 and the annual 2010 and 2009 periods. See below for further
discussion of variances over these periods at the segment level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
The following table illustrates the impact from organic growth,
recent acquisitions, and fluctuations in foreign currency, in
relation to combined revenue during the quarter ended
March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic growth
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
Acquisitions/(divestitures), net
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in revenue
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the impact from organic growth,
recent acquisitions, and fluctuations in foreign currency, in
relation to combined revenue during the annual 2010 period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009 Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic growth
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Acquisitions/(divestitures), net
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in revenue
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Revenue
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
Infrastructure
Revenue generated by our Water Infrastructure segment during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010 period was
$551 and $1,930, respectively, reflecting an increase of $174
and $279, respectively, as compared to the same prior year
periods. These increases were primarily driven by acquisitions,
including Godwin and Nova, which in the aggregate contributed
$110 and $247, respectively, over the same respective periods.
Since their acquisition, Godwin and Nova have both performed
favorably versus our initial expectations. Foreign exchange
translation was favorable by $12 and $8 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 and the annual period ended
December 31, 2010, as compared to the same prior year
period, respectively.
Organic revenue growth for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
was $52 or 13.7% and was primarily driven by increased treatment
and transport project activity in the public utilities markets.
Organic revenue increased 1.5% for the annual 2010 period
reflecting mixed regional results, including favorable treatment
performance in Northern Europe and in emerging markets such as
Asia Pacific, Eastern Europe and Latin America. Unfavorable
economic conditions and uncertainty within the region continued
to negatively impact performance in our Southern European
markets.
Applied
Water
Revenue generated by our Applied Water segment during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010 period was
$355 and $1,327, respectively, reflecting an increase of $32 and
$73, respectively, as compared to the same prior year periods.
During 2010, contributions from the 2009 Laing acquisition of
$19 were partially offset by a decline in revenues from
businesses divested of $3. Foreign exchange translation was
favorable by $1 and unfavorable by $16 for the quarter
March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010 period ended, as
compared to the same prior year period, respectively.
Organic revenue growth of $30 or 9.4% during the first quarter
of 2011 compared with the prior year generally reflects
improving market conditions including: (1) increased volume
for light industrial applications driven by demand for general
and specialty industrial pumps, marine products and valves;
(2) increased
53
volume within commercial building services within both developed
and emerging markets; and (3) increased demand for
agriculture/irrigation applications. We also benefited from
price realization initiatives.
Despite relatively weak market conditions throughout 2010, we
recorded organic revenue growth of $72 or 5.8% over the prior
year. This growth was primarily attributable to European and
emerging market share gains as well as the impact from new
product launches, including energy efficient pumps and new
beverage applications. We also benefited from price realization
initiatives. Organic revenue growth was partially offset by
unfavorable weather conditions in North America, which
negatively impacted our sales of irrigation applications.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the
annual 2010 period was $337 and $1,214, respectively,
representing increases of $82, or 32.2%, and $177, or 17.1%,
respectively, as compared to prior periods. These increases
include respective gross profits from our 2010 acquisitions of
$56 and $101 in quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual
2010 period, respectively, increased organic sales volume, and
benefits from productivity and price realization initiatives. As
result of these factors, gross profit margin expanded by
approximately 70 bps and 150 bps over the same
comparable respective periods.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses increased approximately 27.4% and 8.5% during
the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010 period
to $237 and $826, respectively. The following table provides
further information by expense type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
737
|
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
NM*
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(51.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*NM = Not meaningful
Selling,
General & Administrative Expenses
(SG&A)
SG&A expenses increased $49, or 29.9%, and $70, or 10.5%,
during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010
period, respectively. These increases primarily reflect
additional costs of $26 and $55, respectively, related primarily
to our newly acquired Godwin and Nova businesses, as well as
costs attributable to an increase in sales volumes, as well as
additional spending on various strategic investments. During the
first quarter of 2011, we were allocated separation costs of $3
primarily attributable to tax, accounting, and other
professional fees. It is expected that separation costs will
increase as the separation nears.
SG&A as a percent of sales was 23.9% for both three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. SG&A as a
percent of sales was 23.0% and 23.4% for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Research
and Development Expenses (R&D)
R&D spending increased by $6, or 33.3%, and $11, or 17.5%,
during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010
period, respectively, primarily due to our newly acquired Nova
business. R&D as a percent of sales was 2.7% and 2.6% for
the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. R&D as a percent of sales was 2.3% and 2.2%
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
54
Restructuring,
Net
We had no restructuring charges during the quarter ended
March 31, 2011. During the annual 2010 period, we
recognized net restructuring charges of $15, representing a $16
or 51.6% decrease as compared to, the prior annual period.
During 2009, we initiated several actions, primarily within our
Applied Water segment in response to declining market
conditions. The frequency and overall impact of such actions
subsided and as a result we incurred less cost during 2010. We
consider the majority of our restructuring initiatives to be
complete as of December 31, 2010.
See Note 5, Restructuring Charges Net, in the
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements for additional
information.
Operating
Income
We generated operating income of $100 and $388 during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the annual 2010 period,
respectively. This reflected increases from the prior period of
44.9% and 40.6%, respectively. Operating margin increased to
11.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 12.1% for
the annual 2010 period, a
period-over-period
increase of 110 and 240 basis points, respectively. The
following table illustrates operating income results of our
business segments, including operating margin results for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 and annual 2010 and 2009
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
110
|
bps
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
240
|
bps
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
(30
|
) bps
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
bps
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
bps
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
320
|
bps
|
Water
Infrastructure
Operating income for our Water Infrastructure segment increased
$19 or 42.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared
with the comparable prior year period. This increase is
primarily attributable to contributions from the Nova and Godwin
acquisitions, which provided incremental operating income of
approximately $20 over the same period. Operating margin
declined 30 bps over the same period as the
year-over-year
benefits attributable to higher organic revenue, lower
restructuring expense and benefits from productivity and
material costs savings initiatives were offset by the
unfavorable impact from foreign exchange costs, higher labor and
overhead costs, material inflation, operating reserves, and
unfavorable mix.
Operating income for our Water Infrastructure segment increased
$49 or 21.6% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared
with the comparable prior year period. This increase is
primarily attributable to contributions from the Nova and Godwin
acquisitions, which provided combined incremental operating
income of $28 during 2010. Operating productivity and lower
restructuring expense more than offset incremental strategic
investments, higher pension costs, and unfavorable foreign
currency impacts. Operating margin expansion of 60 bps over
the same period, a decline largely attributable to these same
factors.
Applied
Water
Operating income for our Applied Water segment increased $6 or
15.0% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared with
the prior year. Operating margin expanded 60 bps to 13.0%
over the same period. These
55
increases were primarily attributable to operating productivity
driven by increased sales volume and price increases.
Operating income for our Applied Water segment increased $49 or
45.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared with
the prior year. Operating productivity, including increased
volume, increased price, benefits from our cost savings
initiatives, and lower restructuring charges of $12, more than
offset incremental costs associated with strategic initiatives.
Operating margin expansion of 320 bps over the same period
was largely attributable to these same factors.
Other
Other expenses decreased $6 and $14 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 and year ended December 31, 2010,
respectively, as compared with each prior year period. Other
primarily consists of general corporate expenses related to
finance, legal, communications, employee benefits and
incentives, and equity-based compensation, which are not
allocated to our business segments. The majority of the general
corporate expenses are allocations for certain functions
provided by ITT.
Income
Tax Expense
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, we
recorded an income tax provision of $23 or 22.8% of income
before income taxes compared to $11 or 16.4% during the prior
period. For 2011, the effective tax rate is lower than the
federal statutory rate of 35% due principally to a lower rate
incurred on foreign earnings and the favorable impact of
interest income not subject to income taxes. For 2010, the
effective tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of
35% due principally to a lower rate incurred on foreign earnings
and the favorable impact of the repatriation of foreign earnings
net of foreign tax credits.
In 2010 and 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of
$59 million and $14 million, respectively, which
represents effective tax rates of 15.2% and 5.1%, respectively.
For 2010, the effective tax rate is lower than the federal
statutory rate of 35% due principally to a lower rate incurred
on foreign earnings and the favorable impact of the repatriation
of foreign earnings net of foreign tax credits. For 2009, the
effective tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of
35% due principally to a lower rate incurred on foreign earnings
and the favorable impact of the restructuring of certain legal
entities.
Year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended
December 31, 2008
Revenue
The deteriorating global economic conditions experienced during
2009 created recessionary challenges within our Water
Infrastructure and Applied Water segments. As a result, we
experienced a decline in order activity that translated into a
13.4% decrease in total revenue. The following table illustrates
the 2009 and 2008 revenue results of our business segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)%
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
The following table illustrates the impact from organic growth,
acquisitions completed during 2008, and fluctuations in foreign
currency, in relation to combined revenue during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008 Revenue
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic decline
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
Acquisitions/(divestitures), net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in revenue
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
Infrastructure
The 2009 revenue generated by our Water Infrastructure segment
was $1,651, representing a decline of $173 or 9.5% from 2008
revenue of $1,824. These results include an unfavorable impact
from foreign currency fluctuations of $109. Challenging global
economic conditions impacted most of our served markets
resulting in organic revenue decline of $65 or 3.6%.
Applied
Water
The 2009 revenue generated by our Applied Water segment was
$1,254, representing a decline of $273 or 17.9% from 2008
revenue of $1,527. These results include an unfavorable impact
from foreign currency fluctuations of $53. Organic revenue
declined 14.9% primarily due to lower volumes caused by
challenging global economic conditions affecting the majority of
markets served. Light industrial market share gains,
particularly with beverage and marine applications, partially
offset overall volume declines over the second half of the year.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit for 2009 was $1,037, representing a $104 or 9.1%
decrease from 2008. This decrease was attributable to the
decline in revenue and unfavorable foreign currency
fluctuations, partially offset by benefits from productivity
gains, including efforts to improve supply chain productivity
and control material costs. Gross margin increased 170 bps
to 36.4% during 2009. The improvement is primarily due to
benefits from productivity improvements and various other
cost-saving initiatives, which more than offset the impacts from
reductions in sales volumes.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses decreased 7.9% during 2009 to $761, primarily
attributable to cost savings initiatives and lower restructuring
expense. The following table provides further information by
expense type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)%
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
Restructuring and asset impairment charges, net
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
761
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
General & Administrative Expenses
SG&A decreased 7.5% to $667 in 2009. This decrease was
primarily attributable to cost-saving initiatives in response to
declining global economic conditions, lower sales volumes, and
lower stock compensation expense, partially offset by higher
postretirement plan costs. SG&A as a percent of sales was
approximately 23.4% and 21.9% for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
57
Research
and Development Expenses
R&D expenses decreased $1 from the prior year to $63 during
2009 as compared to the prior year. R&D expense of $63
equates to an investment of 2.2% of sales, an increase of
30 bps over the prior year rate, reflecting our commitment
to the development of new technologies in our served markets.
Restructuring,
Net
During 2009, we recognized net restructuring charges of $31,
representing a $10 decrease as compared to 2008. The charges
associated with 2009 and 2008 actions primarily represent
severance costs for reductions in headcount within both of our
business segments, in response to declining market conditions.
See Note 5, Restructuring Charges Net, in the
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements for additional
information.
Operating
Income
We generated operating income of $276 during 2009, a 12.4%
decrease from 2008, primarily reflecting volume declines. This
decline was partially offset by benefits from the implementation
of extensive cost-saving initiatives and productivity
improvements. Operating margin increased to 9.7% for 2009, a
year-over-year
increase of 10 bps, despite reductions in sales volumes.
This increase was attributable to benefits from productivity
improvements and various cost-saving initiatives. The following
table illustrates the 2009 and 2008 operating income results of
our business segments, including operating margin results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
(32.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
bps
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
160
|
bps
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
(190
|
) bps
|
Water
Infrastructure
Operating income increased $7 or 3.2% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared with the prior year. Operating
margin increased 160 bps over the same period. Operating
productivity driven by benefits from our cost savings
initiatives, lower restructuring expense, and favorable foreign
exchange transaction costs more than offset the impact of volume
declines.
Applied
Water
Operating income decreased $53 or 32.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared with the prior year. Operating
margin decreased 190 bps over the same period. These
significant declines were attributable to weak global economic
conditions resulting in significant unfavorable volume impacts
across most markets and regions. During the period we also
incurred higher restructuring and pension costs.
Other
Other expenses decreased $7 for the year ended December 31,
2009 as compared with the prior year. Other primarily consists
of general corporate expenses related to finance, legal,
communications, employee benefits and incentives, and
equity-based compensation, which are not allocated to our
business segments. The majority of the general corporate
expenses are allocations for certain functions provided by ITT.
58
Income
Tax Expense
In 2009 and 2008, we recorded an income tax provision of $14 and
$88, respectively, which represents effective tax rates of 5.0%
and 28.2%, respectively. For 2009, the effective tax rate is
lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% due principally to
a lower rate incurred on foreign earnings and the favorable
impact of the restructuring of certain legal entities. For 2008,
the effective tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate
of 35% due principally to a lower rate incurred on foreign
earnings.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Funding
and Liquidity Strategy
Current
Liquidity
Historically, we have generated operating cash flow sufficient
to fund our working capital, capital expenditure and financing
requirements. Subsequent to the separation, while our ability to
forecast future cash flows is more limited, we expect to fund
our ongoing working capital, capital expenditure and financing
requirements through cash flows from operations via access to
cash on hand and capital markets.
If our cash flows from operations are less than we expect, we
may need to incur debt or issue equity. From time to time we may
need to access the long-term and short-term capital markets to
obtain financing. Although we believe that the arrangements in
place at the time of the separation will permit us to finance
our operations on acceptable terms and conditions, our access
to, and the availability of, financing on acceptable terms and
conditions in the future will be impacted by many factors,
including: (i) our credit ratings or absence of a credit
rating, (ii) the liquidity of the overall capital markets,
and (iii) the current state of the economy. There can be no
assurance that we will continue to have access to the capital
markets on terms acceptable to us. We cannot assure that such
financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or that
such financing will be available at all.
The majority of our operations participate in U.S. and
international cash management and funding arrangements managed
by ITT where cash is swept from our balance sheet daily, and
cash to meet our operating and investing needs is provided as
needed from ITT. Transfers of cash both to and from these
arrangements are reflected as a component of Parent
company investment within Parent company
equity in the combined balance sheets. The cash presented
on our balance sheet consists primarily of U.S. and
international cash from subsidiaries that do not participate in
these arrangements.
Future
Liquidity
Our primary future cash needs will be centered on operating
activities, working capital, capital expenditures, and strategic
investments. Our ability to fund these needs will depend, in
part, on our ability to generate or raise cash in the future,
which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. The
Company expects to generate sufficient cash from operations to
meet its liquidity and capital needs, subject to the expected
borrowing described below.
At or prior to the distribution, we expect to raise indebtedness
in an amount of $1,200, including
$ of senior notes, the net proceeds
of which are expected to fund a cash transfer of approximately
$833 to ITT, with the balance to be used in connection with the
YSI acquisition and for general corporate purposes. The notes
will be our senior unsecured obligations and will rank equally
with all of our existing and future senior unsecured
indebtedness. The notes initially will be guaranteed on a senior
unsecured basis by ITT (the ITT Guarantee). The ITT
Guarantee will terminate upon the completion of the spin-off. It
is expected that the indenture governing the notes will include
covenants that restrict our ability to, subject to exceptions,
incur indebtedness secured by liens or engage in sale and
leaseback transactions. The actual terms of the notes, including
interest rate, principal amount, redemption provisions and
maturity, will depend on market conditions at the time of
pricing.
At or prior to the separation, we expect to enter into a
new -year unsecured senior
revolving credit facility. The commitment under the new credit
facility is expected to be $ The
interest rate for borrowings under the new credit facility is
expected to be generally based on the London Interbank Offered
Rate
59
(LIBOR), plus a spread, based upon our debt rating. The senior
revolving credit facility will replace, in part, the existing
credit facility of ITT, and be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. ITT initially
will guarantee the new credit facility, and we will assume the
obligations of ITT in connection with the distribution. The
actual terms of the new credit facility, including interest
rate, commitment, covenants and maturity, will depend on market
conditions at the time we enter into the new credit facility.
Following our separation from ITT, our capital structure and
sources of liquidity will change significantly from our
historical capital structure. We will no longer participate in
cash management and funding arrangements with ITT. Instead, our
ability to fund our capital needs will depend on our ongoing
ability to generate cash from operations, and access to the bank
and capital markets. We believe that our future cash from
operations, together with our access to funds on hand and
capital markets, will provide adequate resources to fund our
operating and financing needs.
Following the spin-off, we expect our cash will be predominately
held by our foreign subsidiaries. We expect to manage our
worldwide cash requirements considering available funds among
the many subsidiaries through which we conduct business and the
cost effectiveness with which those funds can be accessed. As
such, we plan to look for opportunities to access cash balances
in excess of local operating requirements to meet global
liquidity needs in a cost-efficient manner. We may transfer cash
from certain international subsidiaries to the U.S. and
other international subsidiaries when it is cost effective to do
so. If these funds are needed for our operations in the United
States, we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes
to repatriate these funds. Our effective tax rate includes the
historical assumption that we do not intend to repatriate
non-U.S. earnings.
We are in the process of evaluating our future expected tax rate
including tax implications resulting from the spin-off and any
potential changes to our intention in repatriating
non-U.S. earnings.
Dividends
Following the distribution, we expect that initially WCO will
pay a dividend, although the timing, declaration, amount and
payment of future dividends to our shareholders fall within the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many
factors, including our financial condition, results of
operations and capital requirements, as well as applicable law,
regulatory constraints, industry practice and other business
considerations that WCOs Board of Directors considers
relevant. In addition, the terms of the agreements governing our
new debt or debt that we may incur in the future may limit or
prohibit the payments of dividends. There can be no assurance
that we will pay a dividend in the future or continue to pay any
dividend if we do commence the payment of dividends. There can
also be no assurance that the combined annual dividends on ITT
common stock, DCO common stock and our common stock after the
spin-off, if any, will be equal to the annual dividends on ITT
common stock prior to the spin-off.
Sources
and Uses of Liquidity
Our principal source of liquidity is our cash flow generated
from operating activities, which provides us with the ability to
meet the majority of our short-term funding requirements. The
following table provides net cash provided by operating
activities and used in investing and financing activities for
each of the previous three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
(1,093
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $29 for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the
comparable 2010 period. This increase is primarily due to a $36
increase in net income excluding non-cash increases in
depreciation and amortization. The increased cash use from
working capital to support increasing order growth was offset by
reduced cash needs from other assets and liabilities as well as
taxes. Cash from operating activities includes a contribution of
$29 attributable to the Godwin and Nova acquisitions.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $38 in
2010 as compared to 2009. This increase is primarily
attributable to a $88 increase in net income excluding non-cash
increases in depreciation and amortization, partially offset by
a reduced source of cash from working capital. Cash from
operating activities includes a contribution of $72 attributable
to Godwin and Nova acquisitions.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $64 in
2009 as compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily
attributable to a $47 increase in net income excluding non-cash
increases in depreciation and amortization, which was more than
offset by a
year-over-year
reduction in cash from taxes as well as higher net cash payments
for restructuring activities.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $383 for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the
comparable 2010 period. This decline is attributable to the
acquisition of Nova during the first quarter of 2010, which had
a purchase price of $385, net of cash acquired. Net cash used in
investing activities increased $1,009 in 2010 as compared to
2009. This increase reflects the amounts paid for the Godwin and
Nova acquisitions (approximately $965, net of cash acquired) as
well as other acquisitions completed during 2010. Net cash used
in investing activities increased $3 in 2009 as compared to
2008, primarily reflecting a net increase in amounts paid for
acquisitions, capital expenditures and other.
Cash used for or provided by financing activities is due to
transfers to and from our parent, ITT. The components of net
transfers include: (i) cash transfers from the Company to
parent, (ii) cash investments from our parent used to fund
operations, capital expenditures and acquisitions,
(iii) charges (benefits) for income taxes, and
(iv) allocations of parents corporate expenses
described in this Information Statement.
Funding
of Postretirement Plans
At December 31, 2010, our defined benefit pension plans
were underfunded by $155 million. A substantial portion of
the underfunded position arose during the fourth quarter of
2008, when we recognized a significant decline in the fair
market value of our defined benefit pension plan assets.
Favorable market conditions during the latter half of 2009 and
throughout 2010 resulted in an increase in the fair market value
of our defined benefit pension plan assets.
With respect to defined benefit pension plans, we intend to
contribute annually not less than the minimum required by
applicable laws or regulations. In 2010, we contributed $9 to
our defined benefit pension plans. Funding requirements under
IRS rules are a major consideration in making contributions to
our U.S. defined benefit pension plans. While the Company
has significant discretion in making voluntary contributions,
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and further amended by the
Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008 and
applicable Internal Revenue Code regulations, mandate minimum
funding thresholds. Failure to satisfy the minimum funding
thresholds could result in restrictions on our ability to amend
the plans or make benefit payments. We anticipate making
contributions to our defined benefit pension plans in the range
of $15 to $20 during 2011.
The funded status at the end of 2011 and future required
contributions will depend primarily on the actual return on
assets during the year and the discount rate used to measure the
benefit obligation at the end of the year. Depending on these
factors, and the resulting funded status of our pension plans,
the level of future statutory minimum contributions could be
material.
61
Contractual
Obligations
Our commitment to make future payments under long-term
contractual obligations was as follows, as of December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases(1)
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations reflected on balance sheet(3)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the amounts presented in the table above, we have
recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $43 as of
December 31, 2010. These amounts have been excluded from
the contractual obligations table due to an inability to
reasonably estimate the timing of such payments in individual
years.
(1) Refer to Note 15, Operating Leases, in
the Notes to Combined Financial Statements, for further
discussion of lease and rental agreements.
(2) Represents unconditional purchase agreements that are
enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant
terms to purchase goods or services, including fixed or minimum
quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price
provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.
Purchase agreements that are cancellable without penalty have
been excluded.
(3) Other long-term obligations include capital lease
obligations and estimated environmental payments. We estimate,
based on historical experience, that we will spend between $2
and $4 per year on environmental investigation and remediation.
At December 31, 2010, our best estimate for environmental
liabilities is $8.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources are based on our combined
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP. The preparation of these combined financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and
expenses, and disclosure of contingent liabilities. Management
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the
Combined Financial Statements are discussed in Note 1,
Separation from ITT Corporation, Basis of Presentation and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes
to the Combined Financial Statements. Accounting estimates and
assumptions discussed in this section are those that we consider
most critical to an understanding of our financial statements
because they are inherently uncertain, involve significant
judgments, and include areas where different estimates
reasonably could have been used and changes in the estimate that
are reasonably possible could materially impact the financial
statements. Management believes that the accounting estimates
employed and the resulting balances are reasonable; however,
actual results in these areas could differ from
managements estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or
determinable, and collectability of the sales price is
reasonably assured. For product sales, delivery does not occur
until the products have been shipped, risk of loss has been
transferred to the customer and the contractual terms have been
fulfilled. In instances where contractual terms include a
provision for
62
customer acceptance, revenue is recognized when either
(i) we have previously demonstrated that the product meets
the specified criteria based on either seller or
customer-specified objective criteria or (ii) upon formal
acceptance received from the customer where the product has not
been previously demonstrated to meet customer-specified
objective criteria. Revenue on service and repair contracts is
recognized after services have been agreed to by the customer
and rendered.
Although most of the sales agreements contain standard terms and
conditions, certain agreements contain multiple elements or
non-standard terms and conditions. As a result, judgment is
sometimes required to determine the appropriate accounting,
including whether the deliverables specified in these agreements
should be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue
recognition purposes, and, if so, how the transaction price
should be allocated among the elements and when to recognize
revenue for each element. For delivered elements, revenue is
recognized only when the delivered elements have standalone
value, fair values of undelivered elements are known, there are
no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance and there are no
customer-negotiated refund or return rights affecting the sales
recognized for delivered elements.
We record a reduction in revenue at the time of sale for
estimated product returns, rebates and other allowances, based
on historical experience and known trends. Future market
conditions and product transitions may require us to take
actions to increase customer incentive offerings, possibly
resulting in an incremental reduction of revenue at the time the
incentive is offered.
Warranty
Accrual
Additionally, accruals for estimated expenses related to
warranties are made at the time products are sold or services
are rendered and are recorded as a component of costs of
revenue. These accruals are established using historical
information on the nature, frequency and average cost of
warranty claims and estimates of future costs. Our standard
product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and
repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for
a specified period of time. While we engage in extensive product
quality programs and processes, we base our estimated warranty
obligation on product warranty terms offered to customers,
ongoing product failure rates, material usage and service
delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure, as well
as specific product class failures outside of our baseline
experience. If actual product failure rates, repair rates or any
other post-sales support costs differ from these estimates,
revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.
Income
Taxes
Our income taxes as presented are calculated on a separate tax
return basis, and may not be reflective of the results that
would have occurred on a stand alone basis. Our operations have
historically been included in ITTs U.S. federal and
state tax returns or
non-U.S. jurisdictions
tax returns.
With the exception of certain dedicated foreign entities, we do
not maintain taxes payable to/from our parent, and we are deemed
to settle the annual current tax balances immediately with the
legal tax-paying entities in the respective jurisdictions. These
settlements are reflected as changes in parent company
investment.
We determine the provision for income taxes using the asset and
liability approach. Under this approach, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on temporary differences
between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities, applying enacted tax rates in effect for the year
in which we expect the differences will reverse. Based on the
evaluation of available evidence, we recognize future tax
benefits, such as net operating loss carryfowards, to the extent
that we believe it is more likely than not we will realize these
benefits. We periodically assess the likelihood that we will be
able to recover our deferred tax assets and reflect any changes
to our estimate of the amount we are more likely than not to
realize in the valuation allowance, with a corresponding
adjustment to earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), as
appropriate.
In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we look to the
future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences,
taxable income in carryback years, the feasibility of tax
planning strategies and
63
estimated future taxable income. The valuation allowance can be
affected by changes to tax laws, changes to statutory tax rates
and changes to future taxable income estimates.
We have not provided U.S. taxes on the excess of financial
reporting over the tax basis of investments because we plan to
reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside the United States.
We plan foreign earnings remittance amounts based on projected
cash flow needs, as well as the working capital and long-term
investment requirements of our foreign subsidiaries and our
domestic operations. Based on these assumptions, we estimate the
amount we will distribute to the United States and provide the
U.S. federal taxes due on these amounts. Material changes
in our estimates of cash, working capital and long-term
investment requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we
do business could impact our effective tax rate.
The calculation of our tax provision involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a
multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. We
recognize tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in
the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on our
estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional
taxes will be due. Furthermore, we recognize the tax benefit
from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than
not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by
the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position are measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement.
We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits in light
of changing facts and circumstances; however, due to the
complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate
resolution may result in a payment that is materially different
from our current estimate. If our estimate proves to be less
than the ultimate assessment, an additional tax expense would
result. If these amounts ultimately prove to be less than the
recorded amounts, the reversal of the liabilities may result in
a tax benefit in the period when the liabilities are no longer
necessary.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
We review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment annually and whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. We also review the carrying value of our
finite-lived intangible assets for potential impairment when
impairment indicators arise. We conduct our annual impairment
test as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. We
perform a two-step impairment test for goodwill. In the first
step, we compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit
to its carrying value. If the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets
assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired and we
are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying
value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds
its fair value, then we must perform the second step of the
impairment test in order to measure the impairment loss to be
recorded. If the carrying value of a reporting units
goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an
impairment loss equal to the difference. In our annual
impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets, we
compare the fair value of those assets to their carrying value.
We recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of
the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying
value. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units and
intangible assets with indefinite lives using an income
approach. Under the income approach, we calculate fair value
based on the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit or an
indefinite-lived intangible asset is judgmental in nature and
involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions,
particularly related to future operating results and cash flows.
These estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to,
revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate
projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates,
assumed royalty rates, future economic and market conditions,
and identification of appropriate market comparable data. In
addition, the identification of reporting units and the
allocation of assets and liabilities to the reporting units when
determining the carrying value of each reporting unit also
requires judgment. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the
reporting unit level, which based on the relevant accounting
guidance, is at the operating segment level or one level below
the operating segments identified in Note 19, Segment
Information, in the Notes to the Combined Financial
Statements. The fair value of our reporting units and
indefinite-lived
64
intangible assets are based on estimates and assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable. Significant changes to these
estimates and assumptions could adversely impact our
conclusions. Actual future results may differ from those
estimates.
Our 2010 annual goodwill impairment analysis indicated the
estimated fair value of our reporting units significantly
exceeded their carrying value, and accordingly, no impairment
charges were recorded. In order to evaluate the sensitivity of
the fair value estimates on the goodwill impairment test, we
applied a hypothetical 100 basis point increase to the
discount rates utilized, a ten percent reduction in expected
future cash flows, and reduced the assumed future growth rates
of each reporting unit to zero. These hypothetical changes did
not result in any reporting unit failing step one of the
impairment test. Further, our 2010 annual indefinite-lived
intangible asset impairment test did not result in an impairment
charge as the estimated fair value of the assets exceeded their
carrying value.
Postretirement
Plans
Company employees around the world participate in numerous
defined benefit pension plans that are direct to or sponsored by
WCO. The determination of projected benefit obligations and the
recognition of expenses related to these pension plans are
dependent on various assumptions. These major assumptions
primarily relate to discount rates, long-term expected rates of
return on plan assets, rate of future compensation increases,
mortality and termination (some of which are disclosed in
Note 13, Postretirement Benefit Plans, in the
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements) and other factors.
Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated
and are amortized generally over the estimated future working
life of the plan participants.
Significant
Assumptions
Management develops each assumption using relevant Company
experience, in conjunction with market-related data for each
individual country in which such plans exist. All assumptions
are reviewed annually with third party consultants and adjusted
as necessary. The table included below provides the weighted
average assumptions used to estimate our defined benefit pension
obligations and costs as of and for the years ended 2010 and
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Obligation Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
Rate of future compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
Cost Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.79
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.20
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.97
|
%
|
Rate of future compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
The majority of our plan assets relate to U.S. plans and
are managed by ITT on a commingled basis in a master investment
trust. With respect to plan assets in the master investment
trust, ITT determines the expected return on plan assets by
evaluating both historical returns and estimates of future
returns. Specifically, ITT analyzes the plans actual
historical annual return on assets over the past 15, 20 and
25 years; estimates future returns based on independent
estimates of asset class returns; and evaluates historical broad
market returns over long-term timeframes based on the strategic
asset allocation, which is detailed in Note 13,
Postretirement Benefit Plans, in the Notes to the
Combined Financial Statements.
Based on the approach described above, the long-term annual rate
of return on plan assets in the master investment trust is
estimated at 9.0%. For reference, our actual geometric average
annual return on plan assets in the master investment trust was
8.8%, 10.1% and 10.3%, for the past 15, 20, and 25 year
periods, respectively.
65
The chart below shows actual returns versus the expected
long-term returns for our U.S. pension plans that were
utilized in the calculation of the net periodic pension cost for
each respective year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Actual rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)%
|
For the recognition of net periodic pension cost, the
calculation of the expected return on plan assets is generally
derived using a market-related value of plan assets based on
average asset values at the measurement date over the last five
years. The use of fair value, rather than a calculated value,
could materially affect net periodic pension cost. Our weighted
average expected return on plan assets for all pension plans,
including foreign affiliate plans, at December 31, 2010 is
8.2%.
The discount rate reflects our expectation of the present value
of expected future cash payments for benefits at the measurement
date. A decrease in the discount rate increases the present
value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. We
base the discount rate assumption on current investment yields
of high-quality fixed income investments during the retirement
benefits maturity period. The pension discount rate was
determined by considering an interest rate yield curve
comprising AAA/AA bonds, with maturities between zero and thirty
years, developed by the plans actuaries. Annual benefit
payments are then discounted to present value using this yield
curve to develop a single-point discount rate matching the
plans characteristics. Our weighted average discount rate
for all pension plans, including foreign affiliates, at
December 31, 2010 is 5.35%.
The rate of future compensation increase assumption reflects our
long-term actual experience and future and near-term outlook. At
December 31, 2010, our expected rate of future compensation
of 4.0% for U.S. plan participants was unchanged from the
prior year.
Funded
Status
Funded status is derived by subtracting the respective year-end
values of the projected benefit obligations from the fair value
of plan assets. We estimate that every 25 basis point
change in the discount rate impacts the funded status by
approximately $8.
Fair
Value of Plan Assets
The plan assets of our postretirement plans comprise a broad
range of investments, including domestic and foreign equity
securities, interests in private equity and hedge funds, fixed
income investments, commodities, real estate, and cash and cash
equivalents.
A substantial portion of our postretirement benefit plan assets
portfolio in the master investment trust comprises investments
in private equity and hedge funds. The private equity and hedge
fund investments are generally measured at net asset value.
However, in certain instances, the values reported by the asset
managers were not current at the measurement date. Accordingly,
ITT has estimated adjustments to the last reported value where
necessary to measure the assets at fair value at the measurement
date.
These adjustments consider information received from the asset
managers, as well as general market information. The adjustment
recorded for these assets represented approximately one percent
of total plan assets. Asset values for other positions were
generally measured using market observable prices.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, New Accounting Pronouncements, in
the Notes to the Combined Financial Statements for a complete
discussion of recent accounting pronouncements. There were no
new pronouncements which we expect to have a material impact on
our financial condition and results of operations in future
periods.
66
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we
are exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates and commodity prices, which may adversely affect
our operating results and financial position. The impact from
changes in market conditions is generally minimized through our
normal operating and financing activities. We do not use
derivative instruments to manage these exposures.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Exposures
Our foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to receipts from
customers, payments to suppliers and intercompany transactions
denominated in foreign currencies. We may use derivative
financial instruments to offset risk related to receipts from
customers and payments to suppliers, when it is believed that
the exposure will not be limited by our normal operating and
financing activities. Our principal currency exposures relate to
the Euro, Swedish Krona, British Pound, Australian Dollar,
Canadian Dollar, Polish Zloty, and Hungarian Forint. We estimate
that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency
exchange rates would not be material to WCOs financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Commodity
Price Exposures
Portions of our business are exposed to volatility in the prices
of certain commodities, such as copper, nickel and aluminum,
among others. Our primary exposure to this volatility resides
with the use of these materials in purchased component parts. We
generally maintain long-term fixed price contracts on raw
materials and component parts; however, we are prone to exposure
as these contracts expire. We estimate that a hypothetical 10%
adverse movement in prices for raw metal commodities would not
be material to the financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
67
BUSINESS
Our
Company
Our Company is a world leader in the design, manufacturing, and
application of highly engineered technologies for the water
industry. We are a leading equipment and service provider for
water and wastewater applications with a broad portfolio of
products and services addressing the full cycle of water, from
collection, distribution and use to the return of water to the
environment. Our Companys brands, such as Bell &
Gossett and Flygt, are well known throughout the industry and
have served the water market for many years. Over the years, we
have leveraged our heritage strength in wastewater pumping
technologies to expand into wastewater treatment, and later into
clean water treatment and water quality analysis. We believe we
are strongly positioned to use our deep applications expertise
and offer our customers a full spectrum of service offerings in
the transportation, treatment and testing of water. Net sales
and operating income for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 were $3.2 billion and
$388 million, respectively, and for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 were $890 million and
$100 million, respectively.
We operate in two segments, Water Infrastructure and Applied
Water. The Water Infrastructure segment focuses on the
transportation, treatment and testing of water, offering a range
of products including water and wastewater pumps, treatment and
testing equipment, and controls and systems. Key brands include
Flygt, Wedeco, Godwin Pumps, WTW, Sanitaire, AADI and Leopold.
The Applied Water segment encompasses all the uses of water and
focuses on the residential, commercial, industrial and
agricultural markets. The segments major products include
pumps, valves, heat exchangers, controls and dispensing
equipment. Key brands in this segment include Goulds,
Bell & Gossett, AC Fire, Standard, Flojet, Lowara,
Jabsco and Flowtronex. In both our segments, we benefit from a
large and growing installed base of products driving growth in
aftermarket sales for replacement parts and services.
Our global manufacturing footprint enables us to optimize
sourcing, lower production costs and localize products. We serve
a global customer base across diverse end markets while offering
localized expertise. We sell our products in more than 140
countries through a balanced distribution network consisting of
our direct sales force and independent channel partners. In
2010, approximately 65% of our revenues were generated outside
the United States.
We believe our companys operational structure and strategy
will drive sustained, profitable growth in the markets we serve.
We have a seasoned management team that has demonstrated its
ability to strategically grow a global engineering and
manufacturing enterprise while expanding positions throughout
the global water industry. We believe our businesses are well
positioned to continue to grow by enhancing our product and
application offerings and expanding our customer base in each of
our strategic markets.
Our
Industry
Our planet faces a serious water challenge. Less than 1% of the
total water available on earth is fresh water, which is
declining due to factors such as the draining of aquifers,
increased pollution and climate change. In addition to this
declining supply, demand is rising rapidly due to population
growth, industrial expansion, and increased agricultural
development, with consumption estimated to double every
20 years. By 2025, over 30% of the worlds population
is expected to live in areas without adequate water supply. Even
in developed countries with sufficient supply, existing
infrastructure for water supply is relatively underfunded and
aging. In the United States, degrading pipe systems leak one out
of every six gallons of water, on average, on its way from a
treatment plant to the customer. These challenges are driving
opportunities for growth in the global water industry, which we
estimate to have a total market size of $500 billion.
The water industry supply chain comprises Equipment and Services
companies, Design and Build service providers, and water
utilities. Equipment and Service providers serve two distinct
customer types. The first, utilities, supplies water through an
infrastructure network. Companies that operate on this side of
the supply chain provide single, or sometimes combined,
functions from equipment manufacturing and services to facility
design (engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC firms)
to plant operations (utilities), as depicted below in Figure 1.
The utility and EPC customers are looking for technology and
application expertise from
68
their Equipment and Services providers, due to trends such as
rising pollution, stricter regulations, and the increased
outsourcing of process knowledge by utilities. The second
customer type, the end users of water, comprises a wide array of
entities, ranging from farms to power plants to residential
homes. These customers are predominately served through
specialized distributors and original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs).
|
|
Figure 1: |
Water Industry Supply Chain, based upon Global Water
Intelligences Global Water Market 2011 and
Management Estimates
|
Our business focuses on the beginning of the supply chain, by
providing technology-intensive equipment and services. We sell
our equipment and services via direct and indirect channels that
serve the needs of each customer type. On the utility side, we
provide over 70% direct sales with strong application expertise,
with the remaining amount going through distribution partners.
To end users of water, we provide over 85% of our sales through
long-standing relationships with the worlds leading
distributors, with the remainder going direct to customers. The
total market opportunity for this Equipment and Services portion
of the water industry supply chain is estimated at
$280 billion.
The Equipment and Services market addresses the key processes of
the water industry, which is best illustrated through the cycle
of water, as depicted in Figure 2, below. We believe this
industry has two distinct sectors within the cycle of water:
Supply Infrastructure and Usage Applications. The key processes
of this cycle begin when raw water is extracted by pumps, which
provide the necessary pressure and flow, to move, or
Transport, this water from natural sources, such as
lakes, oceans or aquifers through pipes to a treatment facility.
Treatment facilities can provide many forms of treatment,
such as filtration, disinfection and desalination, to remove
solids, bacteria, and salt, respectively. A network of pipes and
pumps again Transport this clean water to where it is
needed, such as to crops for Irrigation, to power plants
to provide cooling in Industrial Water, or to an
apartment building as drinking water in Residential,
Commercial and Building Services. After usage, the
wastewater is collected by a separate network of pipes and pumps
and transported to a wastewater treatment facility, where
processes such as digestion deactivate and reduce the volume of
solids, and disinfection purifies effluent water. Once treated,
analytical instruments Test the treated water to ensure
69
regulatory requirements are met so that it can be discharged
back to the environment, thereby completing the cycle.
Figure 2: Cycle of Water
Our two operating segments are aligned with each of the sectors
in the cycle of water: Water Infrastructure serves the Supply
Infrastructure sector, and Applied Water serves Usage
Applications. Within the Supply Infrastructure sector, our pump
systems Transport water from aquifers, lakes, rivers and
seas. From there, our filtration, UV and ozone systems provide
Treatment, making the water fit for use. After
consumption, our pump lift stations move the wastewater to
treatment facilities where our mixers, biological treatment,
monitoring, and control systems provide the primary functions in
the treatment process. Throughout each of these stages, our
analytical systems Test and ensure water quality,
allowing the water to be consumed and returned to nature. Our
served market size in this sector is approximately
$16 billion.
In the Usage Applications sector, we participate in all major
areas of water demand. Irrigation is approximately 70% of
all water usage globally. Examples of what we provide include:
boosting systems for farming irrigation, pumps for dairy
operations, and rainwater reuse systems for small scale crop and
turf irrigation. Industrial Water applications account
for 20% of global consumption. Our pumps, heat exchangers,
valves and controls provide cooling to power plants and
manufacturing facilities, as well as circulation for food and
beverage processing. The remaining 10% of global water use
resides in human and building consumption, where we deliver
water boosting systems for drinking, heating, ventilation and
air conditioning (HVAC) and fire protection systems to
Residential and Commercial Building Services. Our
served market size in this sector is estimated at
$14 billion.
70
Customers in the water industry vary by end market. Two end
markets exist within the Supply Infrastructure sector: public
utility and industrial, representing 85% and 15% of the total
equipment and services market, respectively. The public utility
market comprises public, private and public-private institutions
that handle water and wastewater for mostly residential and
commercial purposes. The industrial market involves the supply
of water and removal of wastewater for industrial facilities.
Sales in our Water Infrastructure segment are approximately 63%
in the public utility market, and 37% in the industrial market.
We view the main macro drivers of this sector to be water
quality, the desire for
energy-efficient
products, water scarcity and infrastructure needs, for both the
repair of aging systems in developed countries and new
installations in developing countries. These markets tend to be
less cyclical and are estimated to grow annually in the
mid-single digits through 2015, according to management
estimates.
In the Usage Applications sector, end-use customers fall into
four main markets: residential, commercial, industrial and
agricultural. Homeowners represent the end users in the
residential market. Owners and managers of properties such as
apartment buildings, retail stores, hospitals, and hotels are
examples of end users in the commercial market. The industrial
market is wide ranging, involving developers and managers of
facilities operated by electrical power generators, chemical
manufacturers, machine shops, clothing manufacturers, beverage
production and dispensing firms and car washes. The agricultural
market end users are owners and operators of businesses such as
crop and livestock farms, aquaculture, golf courses, and other
turf applications. Sales in our Applied Water segment are
approximately 38% industrial, 33% commercial, 22% residential
and 7% agricultural. We believe population growth and
urbanization are the two primary macro drivers of these markets,
as these trends drive the need for housing, food, community
services and retail goods within growing city centers. Water
reuse and conservation are driving the need for new
technologies. Annual total market growth in these industrial,
commercial, residential, and agricultural markets is estimated
to be in the low- to mid-single digits through 2015, according
to internal management estimates.
Our
Competitive Strengths
Our leading positions in the markets we serve result from the
following competitive strengths:
Leading
Brands in a Diversified Product Portfolio
We are among the worlds largest water equipment and
services companies and have global leading product positions in
core applications across the water cycle, from the manufacturing
of submersible pumps under our Flygt brand to the key products
used in plumbing and water-based heating and air conditioning
markets manufactured through our Bell & Gossett brand.
Although other equipment and services companies are diversified,
in that they serve markets outside of water as well, we are one
of the largest water companies in the industry that is
exclusively focused on water equipment and services. In
addition, we have capabilities in transport, treatment and
testing of water and have consistently demonstrated the ability
to develop new offerings that anticipate the manufacturing,
installation and servicing needs of our customers, such as the
innovative water collection and distribution systems that used
Goulds pumps and a Bell & Gossett pumping package to
conserve clean water at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, and the
Lowara water booster sets used to even water supply pressure in
the worlds tallest building, Burj Dubai, in
the United Arab Emirates. Our brands, such as Flygt,
Bell & Gossett, Wedeco, Sanitaire, Lowara, Godwin
Pumps, Goulds, WTW and Jabsco, among others, have been in
existence for over 150 years and are globally recognized as
leading brands for quality in the markets they serve.
Culture
of Innovation and Strong Application Expertise
Our business invented the first submersible sewage pump, and we
remain the worlds largest manufacturer of submersible
wastewater pumps. We have built upon this deep legacy and
expertise by developing new, more efficient designs and more
advanced application solutions. In 1999, we led the industry in
wastewater pumps with the launch of the Flygt N-pump,
guaranteeing at least a 25% improvement in energy consumption
compared to any installed, non-Flygt system. In recent years, we
designed a standardized range of lift stations, called The
Optimal Pumping (TOP) Station, to quickly and simply install
full lift stations, rather than design, order, and assemble all
the components needed at various pipeline locations. The TOP
Station is now a staple
71
of our product line. In 2009, we launched the next generation
N-pump, called the Adaptive N-pump, which eliminates virtually
all forms of clogging, and therefore improves maintenance and
efficiency costs, even under the most difficult conditions.
Similarly, we also launched the next generation vertical
multi-stage pump in 2011, called eSV, which brings benefits in
energy efficiency and maintenance costs to water boosting in
multiple end uses. This innovation around new technology and
application solutions is an expertise we deploy across all
product lines and brands, and we continuously seek to improve
our products and invest in the development of new,
differentiated technologies to best fit our customers
needs.
Large
Installed Base Driving Strong Aftermarket Revenues
By virtue of our global scale and tenure, we have one of the
largest installed bases in the water equipment market. This
provides us with a highly profitable and recurring revenue
stream from the sale of parts, repair services, and end of
lifecycle product replacements. During their lifecycle,
installed products require maintenance, repair services and
parts due to the harsh environments in which they operate. In
2010, 16% of our total revenue was derived from sales of repair
parts and services. In addition, depending on the type of
product, median lifecycles range from 5 years to over
50 years, at which time the products must be replaced. Many
of our products are precisely selected and applied within a
larger network of equipment, driving a strong preference by
customers and installers to replace them with the same exact
brand and model when they reach the end of their lifecycle. This
dynamic establishes a large recurring revenue stream for our
business.
Diverse
Customer Base and Established International Distribution
Channels
Our customer base spans numerous industries and regions, with no
single customer representing more than 2% of our revenue and
approximately 65% of our 2010 revenues derived from operations
outside of the United States, including 18% from emerging market
countries. We sell our products through a balanced distribution
network, with more than 1,800 direct sales employees and more
than 2,700 independent distributors in more than 140 countries.
Our global reach within the highly fragmented global water
industry allows us to align our sales strategy to meet the needs
of our customers in specific end markets, as we are better able
to optimize sourcing, lower our production costs, and enable
product localization and application expertise. In our Water
Infrastructure segment, we maintain close customer relationships
through our direct sales force, allowing us to quickly respond
to a dynamic and highly regulated environment in which some of
our customers operate, including public utility and industrial
clients. In our Applied Water segment, we use distributors from
our global independent distribution network, several of whom are
exclusive distributors, to sell our products.
Proven
Operating Performance
Our strong profit margins, combined with our disciplined
approach to investing and managing our capital and our focus on
higher-margin business opportunities, enable us to generate
strong and recurring cash flow. Following our 2008
restructuring, implemented prior to the recent economic
downturn, we positioned the cost structure of our company to
realize strong margin improvements driven by robust sales
growth. For instance, in 2010, our operating margin increased
240 basis points to 12.1% as compared to the prior year. We
focus on productivity and efficiency within our manufacturing
facilities by driving operational efficiencies through the
application of Lean Six Sigma and other continuous improvement
programs.
Experienced
Management Team
Our senior management team is highly regarded in the water
equipment and services industry and has significant experience
in leadership roles. Collectively, the top nine senior
executives have an average of 20 years of experience in
managing large global industrial businesses. They have a
successful track record of enabling our company to recognize and
capitalize upon attractive opportunities in the key markets we
serve, and our executive management teams have a strong record
of winning new business, reducing costs, improving working
capital and executing operating efficiencies.
72
Our
Growth Strategy
Our strategy is focused on enhancing shareholder value by
providing solutions for our customers, and by growing revenues,
both organically and through strategic acquisitions. Key
elements of our strategy are summarized below:
Grow
Our Product Offerings and Solutions through Portfolio
Differentiation
We will continue to extend leading market positions where we
have a strong competitive position, cost leadership and proven
technology. In addition, we will invest in the differentiation
of our core product lines to build on our strong product and
application expertise. We also plan to expand into adjacent and
complementary technologies as demonstrated by the recent
acquisitions of analytical instrumentation and dewatering
solutions businesses.
Focus
on Organic Growth Initiatives
We have launched a global commercial excellence initiative,
deploying people, processes and tools to make our sales and
marketing teams more effective and efficient. We have trained
over 500 front-line sales agents under this initiative and have
30 dedicated commercial excellence leaders to service our most
profitable accounts. In addition, we have launched digital
selling tools, which improve our value propositions, and have
built a strategic accounts program to focus on our most
important customers. These efforts have already improved the
revenues generated per sales agent across our businesses. We
will continue to make investments in customer relationship
management, mobile technologies, customer applications and other
technologies that improve our knowledge of customers and the
critical activities that drive growth.
Investing
in New Technology and Innovation
We will continue to make targeted investments in research and
development activities to develop breakthrough products and
solutions. We will pursue and execute a robust pipeline of
opportunities in core and emerging markets. We have established
a wastewater Center of Excellence, in Stockholm, Sweden, with
over 100 research, development and engineering employees. We
have launched engineering Centers of Excellence in India and
China, where we are accelerating the customization of our
application expertise to local needs. Our engineers will
continue to work closely with our customers in an effort to
identify new applications for our products and develop new
technologies and solutions to expand our current portfolio
further.
Build
on Our Presence in Fast-Growing Emerging Markets
Urbanization trends and growth in the middle class in developing
countries are generating significant demand for water
applications. We intend to continue to capture this growth by
further expanding into emerging markets, such as China, India
and Brazil, increasing our existing presence of over 40
facilities. We plan to leverage our strong global reach,
manufacturing footprint and extensive distribution network to
capitalize on growth opportunities in these regions. We will
continue to establish and reinforce local capabilities by
growing our local presence in these markets with investments in
sales, marketing and manufacturing capabilities globally.
Growth
through Disciplined Acquisitions
Acquisitions are an important part of our growth strategy.
Certain segments of the global water industry we serve are
highly fragmented, providing numerous acquisition opportunities.
We have successfully completed and integrated 20 acquisitions
over the past five years, including Godwin Pumps, Nova
Analytics, and OI Corporation, and we will selectively pursue
highly targeted acquisitions that will broaden our core product
portfolio, expand our geographic footprint and enhance our
position in strategic markets.
73
Our
Business Segments
We operate in two business segments that are aligned with the
cycle of water and the key strategic market applications they
provide: Water Infrastructure (collection, distribution, return)
and Applied Water (usage). The table and descriptions below
provide an overview of our business segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
2010
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Applications
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Major Products
|
|
Primary Brands
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
Transport
Treatment
Test
|
|
$
|
1,436
377
117
$1,930
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
20%
6%
100%
|
|
Water and wastewater pumps
Filtration, disinfection and biological treatment equipment
Test equipment
Controls
|
|
Flygt
Wedeco
Godwin Pumps
WTW
Sanitaire
AADI
Leopold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
Building Services
Industrial Water
Irrigation
|
|
$
|
723
509
95
$1,327
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
38%
7%
100%
|
|
Pumps
Valves
Heat exchangers
Controls
Dispensing equipment systems
|
|
Goulds
Bell & Gossett
AC Fire
Standard
Lowara
Jabsco
Flojet
Flowtronex
|
Most of our product portfolio is involved in Transport and
comprises water pumps, pumping systems and pump-related
equipment and services across both our segments, which
represented 83% of our revenue for each of the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. In recent years, we have
built our capabilities in Treatment, the cleaning of water and
wastewater, and Test, the measurement of water characteristics
such as quality. Both of these application areas, Treatment and
Test, reside within the Water Infrastructure segment.
Water
Infrastructure
Water Infrastructure involves the process that collects water
from a source and distributes it to users, and then returns the
wastewater responsibly to the environment. Water Infrastructure
serves three basic closely linked applications:
Transport, Treatment and Test of water and
wastewater for two types of customers: public utilities and
industrial facilities. We believe our served market size for
this segment is approximately $16 billion, comprising
served markets of approximately $11 billion for Transport,
$3 billion for Treatment and $2 billion for Test.
Transport
The Transport application includes all of the equipment and
services involved in the safe and efficient movement of water
from sources, such as oceans, lakes, rivers and ground water, to
treatment facilities, and then to users. It also includes the
movement of wastewater from the point of use to a treatment
facility and then back into the environment. We serve the
higher-value
equipment markets, such as water and wastewater submersible
pumps, monitoring controls, and application solutions; we do not
serve the market for lower-value equipment such as pipes and
fittings. We believe our business is the largest player in this
served market based on management estimates. With operations on
six continents, we also have the worlds largest dewatering
rental fleet, serviced with our Flygt and Godwin brands.
Flygt - Flygt is the worlds premier manufacturer of
submersible pumps, mixers, and aeration equipment for use in
environments such as water and wastewater treatment, raw water
supply, abrasive or contaminated industrial processes, mining
and crop irrigation. The Flygt brand was founded in 1901 in
Lindås, Sweden and developed the worlds first
submersible close-coupled motor-driven pump. Flygt products have
leading non-clogging capabilities and innovative N-technology,
which provide customers with highly sustainable efficiencies and
lowest total cost of ownership. Flygt products have applications
in various markets, including wastewater lift stations, water
and wastewater treatment facilities, pressurized sewage systems,
oil and gas,
74
steel, mining and leisure markets. Customers include public
utility wastewater and clean water treatment facilities, oil and
gas platforms, and steel manufacturing companies. As an example,
Flygt recently served the village of Hartland, WI, population
8,350, located in Wisconsins Lake Country. The Hartland
Department of Public Works (DPW) is, among other things,
responsible for operation and maintenance of sanitary sewers,
lift stations and manholes. The DPW had experienced a range of
problems resulting from ongoing clogging of the pumps in their
collection-system lift stations. Replacing the pumps with
self-cleaning Flygt N-pumps eliminated the clogging as well as
unscheduled and costly service calls.
Godwin Pumps - With more than 30 years as a leader
in pump manufacturing, Godwin Pumps has established itself as a
well-recognized and respected brand in the global portable pump
market for removal of temporary, unwanted water. It
manufactures, sells, rents and services products that are
economical, reliable and customized to the specific needs of its
clients. Founded in Quenington, England, Godwin Pumps is
currently headquartered in Bridgeport, NJ. Godwin Pumps
products include the fully automatic self-priming Dri-Prime
pump, a range of
Sub-Prime
electric and Heidra hydraulic submersible pumps, Wet-Prime
gasoline-powered contractor pumps and a broad line of generators
and portable light towers. Godwin products are primarily used in
construction, disaster recovery, flooding, heavy industry,
marine use, mining, oil, gas and chemical extraction,
refineries, temporary fire protection and water and wastewater
transport. Customers include industrial plants, construction
contractors, public utility wastewaters and clean water
treatment and transportation facilities, oil, gas and chemical
drilling outfits, and refineries. Godwins fleet of
equipment is rented through 32 U.S. branches and a global
network of distributors.
Treatment
The Treatment application includes equipment and services that
treat water for consumption and wastewater to be returned
responsibly to the environment. While there are several
treatment solutions in the market today, we focus on three basic
treatment types: (i) filtration, (ii) disinfection and
(iii) biological treatment systems. Filtration uses
gravity-based media filters and clarifiers to clean both water
and wastewater. Leopold, with more than 80 years of
experience, is our leading filtration brand. Disinfection
systems, both ultraviolet (UV) and ozone oxidation, treat both
public utility drinking water and wastewater, as well as
industrial process water, and are provided through our WEDECO
brand. Biological treatment systems are key to the treatment of
solids in wastewater plants, which is provided through our
Sanitaire brand. We believe our business is the largest player
in this served market based on management estimates.
Sanitaire - Launched in 1967, the Sanitaire brand
provides complete biological wastewater treatment solutions for
public utility and industrial applications. Sanitaires
comprehensive offering includes diffused aeration, sequencing
batch reactors, drum filters and state-of-the-art controls.
Sanitaire is regarded as a leading brand in diffused aeration,
which is a process that introduces air into a liquid, providing
an aerobic environment for degradation of organic matter. Fine
pore diffusion of air is highly competitive due to its high
oxygen transfer efficiency and lower energy costs. Sanitaire
wide-band aeration systems are used in applications such as grit
chambers and sludge that require non-clogging, maintenance-free
systems. Principal Sanitaire customers are public utility and
industrial wastewater treatment facilities.
WEDECO - WEDECO was founded in 1975 in Herford, Germany
to develop chemical-free and environmentally friendly water
treatment technologies, including ultraviolet light and ozone
systems. There are over 250,000 installed WEDECO systems for UV
disinfection and ozone oxidation globally in private, public
utility and industrial locations. WEDECO introduced ozone
technology in 1988 and has been expanding internationally ever
since. UV disinfection systems have a number of applications
including water treatment and aquaculture. Ozone disinfection
systems have applications in drinking water, wastewater, process
water, product polishing, bleaching, ozonolysis/synthesis and
desodoration. Customers include public utility wastewater and
clean water treatment facilities, power plants, pulp and paper
mills, food products manufacturers and aquaculture facilities.
Leopold - Founded in 1924 in Pittsburgh, PA, Leopold is a
leader in rapid gravity media filtration and clarification
solutions for the water and wastewater industry. In Potable
Drinking Water treatment plants, the Clari-DAF system is used to
clarify raw water to remove contaminants such as turbidity,
algae, color, iron/
75
manganese, organics, and taste and odor compounds. In public
utility wastewater treatment plants, the ClariVAC system is used
in final clarifiers to remove the sludge solids. For those areas
where nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient removal is required, we
provide elimi-NITE systems which convert the filters to become
biologically active so that the effluent meets the mandated
nitrate and phosphorus levels. In desalination systems, Leopold
Clari-DAF systems and Filterworx systems are provided to remove
contaminants that will harm reverse osmosis membranes, so that
salt can be removed from the seawater to make it potable.
Primary customers are public utility water and wastewater
systems, as well as desalination plant facilities.
Test
Analytical instrumentation is used across most industries to
ensure regulatory requirements are met. Growth in this market is
primarily driven by increasing regulation of water and
wastewater in North America, Europe and Asia. Largely through
our 2010 acquisition of Nova Analytics, our served market is
predominately focused on water and the environment for quality
levels throughout the water infrastructure loop. Analytical
systems are applied in three primary ways: in the field, in a
facility laboratory, or real time, online monitoring in a
treatment facility process. We believe we have a leading
position in this served market based on management estimates.
WTW - In wastewater treatment facilities, WTW branded
systems monitor parameters such as dissolved oxygen, pH, and
turbidity throughout the water process to ensure regulatory
standards are met before water is discharged back into the
environment. Founded in 1945 as a major brand in Europe, WTW has
particularly strong market penetration in the environmental,
water and wastewater segments. WTW holds leading market
positions in both field and on-line instrumentation and
manufactures premium positioned robust and reliable analysis
products for the measurement of pH, dissolved oxygen,
conductivity, total dissolved solids, turbidity, specific ions
and biological oxygen demand. WTWs product offering
includes meters, sensors, data-loggers, photometers and software
providing customers solutions to even the most challenging
applications.
AADI - Aanderaa Data Instruments AS (AADI), founded in
1966 and headquartered in Bergen, Norway, offers sensors,
instruments and systems for measuring and monitoring in the most
demanding environments such as rivers, oceans and the polar
regions through fully networked systems using wireless
technology that monitors temperature, salinity, oxygen,
turbidity, current and waves for ecosystem health. The main
market areas are marine transportation, environmental and ocean
research, oil and gas, aquaculture, road and traffic, and
construction. AADIs new technologies underlie the most
advanced distributed instrumentation for underwater and
atmospheric measurements. Hydro acoustic, electro-optical,
electro-chemical, pressure, temperature and meteorological data
are captured by observing networks and self-contained
instrumentation using real-time communication. Key customers
include many oceanographic institutes, universities, geophysical
surveyors, navies, offshore oil and gas companies, drilling
companies, port and harbor authorities, government agencies,
water authorities and electric power utilities internationally.
Applied
Water
Applied Water encompasses all the uses of water. Since water is
used to some degree in almost every aspect of human, economic
and environmental activity, this segment has innumerable
applications. Our served market today consists of the main uses
of global water: Building Services, Industrial Water and
Irrigation. We believe our served market size for this segment
is approximately $14 billion, comprising served markets of
approximately $8 billion for Building Services,
$4 billion for Industrial Water and $2 billion for
Irrigation.
Building
Services
This business is defined by four main uses of water in building
services applications, such as in residential homes and
commercial buildings, including offices, hotels, restaurants and
malls. The first is the supply of potable water for consumption,
such as for drinking and hygiene. The Goulds brand is a leader
in pumps and boosting systems utilized within buildings,
sourcing water from distribution networks or from wells. The
second application is wastewater removal with sump and sewage
pumps. The third application is in heating, ventilation and air
conditioning (HVAC), where Bell & Gossett specializes
in pumps and valves that
76
are used in water-based heating and cooling systems. The fourth
water-related building service area is fire protection, where
our AC Fire brand supplies full pump systems for emergency fire
suppression. In Europe, Lowara is a leading brand in the
commercial and residential water market with applications in the
four main uses of water. We believe our business is the second
largest player in this served market based on management
estimates.
Industrial
Water
Water is used in most industrial facilities to provide
processing steps such as cooling, cleaning and mixing. Our
Goulds brand supplies vertical multistage pumps to boost
pressure for purposes such as circulating water through a
manufacturing facility to cool machine tools. Our Lowara brand
focuses on water treatment, industrial washing equipment and
machine tool cooling. The Standard brand delivers heat
exchangers for combined heat and power (CHP) applications within
power generation plants. We also provide niche applications such
as flexible impeller pumps for wine processing facilities served
by our Jabsco brand, and water-based detergent dispensing and
water circulation within car washes served by Flojet and Goulds
air-operated diaphragm and end suction pumps. Across all these
various end applications, we believe our business is the second
largest player in this served market based on management
estimates.
Irrigation
The irrigation business consists of irrigation-related equipment
and services associated with bringing water from a source to the
plant or livestock need, including hoses, sprinklers, center
pivot and drip irrigation. We focus on the pumps and boosting
systems that supply this ancillary equipment with water. Our
Goulds brand brings mixed flow pumps, and our Flowtronex group
specializes in equipment solutions such as the Hydrovar boosting
system, which incorporates monitoring and controls to optimize
energy efficiency in irrigation delivery. Our Lowara brand also
produces pumps for agriculture applications and irrigation of
gardens and parks. We believe we have a leading position in this
served market based on management estimates.
As described above, the following brands and products are used
across the applications in our Applied Water segment:
Goulds - With origins dating back over 150 years,
Goulds is a leading brand of centrifugal and turbine pumps,
controllers, variable frequency drives and accessories for
residential and commercial water supply and wastewater
applications. Goulds is a leader in the water technologies
market with its line of residential water well pumps. The Goulds
product portfolio includes submersible and line shaft turbine,
4 submersible, jet, sump, effluent, sewage and centrifugal
pumps for residential, agriculture and irrigation, sewage and
drainage, commercial and light industrial use. Goulds
submersible, deepwell or other pumps can be found in more than a
quarter of the existing 15 million household wells and more
than 380,000 public and community wells in the United States.
Products for commercial wastewater include sewage, effluent and
grinder pumps and packages. Agriculture products include pump
and control products for irrigation, stockwater, wash systems,
cooling systems and waste management, with turf irrigation
products including submersible and surface pumps for landscape
and turf irrigation systems. We serve the building trades market
with filtration, chilling, pressure boost, wash system, water,
supply, wastewater and boiler feed applications. We also have a
range of standard cast iron and bronze end-suction and
multistage pumps for various commercial applications.
Lowara - Founded in 1968, and headquartered in Vicenza,
Italy, Lowara is a leader in stainless steel pump manufacturing
technology for water technology applications. The Lowara range
includes submersible, sump, effluent, sewage, centrifugal pumps
and booster packages for water supply and water pumping needs in
the residential, agriculture, industrial, public utility,
building service and commercial markets worldwide, with
particular strength in Europe. Residential applications include
pumps for pressurization, conditioning, fire-fighting systems,
lifting stations and dewatering. Agriculture applications
include pumps for irrigation of gardens and parks. Industrial
applications include drinking water, water treatment, industrial
washing equipment and machine tool cooling. As an example of how
Lowara has served the commercial building
77
services market, seven Lowara water booster sets are used for
even pressure water supply in the worlds tallest building,
Burj Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.
Bell & Gossett - Founded in 1916 in Chicago,
IL, Bell & Gossett has been headquartered in Morton
Grove, IL since 1941. Bell & Gossett, or B&G, is
a leader in plumbing and water-based heating and air
conditioning markets. Products are used in residential
applications where single- or multi-family homes are heated with
hot water or steam. Key products include circulating pumps,
valves, and specialty products used in these systems. B&G
also sells wastewater pumps for residential applications. In
commercial applications, B&G provides a broad range of
products, including a wide variety of pumps, heat exchangers,
valves and controls for heating and air-conditioning systems,
sump pumps for wastewater systems, condensate pumping systems
for steam heating systems and a comprehensive line of
energy-saving variable speed controls. Training is provided for
Building System Design Engineers at B&Gs industry
renowned Little Red Schoolhouse in Morton Grove. Key commercial
building types include hospitals, schools, and data centers.
B&G products are sold globally by independent manufacturer
representatives and distributed locally by heating, ventilating
and air conditioning, or HVAC, wholesalers. B&G recently
sold some of its largest pumps to the new Childrens
Memorial Hospital building in Chicago, IL. These pumps will
circulate chilled water throughout the building to provide
air-conditioning for the occupants.
AC Fire - Allis-Chalmers Company was founded in the 1840s
in Milwaukee, WI. It offers turnkey fire pump systems for
commercial, residential and industrial applications. We design
and custom-build a wide range of fire pump systems including
prefabricated packages and house units that meet every fire
protection need. AC Fire products include In-Line Pumps,
Vertical Turbine, Package Systems, Split Case (various series)
and 13D Home Defender for residential fire pump service. The 13D
Home Defender is designed to boost water pressure for automatic
residential sprinkler systems. In addition to residential
applications, turnkey fire pumping systems from A-C Pump protect
an increasing number of petrochemical facilities, commercial
buildings and factories around the world.
Flowtronex - Flowtronex, founded in 1974 as Pumping
Systems, Inc., began by producing some of the golf
industrys first prefabricated water pumping systems. ITT
opened a new 125,000 square foot manufacturing facility in
Dallas, TX to support the companys growth in the public
utility and turf/irrigation markets. The Silent Storm package
and Pace Integrated Pump Controller are our two primary products
sold into the golf market. In landscape, Flowtronex products,
primarily the Floboy system, are sold to customers such as
cities and nurseries. In golf, Flowtronex products are sold to
golf course superintendents through our Toro Distribution
partnership. Retrofit sales of golf pumping systems are sold
through our FlowNet Service Network, a group of factory
authorized service technicians that provide set up and start up
and service and repair of Flowtronex pump stations.
Standard - For close to 90 years Standard has been
the leader in the design and manufacture of shell and tube heat
exchangers. Standard is the brand of our complete line of heat
transfer products used in industrial and process applications
such as heating or cooling liquids or gases, heat recovery in
chemical processing, power and co-generation, paper and pulp,
OEM and commercial marine markets. Products include basic
shell-and-tube
heat exchanger, air coolers, heat transfer coils, compact
brazed, welded, gasketed plate units and packaged steam
condensers.
Jabsco - The Jabsco brand is known for its marine,
industrial, and hygienic/sanitary pumps and systems that are
used in many industries, including marine, industrial,
healthcare and food processing. It was founded in 1941 by the
inventors of the flexible impeller pump. Jabsco is a leader in
the leisure marine market, with a broad range of products
including water system, engine cooling pumps, searchlights and
marine waste systems. Jabsco also offers industrial pumps for
hygienic applications, fluid transfer in chemical processing,
laboratory, paint processing, plating, and construction. Jabsco
rotary lobe pumps offer outstanding performance with unique
capabilities. Jabsco Hy-line and Ultima rotary lobe pumps
support food and dairy product production, healthcare, chemical,
pharmaceutical and biotech applications, whether the product is
thin, viscous or fragile. Jabsco also offers multi-purpose and
specialized flexible impeller, diaphragm and sliding vane pumps
for chemical and general transfer applications.
78
Flojet - Established in 1975, the Flojet brand
encompasses a broad range of small pumps, motors and dispensing
pumps for the beverage, industrial, RV, marine and food
processing markets. Flojet is a leader in the small pump market,
offering a versatile range of products serving the beverage
market, including both air- and motor-operated diaphragm pumps
and centrifugal chilling pumps, as well as booster systems and
accumulator tanks. Flojets beverage pumps can be found in
applications such as beer dispensing, syrup mixing for
carbonated drinks, re-circulation in vending machines and
refrigerators, bottled water dispensers, icemakers and coffee
machines. In addition to significant beverage applications,
Flojets electric and air-operated diaphragm pumps are
utilized in street sweepers, car washes, carpet cleaners, parts
washers, agricultural spraying and road rollers. Flojets
positive displacement diaphragm pumps can be driven by air,
electric motor or solenoid. The positive displacement diaphragm
design of Flojet pumps makes them ideal for use in conditions
that require self-priming and dry running capability for short
periods of time. Additionally, the compact size of these pumps
makes them very useful in tight spaces where one cannot ensure a
flooded suction. Flojet pumps are designed to be more efficient
and are often the choice of customers for applications where low
power consumption is critical.
Distribution,
Training and End Use
Water Infrastructure provides more than 70% of its sales through
direct channels with remaining sales through indirect channels
and service capabilities. Both public utility and industrial
facility customers increasingly require our teams global
but locally proficient expertise to use our equipment in their
specific applications. Several trends are increasing the need
for this application expertise: (i) the increase in type
and amount of contaminants in water supply, (ii) increasing
environmental regulations, (iii) the need to increase
system efficiencies due to rising energy costs, and
(iv) the retirement of a largely aging water industry
workforce not systematically replaced at utilities.
In the Applied Water segment, many end-use areas are widely
different, so specialized distribution partners are often
preferred. Our commercial teams have built long-standing
relationships around our brands in many of these industries
through which we can continue to leverage new product and
service applications. Revenue opportunities are balanced between
OEM and after-market customers. Our products in the Applied
Water segment are sold through our global direct sales and
world-class indirect channels with more than 85% of revenue
going through indirect channels. We have
long-standing
relationships with the leading independent distributors in the
markets we serve, and we provide incentives to distributors,
such as specialized training programs, to exclusively sell our
products.
In addition to distributors, we also provide the same training
to engineers at the EPCs who influence purchasing decisions. For
example, the Bell & Gossett Little Red Schoolhouse is
a training center in Morton Grove, IL, which we believe to be
the heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC)
industrys leading educational facility. Since it was
opened in 1954, the instructors at our Little Red Schoolhouse
have trained more than 55,000 engineers, contractors and
installers in the design, installation and maintenance of
hydronic and steam systems, while another 135,000 professionals
have received training through Bell & Gossetts
Traveling Classroom Program.
Our sales channels offer more than one brand type to a specific
application. For example, the 2010 Winter Olympics held in
Vancouver, British Columbia in February 2010, involved
unprecedented planning and coordination among many organizations
and suppliers, and we played a major role in supplying water
handling products at many of the facilities. We also supplied
pumps and controls for the heating and cooling systems in the
Speed Skating Oval, which included Bell & Gossett
brand pumps, heat exchangers and expansion tanks used in the
heating and cooling systems, as well as Goulds brand pumps and
Aquavar®
variable speed drive controllers used in the facilitys
grey water handling system. Finally, to conserve clean water at
the Olympic Village, an innovative grey water collection and
distribution system was constructed. ITTs Goulds SSV
Series vertical multi-stage pumps move collected rainwater from
storage tanks to the plumbing systems used for flushing toilets
and watering plants. A Bell & Gossett 70M-MS pumping
package maintains adequate pressure in the grey water
distribution system.
79
Aftermarket
Parts and Service
We have more than 120 service centers around the world which
employ approximately 600 service employees to provide
aftermarket parts and services to our customers. During their
lifecycle, installed products require maintenance, repair
services and parts due to the harsh environments in which they
operate. In 2010, 16% of our total revenue was derived from
sales of repair parts and services.
In addition, depending on the type of product, median lifecycles
range from 5 years to over 50 years, at which time
they must be replaced. Many of our products are precisely
selected and applied within a larger network of equipment
driving a strong preference by customers and installers to
replace them with the same exact brand and model when they reach
the end of their lifecycle. This dynamic establishes a large
recurring revenue stream for our business.
Geographic
Profile
In addition to the traditional markets of the United States and
Western Europe, opportunities in emerging markets within Asia
Pacific, Eastern Europe, Latin America and other countries are
growing. Revenue derived from emerging markets totaled 18% for
the year ended December 31, 2010. The following chart
provides an overview of our geographic profile depicted as a
percentage of revenue by customer location.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales & Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
We have over 320 locations in over 40 countries. These
properties total approximately 8.5 million square feet, of
which over 280 locations, or approximately 4.9 million
square feet, are leased. We consider the many offices, plants,
warehouses, and other properties that we own or lease to be in
good condition and generally suitable for the purposes for which
they are used. The following table shows the significant
locations by segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Segment
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
Emmaboda, Sweden
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
Owned
|
Morton Grove, Illinois
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
Owned
|
Montecchio, Italy
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
Owned
|
Auburn, New York
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
Leased
|
Lubbock, Texas
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
Owned
|
Shenyang, China
|
|
Water Infrastructure/ Applied Water
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
Owned
|
Cheektowaga, New York
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
Leased
|
Corporate Headquarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Plains, New York
|
|
Corporate Headquarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
Our corporate headquarters is currently located at
1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite 2000, White Plains, New
York. We are currently located in the same building as our
former parent, ITT, but intend to be in an independent space on
separate floors in the near term, with each company having its
own entrance, security and maintenance systems.
80
Supply
and Seasonality
We have a global manufacturing footprint, with production
facilities in Europe, North America, Latin America, and Asia. In
addition, we maintain a global network of service centers
providing after-market customer care. Service centers offer an
array of integrated service solutions for the industry
including: preventive monitoring, contract maintenance,
emergency field service, engineered upgrades, inventory
management, and overhauls for pumps and other rotating equipment.
We offer a wide range of highly engineered products. We
primarily employ
configure-to-order
capabilities to maximize manufacturing and logistics
efficiencies by producing high volumes of basic product
configurations. When we provide a
configure-to-order
solution, we configure a standard product to our customers
specifications. To a lesser extent, we provide
engineer-to-order
products to meet the customization requirements of our
customers. This process requires that we apply our technical
expertise and production capabilities to provide a non-standard
solution to the customer.
Our inventory management and distribution practices seek to
minimize inventory holding periods by taking delivery of the
inventory and manufacturing immediately prior to the sale or
distribution of products to our customers. All of our businesses
require various parts and raw materials, the availability and
prices of which may fluctuate. Parts and raw materials commonly
used in our products include motors, fabricated parts, castings,
bearings, seals, nickel, copper, aluminum, and plastics. While
we may recover some cost increases through operational
improvements, we are still exposed to some pricing risk. We
attempt to control costs through fixed-priced contracts with
suppliers and various other programs, such as our global
strategic sourcing initiative.
Our business relies on third-party suppliers, contract
manufacturing and commodity markets to secure raw materials,
parts and components used in our products. We typically acquire
materials and components through a combination of blanket and
scheduled purchase orders to support our materials requirements.
For most of our products, we have existing alternate sources of
supply, or such sources are readily available.
We may experience price volatility or supply constraints for
materials that are not available from multiple sources. From
time to time, we acquire certain inventory in anticipation of
supply constraints or enter into longer-term pricing commitments
with vendors to improve the priority, price and availability of
supply. There have been no raw material shortages that have had
a significant adverse impact on our business as a whole.
Customers
Our business is not dependent on any single customer or a few
customers, the loss of which would have a material adverse
effect on the respective market or on us as a whole. No
individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our combined
2010 revenue.
Competition
Given the highly fragmented nature of the water industry, Water
Infrastructure competes with a large number of businesses. The
larger global peers include: Gorman Rupp Company, IDEX
Corporation, and KSB Group (with respect to transport pumps,
systems and control equipment); Pall Corporation, Nalco Company,
and Parkson Corporation (with respect to treatment equipment);
Danaher Corporation and Thermo Fisher Scientific (with respect
to analytical instruments).
Competition in the water transport and treatment technologies
markets focuses on product performance, application expertise,
design, quality, delivery, and price. In the sale of products
and services, we benefit from our large installed base of pumps
and complementary products, which require maintenance, repair
and replacement parts due to the nature of the products and the
conditions under which they operate. Timeliness of delivery,
quality and the proximity of service centers are important
customer considerations when selecting a provider for
after-market products and services. In geographic regions where
we are locally positioned to provide a quick response, customers
have historically relied on us, rather than our competitors, for
after-market products relating to our highly engineered and
customized solutions.
81
Competition in the Applied Water segment focuses on brand names,
application expertise, product delivery and performance,
quality, and price. We compete by offering a wide variety of
innovative and high-quality products, coupled with world-class
application expertise. We believe our distribution through
well-established channels and our reputation for quality
significantly enhance our market position. Our ability to
deliver innovative product offerings has allowed us to compete
effectively, to cultivate and maintain customer relationships
and to serve and to expand into many niche and new markets.
Research &
Development
Research and development is a key element of our engineering
culture and is generally focused on the design and development
of products and application know-how that anticipate customer
needs and emerging trends. Our engineers are involved in new
product development and improvement of existing products. Our
businesses invest substantial resources for research and
development (R&D) activities. We anticipate we will
continue to develop and invest in our R&D capabilities to
promote a steady flow of innovative, high-quality and reliable
products and applications to further strengthen our position in
the markets we serve. We invested $74 million,
$63 million and $64 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, towards
research and development.
We have over 600 engineering and research employees in more than
40 technology centers around the world. R&D activities are
initially conducted in our technology centers, located in
conjunction with some of our major manufacturing facilities to
ensure an efficient development process. We have established a
wastewater Center of Excellence, in Stockholm, Sweden, with over
100 research, development and engineering employees. We have
launched Centers of Excellence in India and China, where we are
accelerating the customization of our application expertise to
local needs. In the
scale-up
process, our R&D activities are conducted at our piloting
and testing facilities or at strategic customer sites. These
piloting and testing facilities enable us to serve our strategic
markets in each region of the world.
We generally seek patent protection for those inventions and
improvements likely to be incorporated into our products or
where proprietary rights will improve our competitive position.
We believe that our patents and applications are important for
maintaining the competitive differentiation of our products and
improving our return on research and development investments.
While we own and control a significant number of patents, trade
secrets, confidential information, trademarks, trade names,
copyrights, and other intellectual property rights which, in the
aggregate, are of material importance to our business,
management believes that our business, as a whole, as well as
each of our core business segments, is not materially dependent
on any one intellectual property right or related group of such
rights.
Patents, patent applications, and license agreements expire or
terminate over time by operation of law, in accordance with
their terms or otherwise. As the portfolio of our patents,
patent applications, and license agreements has evolved over
time, we do not expect the expiration of any specific patent to
have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Backlog
Order backlog as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
$620 million, $567 million, and $549 million,
respectively. Delivery schedules vary from customer to customer
based upon their requirements. Typically, large projects require
longer lead production cycles and delays can occur from time to
time. We expect the majority of our year-end 2010 backlog will
be recognized as revenue within 2011.
Watermark
In 2008, we launched our signature corporate citizenship
program, Watermark, whose mission is to make a sustainable mark
in the world by providing safe water to children and families in
need. We are dedicated to protecting the environment and
fostering knowledge and awareness of the worlds water
issues through our support of non-governmental organizations
(NGOs). With our NGO partners, we have provided safe water,
sanitation and hygiene education to more than 300 schools in
India, China and Latin America. We also proactively secure and
provide safe water to people in times of emergency (for example,
in the aftermath of
82
the recent earthquakes in Japan, Haiti and China). We believe
our strong culture of social responsibility is a manifestation
of the values of our employees and reflects areas of interest to
our customers, as well as helping our company to attract and
retain talented and committed people.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we employed approximately
11,700 people. Generally, labor relations have been
maintained in a satisfactory manner.
Environmental
Matters and Regulation
Our manufacturing operations worldwide are subject to many
requirements under environmental laws. In the United States, the
Environmental Protection Agency and similar state agencies
administer laws and regulations concerning air emissions, water
discharges, waste disposal, environmental remediation, and other
aspects of environmental protection. Such environmental laws and
regulations in the United States include, for example, the
Federal Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource,
Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
Environmental requirements significantly affect our operations.
We have established an internal program to address compliance
with applicable environmental requirements.
While environmental laws and regulations are subject to change,
such changes can be difficult to predict reliably and the timing
of potential changes is uncertain. Management does not believe,
based on current circumstances, that compliance costs pursuant
to such regulations will have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
However, the effect of future legislative or regulatory changes
could be material to our financial condition or results of
operations.
We are responsible, or are alleged to be responsible, for
ongoing environmental investigation and remediation of sites in
several countries. These sites are in various stages of
investigation
and/or
remediation and at some of these sites our liability is
considered de minimis. We have received notification from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and from
similar state and foreign environmental agencies, that a number
of sites formerly or currently owned
and/or
operated by us, and other properties or water supplies that may
be or have been impacted from those operations, contain disposed
or recycled materials or wastes and require environmental
investigation
and/or
remediation. These sites include instances where we have been
identified as a potentially responsible party under federal and
state environmental laws and regulations. Our accruals for
environmental matters are recorded on a
site-by-site
basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and
the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, based
on current law and existing technologies. It can be difficult to
estimate reliably the final costs of investigation and
remediation due to various factors. In our opinion, the total
amount accrued is appropriate based on facts and circumstances
as currently known to us. We do not anticipate these liabilities
will have a material adverse effect on our combined financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. We cannot assure
you that other sites, or new details about sites known to us,
that could give rise to environmental liabilities with such
material adverse effects on us will not be identified in the
future.
Legal
Proceedings
WCO and its subsidiaries from time to time are involved in legal
proceedings, the majority of which are incidental to the
operation of their businesses. Some of these proceedings seek
remedies relating to personal injury claims, environmental
matters, intellectual property matters, copyright infringement,
employment and pension matters, government contract issues and
commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to
acquisitions or divestitures.
83
MANAGEMENT
Our
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information as of
June 30, 2011, concerning certain of our executive
officers, including a five-year employment history and any
directorships held in public companies following the spin-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Steven A. Loranger
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Executive Chairman
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Chief Communications Officer
|
Gretchen W. McClain Gretchen W. McClain
will serve as our Chief Executive Officer and a Director on the
Board of Directors. Ms. McClain currently serves as
President of the ITT Fluid and Motion Control business.
Ms. McClain joined ITT in September 2005 as the President
of ITTs Residential & Commercial Water business.
She was named President of ITT Fluid Technology in March 2007
and served in that role before being named President of Fluid
and Motion Control in December 2008. Prior to joining ITT,
Ms. McClain was Vice President and General Manager of the
Business, General Aviation & Helicopters (BGH)
Electronics division at Honeywell Aerospace. Prior to assuming
the BGH position, she held a variety of leadership positions in
Honeywell Aerospaces Engines, Systems & Services
division, including Vice President for Engineering and
Technology and Vice President for Program Management. She joined
AlliedSignal in 1999, which later merged with Honeywell.
Earlier, Ms. McClain spent nine years with NASA and served
as Deputy Associate Administrator for Space Development, where
she played a pivotal role in the successful development and
launch of the International Space Station Program. Also with
NASA, she served as Chief Director for Space Station, and as a
Deputy Director for Space Flight. Ms. McClain currently
serves on the board of Faradyne, an ITT joint venture with
Pentair, Inc., and she is a former board member of the Hydraulic
Institute, the largest association of pump producers in North
America. Ms. McClain is a graduate of the University of
Utah in Salt Lake City, where she earned her bachelors
degree in mechanical engineering.
Steven R. Loranger Steven R. Loranger
will serve as our Executive Chairman. Mr. Loranger
currently serves as President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of ITT. Mr. Loranger is
a member of the Business Roundtable, serves on the boards of the
National Air and Space Museum and the Congressional Medal of
Honor Foundation and is on the Executive Committee of the
Aerospace Industries Association Board of Governors.
Mr. Loranger has extensive operational and manufacturing
experience with industrial companies and, in particular, he has
intimate knowledge of the Companys business and operations
having served as Chief Executive Officer of ITT since 2004.
Prior to ITT, Mr. Loranger previously served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Textron, Inc. from
2002 to 2004, overseeing Textrons manufacturing
businesses, including aircraft and defense, automotive,
industrial products and components. From 1981 to 2002,
Mr. Loranger held executive positions at Honeywell
International Inc. and its predecessor company, AlliedSignal,
Inc., including serving as President and Chief Executive Officer
of its Engines, Systems and Services businesses.
Mr. Loranger has been a Director of ITT since 2004 and has
served as a Director of FedEx Corporation since 2006. Mr.
Loranger holds a bachelors and masters degree in
science from the University of Colorado.
Michael T. Speetzen Michael T. Speetzen
will serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Speetzen is
currently Vice President of Finance for the Fluid and Motion
Control business of ITT. He joined ITT in 2009 as Vice President
of Finance for Fluid Technology, and his role was expanded to
his current position later that year. Before joining ITT,
Mr. Speetzen served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer for the StandardAero division of private
equity firm Dubai Aerospace Enterprise. Previously, he held
positions with Honeywell and General Electric. Mr. Speetzen
currently serves on the board of Faradyne, an ITT joint venture
with Pentair, Inc. Mr. Speetzen holds a bachelors
degree in management with an emphasis in finance from Purdue
University, and a Master of Business Administration from
Thunderbirds School of Global Management.
84
Frank R. Jimenez Frank R. Jimenez will
serve as our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
Mr. Jimenez is currently Vice President and General Counsel
for ITT. He joined ITT in June 2009 and previously served under
U.S. Presidents Bush and Obama as the General Counsel of
the U.S. Navy. Earlier, Mr. Jimenez served as Chief of
Staff of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD). Prior to HUD, he was Deputy Chief of Staff
and acting General Counsel for Florida Governor Jeb Bush.
Previously, he practiced commercial and white-collar litigation
as a partner in the Miami office of Steel Hector &
Davis LLP (now Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLP).
Mr. Jimenez received his law degree from the Yale Law
School, and he holds a master of business administration, with
majors in finance and strategic management, from the University
of Pennsylvanias Wharton School, and a masters
degree in national security and strategic studies, with
distinction, from the U.S. Naval War College. He earned his
bachelors degree, with honors, from the University of
Miami.
Angela A. Buonocore Angela A. Buonocore
will serve as our Chief Communications Officer.
Ms. Buonocore currently serves as the Senior Vice President
and Chief Communications Officer for ITT Corporation. She joined
ITT in March 2007 from The Pepsi Bottling Group where she served
as Vice President, Corporate Communications since 2001. Prior to
her 12-year
career in the PepsiCo system, Buonocore spent 11 years with
IBM and five years at General Electric Company in various
internal and external communications roles. Ms. Buonocore
is a trustee of the Arthur W. Page Society and the
Institute for Public Relations, and a member of the Wisemen and
the Seminar, all organizations of senior corporate
communications executives. In 2003, she was elected a member of
the Accademia Europea per le Relazioni Econimiche e Culturali, a
Rome-based organization that honors Italians and
Italian-Americans
who are leaders in their fields. In 2010, she was honored by the
National Organization for Womens New York City chapter as
a Woman of Power and Influence. Ms. Buonocore holds a
bachelors degree in advertising with high honors from the
University of Florida and was honored as a Distinguished Alumna
of the College of Journalism and Communications in May 2007.
Our Board
of Directors
The following table sets forth information with respect to those
persons who are expected to serve on our Board of Directors
following the spin-off. See Our Executive
Officers for Mr. Lorangers and
Ms. McClains biographical information. We are in the
process of identifying three additional individuals who will
become Directors following the spin-off, and we expect to
provide details regarding these individuals in an amendment to
this Information Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Steven A. Loranger
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Executive Chairman
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Director
|
Curtis J. Crawford
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director
|
John J. Hamre
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Surya N. Mohapatra
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Director
|
Markos I. Tambakeras
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
Curtis J. Crawford, Ph.D. Curtis
J. Crawford will serve as a Director on our Board of
Directors. Dr. Crawford has been a Director of ITT since
1996. He is a Director of E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company and
ON Semiconductor Corporation. Dr. Crawford was previously a
Director of Agilysys, Inc. from April 2005 to June 2008.
Dr. Crawford is President and Chief Executive Officer of
XCEO, Inc. From April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003, he
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Onix
Microsystems, a private photonics technology company. He was
Chairman of the Board of Directors of ON Semiconductor
Corporation from September 1999 until April 1, 2002.
Previously, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of
ZiLOG, Inc. from 1998 to 2001 and its Chairman from 1999 to
2001. Dr. Crawford also has extensive executive experience
with AT&T Corporation and IBM Corporation. He is a member
of the Board of Trustees of DePaul University. He holds a
bachelors degree in business administration and computer
science and a masters degree from Governors State
University, a master of business administration from DePaul
University and a
85
Ph.D. from Capella University. Governors State University
awarded him an honorary doctorate in 1996 and he received an
honorary doctorate degree from DePaul University in 1999.
John J. Hamre John J. Hamre will serve as a
Director on our Board of Directors. Dr. Hamre has been a
Director of ITT since 2000. Dr. Hamre was elected President
and Chief Executive Officer of Center for Strategic &
International Studies (CSIS), a public policy
research institution dedicated to strategic, bipartisan global
analysis and policy impact, in April of 2000. Prior to joining
CSIS, he served as U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense from
1997 to 2000 and Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) from
1993 to 1997. Dr. Hamre is a Director of MITRE Corporation,
a
not-for-profit
organization chartered to work in the public interest, with
expertise in systems engineering, information technology,
operational concepts, and enterprise modernization. He has
served as a Director of SAIC, Inc. since 2005 and Oshkosh
Corporation since 2009. Dr. Hamre was previously a Director
of Choicepoint, Inc. from May 2002 through September 2008. He
holds a bachelors degree, with highest distinction, from
Augustana College in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, was a
Rockefeller Fellow at Harvard Divinity School and was awarded a
Ph.D., with distinction, from the School of Advanced
International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, in 1978.
Surya N. Mohapatra, Ph.D. Surya N.
Mohapatra will serve as a Director on our Board of Directors.
Dr. Mohapatra has been Director of ITT since February 2008.
He has also been a Director of Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
since 2002 and served as a Director of Vasogen, Inc. from 2002
to 2006. Dr. Mohapatra was appointed President and Chief
Operating Officer of Quest Diagnostics Incorporated in June
1999, a Director in 2002, its Chief Executive Officer in May
2004, and Chairman of the Board in December 2004.
Dr. Mohapatra joined Quest Diagnostics as Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer in 1999. Prior to joining
Quest, Dr. Mohapatra was Senior Vice President of Picker
International, a worldwide leader in advanced medical imaging
technologies, where he served in various executive positions
during his
18-year
tenure. Dr. Mohapatra is also a Trustee of the Rockefeller
University and a member of the Corporate Advisory Board of Johns
Hopkins Carey Business School. Dr. Mohapatra holds a
bachelors degree in electrical engineering from Sambalpur
University in India. Additionally, he holds a masters
degree in medical electronics from the University of Salford,
England, as well as a doctorate in medical physics from the
University of London and The Royal College of Surgeons of
England.
Markos I. Tambakeras Markos I. Tambakeras
will serve as a Director on our Board of Directors.
Mr. Tambakeras has been a Director of ITT since 2001.
Previously, he was a Director of Kennametal, Inc. from July 1999
through December 2006. Mr. Tambakeras has served on the
Board of Parker Hannifin Corporation since 2005 and served as a
Director of the Board of Newport Corporation from May 2008
through December 31, 2009. Mr. Tambakeras served as
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Kennametal, Inc. from
July 1, 2002 until December 31, 2006. He was also
President and Chief Executive Officer of Kennametal from July
1999 through December 31, 2005. From 1997 to June 1999,
Mr. Tambakeras served as President, Industrial Controls
Business, for Honeywell Incorporated. He is a trustee of Arizona
State University and has served for two years on the
Presidents Council on Manufacturing. He was previously the
Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Manufacturers
Alliance/MAPI, which is the manufacturing industrys
leading executive development and business research
organization. Mr. Tambakeras received a B.Sc. degree from
the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa and
a master of business administration from Loyola Marymount
University, Los Angeles, CA.
Structure
of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors will be divided into three classes that
will be, as nearly as possible, of equal size. Initially,
Class I directors will serve for a one-year term,
Class II directors for a two-year term, and Class III
directors for a three-year term. The terms of the Class I,
Class II and Class III directors will expire at the
annual meeting in 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Upon the
expiration of each initial term, directors will subsequently
serve three-year terms if renominated and reelected. The
proposed Class I directors will
include , the proposed
Class II directors will
include and the proposed
Class III directors will
include .
Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, we have agreed that WCO
shall nominate a slate of directors to be elected at our
shareholder meeting to be held in 2013 and each year thereafter
so that (i) a majority of the
86
Board of Directors shall consist of persons who had not served
as a director or executive officer of ITT at any time during the
twelve month period immediately prior to the distribution (each,
a Legacy Director) and (ii) no director of WCO
that is a Legacy Director shall also be a director of ITT.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Following the spin-off, the standing committees of our Board of
Directors will include an Audit Committee, a Compensation and
Personnel Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee,
each as further described below. Following our listing on the
NYSE and in accordance with the transition provisions of the
rules of the NYSE applicable to companies listing in conjunction
with a spin-off transaction, each of these committees will, by
the date required by the rules of the NYSE, be composed
exclusively of directors who are independent. Other committees
may also be established by the Board of Directors from time to
time.
Audit Committee. The members of the Audit
Committee are expected to be Markos I. Tambakeras
(chair),
and .
The Audit Committee will have the responsibility, among other
things, to meet periodically with management and with both our
independent auditor and internal auditor to review audit results
and the adequacy of and compliance with our system of internal
controls. In addition, the Audit Committee will appoint or
discharge our independent auditor, and review and approve
auditing services and permissible non-audit services to be
provided by the independent auditor in order to evaluate the
impact of undertaking such added services on the independence of
the auditor. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee, which
are anticipated to be substantially identical to the
responsibilities of ITTs Audit Committee, will be more
fully described in our Audit Committee charter. The Audit
Committee charter will be posted on our website and will be
available in print to any shareholder who requests it. By the
date required by the transition provisions of the rules of the
NYSE, all members of the Audit Committee will be independent and
financially literate. Further, the Board of Directors has
determined that
Mr. Tambakeras,
and possess
accounting or related financial management expertise within the
meaning of the NYSE listing standards and that each qualifies as
an audit committee financial expert as defined under
the applicable SEC rules.
Compensation and Personnel Committee. The
members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee are expected
to be Curtis J. Crawford
(chair),
and .
The Compensation and Personnel Committee will oversee all
compensation and benefit programs and actions that affect our
senior executive officers. The Compensation and Personnel
Committee will also provide strategic direction for our overall
compensation structure, policies and programs and will oversee
and approve the continuity planning process. The
responsibilities of the Compensation and Personnel Committee,
which are anticipated to be substantially identical to the
responsibilities of ITTs Compensation and Personnel
Committee, will be more fully described in the Compensation and
Personnel Committee charter. The Compensation and Personnel
Committee charter will be posted on our website and will be
available in print to any shareholder who requests it. Each
member of the Compensation and Personnel Committee will be a
non-employee director and there are no Compensation and
Personnel Committee interlocks involving any of the projected
members of the Compensation and Personnel Committee.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The
members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are expected
to be Surya N. Mohapatra
(chair),
and .
The Nominating and Governance Committee will be responsible for
developing and recommending to the Board of Directors criteria
for identifying and evaluating director candidates; identifying,
reviewing the qualifications of and proposing candidates for
election to the Board of Directors; and assessing the
contributions and independence of incumbent directors in
determining whether to recommend them for reelection to the
Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee will
also review and recommend action to the Board of Directors on
matters concerning transactions with related persons and matters
involving corporate governance and, in general, oversee the
evaluation of the Board of Directors. The responsibilities of
the Nominating and Governance Committee, which are anticipated
to be substantially identical to the responsibilities of
ITTs Nominating and Governance Committee, will be more
fully described in the Nominating and Governance Committee
charter. The Nominating and Governance Committee charter will be
posted on our website and will be available in print to any
shareholder who requests it.
87
Director Independence. Our Board of Directors,
upon recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee,
is expected to formally determine the independence of its
directors following the spin-off. The Board of Directors of ITT
has affirmatively determined that the following directors, who
are anticipated to be elected to our Board of Directors, are
independent: Curtis J. Crawford, John J. Hamre, Surya N.
Mohapatra and Markos I. Tambakeras. Our Board of Directors is
expected to annually determine the independence of directors
based on a review by the directors and the Nominating and
Governance Committee. No director will be considered independent
unless the Board of Directors determines that he or she has no
material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner,
shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a material
relationship with us. Material relationships can include
commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting,
charitable, and familial relationships, among others. To
evaluate the materiality of any such relationship, the Board of
Directors has determined it is in the best interests of the
company to adopt categorical independence standards which will
be set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The
standards that will be relied upon by the Board of Directors in
affirmatively determining whether a director is independent are
composed, in part, of those objective standards set forth in the
NYSE rules, which generally provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
A director who is an employee, or whose immediate family member
(defined as a spouse, parent, child, sibling, father- and
mother-in-law,
son- and
daughter-in-law,
brother- and
sister-in-law
and anyone, other than a domestic employee, sharing the
directors home) is an executive officer, of the company,
would not be independent until three years after the end of such
relationship.
|
|
|
|
A director who receives, or whose immediate family member
receives, more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation
from the company, other than director and committee fees and
pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior
services (provided such compensation is not contingent in any
way on continued service) would not be independent until three
years after ceasing to receive such amount.
|
|
|
|
A director who is a partner of or employed by, or whose
immediate family member is a partner of or employed by and
personally works on the companys audit, a present or
former internal or external auditor of the company would not be
independent until three years after the end of the affiliation
or the employment or auditing relationship.
|
|
|
|
A director who is employed, or whose immediate family member is
employed, as an executive officer of another company where any
of the companys present executives serve on the other
companys compensation committee would not be independent
until three years after the end of such service or employment
relationship.
|
|
|
|
A director who is an employee, or whose immediate family member
is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or
receives payments from, the company for property or services in
an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater
of $1 million, or 2% of such other companys
consolidated gross revenues, would not be independent until
three years after falling below such threshold.
|
Compensation
of Non-Employee Directors
Following the spin-off, director compensation will be determined
by our Board of Directors with the assistance of its Nominating
and Governance Committee. It is anticipated that such
compensation will consist of an annual retainer, an annual
equity award, annual fees for serving as an Audit Committee
chair and other types of compensation.
Director
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning the 2010
compensation awarded by ITT to non-employee directors of ITT who
are expected to be non-employee directors of WCO. The table
below represents the 2010 grant date fair value of compensation
computed in accordance with GAAP. All non-employee directors
received the same cash, stock, and options awards for service as
a non-employee director.
88
Mr. Loranger, as an employee director, did not receive
compensation for his service on the Board of Directors. The
grant date fair value of stock awards and option awards granted
to non-employee directors in 2010 is provided in footnote
(b) to the table. Stock awards are composed of restricted
stock units. Option awards are composed of non-qualified stock
options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
$(a)
|
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Curtis J. Crawford
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,192
|
|
|
|
40,126
|
|
|
|
220,318
|
|
John J. Hamre
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,192
|
|
|
|
40,126
|
|
|
|
220,318
|
|
Surya N. Mohapatra
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,192
|
|
|
|
40,126
|
|
|
|
220,318
|
|
Markos I. Tambakeras
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,192
|
|
|
|
40,126
|
|
|
|
220,318
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Fees earned were paid, at the election of the director, in cash
or deferred cash. Non-employee directors could have irrevocably
elected deferral into an interest-bearing cash account or an
account that tracks an index of ITTs stock. |
|
(b) |
|
Awards reflect the grant date fair value computed in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification (FASB ASC) Topic 718, Stock
Compensation. Non- employee directors do not receive differing
amounts of equity compensation, the grant date fair value for
restricted stock units was $52.59 and was determined on
May 11, 2010, the date of the ITTs 2010 Annual
Meeting. The grant price reflects the closing price of ITT stock
on the grant date. The grant date fair value of non-qualified
stock options was $14.03, determined on March 5, 2010, the
date on which director stock options were awarded. |
89
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
We are currently a wholly owned subsidiary of ITT, which will,
following the spin-off, own the subsidiaries that currently
conduct the operations of ITTs water-related businesses.
Therefore, our historical compensation strategy has been
primarily determined by the Compensation and Personnel Committee
of ITTs Board of Directors (the ITT Compensation
Committee), which approves and oversees administration of
ITTs executive compensation program. Since the information
presented in this document relates primarily to the 2010 fiscal
year, which ended on December 31, 2010, this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis focuses primarily on ITTs
compensation programs and decisions with respect to 2010,
describing all elements of ITTs executive compensation
program as determined by the ITT Compensation Committee. This
Compensation Discussion and Analysis also describes the ways in
which we anticipate that our compensation philosophy will differ
from that of ITTs after we become a separate public
company. As explained under The Spin-Off
Reasons for the Spin-Off separation from ITT will provide
us with the flexibility to establish appropriate compensation
policies to attract, motivate and retain our executives. We will
form our own Compensation Committee (the WCO Compensation
Committee) that will be responsible for our executive
compensation programs prospectively, which may be different from
the compensation programs in place for 2010.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes ITTs
compensation philosophy for those individuals who are expected
to be the most highly compensated WCO executive officers based
on their fiscal 2010 compensation with ITT. These officers are
referred to herein as Named Executive Officers
(NEOs) and WCO also is referred to as
we, us or our. Our named
executives are Gretchen W. McClain, who is expected to be Chief
Executive Officer and was Senior Vice President and President,
Fluid and Motion Control of ITT; Michael T. Speetzen, who is
expected to be Chief Financial Officer and was Vice President of
Finance for Fluid and Motion Control of ITT; Steven R. Loranger,
who is expected to be Executive Chairman of the Board and was
Chairman, President and CEO of ITT; Frank R. Jimenez, who is
expected to be General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and was
Vice President and General Counsel of ITT; and Angela A.
Buonocore, who is expected to be Chief Communications Officer
and was Senior Vice President, Chief Communications Officer of
ITT.
Our
Executive Compensation Program
Overall
compensation policies and programs
Historically. In 2010, the ITT Compensation
Committee retained Pay Governance LLC as its independent
compensation consultant (Pay Governance or the
Compensation Consultant). Pay Governance provides
independent consulting services in support of the ITT
Compensation Committees charter. The Compensation
Consultant also provided independent consulting services in
support of ITTs Nominating and Governance Committees
charter, including providing competitive data on director
compensation. The Compensation Consultants engagement
leader provided objective expert analyses, assessments, research
and recommendations for executive employee compensation
programs, incentives, perquisites, and compensation standards.
In this capacity, the Compensation Consultant provided services
that related solely to work performed for and at the direction
of ITTs Compensation Committee including analysis of
material prepared by ITT for ITTs Compensation
Committees review. In 2010, ITTs human resources,
finance and legal departments supported the work of the ITT
Compensation Committee, provided information, answered questions
and responded to requests. Additionally, the Compensation
Consultant provided analyses to ITTs Nominating and
Governance Committee and the full Board of Directors on
Non-Management Director compensation. The Compensation
Consultant provided no other services to ITT during 2010.
In 2010, as in past years, the ITT Compensation Committee looked
to competitive market compensation data for companies comparable
to ITT to establish overall policies and programs that address
executive compensation, benefits and perquisites. This review
included analysis of the Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank
(CDB) information provided by the Compensation
Consultant. The analyses used a sample of
90
174 companies from the
S&P®
Industrials Companies that were available in the CDB. The
compensation data from these companies were evaluated by the
Compensation Consultant for differences in the scope of
operation as measured by annual revenue. Appendix A at the
end of this section lists the sample of companies from the
S&P®
Industrials Companies that were used in the CDB analyses. The
ITT Compensation Committee believes that these
174 companies most closely reflect the labor market in
which ITT competes for talent.
The ITT Compensation Committee has delegated to ITTs
Senior Human Resources Executive responsibility for
administering the executive compensation program. During 2010,
ITTs Chief Executive Officer and Senior Human Resources
Executive made recommendations to the ITT Compensation Committee
regarding executive compensation actions and incentive awards.
The ITT Compensation Committee reviewed each compensation
element for Mses. McClain and Buonocore and
Messrs. Loranger and Jimenez, as each of these individuals
was a NEO of ITT in 2010, and made the final determination
regarding executive compensation for these officers using the
processes described in this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis. With respect to Mr. Speetzen, Ms. McClain,
in her role as Senior Vice President of ITT and President of its
Fluid and Motion Control businesses made recommendations to
Mr. Loranger, in his role as President and CEO of ITT and
to ITTs Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
regarding Mr. Speetzens executive compensation. After
discussing Ms. McClains recommendations, the final
executive compensation determinations for Mr. Speetzen were
made jointly by Mr. Loranger, as ITTs President and
CEO, ITTs Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer and Ms. McClain. The ITT Compensation Committee
also approved the 2010 long-term incentive awards for the NEOs.
The ITT Compensation Committee believes ITTs compensation
programs reflect ITTs overarching business rationale and
are designed to be reasonable, fair, fully disclosed, and
consistently aligned with long-term value creation. The ITT
Compensation Committee further believes this compensation
philosophy encourages individual and group behaviors that
balance risk and reward and assist ITT in achieving steady,
sustained growth and earnings performance.
Going Forward. Following the separation, it is
expected that the WCO Compensation Committee will retain a
compensation consultant and the nature and scope of the
compensation consultants engagement will be similar to
that of ITTs Compensation Consultant. In addition, we
expect to establish a similar executive compensation philosophy
with respect to our NEOs following the separation. We expect
that our compensation objective will be to implement
compensation programs that reflect overarching business
rationale and are designed to be reasonable, fair, fully
disclosed, and consistently aligned with long-term value
creation. We also expect that the WCO Compensation Committee
will delegate to a senior Human Resources executive
responsibility for administering the Executive Compensation
program.
Individual
executive positions
Historically. ITTs senior management
positions, including each of its NEO positions, were compared to
positions with similar attributes and responsibilities based on
the CDB information. This information was used to provide the
market median dollar value for annual base salary, annual
incentives and long-term incentives. Compensation levels within
approximately 10% above or below the market median dollar value
are considered by the Compensation Consultant and the ITT
Compensation Committee to be within the market median range. The
ITT Compensation Committee used the CDB information, along with
other qualitative information described below, in making its
determination of target and actual compensation provided to each
of ITTs NEOs. The ITT Compensation Committee may consider
deviations from the market median range depending on a
positions strategic value, ITTs objectives and
strategies, and individual experience and performance in the
position. The ITT Compensation Committee may, but is not
required to, consider prior years compensation, including
short-term or long-term incentive payouts, restricted stock or
restricted stock unit vesting or option exercises in
compensation decisions for the NEOs.
The following chart sets out 2010 total target NEO compensation
for annual base salary, annual incentive, long-term incentive
and total compensation relative to the market median dollar
value. For Ms. McClain and Mr. Jimenez, deviations
below the market median range were primarily related to the
relatively short tenure of each in their current positions at
ITT. For Mr. Loranger, the deviations above the market
median range were primarily related to a desire to tie a
significant portion of Mr. Lorangers compensation to
the achievement of sustained, long-term company performance. For
Mr. Speetzen and Ms. Buonocore, deviations above the
market
91
median range were primarily related to their individual
experience and the importance of their positions to the success
of the business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base
|
|
|
Annual Incentive
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
Position as
|
|
|
Position as
|
|
|
Position as
|
|
|
Position as
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Named Executive
|
|
Market Median
|
|
|
Market Median
|
|
|
Market Median
|
|
|
Market Median
|
|
Officer and Title
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain,
Chief Executive Officer
(formerly SVP and President, Fluid and Motion Control of ITT)
|
|
|
96%
|
|
|
|
94%
|
|
|
|
84%
(Below market
median range)
|
|
|
|
89%
(Below market
median range)
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen,
Chief Financial Officer(1)
(formerly VP of Finance, Fluid and
Motion Control of ITT)
|
|
|
114%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
111%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
117%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
122%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
Steven R. Loranger,
Executive Chairman
(formerly Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of ITT)
|
|
|
96%
|
|
|
|
91%
|
|
|
|
112%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
105%
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
(formerly Vice President and General Counsel of ITT)
|
|
|
82%
(Below market
median range)
|
|
|
|
66%
(Below market
median range)
|
|
|
|
50%
(Below market
median range)
|
|
|
|
61%
(Below market
median range)
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore,
Chief Communications Officer
(formerly SVP and Chief Communications
Officer of ITT)
|
|
|
105%
|
|
|
|
120%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
133%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
119%
(Above market
median range)
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Speetzen also received 8,000 shares of restricted
stock as a special retention award. |
Going Forward. While it is expected that the
WCO Compensation Committee will adopt a similar approach to
evaluating and determining target and actual compensation
provided to each of our NEOs, the use of the CDB or the peers
included in the market sample may change to be more reflective
of our industry, size and/or business model.
Our
compensation cycle
Historically. Compensation is reviewed in
detail every year during the first quarter. This review includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual performance reviews for the prior year,
|
|
|
|
Base salary merit increases normally established in
March,
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plans (AIP) target awards, and
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive target awards (including stock options,
restricted stock or restricted stock units and target total
shareholder return (TSR) awards).
|
The actual award date of stock options, restricted stock or
restricted stock units and target TSR awards is determined on
the date on which the ITT Compensation Committee approves these
awards. In recent years, this date has been in March. Target TSR
awards reflect a performance period starting on January 1 of the
year in which the ITT Compensation Committee approved the TSR
award. Restricted stock or restricted stock units, TSR and stock
option award recipients receive communication of the award as
soon as reasonably practical after the grant date of the award.
The ITT Compensation Committee reviewed and assessed the
performance of ITTs NEOs during 2010. The ITT Compensation
Committee will continue to review and assess the performance of
the Chief Executive Officer and all senior executives and
authorize salary actions it believes are appropriate and
commensurate with relevant competitive data and the approved
salary program.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will review, decide and award
compensation to our NEOs following a similar annual cycle.
92
Qualitative
considerations
Historically. ITT considers individual
performance, including consideration of the following
qualitative performance factors, in addition to the quantitative
measures discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
While there is no formal weighting of qualitative factors, the
following factors may be considered important in making
compensation decisions:
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Repositioning,
|
|
|
|
Differentiated Organic Growth,
|
|
|
|
Strategic Execution, and
|
|
|
|
Cultural Transformation.
|
Going forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will consider similar qualitative factors
in making compensation decisions. These qualitative performance
factors may change to reflect our business focus and strategy.
Compensation
Program Objectives
Historically. The following sections,
including material supplied in tabular form, provide more
information about the ITT compensation program, and its
objectives, general principles and specific approaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How We Achieve Our Objectives
|
Objective
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
Attract and retain well-rounded, capable leaders.
|
|
Design ITTs executive compensation program to attract,
reward and retain capable executives. Design total executive
compensation to provide a competitive balance of salary,
short-term and long-term incentive compensation.
|
|
ITTs overarching philosophy is to target total
compensation at the competitive median of the CDB. ITT considers
total compensation (salary plus short-term and long-term
compensation) when determining each component of NEO
compensation.
|
Match compensation components to ITTs short-term and
long-term operating and strategic goals.
|
|
In addition to salary, ITT includes short-term and long-term
performance incentives in its compensation program.
|
|
ITT believes the mix of short-term and long-term
performance-based incentives focuses executive behavior on
annual performance and operating goals, as well as strategic
business objectives that will promote long-term shareholder
value creation.
|
Provide a clear link between at-risk compensation with business
performance.
|
|
ITT believes the measures of performance in our compensation
programs must be aligned with measures key to the success of its
businesses. The clear link between compensation and performance
is intended to provide incentives for achieving performance and
business objectives and increasing the long-term value of
ITTs stock. If ITTs businesses succeed, our
shareholders will benefit.
|
|
ITT links compensation and performance through its long-term
incentive program, comprising restricted stock or restricted
stock unit awards, non-qualified stock options awards and TSR
target awards. If performance goals are not met, at-risk
compensation is reduced or not paid at all.
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How We Achieve Our Objectives
|
Objective
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
Align at-risk compensation with levels of executive
responsibility.
|
|
As executives move to greater levels of responsibility, the
proportion of compensation at risk, whether through annual
incentive plans or long-term incentive programs, increases in
relation to the increased level of responsibility.
|
|
NEO compensation is structured so that a substantial portion of
compensation is at risk for executives with greater levels of
responsibility. The ITT Compensation Committee considered
allocation of short-term and long-term compensation, cash and
non-cash compensation and different forms of non-cash
compensation for NEOs based on its assessment of the proper
compensation balance needed to achieve ITTs short-term and
long-term goals. The Compensation Consultant compiled and
analyzed data that the ITT Compensation Committee considered in
weighting compensation components for each of the NEOs.
|
Tie short-term executive compensation to specific business
objectives.
|
|
The AIP performance metrics are designed to further ITTs
total enterprise objectives. By linking AIP performance to total
enterprise performance, collaboration across the enterprise is
rewarded.
|
|
The AIP sets out short-term performance components. If specific
short-term performance goals are met, cash payments that reflect
performance across the enterprise may be awarded.
|
Tie long-term executive compensation to increasing shareholder
return.
|
|
The long-term incentive award programs link executive
compensation to increases in absolute shareholder return or
relative shareholder return against industrial peers.
|
|
Long-term executive compensation comprises restricted stock or
restricted stock units, stock options and target TSR cash awards
that are tied to the achievement of three-year relative total
shareholder return goals.
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How We Achieve Our Objectives
|
Objective
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
Provide reasonable and competitive benefits and perquisites.
|
|
Make sure that other employee benefits, including perquisites,
are reasonable in the context of a competitive compensation
program.
|
|
NEOs participate in many of the same benefit plans with the same
benefit plan terms as other employees. Certain other benefit
plans are available to NEOs and described more fully in
Compensation Tables ITT Pension Benefits
and Compensation Tables ITT Deferred
Compensation Plan. The Compensation Consultant provides
survey data on perquisites to the ITT Compensation Committee.
Perquisites provided to NEOs are designed to be consistent with
competitive practice and are regularly reviewed by the ITT
Compensation Committee. Mr. Loranger has a Special Pension
Arrangement discussed in Compensation Tables
ITT Pension Benefits Special Pension
Arrangement.
|
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will conduct a thorough review of the
current ITT compensation program and adopt a program with
objectives, principles and approaches that appropriately reflect
our business needs and strategy.
Primary
Compensation Components
Historically. The following sections,
including information supplied in tabular form, provide
information about Base Salary, the AIP and Long-Term Incentive
Target Awards.
BASE
SALARY
|
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
A competitive salary provides a necessary element of stability.
|
|
Salary levels reflect comparable salary levels based on survey
data provided by the Compensation Consultant. Salary levels are
reviewed annually.
|
Base salary should recognize individual performance, market
value of a position and the incumbents tenure, experience,
responsibilities, contribution to ITT and growth in his or her
role.
|
|
Merit increases are based on overall performance and relative
competitive market position.
|
95
ANNUAL
INCENTIVE PLAN (AIP)
|
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
The AIP award recognizes contributions to the years
results and is determined by performance against specific
premier metrics on the enterprise level, as well as qualitative
factors, as described in more detail in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis Our Executive Compensation
Program Qualitative Considerations. The 2010
AIP is structured to reward and emphasize overall enterprise
performance and emphasizes collaboration among ITTs Groups.
|
|
The AIP focuses on operating performance, targeting premier metrics considered predictive of top-ranking operating performance. 2010 AIP targets were established based on these four internal premier performance metrics:
earnings per share performance,
free cash flow,
sum of Group return on invested capital, and
the sum of Group revenue.
|
Structure AIP target awards to achieve competitive compensation
levels when targeted performance results are achieved. Use
objective formulas to establish potential AIP performance awards.
|
|
ITTs AIP provides for an annual cash payment to
participating executives established as a target percentage of
base salary. AIP target awards are set with reference to the
median of competitive practice based on the CDB. Any AIP payment
is the product of the annual base salary rate multiplied by the
target base salary percentage multiplied by the AIP annual
performance factor based on the approved metrics. The ITT
Compensation Committee may approve negative discretionary
adjustments with respect to NEOs.
|
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE AWARDS
|
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
Design long-term incentives for NEOs to link payouts to success
in the creation of shareholder value over time.
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee believes that long-term incentives directly reward NEOs for success in the creation of long-term value creation and enhanced total shareholder return. The ITT Compensation Committee employed four considerations in designing the long-term incentive award program:
alignment of executive interests with shareholder interests,
a multi-year plan that balances short-term and long-term decision-making,
long-term awards included as part of a competitive total compensation package, and
retention.
|
For NEOs, long-term equity-based incentives should recognize
current performance as well as the expectation of future
contributions.
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee grants restricted stock or
restricted stock units and stock options awards to link
executive compensation to absolute share price performance. It
grants TSR awards to provide a link to ITTs total
shareholder return relative to the TSR Performance Index.
|
Review award programs annually to provide for regular assessment.
|
|
As part of its annual compensation review, the ITT Compensation
Committee determines long-term incentive award program
components, the percentage weight of each component, and
long-term award target amounts.
|
96
|
|
|
General Principle
|
|
Specific Approach
|
|
Use competitive market survey data provided by the Compensation
Consultant from a sample of
S&P®
Industrial Companies to select long-term components designed to
advance ITTs long-term business goals as well as
determining competitive target amounts.
|
|
In 2010, the ITT Compensation Committee, based on management
recommendations, used competitive market data for each of the
NEO positions to determine the 2010 long-term award value for
each NEO.
|
Balance absolute share price return and relative share price
return.
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee balanced long-term awards among
awards designed to encourage relative share price performance
and awards designed to encourage absolute share price
performance. More information on this allocation is provided in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long Term
Incentive Awards Programs.
|
Consider the median of competitive market data, as well as
individual contributions and business performance in determining
target awards.
|
|
Specific target awards are set out in the Grants of Plan-Based
Awards table below.
|
Going forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will adopt similar principles and
approaches with respect to Base Salary. With regard to the AIP
and aggregate Long-Term Incentive Target Awards (or their
equivalents), we expect to develop programs reflecting
appropriate measures, goals, and targets for our industry and
business objectives and based on our competitive marketplace.
Overview
of the AIP and Long-Term Incentive Target Awards
Establishing
AIP Performance in 2010
The 2010 AIP format was designed to consider internal business
achievements. For 2010, NEOs include officers from the Fluid
Technology and the Motion & Flow Control segment and
Corporate headquarters.
2010
Internal Premier Performance Metrics
The ITT Compensation Committee studied past and projected
earnings per share and other performance measures of comparable
multi-industry peers. Six multi-industry companies were
identified as premier based on their rankings in the
top quartile of the majority of the quantitative metrics
evaluated. These six companies are:
|
|
|
3M Co.
United Technologies Corp.
Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
|
|
General Electric Co.
Emerson Electric Co.
Danaher Corp.
|
Based on an analysis of these premier companies, ITT identified
four internal premier performance metrics as most closely
predictive of top-ranking operating performance. The AIP design
for the 2010 performance year was modified to emphasize business
collaboration across each of ITTs business segments (or
Groups).
|
|
|
Premier Performance Metric
|
|
Why this Metric
|
|
Sum of Group revenue
|
|
Revenue reflects ITTs emphasis on growth. Revenue is
defined as reported GAAP revenue excluding the impact of foreign
currency fluctuations and contributions from acquisitions and
divestitures. ITTs definition of revenue may not be
comparable to similar measures utilized by other companies.
Revenue is based on the local currency exchange.
|
97
|
|
|
Premier Performance Metric
|
|
Why this Metric
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
Free cash flow reflects ITTs emphasis on cash flow
generation. Free cash flow is defined as GAAP net cash flow from
operating activities, less capital expenditures and adjusted for
other non-cash special items and discretionary pension
contributions. Free cash flow should not be considered a
substitute for cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP.
ITTs definition of free cash flow may not be comparable to
similar measures utilized by other companies. Management
believes that free cash flow is an important measure of
performance and it is utilized as a measure of ITTs
ability to generate cash.
|
Sum of Group return on invested capital
(ROIC)
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee considers ROIC to be an
appropriate measurement of capital utilization in ITTs
businesses and a key element of premier performance.
|
Earnings per share (EPS)
performance
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee believes that EPS performance is
an appropriate measure of ITTs total performance and
employed the ITT EPS performance metric to encourage focus on
the achievement of premier earnings performance for the overall
company. EPS performance is defined as GAAP net income from
continuing operations per diluted share, adjusted to exclude
items such as unusual and infrequent non-operating items,
non-operating tax settlements or adjustments relating to prior
periods and impacts from acquisitions and divestitures.
|
Internal performance metrics are weighted to represent
operational goals. In order to encourage focus on total company
performance, earnings per share performance across the
enterprise represented 40% of the overall performance metrics
for ITTs 2010 AIP.
2010
Internal Performance Metrics Weight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Enterprise
|
|
2010 Metrics
|
|
Performance Percentage
|
|
|
Sum of Group Revenue
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Sum of Group ROIC
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
EPS Performance
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
As executive officers of ITT in 2010, the 2010 AIP Awards for
Mses. McClain and Buonocore and Messrs. Loranger and
Jimenez were subject only to negative discretion by the ITT
Compensation Committee based on four qualitative business goals:
Portfolio Repositioning, Differentiated Organic Growth,
Strategic Execution, and Cultural Transformation. However, since
Mr. Speetzen was not an executive officer of ITT in 2010,
his 2010 AIP Award was subject to negative and positive
discretion based on an assessment of his individual performance
by Ms. McClain, Mr. Loranger, as ITTs President
and CEO, and ITTs Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer.
2010
Internal Performance Metric Attainment and Payout
Design
We pay for AIP performance that clearly demonstrates substantial
achievement of plan goals. We established strong incentives for
revenue performance and set aggressive goals for other metrics.
In order to achieve an AIP payout, each metric must meet a
certain threshold for that component to be considered in the
98
calculation. For example, EPS performance below the 50% payout
percentage of target would result in that metric being reflected
as zero in the AIP calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Performance
|
|
$
|
3.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
Earnings Per Share Payout Percentage of Target
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
Sum of Group revenue must meet or exceed a 90% threshold
performance. The remaining metrics must meet or exceed an 85%
threshold performance level (as described in the chart below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 AIP Attainment and Payout Design
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Remaining Metrics
|
|
|
Performance Percentage of Target
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
110
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
Payout Percentage of Target
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
In 2010, each performance component of the AIP and the overall
AIP award were capped at 200%. Results are interpolated between
points.
2010
AIP Performance Targets and Performance
The ITT Compensation Committee, after considering management
recommendations, established 2010 AIP performance targets for
the NEOs based on the applicable internal premier performance
metrics and ITTs approved annual operating plan, taking
into consideration ITTs aspirational business goals.
Successful attainment of both qualitative factors and
quantitative factors (described in Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Our Executive Compensation
Program Qualitative Considerations and
Compensation Discussion and Analysis 2010
Internal Performance Metric Attainment and Payout Design)
are achievable only if the enterprise and the individual NEO
perform at levels established by the ITT Compensation Committee.
As permitted by the 1997 Annual Incentive Plan for Executive
Officers, the ITT Compensation Committee may exclude the impact
of acquisitions, dispositions and other special items in
computing AIP. The 2010 targets for EPS performance, free cash
flow performance for ITT, and the sum of Group revenue
performance targets are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Target at
|
|
|
|
|
Metric (all $ amounts in millions other than earnings per
share performance)
|
|
100% Payment
|
|
|
2010 Performance
|
|
|
EPS Performance
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
$
|
924
|
|
Sum of Group Revenue
|
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
|
$
|
10,831
|
|
Remaining Performance Target. We set the
remaining performance target, the sum of Group ROIC, at a
challenging level that is consistent with our long-term premier
targets and designed to meet high shareholder expectations. We
consider the sum of Group ROIC level difficult to attain.
Specific
Internal Metrics for Mr. Loranger in 2010
All elements of compensation for Mr. Loranger are reviewed
by the ITT Compensation Committee. Mr. Loranger
participates in the AIP described above. In 2010, with respect
to Mr. Loranger, the ITT Compensation Committee determined
and considered the same four quantifiable goals related to free
cash flow, sum of Group revenue, sum of Group ROIC and EPS
performance, as provided above. Sum of Group ROIC goals were set
at challenging levels that were considered difficult to attain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Target at
|
|
|
|
|
Metric (all $ amounts in millions other than earnings per
share performance)
|
|
100% Payment
|
|
|
2010 Performance
|
|
|
EPS Performance
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
$
|
924
|
|
Sum of Group Revenue
|
|
$
|
11,200
|
|
|
$
|
10,831
|
|
99
2010
Target AIP Award Percentage of Base Salary and Weighting of AIP
Performance Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sum of
|
|
|
ITT EPS
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Sum of Group
|
|
|
Free Cash
|
|
|
Group ROIC
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
Revenue(a)
|
|
|
Flow(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c+d
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c+d
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c+d
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c+d
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c+d
|
|
For NEOs, the 2010 AIP potential payment was calculated as
follows:
2010 AIP Potential Payout = Annual Base Salary Rate x
Target Award Percentage of Base Salary x Results of Total
Enterprise Performance interpolated up to 200% for performance
above goal, subject to negative or positive discretion, as
applicable, as discussed above.
2010
AIP Awards Paid in 2011
On March 3, 2011, the ITT Compensation Committee determined
the 2010 AIP awards for Mses. McClain and Buonocore and
Messrs. Loranger and Jimenez. No negative discretion was
exercised by the ITT Compensation Committee. As permitted by the
1997 Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, the ITT
Compensation Committee excluded the impact of acquisitions,
dispositions and other special items in computing AIP
performance relating to AIP targets, which AIP targets also
excluded these items. In addition to her 2010 AIP Award, the ITT
Compensation Committee also awarded Ms. Buonocore a
discretionary bonus award of $15,700 outside of the 2010 AIP in
recognition of her strong contributions and strategic importance
to the business. The ITT Compensation Committee met privately,
without any members of management present, to determine
Mr. Lorangers 2010 AIP award. 2010 AIP Awards for
NEOs are also included in the Summary Compensation Table below.
The 2010 AIP Award for Mr. Speetzen was reviewed and
approved by Ms. McClain, Mr. Loranger, as ITTs
President and CEO and ITTs Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. In recognition of his contributions to the
strategic execution of the business, Ms. McClain,
Mr. Loranger and ITTs Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer determined to exercise their positive
discretion and awarded Mr. Speetzen a 2010 AIP Award that
was 5% above the 2010 AIP Potential Payout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIP 2010
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
$
|
654,700
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
$
|
260,100
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
$
|
2,328,352
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
$
|
384,500
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
$
|
330,700
|
|
2011
Internal Performance Metric Attainment and Payout
Design
To focus the businesses on operating performance during the
spin-off, the 2011 Internal Performance Metric Attainment and
Payout Design is structured to emphasize performance at the
value center level, which is a level below the business segment
or group level. However, 2011 AIP awards for the NEOs will still
be based on the performance of all ITT businesses as a whole
through the date immediately prior to the spin-off. The
performance metrics and payout design for 2011 AIP awards for
the period after the spin-off have not yet been determined.
The 2011 AIP metrics for the NEOs for the period prior to the
spin-off are weighted as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value Center Consolidated Operating Income
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Total Value Center Operating Plan Cash Flow
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Total Value Center Plan Revenue
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
100
While the ITT Compensation Committee did not undertake a study
of premier companies in setting the 2011 AIP metrics
for the period prior to the spin-off, the ITT Compensation
Committee determined that the above metrics would be most
closely predictive of top-ranking operating performance in 2011.
Internal performance metrics were weighted to represent
operational goals. The ITT Compensation Committee eliminated
earnings per share performance across the enterprise as one of
the performance metrics for the period prior to the spin-off in
order to further emphasize performance at the value center level
for those employees who are not NEOs and whose 2011 AIP for the
period prior to the spin-off will be based on the performance of
their individual value center.
Total Value Center Consolidated Operating Income must meet or
exceed a 90% threshold performance. The remaining metrics must
meet or exceed an 85% threshold performance level (as described
in the chart below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 AIP Attainment and Payout Design
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Metrics
|
|
|
Performance Percentage of Target
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
110
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
Payout Percentage of Target
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
Similar to the 2010 AIP, in 2011, each performance component of
the AIP and the overall AIP award will be capped at 200% and
results will be interpolated between points.
2011
Target AIP Award Percentage of Base Salary and Weighting of AIP
Performance Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center
|
|
|
Total Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Award
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Center
|
|
|
Total Value
|
|
|
Total Value
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Operating Plan
|
|
|
Center Plan
|
|
|
Center
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
Income (a)
|
|
|
Cash Flow (b)
|
|
|
Revenue (c)
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
a+b+c
|
|
For NEOs, the 2011 AIP potential payment for the period prior to
the spin-off will be calculated as follows:
2011 AIP Potential Payout = Annual Base Salary Rate x
Target Award Percentage of Base Salary x Results of Total Value
Center Performance interpolated up to 200% for performance above
goal, subject to negative discretion.
Going Forward. In connection with the
separation, we expect to adopt an annual incentive plan with
terms to be determined by the WCO Compensation Committee. We
expect this program will be designed to reflect measures,
targets and goals reflective of our business and industry using
our competitive marketplace as a benchmark.
Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program
Historically. ITTs long-term incentive
award component for senior executives has three subcomponents,
each of which directly ties long-term compensation to long-term
value creation and shareholder return:
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock or restricted stock unit awards. In 2010 the
ITT Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock awards. In
2011 the ITT Compensation Committee determined to award
restricted stock units, which will be settled in shares upon
vesting. Restricted stock units provide the same economic risk
or reward as restricted stock, but recipients do not have voting
rights and do not receive cash dividends during the restriction
period. Dividend equivalents are accrued and paid in cash upon
vesting of the restricted stock units. The ITT Compensation
Committee determined to award restricted stock
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
units rather than restricted stock in 2011 because restricted
stock unit awards provide consistent tax treatment for domestic
and international employees,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified stock option awards, and
|
|
|
|
TSR, a target cash award that directly links ITTs
three-year total shareholder return performance to the
performance of companies in the TSR Performance Index (the
S&P Industrials Companies, without consideration of utility
and transportation service industries (described herein as the
TSR Performance Index)) on a relative basis.
|
The following table describes the 2010 TSR target and equity
awards for the NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Target Cash
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
Award)
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
Award
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
$
|
|
|
# Options
|
|
|
# Shares
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
24,049
|
|
|
|
7,503
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen(1)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
132,265
|
|
|
|
41,267
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As described in Compensation Tables Grants of
Plan Based Awards, Mr. Speetzen received a special
retention award of 8,000 shares of restricted stock in
recognition of his strategic importance to the business.
2,400 shares vest on March 5, 2013 and
5,600 shares vest on March 5, 2014. |
Allocation
of Long-Term Incentive Components
The 2010 Long-Term Incentive Program Awards were allocated as
follows: 1/3 TSR calculated at target payment amount; 1/3
non-qualified stock options calculated at the grant date fair
value of the non-qualified options; and 1/3 restricted stock or
restricted stock units calculated at grant date fair value.
2010
Long-Term Incentive Program
Restricted
Stock Subcomponent
Grants of restricted stock provide NEOs with stock ownership of
unrestricted shares after the restriction lapses. NEOs received
restricted stock awards because, in the judgment of the ITT
Compensation Committee and based on management recommendations,
these individuals are in positions most likely to assist in the
achievement of ITTs long-term value creation goals and to
create shareholder value over time. The ITT Compensation
Committee reviews all proposed grants of shares of restricted
stock for executive officers prior to award, including awards
based on performance, retention-based awards and awards
contemplated for new employees as part of employment offers.
Key elements of the 2010 restricted stock program were:
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of restricted stock have the right to receive dividends
and vote the shares during the restriction period,
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock generally is subject to a three-year
restriction period,
|
|
|
|
If an acceleration event occurs (as described in
Compensation Tables Change of Control
Arrangements) the restricted stock vests in full,
|
|
|
|
If an employee dies or becomes disabled, the restricted stock
vests in full,
|
|
|
|
If an employee leaves ITT prior to vesting, whether through
resignation or termination for cause, the restricted stock is
forfeited, and
|
|
|
|
If an employee retires or is terminated other than for cause, a
pro-rata portion of the restricted stock award vests. With
respect to a termination other than for cause, the pro-rata
portion includes vesting that reflects the applicable severance
period. Mr. Loranger is currently eligible to retire
pursuant to a Special Pension Arrangement under the Steven R.
Loranger Employment Agreement described in Compensation
Tables Specific Compensation Arrangements and
the 2010 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table below.
|
In certain cases, such as for new hires or to facilitate
retention, selected employees may receive restricted stock
subject to different vesting terms as determined by the ITT
Compensation Committee.
Non-Qualified
Stock Options Subcomponent
Non-qualified stock options permit optionees to buy ITT stock in
the future at a price equal to the stocks value on the
date the option was granted, which is the option exercise price.
Non-qualified stock option terms were selected after the ITT
Compensation Committees review and assessment of the CDB
and consideration of terms best suited to ITT.
For Ms. McClain, Mr. Loranger and Ms. Buonocore,
non-qualified stock options do not vest until three years after
the award date. This delayed vesting is referred to as
three-year cliff vesting. This vesting schedule prohibits early
option exercises, notwithstanding share price appreciation, and
focuses senior executives on ITTs long-term value creation
goals. Stock options awarded to Mr. Jimenez and
Mr. Speetzen in 2010 vest in one-third annual installments.
In 2010, the fair value of stock options granted under the
employee stock option program was calculated using a binomial
lattice valuation model. The ITT Compensation Committee
considered this a preferred model since the model can
incorporate multiple and variable assumptions over time,
including assumptions such as employee exercise patterns, stock
price volatility and changes in dividends.
Key elements of the 2010 non-qualified stock option program were:
|
|
|
|
|
The option exercise price of stock options awarded is the NYSE
closing price of ITTs common stock on the date the award
is approved by the ITT Compensation Committee,
|
|
|
|
For options granted to new executives, the option exercise price
of approved stock option awards is the closing price on the
grant date, generally the day following the first day of
employment,
|
|
|
|
Options cannot be exercised prior to vesting,
|
|
|
|
Three-year cliff vesting is required for executives at the level
of senior vice president or above. Stock options vest in
one-third cumulative annual installments for executives below
the senior vice president level,
|
|
|
|
If an acceleration event occurs (as described in
Compensation Tables Change of Control
Arrangements), the stock option award vests in full,
|
|
|
|
Options awarded in 2010 and 2011 and prior to 2005 expire ten
years after the grant date. Options awarded between 2005 and
2009 expire seven years after the grant date. In 2010, the
seven-year option term was extended to ten years based on a
review of competitive market practices,
|
|
|
|
If an employee is terminated for cause, vested and unvested
portions of the options expire on the date of termination,
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2003
Plan) and ITTs 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan prohibit
the repricing of, or exchange of, stock options and stock
appreciation rights that are priced below the prevailing market
price with lower-priced stock options or stock appreciation
rights without shareholder approval, and
|
|
|
|
There may be adjustments to the post-employment exercise period
of an option grant if an employees tenure with ITT is
terminated due to death, disability, retirement or termination
by ITT other than for cause. Any post-employment exercise
period, however, cannot exceed the original expiration date of
the option. If employment is terminated due to an acceleration
event or because the option holder believes in good faith that
he or she would be unable to discharge his or her duties
effectively after the acceleration event, the option expires on
the earlier of the date seven months after the acceleration
event or the normal expiration date.
|
|
|
|
Currently, no individual may receive more than 600,000 options
under the 2003 Plan in any one year.
|
Why both restricted stock or restricted stock units and stock
options. A balanced award of restricted stock or
restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options provides
a combination of incentives for absolute share price
appreciation. The following table provides an overview of some
of the main characteristics of restricted stock or restricted
stock units and non-qualified stock options.
|
|
|
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Options
|
|
A restricted stock award is a grant of ITT stock, subject to
certain vesting restrictions. A restricted stock unit award is a
promise to deliver to the recipient, upon vesting, shares of ITT
stock. Both restricted stock and restricted stock units carry
the same economic risk and reward.
|
|
Non-qualified stock options provide the opportunity to purchase
ITT stock at a specified price called the exercise
price at a future date.
|
Holders of restricted stock, as shareholders of ITT, are
entitled to vote the shares and receive dividends or dividend
equivalents prior to vesting. Holders of restricted stock units
are not entitled to vote the shares and do not receive cash
dividends during the restriction period. Dividend equivalents
are paid in cash upon restricted stock unit vesting beginning
with the 2011 awards.
|
|
Stock option holders do not receive dividends on shares
underlying options and cannot vote their shares.
|
Restricted stock and restricted stock units have intrinsic value
on the day the award is received and retain some realizable
value even if the share price declines during the restriction
period. Since restricted stock and restricted stock units do not
expire, each provides strong employee retention value even after
vesting.
|
|
Non-qualified stock options increase focus on activities
primarily related to absolute share price appreciation.
ITTs non-qualified stock options expire ten or seven years
after their grant date depending on the year of award. If the
value of ITTs stock increases and the optionee exercises
his or her option to buy at the exercise price, the optionee
receives a gain in value equal to the difference between the
option exercise price and the price of the stock on the exercise
date. If the value of ITTs stock fails to increase or
declines, the stock option has no realizable value. Stock
options provide less retention value than restricted stock since
stock options have realizable value only if the share price
appreciates over the option exercise price before the options
expire.
|
The ITT Compensation Committee has selected vesting terms for
restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options based
on the Compensation Consultants review and assessment of
the CDB, as well as the ITT Compensation Committees view
of the vesting terms appropriate for ITT. The ITT Compensation
Committee considers the Compensation Consultants review
and assessment of CDB, as well as individual performance, in
determining the quantity of restricted stock, restricted stock
units and stock option awards.
104
Total
Shareholder Return (TSR) Awards Subcomponent
The following table describes some of the main features of TSR
awards and describes how the ITT Compensation Committee
considers those features as it determines target TSR awards.
|
|
|
Feature
|
|
Implementation
|
|
TSR rewards comparative stock price appreciation relative to
that of the TSR Performance Index
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee, at its discretion, determines
the size and frequency of target TSR awards, performance
measures and performance goals, in addition to performance
periods. In determining the size of target TSR awards for
executives, the ITT Compensation Committee considers comparative
data provided by the Compensation Consultant and ITTs
internal desired growth in share price. ITTs target TSR
awards provided to NEOs are generally based on a
participants position, competitive market data, individual
performance and anticipated potential contributions to
ITTs long-term goals.
|
Three-year performance period
|
|
A three-year TSR performance period encourages behaviors and
performance geared to ITTs long-term goals and, in the
view of the ITT Compensation Committee, discourages behaviors
that might distract from the three-year period focus. The
three-year performance period is consistent with ITTs
business cycle because it allows sufficient time for focus on
long-term goals and mutes market swings not based on
performance. The three-year performance period is also somewhat
independent of short-term market cycles.
|
Performance measurement and award frequency
|
|
ITTs performance for purposes of the TSR awards is
measured by comparing the average stock price over the trading
days in the month of December immediately prior to the start of
the TSR three-year performance period to the average stock price
over the trading days in the last month of the three-year cycle,
as well as dividend yields and other forms of shareholder return.
|
TSR awards are expressed as target cash awards and paid in cash.
|
|
Cash awards compensate relative performance while reducing share
dilution.
|
Components of TSR
|
|
The ITT Compensation Committee considered the components of a measurable return of value to shareholders, reviewed peer practices and received input from the Compensation Consultant. Based on that review the ITT Compensation Committee determined that the most significant factors to measure return of value to shareholders were:
dividend yields,
cumulative relative change in stock price, and
extraordinary shareholder payouts.
|
105
|
|
|
Feature
|
|
Implementation
|
|
TSR calculation
|
|
TSR = the sum of 1) dividends paid and reinvested and any other
extraordinary shareholder payouts during the three-year
performance period and 2) the cumulative change in stock price
from the beginning to the end of the performance period as a
percentage of beginning stock price.
|
Amount of target TSR awards. The ITT
Compensation Committee considers individual performance and
competitive market data in determining target TSR awards.
Key elements of the long-term incentive plan under which TSR
awards are granted include:
|
|
|
|
|
If a participants employment terminates before the end of
the three-year performance period, the award is forfeited except
in two cases: 1) if a participant dies or becomes disabled,
the TSR award vests in full and payment, if any, is made
according to its original terms. Vesting in full in the case of
death or disability reflects the inability of the participant to
control the triggering event and is consistent with benefit plan
provisions related to death and disability; and 2) if a
participant retires or is terminated by ITT other than for
cause, a pro-rata payout, if any, is provided based on the
number of full months of employment during the measurement
period divided by thirty-six months (the term of the three-year
TSR). This pro-rated payout, if any, is provided because it
reflects the participants service during the pro-rated
period.
|
|
|
|
ITTs performance for purposes of the TSR awards is
measured by comparing the average stock price performance over
the trading days in the month of December immediately prior to
the start of the TSR three-year performance period to the
average stock price performance over the trading days in the
last month of the three-year cycle, including adjustments for
dividends and extraordinary payments. (For example, trading days
in the month of December 2010 are used as a base for 2011 TSR
awards, which will be measured from January 1, 2011 to
December 31, 2013).
|
|
|
|
Payment, if any, of cash awards generally will be made following
the end of the applicable three-year performance period and will
be based on ITTs performance measured against the total
shareholder return performance of the TSR Performance Index.
|
|
|
|
Subject to the provisions of Section 409A, in the event of
an acceleration event in a change of control (described in
Compensation Tables Change of Control
Arrangements), a pro-rata portion of outstanding awards
will be paid through the date of the change of control based on
actual performance and the balance of the award will be paid at
target (100%). There may be up to three outstanding TSR awards
at any time.
|
|
|
|
Performance goals for the applicable TSR performance period are
established in writing no later than ninety days after the
beginning of the applicable performance period.
|
Performance Goals and Payments for the
TSR. Individual targets for the NEOs for the
2010-2012
performance period are provided in the Grants of Plan Based
Awards table below. Payouts, if any, are based on a
non-discretionary formula and interpolated for values between
the 35th and 80th percentile of performance. The ITT
Compensation Committee felt these breakpoints were properly
motivational and rewarded the desired behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
If ITTs Total Shareholder Return
|
|
|
|
Rank Against the Companies that Comprise
|
|
Payout Factor
|
|
the TSR Performance Index is
|
|
(% of Target Award)
|
|
|
less than the 35(th) percentile
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
at the 35(th) percentile
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
at the 50(th) percentile
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
at the 80(th) percentile or more
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
106
The following performance goals were established for TSR awards
for the performance period January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
If ITTs Total Shareholder Return
|
|
|
|
Rank Against the Companies that Comprise
|
|
Payout Factor
|
|
the TSR Performance Index is
|
|
(% of Target Award)
|
|
|
less than the 35(th) percentile
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
at the 35(th) percentile
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
at the 50(th) percentile
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
at the 80(th) percentile or more
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
ITT achieved a 25.89th percentile ranking in the TSR
Performance Index for the
2008-2010
performance period, resulting in no cash payment under the TSR
for this performance period.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will review ITTs long-term
incentive awards program and determine the appropriate structure
and mix of components appropriate for our business needs.
Similar to ITT, we would expect to deliver multiple forms of
long-term incentive awards; however, the vehicles provided, the
blend of these vehicles and the measures used to determine our
long-term performance may differ.
2011
Long-Term Incentive Awards
The following table describes the 2011 long-term incentive
awards for the NEOs, as determined by the ITT Compensation
Committee on March 3, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSR
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Target Cash
|
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
Award)
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
Unit Award
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
$
|
|
|
# Options
|
|
|
# Units
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
533,300
|
|
|
|
33,459
|
|
|
|
9,111
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
7,640
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
2,133,300
|
|
|
|
133,835
|
|
|
|
36,442
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
233,300
|
|
|
|
16,205
|
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
10,456
|
|
|
|
2,847
|
|
Going Forward. We intend to adopt, subject to
the approval of ITT prior to the separation in its capacity as
our sole stockholder, the WCO 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The
WCO 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan is expected to permit us to
grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards,
other stock-based awards and target cash awards based on
attainment of performance goals. The reserve placed in the WCO
2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan will be expected to be sufficient to
maintain our stock-based incentive plans
for years. Under the WCO 2011
Omnibus Incentive Plan, no individual may receive more
than options in any one year. The
WCO 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan will not permit repricing of
stock options without shareholder approval and will generally
comply in all significant aspects with best practices in
corporate governance of stock-based compensation plans.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
Historically. The ITT Board of Directors
share ownership guidelines currently provide for share ownership
levels at five times the annual retainer amount. Non-management
directors receive a portion of their retainer in restricted
stock or restricted stock units, which are paid in shares when
the restricted stock units vest. Non-management directors are
encouraged to hold such shares until their total share ownership
meets or exceeds the ownership guidelines.
Share ownership guidelines for corporate officers, first
approved by ITTs Board of Directors during 2001, are
regularly reviewed. The guidelines specify the desired levels of
ITT stock ownership and encourage a set of behaviors for each
officer to reach the guideline levels. The approved guidelines
require share ownership expressed as a multiple of base salary
for all corporate officers.
107
Specifically the guidelines apply as follows: chief executive
officer at five times annual base salary; chief financial
officer at three times annual base salary; senior vice
presidents and group presidents at two times annual base salary;
and all other corporate vice presidents at one times annual base
salary. In achieving these ownership levels, shares owned
outright, ITT restricted stock and restricted stock units,
shares held in the ITT dividend reinvestment plan, shares owned
in the ITT Salaried Investment and Savings Plan, and
phantom shares held in a fund that tracks an index
of ITTs stock in the deferred compensation plan are
considered.
To attain the ownership levels set forth in the guidelines it is
expected that any restricted shares that become unrestricted
will be held, and that all shares acquired through the exercise
of stock options will be held, except, in all cases, to the
extent necessary to meet tax obligations.
Compliance with the guidelines is monitored periodically.
Consistent with the guidelines, the share ownership levels have
been substantially met for most of non-management directors and
ITT officers as of January 31, 2011. Non-management
directors and ITT officers are afforded a reasonable period of
time to meet the guidelines. ITT has taken the individual tenure
and non-management directors and corporate officer share
ownership levels into account in determining compliance with the
guidelines.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines Summary
|
|
|
Non-management directors
|
|
5 X Annual Retainer Amount
|
CEO
|
|
5 X Annual Base Salary
|
CFO
|
|
3 X Annual Base Salary
|
Senior Vice Presidents
|
|
2 X Annual Base Salary
|
Vice Presidents
|
|
1 X Annual Base Salary
|
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will establish similar share ownership
guidelines for our non-management directors and corporate
officers that are consistent with general marketplace practices
in this regard. Specific guidelines have not yet been determined.
Recoupment
Policy
Historically. In 2008, ITT, upon the
recommendation of the ITT Compensation Committee, adopted a
policy that provides for recoupment of performance-based
compensation if the Board of Directors determines that a senior
executive has engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that caused
or otherwise contributed to the need for a material restatement
of ITTs financial results. In such a situation, the Board
will review all compensation awarded to or earned by that senior
executive on the basis of ITTs financial performance
during fiscal periods materially affected by the restatement.
This would include annual cash incentive and bonus awards and
all forms of equity-based compensation. If, in the Boards
view, the compensation related to ITTs financial
performance would have been lower if it had been based on the
restated results, the Board will, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, seek recoupment from that senior executive of
any portion of such compensation as it deems appropriate after a
review of all relevant facts and circumstances. The NEOs are
covered by this policy.
Going Forward. The WCO Compensation Committee
will consider and develop a similar policy to provide for
recoupment of performance-based compensation if the Board of
Directors determines that a senior executive has engaged in
fraud or willful misconduct. However, the policy will be
reviewed and updated for consistency with the final rules issued
by the SEC implementing the clawback provisions set forth in the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
Consideration
of Material Non-Public Information
Historically. ITT typically closes the window
for insiders to trade in ITTs stock in advance of, and for
a period of time immediately following, earnings releases and
Board and Committee meetings, because ITT and insiders may be in
possession of material non-public information. The first quarter
Committee meeting at which compensation decisions and awards are
typically made for employees usually occurs during a Board
meeting period, so stock option awards may occur at a time when
ITT is in possession of material non-public
108
information. The ITT Compensation Committee does not consider
the possible possession of material non-public information when
it determines the number of non-qualified stock options granted,
price of options granted or timing of non-qualified stock
options granted. Rather, it uses competitive data, individual
performance and retention considerations when it grants
non-qualified stock options, restricted stock or restricted
stock units and TSR awards under the long-term incentive program.
Non-qualified stock option awards and restricted stock awards or
restricted stock unit awards granted to NEOs, senior and other
executives, and Directors are awarded and priced on the same
date as the approval date. ITT may also award non-qualified
stock options in the case of the promotion of an existing
employee or hiring of a new employee. Again, these non-qualified
stock option grants may be made at a time ITT is in possession
of material non-public information related to the promotion or
the hiring of a new employee or other matters. ITT does not time
its release of material non-public information for the purpose
of affecting the value of executive compensation, and executive
compensation decisions are not timed to the release of material
non-public information.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will establish a similar policy with
respect to window periods in advance of, and immediately
following, earnings releases and Board and Committee meetings,
and the appropriate treatment of material non-public information.
ITT
Salaried Investment and Savings Plan
Historically. Most of ITTs salaried
employees who work in the United States participate in the ITT
Salaried Investment and Savings Plan, a tax-qualified savings
plan, which allows employees to contribute to the plan on a
before-tax basis
and/or
after-tax basis. ITT makes a floor contribution of
1/2
of 1% of base salary to the plan for all eligible employees and
matches employee contributions up to 6% of base salary at the
rate of 50%. Participants can elect to have their contributions
and those of ITT invested in a broad range of investment funds
including ITT stock. Federal law limits the amount of
compensation that can be used to determine employee and employer
contribution amounts ($245,000 in 2010) to the
tax-qualified plan. Accordingly, ITT has established and
maintains a non-qualified, unfunded ITT Excess Savings Plan that
is discussed in more detail in the narrative to the 2010
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table below.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will adopt and implement competitive
post-employment compensation programs. The specific plans and
terms of such plans have not yet been determined.
Post-Employment
Compensation
Salaried
Retirement Plan
Historically. Most of ITTs salaried
employees who work in the United States participate in the ITT
Salaried Retirement Plan. Under the plan, participants have the
option, on an annual basis, to elect to be covered by either a
Traditional Pension Plan or a Pension Equity Plan formula for
future pension accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan is a
tax-qualified plan, which provides a base of financial security
for employees after they cease working. The plan is described in
more detail in the narrative related to Pension Benefits in
Compensation Tables ITT Pension Benefits
and in the 2010 Pension Benefits table below.
Going Forward. It is expected that ITT will
transfer the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, together with all of
its associated assets and liabilities, to DCO and that DCO will
maintain the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan going forward. It is
expected that future accruals under the ITT Salaried Retirement
Plan will be capped at the spin-off for all WCO and ITT
employees not solely dedicated to DCO and that WCO and ITT will
adopt and implement competitive post-employment compensation
programs.
Excess
Pension Plans
Historically. Because federal law limits the
amount of benefits that can be paid and the amount of
compensation that can be recognized under tax-qualified
retirement plans, ITT has established and maintains
non-qualified, unfunded excess pension plans solely to pay
retirement benefits that could not be paid from the ITT Salaried
Retirement Plan. Benefits under the excess pension plans are
generally paid directly by ITT.
109
Participating officers with excess plan benefits had the
opportunity to make a one-time election prior to
December 31, 2008 to receive their excess benefit earned
under the Traditional Pension Plan formula (described in
Compensation Tables ITT Pension
Benefits) in a single discounted sum payment or as an
annuity. An election of a single-sum payment is only effective
if the officer meets the requirements for early or normal
retirement benefits under the plan; otherwise, the excess
benefit earned under the Traditional Pension Plan formula will
be paid as an annuity. Since the excess pension plans are an
unfunded obligation of ITT, in the event of a change of control,
any excess plan benefit would be immediately payable, subject to
any applicable Section 409A restrictions with respect to
form and timing of payments, and would be paid in a single
discounted sum. The single-sum payment provision provides
executives the earliest possible access to the funds in the
event of a change of control, and avoids leaving unfunded
pension payments in the hands of the acquirer.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will adopt and implement competitive
post-employment compensation programs. The specific plans and
terms of such plans have not yet been determined.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
Historically. ITT NEOs are also eligible to
participate in the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan, which is
described in more detail in Compensation
Tables ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. This
plan provides executives an opportunity to defer receipt of
between 2% and 90% of any AIP payments they earn. The amount of
deferred compensation ultimately received reflects the
performance of benchmark investment funds made available under
the Deferred Compensation Plan as selected by the executive.
Participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan may elect a fund
that tracks the performance of ITT common stock.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will adopt and implement competitive
post-employment compensation programs. The specific plans and
terms of such plans have not yet been determined.
Mr. Lorangers
Non-Qualified Pension Arrangement
Historically. Mr. Lorangers
employment agreement (the Steven R. Loranger Employment
Agreement), as described in Compensation
Tables Specific Compensation Arrangements,
provides for a non-qualified pension arrangement. Because
Mr. Loranger forfeited certain employment benefits,
including pension arrangements, when he left his prior employer,
the Steven R. Loranger Employment Agreement provides him with a
pension arrangement similar to the arrangement he forfeited.
Pensions and other post-retirement compensation for the NEOs are
discussed in more detail in the 2010 Pension Benefits narrative,
table and footnotes in Compensation Tables ITT
Pension Benefits, the Potential Post-Employment
Compensation Tables and footnotes in Compensation
Tables Potential Post-Employment Compensation
and in descriptions of the compensation arrangements for
Mr. Loranger in Compensation Tables
Specific Compensation Arrangements. The Steven R. Loranger
Employment Agreement was negotiated when Mr. Loranger
joined ITT.
Severance
Plan Arrangements
Historically. ITT maintains two severance
plans for its senior executives the Senior Executive
Severance Pay Plan and the Special Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan. ITTs Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan were originally
established in 1984 and are regularly reviewed by the ITT
Compensation Committee. These plans are described in more detail
Compensation Tables Potential Post-Employment
Compensation. The severance plans apply to ITTs key
employees as defined by Section 409A. ITTs severance
plan arrangements are not considered in determining other
elements of compensation.
Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. The
purpose of this plan is to provide a period of transition for
senior executives. Senior executives, other than
Mr. Loranger, who are U.S. citizens or who are
employed in
110
the United States are covered by this plan. The plan generally
provides for severance payments if ITT terminates a senior
executives employment without cause.
The exceptions to severance payment are:
|
|
|
|
|
the executive terminates his or her own employment,
|
|
|
|
the executives employment is terminated for cause,
|
|
|
|
termination occurs after the executives normal retirement
date under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, or
|
|
|
|
termination occurs in certain divestiture instances if the
executive accepts employment or refuses comparable employment.
|
No severance is provided for termination for cause, because ITT
believes employees terminated for cause should not receive
additional compensation. No severance is provided in the case of
termination after a normal retirement date because the executive
will be eligible for retirement payments under the ITT Salaried
Retirement Plan. No severance is provided where an executive
accepts or refuses comparable employment because the executive
has the opportunity to receive employment income from another
party under comparable circumstances.
Mses. McClain and Buonocore and Mr. Jimenez participate in
this plan. Mr. Loranger does not participate in this plan
because his severance arrangements, including severance pay and
benefits upon termination from ITT, are provided separately
under the Steven R. Loranger Employment Agreement described in
Compensation Tables Specific Compensation
Arrangements. Mr. Speetzen does not participate in
this plan. Mr. Speetzen is covered by the ITT Severance
Policy which provides for severance based on salary level and
years of service.
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay
Plan. The purpose of this plan is to provide
compensation in the case of termination of employment in
connection with an acceleration event (defined in
Compensation Tables Change of Control
Arrangements) including a change of control. The
provisions of this plan are specifically designed to address the
inability of senior executives to influence ITTs future
performance after certain change of control events. The plan is
structured to encourage executives to act in the best interests
of shareholders by providing for certain compensation and
retention benefits and payments, including change of control
provisions, in the case of an acceleration event.
The purposes of these provisions are to:
|
|
|
|
|
provide for continuing cohesive operations as executives
evaluate a transaction, which, without change of control
protection, could be personally adverse to the executive,
|
|
|
|
keep executives focused on preserving value for shareholders,
|
|
|
|
retain key talent in the face of potential transactions, and
|
|
|
|
aid in attracting talented employees in the competitive
marketplace.
|
As discussed above, this plan provides severance benefits for
covered executives, including any NEO whose employment is
terminated by ITT other than for cause, or where the covered
executive terminates his or her employment for good reason
within two years after the occurrence of an acceleration event
as described below (including a termination due to death or
disability) or if during the two-year period following an
acceleration event, the covered executive had grounds to resign
with good reason or the covered executives employment is
terminated in contemplation of an acceleration event that
ultimately occurs.
The plan is designed to put the executive in the same position,
from a compensation and benefits standpoint, as he or she would
have been in without the acceleration event. With respect to
incentive plan awards, since the executive will no longer have
the ability to influence the corporate objectives upon which the
awards are based, the plan provides that any AIP awards are paid
out at target 100%. In the event of a change of control, a
pro-rata portion of outstanding TSR awards will be paid through
the date of the change of
111
control based on actual performance and the balance of the award
will be paid at target (100%). More information about the
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan is provided in
Compensation Tables Potential Post-Employment
Compensation Special Senior Executive Severance Pay
Plan.
Mses. McClain and Buonocore participate in the Special Senior
Executive Severance Pay Plan at the highest level of benefits
and Messrs. Speetzen and Jimenez participate in the Special
Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan at the lower level.
Mr. Loranger does not participate in the plan because his
severance arrangements, which include severance pay and benefits
upon termination from ITT in connection with an acceleration
event, are set forth in the Steven R. Loranger Employment
Agreement, described in Compensation Tables
Specific Compensation Arrangements.
Going Forward. It is expected that the
Compensation Committee will adopt and implement severance plans
similar to the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and the
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and that each of the
NEOs, other than Mr. Loranger, will participate in these
plans. The specific arrangements and terms of such severance
plans or arrangements have not yet been determined.
Change
of Control Arrangements
Historically. As described more fully in
Compensation Tables Change of Control
Arrangements, many of ITTs short-term and long-term
incentive plans, severance arrangements and nonqualified
deferred compensation plans provide additional or accelerated
benefits upon a change of control. Generally, these change of
control provisions are intended to put the executive in the same
position he or she would have been in had the change of control
not occurred. Executives then can focus on preserving value for
shareholders when evaluating situations that, without change of
control provisions, could be personally adverse to the executive.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will provide for similar treatment of
short-term and long-term incentive plans, severance arrangements
and nonqualified deferred compensation plans upon a change of
control. The specific terms of these plans and arrangements have
yet not been determined.
Employee
Benefits and Perquisites
Historically. Executives, including the NEOs,
are eligible to participate in ITTs broad-based employee
benefits program. The program includes a pension program, an
investment and savings plan which includes before-tax and
after-tax savings features, group medical and dental coverage,
group life insurance, group accidental death and dismemberment
insurance and other benefit plans. These other benefit plans
include short- and long-term disability insurance, long-term
care insurance and a flexible spending account plan.
Certain
perquisites to the NEOs.
Historically. ITT provides only those
perquisites that it considers to be reasonable and consistent
with competitive practice. Beginning with tax year 2011, the ITT
Compensation Committee eliminated any tax
gross-up
provisions for the NEOs associated with financial counseling and
tax preparation for senior executives. No offsetting salary
increase will be provided. Perquisites (which are described more
fully in Compensation Tables All Other
Compensation Table and the related narrative) available
for NEOs include a car allowance up to $1,300 per month and
financial and estate planning. Mr. Lorangers
perquisites are separately discussed in Compensation
Tables Specific Compensation Arrangements.
Going Forward. The WCO Compensation Committee
will review these benefits and perquisites after the separation.
Consideration
of Tax and Accounting Impacts
Historically. Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount
of compensation that ITT may deduct in any one year with respect
to its Chief Executive Officer and the three other highest-paid
NEOs, other than the Chief Financial Officer. There is an
exception to the $1,000,000
112
limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain
requirements. Compensation attributable to awards under
ITTs AIP and long-term incentive program are generally
structured to qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m).
However, the ITT Compensation Committee realizes that evaluation
of the overall performance of the senior executives cannot be
reduced in all cases to a fixed formula. There may be situations
in which the prudent use of discretion in determining pay levels
is in the best interests of ITT and its shareholders and,
therefore, desirable. In those situations where discretion is
used, awards may be structured in ways that will not permit them
to qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m). The compensation of Mr. Loranger, as
ITTs President and CEO, may not be fully deductible under
these criteria. However, the ITT Compensation Committee does not
believe that such loss of deductibility would have any material
impact on the financial condition of ITT.
ITT has also agreed to provide a tax reimbursement should an
NEOs post-termination compensation be determined to
constitute an excess parachute payment. ITTs plans are
intended to comply with Section 409A, to the extent
applicable, and ITT made amendments to the plans during 2008 in
this regard. While ITT complies with other applicable sections
of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to compensation, ITT
and the ITT Compensation Committee do not consider other tax
implications in designing the Companys compensation
programs.
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will establish a similar policy and
practice with respect to compliance with Sections 162(m)
and 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Business
Risk and Compensation
Historically. In 2010, as in past years, the
ITT Compensation Committee evaluated risk factors associated
with ITTs businesses in determining compensation structure
and pay practices. The structure of the Board of Director
Committees facilitates this evaluation and determination. During
2010, the Chair of the ITT Compensation Committee was a member
of the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee Chair was a
member of the ITT Compensation Committee. This membership
overlap provides insight into ITTs business risks and
affords the ITT Compensation Committee access to the information
necessary to consider the impact of business risks on
compensation structure and pay practices. Further, overall
enterprise risk is considered and discussed at Board meetings,
providing additional important information to the ITT
Compensation Committee. The Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer attend those portions of the ITT Compensation
Committee meetings at which plan features and design
configurations of ITTs annual and long-term incentive
plans are considered and approved.
Compensation across the enterprise is structured so that
unnecessary or excessive risk-taking behavior is discouraged.
Further, total compensation for senior officers is heavily
weighted toward long-term compensation consistent with
ITTs compensation philosophy, which is focused on
long-term value creation. This long-term weighting discourages
behaviors that encourage short-term risks.
The following table summarizes our representative compensation
components or policies and relevant risk mitigation factors:
|
|
|
Compensation Component or Policy
|
|
Risk Mitigation Factor
|
|
Salary
|
|
Based on market rates.
|
|
|
Provides stability and minimizes
risk-taking incentives.
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
AIP design emphasizes overall
performance and collaboration among business Groups. ITTs
Fluid Technology, Motion & Flow Control and Defense &
Information Solutions businesses are each a business segment or
Group.
|
113
|
|
|
Compensation Component or Policy
|
|
Risk Mitigation Factor
|
|
|
|
AIP components focus on metrics that
encourage operating performance and earnings per share
appreciation.
|
|
|
AIP design is tailored to meet unique
business considerations for Corporate headquarters and business
Groups.
|
|
|
Individual AIP components and total AIP
awards are capped.
|
Long-Term Incentive Awards
|
|
|
Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock
Units
|
|
Restricted stock or restricted stock
units generally vest after three years.
|
Stock Options
|
|
Stock options vest after three years for
the Chief Executive Officer and for senior vice presidents and
in one-third cumulative annual installments after the first,
second and third anniversary of the grant date for other
optionees. Options awarded in 2010 and 2011 and options awarded
prior to 2005 expire ten years after the grant date. Options
awarded between 2005 and 2009 expire seven years after the grant
date.
|
|
|
The three-year vesting threshold for
senior vice presidents and the Chief Executive Officer and seven
and ten-year option terms encourage long-term behaviors.
|
Total Shareholder Return Awards
|
|
The TSR long-term award is based on
three-year share price performance and encourages behaviors
focused on long-term goals, while discouraging behaviors focused
on short-term risks.
|
Perquisites
|
|
Limited perquisites are based on competitive market data. The
ITT Compensation Committee has determined that tax
reimbursements related to financial counseling and tax
preparation for senior executives associated with the 2011 tax
year will be eliminated. No salary increase will be provided to
offset the elimination of tax reimbursement.
|
Severance and Pension benefits
|
|
Severance and pension benefits are in line with competitive
market data.
|
Recoupment Policy
|
|
Provides mechanism for senior executive compensation recapture
in certain situations involving fraud or willful misconduct.
|
Officer Share Ownership Guidelines
|
|
ITT officers are required to own ITT shares or share equivalents
up to 5x base salary, depending on the level of the officer
(discussed in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Stock Ownership Guidelines). Share
ownership guidelines align executive and shareholder interests.
ITT policy prohibits speculative trading in and out of ITT
securities, including prohibitions on short sales and leverage
transactions, such as puts, calls, and listed and unlisted
options.
|
114
Going Forward. It is expected that the WCO
Compensation Committee will adopt a compensation philosophy
similar to that of ITT, and that it will be structured and
operate similarly so as to discourage unnecessary or excessive
risk-taking and promote long-term value creation.
Action
Taken in Anticipation of Separation
The following are the anticipated compensation arrangements
expected in connection with the spin-off for each of the NEOs.
All of these arrangements are subject to review and approval by
the WCO Compensation Committee. Similar to 2010 and past years,
the ITT Compensation Committee reviewed CDB information provided
by the Compensation Consultant with respect to the
174 companies listed on Annex A to this Information
Statement. The ITT Compensation Committee used this information
to determine market median dollar values for each of the NEOs
for annual base salaries effective upon completion of the
spin-off, the Target 2012 Long-Term Incentive Award and target
awards for the 2012 Annual Incentive Award, a Founders
Grant and for Ms. Buonocore and Messrs. Speetzen and
Jimenez, a Transaction Success Incentive Award. Compensation
levels within approximately 10% above or below the market median
dollar value are considered by the Compensation Consultant and
the ITT Compensation Committee to be within the market median
range. The ITT Compensation Committee used the CDB information,
along with other qualitative information described below, in
making its determination of anticipated target and actual
compensation to be provided to each of the NEOs. For
Ms. McClain and Mr. Speetzen, the ITT Compensation
Committee determined to set their compensation levels below the
market median range based on the relatively short tenure each
will have in their positions at WCO. For Mr. Jimenez and
Ms. Buonocore, the ITT Compensation Committee determined to
set their compensation levels above the market median range
primarily based on the importance of their positions to the
success of WCO.
Founders Grants and 2012 Long-Term Incentive Awards
will be equity-based awards as determined by the WCO
Compensation Committee. It is anticipated that Founders
Grants will be awarded to each of the NEOs and to other
employees in positions deemed critical to the establishment and
success of WCO and are intended to closely align the economic
interests of the recipients with the WCO shareholders. It is
anticipated that the Founders Grants will comprise the
following: one-half of the Founders Grant award will be in
restricted stock units and one-half will be in stock options,
which combined awards will have a grant date fair value equal to
the dollar value of the Founders Grant. It is anticipated
that the restricted stock units will be subject to three-year
cliff vesting and the stock options will vest in one-third
cumulative annual installments on the date of the award.
Founders Grants are expressed below as an aggregate grant
date fair value. The Target Transaction Success Incentive Award
is a cash award payable with the 2011 AIP Award and is expected
to include consideration of the following factors in determining
the actual payout of the award: timely completion of the
spin-off, retention of key employees and control of corporate
costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
|
Annual Base Salary
|
|
|
Target 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success
|
|
Named Executive
|
|
Effective Upon
|
|
|
Annual Incentive
|
|
|
2012 Long-Term
|
|
|
Founders
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Officer
|
|
Spin-Off
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
Incentive Award
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
100% of Annual Base Salary
|
|
|
$
|
3,400,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
$
|
439,000
|
|
|
|
80% of Annual Base Salary
|
|
|
$
|
746,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,000
|
|
|
$
|
160,000
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
$
|
435,000
|
|
|
|
60% of Annual Base Salary
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,050, 000
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
$
|
365,000
|
|
|
|
60% of Annual Base Salary
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
185,000
|
|
115
Compensation
Tables
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
|
($)(f)
|
|
|
($)(g)
|
|
|
($)(h)
|
|
|
($)(i)
|
|
|
($)(j)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
527,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,335
|
|
|
|
372,279
|
|
|
|
654,700
|
|
|
|
97,308
|
|
|
|
74,141
|
|
|
|
2,487,367
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
504,054
|
|
|
|
61,000
|
|
|
|
2,426,708
|
|
|
|
317,269
|
|
|
|
474,600
|
|
|
|
70,753
|
|
|
|
65,453
|
|
|
|
3,919,837
|
|
(formerly Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
426,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801,010
|
|
|
|
249,883
|
|
|
|
527,700
|
|
|
|
39,611
|
|
|
|
139,099
|
|
|
|
2,183,765
|
|
and President, Fluid and Motion Control of ITT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
309,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639,393
|
|
|
|
100,104
|
|
|
|
260,100
|
|
|
|
20,508
|
|
|
|
45,978
|
|
|
|
1,375,775
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (formerly Vice President of Finance for
Fluid and Motion Control of ITT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
1,154,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,187,372
|
|
|
|
2,047,462
|
|
|
|
2,328,352
|
|
|
|
2,602,844
|
|
|
|
314,791
|
|
|
|
12,635,052
|
|
Executive Chairman
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
1,130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,713,945
|
|
|
|
1,744,716
|
|
|
|
1,909,700
|
|
|
|
4,940,075
|
|
|
|
406,545
|
|
|
|
13,844,981
|
|
(formerly, Chairman, President
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,119,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,806,163
|
|
|
|
1,499,000
|
|
|
|
2,534,025
|
|
|
|
2,508,911
|
|
|
|
211,125
|
|
|
|
12,678,839
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer of ITT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
412,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,524
|
|
|
|
166,817
|
|
|
|
384,500
|
|
|
|
47,578
|
|
|
|
54,855
|
|
|
|
1,418,389
|
|
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (formerly Vice President
and General Counsel of ITT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
338,077
|
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
285,521
|
|
|
|
139,614
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
64,169
|
|
|
|
41,785
|
|
|
|
1,199,866
|
|
Chief Communications Officer (formerly Senior Vice President and
Chief Communications Officer of ITT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
For the 2010 performance year, the ITT Compensation Committee
awarded Ms. Buonocore a discretionary bonus of $15,700,
which payment was outside the AIP plan. This award was in
recognition of Ms. Buonocores strong contributions
and strategic importance to the business. For the 2009
performance year, the ITT Compensation Committee awarded
Ms. McClain a discretionary bonus of $61,000, which payment
was outside the AIP plan. This award was in recognition of
Ms. McClains exceptional business leadership of the
Fluid Technology and Motion and Flow Control business segments
during difficult economic conditions. |
|
(e) |
|
Amounts in the Stock Awards column include the aggregate grant
date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718
for TSR units and restricted stock. The TSR is considered a
liability plan under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. A
discussion of restricted stock units, restricted stock, and the
TSR may be found in Note 4 to the Combined Financial
Statements in this Information Statement. The values of TSR
units at target for the
2010-2012
performance period for Ms. McClain, Mr. Speetzen,
Mr. Loranger, Mr. Jimenez and Ms. Buonocore were
$360,000, $100,000, $1,980,000, $166,700, and $135,000
respectively. Assuming the maximum value at the highest level of
achievement, Ms. McClain, Mr. Speetzen,
Mr. Loranger, Mr. Jimenez and Ms. Buonocore would
receive TSR unit payouts of $720,000, $200,000, $3,960,000,
$333,400 and $270,000, respectively, following the end of the
performance period. |
|
(f) |
|
Amounts in the Option Awards column include the aggregate grant
date fair value of: non-qualified stock option awards in the
year of grant based on a binomial lattice value of $15.48 for
Ms. McClain, Mr. Loranger, and Ms. Buonocore and
$14.03 for Mr. Speetzen and Mr. Jimenez for the 2010
grant year; $10.53 for Ms. McClain, and Mr. Loranger
for the 2009 grant year and $14.99 for Ms. McClain and
Mr. Loranger for the 2008 grant year. A discussion of
assumptions relating to option awards may be found in
Note 4 to the Combined Financial Statements in this
Information Statement. |
|
(g) |
|
Amounts in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column
represent AIP awards for performance year 2010, which to the
extent not deferred by an executive, were paid out shortly after
that date. |
116
|
|
|
(h) |
|
No NEO received preferential or above-market earnings on
deferred compensation. The change in the present value in
accrued pension benefits was determined by measuring the present
value of the accrued benefit at the respective dates using a
discount rate of 6.25% at December 31, 2008, 6.00% at
December 31, 2009, and 5.75% at December 31, 2010
(corresponding to the discount rates used for the ITT Salaried
Retirement Plan, which is a component of ITTs consolidated
pension plans, as described in Note 13 to the Combined
Financial Statements in this Information Statement and based on
the assumption that retirement occurs at the earliest date the
individual could retire with an unreduced retirement benefit.)
The amount for Mr. Loranger includes an increase in value
of $593,304 and $1,971,058 representing an increase in the value
of his accrued benefit under the ITT Excess Pension Plan and the
Special Pension Arrangement, respectively, described in
Compensation Tables ITT Pension Benefits. |
|
(i) |
|
Amounts in this column for 2010 represent items specified in the
All Other Compensation Table below. |
All Other
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Compensation
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Savings
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total All
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Plan Contri-
|
|
|
Reimburse-
|
|
|
401(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
Counseling
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
|
butions
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
Match
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
8,936
|
|
|
|
15,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,600
|
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
14,263
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
74,141
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
15,868
|
|
|
|
13,200
|
|
|
|
29,798
|
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
10,878
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
45,978
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
152,979
|
|
|
|
63,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,600
|
|
|
|
231,745
|
|
|
|
31,823
|
|
|
|
37,746
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
314,791
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,600
|
|
|
|
30,400
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
9,079
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
54,855
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,600
|
|
|
|
24,235
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
4,922
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
41,785
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Amounts reflect the aggregate incremental cost to ITT for
personal use of the corporate aircraft for Mr. Loranger and
Ms. McClain. Mr. Lorangers employment agreement
with ITT permits occasional personal use of ITT aircraft.
Ms. McClains personal use of the corporate aircraft
related to a trip where Ms. McClain was a passenger on a
trip previously scheduled by Mr. Loranger. The aggregate
incremental cost to ITT is determined on a per-flight basis and
includes the cost of fuel, a pro-rata share of repairs and
maintenance, landing and storage fees, crew-related expenses and
other miscellaneous variable costs. A different value
attributable to personal use of the corporate aircraft (as
calculated in accordance with Internal Revenue Service
guidelines) is included as compensation on the
W-2s for
Mr. Loranger and Ms. McClain in the amounts of $30,542
and $1,771 respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts represent financial counseling and tax service fees paid
during 2010. Financial counseling and tax service fees reflect
fees for invoices submitted during the calendar year. |
|
(d) |
|
For Mr. Speetzen amounts in this column represent
relocation-related
expenses. |
|
(e) |
|
Auto allowances are provided to a range of executives, including
the NEOs. |
|
(g) |
|
ITT contributions to the ITT Excess Savings Plan are unfunded
and earnings accrue at the same rate as the Stable Value Fund
available to participants in the ITT Salaried Investment and
Savings Plan. |
|
(h) |
|
Amounts in this column are tax reimbursement allowances intended
to offset the inclusion of taxable income of financial
counseling and tax preparation services. Tax reimbursement for
financial counseling has been eliminated for the 2011 tax year.
No compensating salary increase will be provided.
Mr. Jimenezs amount also includes a tax-related
relocation reimbursement of $130. Amounts for Mr. Speetzen
represent tax reimbursements related to a relocation. |
|
(i) |
|
Amounts represent the aggregate of ITTs floor and matching
contributions to the participants ITT Salaried Investment
and Savings Plan account. |
|
(j) |
|
Amounts include taxable group term-life insurance premiums
attributable to each NEO. |
117
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table provides information about 2010 equity and
non-equity awards for the NEOs. The table includes the grant
date for equity-based awards, the estimated future payouts under
non-equity incentive plan awards (which consist of potential
payouts under the 2010 AIP) and estimated future payouts under
2010 equity incentive plan awards (which consist of the TSR
target award granted in 2010 for the
2010-2012
performance period (each unit equals $1)). Also provided is the
number of shares underlying all other stock awards, comprising
restricted stock and non-qualified stock option awards. The
table also provides the exercise price of the non-qualified
stock option awards, reflecting the closing price of ITT stock
on the grant date and the grant date fair value of each equity
award computed under FASB ASC Topic 718. The compensation plans
under which the grants in the following table were made are
described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and
include the AIP, TSR, restricted stock awards, and non-qualified
stock options awards.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Base Price of
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
of Stock or
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Units (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,000
|
|
|
|
424,000
|
|
|
|
848,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,335
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,049
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
372,279
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
312,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,473
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,920
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
100,104
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754,000
|
|
|
|
1,508,000
|
|
|
|
3,016,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990,000
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
3,960,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,207,372
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,265
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
2,047,462
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,500
|
|
|
|
249,000
|
|
|
|
498,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,350
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
333,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,824
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
166,817
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,521
|
|
|
|
|
05-Mar-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
139,614
|
|
|
|
|
(c)(d)(e) |
|
Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum payment
levels, respectively, if an award payout is achieved under the
2010 AIP described above in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Overview of the AIP And Long-Term Incentive
Target Awards) These potential payments are based on
achievement of specific performance metrics and are completely
at risk. The target award is computed based upon the applicable
range of net estimated payments denominated in dollars where the
target award is equal to 100% of the award potential, the
threshold is equal to 50% of target and the maximum is equal to
200% of target. |
118
|
|
|
(f)(g)(h) |
|
Amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum payment
levels, if an award payout is achieved, under ITTs TSR
Plan for the
2010-2012
performance period described above in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis Long-Term Incentive Awards
Program Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Awards
Subcomponent. Each unit under the TSR Plan equals $1.
Payments, if any, under the TSR Plan are paid in cash at the end
of the performance period. The performance period for awards
under ITTs TSR Plan, reflected in the Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards column, for the
2010-2012
performance period is January 1,
2010-December 31,
2012. |
|
(i) |
|
Amounts reflect the number of shares of restricted stock granted
in 2010 to the NEOs. The number of shares underlying restricted
stock awards is determined by the average of the high and low
stock price on the program valuation date of February 8,
2010. Restricted stock grants to NEOs generally vest in full at
the end of the three-year restriction period following the grant
date. During the restriction period, the holder receives
dividends and may vote the shares. With respect to
Mr. Speetzen, 2,400 of the 8,000 shares of restricted
stock received on March 5, 2010 as a special retention
award vest on March 5, 2013 and the remaining
5,600 shares vest on March 5, 2014. |
|
(j) |
|
Amounts reflect the number of non-qualified stock options
granted in 2010 to the NEOs. Such non-qualified stock options
generally become exercisable at the end of the three-year period
following the grant date and expire ten years after the grant
date. For Mr. Speetzen and Mr. Jimenez, one-third of
non-qualified stock options granted in 2010 vest in 2011,
one-third vest in 2012 and one-third vest in 2013. |
|
(k) |
|
The option exercise price for non-qualified stock options
granted in 2010 was the closing price of ITT common stock on
March 5, 2010, the date the non-qualified stock options
were granted. |
|
(l) |
|
Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for TSR target
awards, restricted stock awards and non-qualified stock option
awards granted to the NEOs in 2010. |
Specific
Compensation Arrangements
Mr. Lorangers
Employment Agreement with ITT
Term: The original term of the Steven R. Loranger Employment
Agreement was from June 28, 2004 to June 27, 2007,
subject to automatic
12-month
extensions unless ITT or Mr. Loranger provides at least
180 days prior written notice of non-extension.
Mr. Lorangers employment agreement has been extended
to June 27, 2011 as no notice of non-extension was provided
in 2010.
Annual Base Salary: Mr. Loranger receives a base salary
under his employment agreement, subject to increase by the Board
of Directors. On March 8, 2010, Mr. Lorangers
base salary was $1,160,000. Effective March 7, 2011
Mr. Lorangers base salary was $1,200,000.
Mr. Loranger participates in our AIP and Long-Term
Incentive Award programs discussed in Compensation
Discussion and Analysis Overview of the AIP and
Long-Term Incentive Target Awards and in the Summary
Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2010 Table
below.
Restricted Stock Units (RSU): Mr. Loranger
received 250,000 restricted stock units granted on June 28,
2004, in connection with the Steven R. Loranger Employment
Agreement. The units vested in one-third installments on
June 28, 2007, June 28, 2008 and June 28, 2010.
One-half of the vesting RSUs settle upon the vesting date and
the remaining one-half of the vesting RSUs settle within ten
days of Mr. Lorangers termination of employment.
During the restriction period, Mr. Loranger could not vote
the shares but was credited for RSU dividends that vested and
settled following the terms of the original award.
Mr. Lorangers Special Pension Arrangement:
Mr. Loranger has a Special Pension Arrangement, which is
described below under Compensation Tables ITT
Pension Benefits Special Pension Arrangement.
Severance Arrangements: Under Mr. Lorangers
employment agreement, if Mr. Lorangers employment is
terminated prior to June 28, 2011 by ITT without
cause or by Mr. Loranger for good
reason (as each such
119
term is defined in the employment agreement), in either case
upon or following a Change of Control (as defined in
the employment agreement), Mr. Loranger would be entitled
to receive a lump-sum payment of the actuarial present value of
his non-qualified pension as a Special Pension Arrangement.
These pension benefits are offset by any benefits to which he is
entitled (or which he already has received) under other defined
benefit pension arrangements maintained by ITT or any prior
employer. Mr. Loranger is also entitled to retiree medical
coverage as such coverage is in effect for persons joining ITT
on June 28, 2004 (the effective date of
Mr. Lorangers employment), provided that if his
employment is terminated by ITT without cause or by him for good
reason on or after June 28, 2005, that termination will be
considered a retirement under ITTs retiree
medical plan and will entitle Mr. Loranger to receive
benefits under that arrangement.
If Mr. Loranger resigns or is terminated for cause he would
receive no TSR payment. In the event of termination without
cause he would receive payment, if any, on a pro-rata portion of
the outstanding TSR as of the termination date, based on
ITTs performance. If Mr. Lorangers employment
terminates due to disability, death or normal retirement
(defined as age 65), he (or his estate) will be entitled to
receive a pro-rata payment of the target AIP award for the year
of termination and payment of the pro-rata target award for each
outstanding TSR award (or such greater amount as is provided
under the TSR award agreement). If Mr. Lorangers
employment is terminated by ITT without Cause or by
Mr. Loranger for Good Reason (other than during the
two-year period following a Change of Control),
Mr. Loranger will be entitled to (i) a lump sum
payment of (A) any earned but unpaid base salary through
the date of termination, (B) any earned but unpaid AIP for
any calendar year preceding the year in which the termination
occurs, plus (C) a lump sum payment equal to the product of
(x) Mr. Lorangers base Salary (at the rate then
in effect) multiplied by (y) a fraction, the numerator of
which is number of days Mr. Loranger was employed during
the calendar year in which he was terminated and the denominator
of which is 365 (collectively, the Accrued
Obligations) plus (ii) twenty-four (24) monthly
payments, each of which shall be equal to one twenty-fourth of
the sum of (A) two times his base salary (at the rate then
in effect) and (B) two times his target AIP; all such
payments subject to Section 409A timing and payment
requirements. If, within the two-year period following a Change
of Control, ITT terminates Mr. Lorangers employment
without cause or Mr. Loranger terminates his employment for
good reason, ITT will pay Mr. Loranger a lump-sum payment
consisting of (i) the Accrued Obligations, and (ii) a
severance payment equal to three times the sum of his base
salary and the highest AIP payment paid to him in the three
years prior to the Change of Control subject to
Section 409A timing and payment requirements.
Mr. Loranger would also receive continued health and
welfare benefits for up to two years following a termination
without cause or for good reason (whether before or after a
Change of Control). If Mr. Lorangers employment is
terminated at the end of the initial term or any successive
twelve-month renewal period due to ITT giving a non-extension
notice, such termination will be treated as a termination
without cause, except that his base salary and target bonus will
only be continued for one year. If any payments to
Mr. Loranger are determined to be excess parachute payments
under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, he will
receive a
gross-up
payment with respect to the excise taxes incurred by him. All
severance payments are conditioned upon Mr. Lorangers
execution of a general release.
Restrictive Covenants: In his employment agreement,
Mr. Loranger agreed that during the employment term and for
two years after termination, he would not compete with ITT. He
also agreed that he would not solicit or hire any of ITTs
employees or anyone who was an employee in the previous six
months before his departure without ITTs consent, or
solicit any of ITTs customers or business.
Mr. Loranger also agreed not to make any false or
disparaging statements at any time about ITT. ITT has agreed
that after Mr. Lorangers termination we will instruct
our directors and officers not to make any false or disparaging
remarks about Mr. Loranger. In addition, Mr. Loranger
agreed to follow our Code of Conduct, and he agreed not to
reveal any confidential ITT information or personal information
about our officers, directors or employees except as necessary
during employment. Mr. Loranger has assigned all rights to
any ITT discoveries, inventions or ideas to ITT. If
Mr. Loranger violates any of these covenants, ITT may stop
paying any post-termination benefits.
Perquisites and Other Compensation: Mr. Loranger is
eligible to participate in ITTs benefit plans on the same
basis as other senior executives, may use corporate aircraft for
business travel, and occasional personal use (when not otherwise
scheduled for business use) and may bring his spouse on such
travel. Mr. Loranger receives a monthly car allowance of
$1,300.
120
Mr. Loranger receives employee benefits, fringe benefits
and employment and post-employment privileges on terms no less
favorable to Mr. Loranger than to our other senior
executives or those provided to our former Chief Executive
Officer. As with other senior executives, however, the Committee
uses the same CDB, regressed for size and adjusted for scope of
operations, to evaluate Mr. Lorangers compensation
and market trends.
Financial Planning: Mr. Loranger receives reimbursement for
reasonable costs associated with tax planning and financial
counseling. Such costs are not subject to tax reimbursement
starting with financial counseling and tax planning associated
with the 2011 tax year. ITT also agreed to reimburse
Mr. Loranger for any legal and accounting expenses paid in
connection with the filing of any tax return or dispute with the
Internal Revenue Service regarding the golden parachute excise
tax that may occur on a change of control. Further, if a
disagreement arises out of the employment agreement and
Mr. Loranger prevails on any material issue, ITT will pay
for all fees and any expenses relating to the arbitration or
litigation, including his reasonable attorney fees and expenses.
Mr. Lorangers perquisites and other compensation are
discussed in more detail in the All Other Compensation Table
above.
121
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Units or Other
|
|
|
Units or Other
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercis-
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Name
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
able
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
Exercisable(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(#)(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.59
|
|
|
|
9/19/2012
|
|
|
|
74,500
|
|
|
|
3,882,195
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
8,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.68
|
|
|
|
3/6/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.99
|
|
|
|
3/7/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.09
|
|
|
|
3/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.19
|
|
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
|
|
6,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.19
|
|
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
12,723
|
|
|
|
662,996
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
199,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.47
|
|
|
|
3/8/2012
|
|
|
|
121,880
|
|
|
|
6,351,167
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
|
83,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.68
|
|
|
|
3/6/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.99
|
|
|
|
3/7/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.52
|
|
|
|
6/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.09
|
|
|
|
3/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.19
|
|
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
|
|
11,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.81
|
|
|
|
6/9/2016
|
|
|
|
7,111
|
|
|
|
370,554
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
6,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.99
|
|
|
|
3/7/2014
|
|
|
|
12,310
|
|
|
|
641,474
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.09
|
|
|
|
3/10/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.19
|
|
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.49
|
|
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Vesting Schedule for Unexercisable Options (options vest on the
applicable anniversary of the grant date.) |
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Schedule (#s)
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
3/10/2008
|
|
3/10/2015
|
|
|
16,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,049
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
3/10/2008
|
|
3/10/2015
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,265
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
6/9/2009
|
|
6/9/2016
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
3/10/2008
|
|
3/10/2015
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
3/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
3/5/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Vesting Schedule for Restricted Stock (restricted stock vests on
the applicable anniversary of the grant date.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting Schedule (#)
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
3/10/2008
|
|
|
4,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
3/10/2008
|
|
|
28,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
6/9/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
3/7/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/10/2008
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Reflects ITTs closing stock price of $52.11 on
December 31, 2010. |
|
|
|
(i)(j) |
|
Awards are typically expressed as target cash awards and
payment, if any, is in cash following the end of the performance
cycle. Column (i) represents the number of units at
threshold levels (50% of target) based on ITTs stock price
performance at year-end and column (j) represents the
market or payout value of such units (each unit = $1). See
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program Total Shareholder Return
(TSR) Awards Subcomponent for material terms of ITTs
TSR grants. |
123
The following table represents the vesting schedule of
outstanding TSR awards on December 31 of 2011 and 2012, with
each TSR unit reflecting $1 of value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Award in
|
|
|
Vesting Schedule
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Approval Date(1)
|
|
Units (#)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez(2)
|
|
6/9/2009
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
3/5/2009
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of the TSR, the grant date is January 1, the
first day of the performance period for the year in which the
award is approved. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Jimenez joined ITT on June 8, 2009. His target TSR
award was granted effective on the next business day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Exercises & Stock Vested
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
|
|
Acquired on Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Acquired on Vesting
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
|
195,150
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,522
|
|
|
|
5,562,859
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,332
|
|
|
|
445,679
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects aggregate dollar value upon vesting of restricted stock
reflected in column (d). |
|
(e) |
|
On June 28, 2004, Mr. Loranger received an award of
250,000 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) under the ITT
2003 Equity Incentive Plan in connection with his employment
agreement. The last tranche of Mr. Lorangers
June 28, 2004 award vested on June 28, 2010. This
vesting included restricted stock units and applicable
restricted unit dividends, in an amount equal to
88,821 shares. On the June 28, 2010 vesting date
approximately one-half of the restricted stock units settled,
with a value of $2,149,635 and the remainder of
42,869 shares were deferred and will settle within ten days
of Mr. Lorangers termination of employment. The value
of this deferred amount was $2,005,412 on the vesting date. In
addition, 2,227 restricted stock unit dividends (representing
dividends attributable to shares which previously vested)
vested, of which 369 settled and 1,858 were deferred. |
|
|
|
With respect to all NEOs, the amount in column (e) does not
include payment for the
2008-2010
TSR award, which vested on December 31, 2010, as ITTs
relative share price appreciation did not meet the minimum
threshold requirement for a payment. |
ITT
Pension Benefits
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan. Under the ITT
Salaried Retirement Plan, participants have the option, on an
annual basis, to elect to be covered under either a Traditional
Pension Plan or a Pension Equity Plan formula for future pension
accruals. The ITT Salaried Retirement Plan is a funded and
tax-qualified retirement
124
program. The plan is described in detail below. All of the NEOs
participate in the Traditional Pension Plan formula of the ITT
Salaried Retirement Plan.
While the Traditional Pension Plan formula pays benefits on a
monthly basis after retirement, the Pension Equity Plan formula
enables participants to elect to have benefits paid as a single
sum payment upon employment termination, regardless of the
participants age. The Traditional Pension Plan benefit
payable to an employee depends upon the date an employee first
became a participant under the plan.
A participant first employed on or after January 1, 2000,
under the Traditional Pension Plan would receive an annual
pension that would equal:
|
|
|
|
|
11/2%
of his or her average final compensation (as defined below) for
each year of benefit service up to 40 years, reduced by
|
|
|
|
11/4%
of his or her primary Social Security benefit for each year of
benefit service up to a maximum of 40 years.
|
For a participant first employed prior to January 1, 2005,
average final compensation (including salary and approved bonus
or AIP payments) is the total of:
|
|
|
|
|
the participants average annual base salary for the five
calendar years of the last 120 consecutive calendar months of
eligibility service that would result in the highest average
annual base salary amount, plus
|
|
|
|
the participants average annual pension eligible
compensation, not including base salary, for the five calendar
years of the participants last 120 consecutive calendar
months of eligibility service that would result in the highest
average annual compensation amount.
|
For a participant first employed on or after January 1,
2005, average final compensation is the average of the
participants total pension eligible compensation (salary,
bonus and annual incentive payments for NEOs and other exempt
salaried employees) over the highest five consecutive calendar
years of the participants final 120 months of
eligibility service.
For participants first employed from January 1, 2000
through December 31, 2004, under the Traditional Pension
Plan, Standard Early Retirement is available to employees at
least 55 years of age with 10 years of eligibility
service. If payments begin before age 65, payments from
anticipated payments at the normal retirement age of 65 (the
Normal Retirement Age) are reduced by 1/4% of 1% for
each month that payments commence prior to the Normal Retirement
Age. Special Early Retirement is also available to employees who
have attained at least age 55 with 15 years of
eligibility service (but not earlier than age 55). For
Special Early Retirement, the benefit payable at or after
age 62 would be at 100%; if payments commence prior to
age 62 they would be reduced by 5/12 of 1% for each of the
first 48 months prior to age 62 and by an additional
4/12 of 1% for each of the next 12 months and by an
additional 3/12 of 1% for each month prior to age 57. For
participants first employed on or after January 1, 2005,
and who retire before age 65, benefits may commence at or
after age 55 but the benefit would be reduced by 5/9 of 1%
for each of the first 60 months prior to age 65 and an
additional 5/18 of 1% for each month prior to age 60.
In December 2007, effective January 1, 2008, the ITT
Salaried Retirement Plan and the ITT Excess Pension Plans were
amended to provide for a three-year vesting requirement. In
addition, for employees who are already vested and who are
involuntarily terminated and entitled to severance payments from
ITT, additional months of age and service (not to exceed
24 months) are to be imputed based on the employees
actual service to his or her last day worked, solely for
purposes of determining eligibility for early retirement.
The 2010 Pension Benefits below provides information on the
pension benefits for the NEOs. At the present time, none of the
NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table has elected to
accrue benefits under the Pension Equity Plan formula.
Mr. Loranger participates under the terms of the plan in
effect for employees hired between January 1, 2000 and
December 31, 2004 and Mses. McClain and Buonocore and
Messrs. Jimenez and Speetzen participate under the terms of
the plan in effect for employees hired after January 1,
2005. However, Mr. Speetzen has not yet accrued a vested
pension benefit. Employees may retire
125
as early as age 55 under the terms of the plan. Pensions
may be reduced if retirement starts before age 65. Possible
pension reductions are described above.
Benefits under this plan are subject to the limitations imposed
under Sections 415 and 401(a) (17) of the Internal
Revenue Code in effect as of December 31, 2010.
Section 415 limits the amount of annual pension payable
from a qualified plan. For 2010, this limit is $195,000 per year
for a single-life annuity payable at an IRS-prescribed
retirement age. This ceiling may be actuarially adjusted in
accordance with IRS rules for items such as employee
contributions, other forms of distribution and different annuity
starting dates. Section 401(a)(17) limits the amount of
compensation that may be recognized in the determination of a
benefit under a qualified plan. For 2010, this limit is $245,000.
ITT Excess Pension Plan. Since federal law
limits the amount of benefits paid under and the amount of
compensation recognized under tax-qualified retirement plans,
ITT maintains the unfunded ITT Excess Pension Plan, which is not
qualified for tax purposes. The purpose of the ITT Excess
Pension Plan is to restore benefits calculated under the ITT
Salaried Retirement Plan formula that cannot be paid because of
the IRS limitations noted above. ITT has not granted any extra
years of benefit service to any employee under either the ITT
Salaried Retirement Plan or the Excess Pension Plan. In the
event of a change of control, certain extra years of service may
be allowed in accordance with the terms of the Special Senior
Executive Severance Pay Plan described in Compensation
Tables Potential Post-Employment
Compensation Special Senior Executive Severance Pay
Plan.
In the event of a change of control, any excess plan benefit
would be immediately payable, subject to any applicable
Section 409A restrictions with respect to form and timing
of payments, and would be paid in a single discounted sum.
Amendments to the excess pension plan related to
Section 409A compliance, while not modifying the previously
disclosed definition of change in control in the excess pension
plan, provide that payouts of pension amounts earned since
January 1, 2005 require a change in control involving an
acceleration event of 30% or more of ITTs outstanding
stock.
Special Pension
Arrangement. Mr. Lorangers employment
agreement with ITT provides for a non-qualified pension
arrangement if Mr. Lorangers employment is terminated
on or after June 28, 2009, or under certain circumstances
prior to that date. This arrangement provides for an annuity
paid monthly over Mr. Lorangers life, calculated as a
percentage of his average annual compensation for the five years
in which his compensation was highest, which percentage ranges
from 38%, if Mr. Loranger is age 57 upon the date of
his termination, to 50%, if Mr. Loranger is at least
age 60 on the date of his termination. Any amount so
determined will be reduced by the amount to which
Mr. Loranger is entitled under the pension plans of ITT or
the plans of any prior employer. Quantification of
Mr. Lorangers pension arrangements, as of
December 31, 2010, is provided in the 2010 Pension Benefits
table below and the arrangements are further discussed in
footnote (5) to Mr. Lorangers Potential
Post-Employment Compensation table below.
No pension benefits were paid to any of the named executives in
the last fiscal year.
126
Pension
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value of
|
|
|
Present Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit at
|
|
|
Benefit at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Normal
|
|
|
Earliest Date for
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Credited
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Unreduced
|
|
|
During Last
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service (#)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
Name(a)
|
|
Plan Name(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
72,062
|
|
|
|
72,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
17,205
|
|
|
|
17,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
13,562
|
|
|
|
13,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
150,257
|
|
|
|
150,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
2,017,943
|
|
|
|
2,017,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Pension Arrangement
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
5,579,701
|
|
|
|
10,732,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
17,912
|
|
|
|
17,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
29,666
|
|
|
|
29,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
70,464
|
|
|
|
70,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumptions used to determine present value as of
December 31, 2010 are as follows: |
|
|
|
Measurement date: December 31, 2010; Discount Rate: 5.75%;
Mortality (pre-commencement): None; Mortality
(post-commencement): UP-94 Mortality Table; Termination of
Employment: Age 65 for all participants; Present value is
based on the single life annuity payable beginning on the first
day of the month at normal retirement age 65 (column (d))
or the earliest time at which a participant may retire under the
plan without any benefit reduction due to age (column (e)). The
six-month delay under the Pension Plan for specified
employees as required under Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code was disregarded for this purpose. All
results shown are estimates only; actual benefits will be based
on precise credited service and compensation history, which will
be determined at termination of employment. |
|
|
|
The 2010 row of the column titled Change in Pension Plan
Value & Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings in
the Summary Compensation Table quantifies the change in the
present value of the Pension Plan benefit from December 31,
2009 to December 31, 2010. To determine the present value
of the plan benefit as of December 31, 2009, the same
assumptions that are described above to determine present value
as of December 31, 2010 were used, except a 5.75% interest
rate was used to determine the present value, as compared to a
6.00% interest rate as of December 31, 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
The accumulated benefit is based on service and earnings (base
salary and bonus and/or AIP payment) considered by the plans for
the period through December 31, 2010, and represents the
actuarial present value under ASC Topic 715 of pension earned to
date and payable at the assumed normal retirement age for the
named executives as defined under each plan, based upon
actuarial factors and assumptions used in Note 13 to the
Combined Financial Statements in this Information Statement and
as described in (1) above, regardless of whether or not the
executive has vested in this benefit. Mr. Lorangers
Special Pension Arrangement is described in detail above under
Compensation Tables ITT Pension
Benefits Special Pension Arrangement.
Mr. Loranger received a special pension arrangement in
connection with his employment agreement to reflect the pension
benefit with prior employers which he agreed to forego when he
entered into his employment agreement with ITT. |
|
(e) |
|
The amounts represent the actuarial present value of the
accumulated benefit at December 31, 2010, for the named
executives under each plan based upon actuarial factors and
assumptions used in Note 13 to the Combined Financial
Statements in this Information Statement and as described in
(1) above, where the retirement age is assumed to be the
earliest age at which the individual can receive undiscounted
early retirement benefits. Mr. Loranger has a Special
Pension Arrangement. The present value of the accumulated
benefit at the earliest date for unreduced benefits with respect
to the Special Pension Arrangement for Mr. Loranger is
$10,732,988. |
127
ITT
Deferred Compensation Plan
ITT Deferred Compensation Plan. The ITT
Deferred Compensation Plan is a tax deferral plan. The ITT
Deferred Compensation Plan permits eligible executives with a
base salary of at least $200,000 to defer between 2% and 90% of
their AIP payment. The AIP amount deferred is included in the
Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation. Withdrawals under the plan are available on
payment dates elected by participants at the time of the
deferral election. The withdrawal election is irrevocable except
in cases of demonstrated hardship due to an unforeseeable
emergency as provided by the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan.
Amounts deferred will be unsecured general obligations of ITT to
pay the deferred compensation in the future and will rank with
other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of ITT.
Participants can elect to have their account balances allocated
into one or more of the 25 phantom investment funds (including a
phantom ITT stock fund) and can change their investment
allocations on a daily basis. All plan accounts are maintained
on the accounts of ITT and investment earnings are credited to a
participants account (and charged to corporate earnings)
to mirror the investment returns achieved by the investment
funds chosen by that participant.
A participant can establish up to six accounts into
which AIP payment deferrals are credited and he or she can elect
a different form of payment and a different payment commencement
date for each account. One account may be selected
based on a termination date (the Termination
Account) and five accounts are based on employee-specified
dates (each a Special Purpose Account). Each Special
Purpose and Termination Account may have different investment
and payment options. Termination Accounts will be paid in the
seventh month following the last day worked. Changes to Special
Purpose Account distribution elections must be made at least
12 months before any existing benefit payment date, may not
take effect for at least 12 months, and must postpone the
existing benefit payment date by at least five years.
Additionally, Termination Account distribution elections are
irrevocable.
ITT Excess Savings Plan. Since federal law
limits the amount of compensation that can be used to determine
employee and employer contribution amounts ($245,000 in
2010) to the tax-qualified plan, ITT has established and
maintains a non-qualified unfunded ITT Excess Savings Plan to
allow for employee and ITT contributions based on base salary in
excess of these limits. Employee contributions under this plan
are limited to 6% of base salary. All balances under this plan
are maintained on the books of ITT and earnings are credited to
the accumulated savings under the plan based on the earnings in
the Stable Value Fund in the tax-qualified plan. Benefits will
be paid in a lump sum in the seventh month following the last
day worked. Employees are immediately 100% vested in their own
contributions. ITT matches contributions, which initially vest
20% for each year of service. After 5 years employees are
100% vested in ITTs matching contributions. The ITT
matching contribution also vests when an employee reaches
age 65 and in the case of death, disability or retirement.
Deferred Compensation. Non-qualified savings
represent amounts in the ITT Excess Savings Plan. Deferred
Compensation earnings under the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan
are calculated by reference to actual earnings of mutual funds
or ITT stock as provided in the accompanying chart.
128
The table below shows the activity within the Deferred
Compensation Plan for the NEOs for 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
|
Balance at Last
|
|
Name
|
|
in Last FY ($)
|
|
|
in Last FY ($)
|
|
|
Last FY ($)
|
|
|
Distributions ($)
|
|
|
FYE ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified savings
|
|
|
16,956
|
|
|
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,417
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
229,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612,990
|
|
Total
|
|
|
246,101
|
|
|
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
26,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,407
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified savings
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,913
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,397
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,310
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified savings
|
|
|
54,554
|
|
|
|
31,823
|
|
|
|
15,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,021
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,829,325
|
|
Vested but Undelivered Shares(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086,701
|
|
|
|
452,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,921,198
|
|
Total
|
|
|
54,554
|
|
|
|
2,118,524
|
|
|
|
892,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,295,544
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified savings
|
|
|
10,027
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,981
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,027
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,981
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified savings
|
|
|
5,585
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,905
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
283,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221,131
|
|
Total
|
|
|
289,063
|
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
51,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248,036
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately one-half of the restricted stock units awarded to
Mr. Loranger in 2004 vested in shares in one-third
cumulative installments in 2007, 2008 and 2010, but did not
settle. The vested but not settled shares were deferred and are
expected to settle within ten days of Mr. Lorangers
termination, as provided in the Steve R. Loranger Employment
Agreement. Amounts in column (c) for vested but undelivered
shares reflect the value of shares which vested but did not
settle pursuant to Mr. Lorangers final installment
vesting of restricted stock units on June 28, 2010 and the
value of dividends on restricted stock units on the dividend
grant date. Amounts in column (d) for vested but
undelivered shares include the sum of the: 1) Difference
between restricted stock unit value at December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2010 based on stock price appreciation or
depreciation of all deferred restricted stock units vested in
years prior to 2010; 2) Difference between restricted stock
unit value at June 28, 2010 and December 31, 2010 of
the deferred portion of the tranche which vested in 2010; and
3) Difference between the value of dividends on any
restricted stock units on the date of dividend grant and
December 31, 2010. Mr. Loranger had a beginning
balance of $4,381,696 prior to 2010 representing restricted
stock units and related dividend equivalents which previously
vested but did not settle. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Non-qualified savings amounts for Executive Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year are included in the Salary column of the
Summary Compensation Table and deferred compensation amounts for
Ms. McClain and Ms. Buonocore represent the deferred
portion of the 2010 AIP, which amounts were credited to the
executives accounts in 2011, and are included in the
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary
Compensation Table. |
129
|
|
|
(c) |
|
The amounts in column (c) for non-qualified savings are
also reflected in column (g) of the All Other Compensation
Table as Excess Savings Plan Contributions and included in the
Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(d) |
|
See note (1) above for a discussion of
Mr. Lorangers restricted stock units. |
|
(f) |
|
With respect to Mr. Loranger, all executive and registrant
contributions to the ITT Deferred Compensation Plan and the ITT
Excess Savings Plan were reported as compensation in the Summary
Compensation Table in ITTs previously filed proxy
statements. With respect to Ms. McClain, includes $446,178
in executive and registrant contributions to the ITT Deferred
Compensation Plan and the ITT Excess Savings Plan that were
reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in
ITTs previously filed proxy statements. For
Messrs. Speetzen and Jimenez and Ms. Buoncore, amounts
in column (f) do not include any amounts reported in
previous Summary Compensation Tables. |
The table below shows the funds available under the ITT Deferred
Compensation Plan, as reported by the administrator and their
annual rate of return for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of
|
|
|
|
Return
|
|
|
|
|
Return
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Option(1)
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
|
Vanguard Developed Markets Index (VDMIX)
|
|
|
8.54
|
%
|
PIMCO Total Return Institutional (PTTRX)
|
|
|
8.86
|
%
|
|
Artio International Equity A (BJBIX)
|
|
|
8.52
|
%
|
PIMCO Real Return Institutional (PRRIX)
|
|
|
7.68
|
%
|
|
American Funds EuroPacific Growth (REREX)
|
|
|
9.39
|
%
|
T Rowe Price High Yield (PRHYX)
|
|
|
14.40
|
%
|
|
First Eagle Overseas A (SGOVX)
|
|
|
19.24
|
%
|
Dodge & Cox Stock (DODGX)
|
|
|
13.49
|
%
|
|
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Open (LZOEX)
|
|
|
22.43
|
%
|
Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX)
|
|
|
14.91
|
%
|
|
AIM Global Real Estate (AGREX)
|
|
|
16.97
|
%
|
American Funds Growth Fund of America R4 (RGAEX)
|
|
|
12.29
|
%
|
|
Model Portfolio* Conservative
|
|
|
8.11
|
%
|
Perkins Mid Cap Value (JMCVX)
|
|
|
14.81
|
%
|
|
Model Portfolio* Moderate Conservative
|
|
|
10.51
|
%
|
Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX)
|
|
|
31.57
|
%
|
|
Model Portfolio* Moderate
|
|
|
12.43
|
%
|
American Century Small Cap Value (ASVIX)
|
|
|
24.15
|
%
|
|
Model Portfolio* Moderate Aggressive
|
|
|
13.45
|
%
|
Perimeter Small Cap Growth (PSCGX)
|
|
|
25.14
|
%
|
|
Model Portfolio* Aggressive
|
|
|
14.70
|
%
|
Harbor International (HIINX)
|
|
|
11.57
|
%
|
|
ITT Corporation Stock Fund (ITT)
|
|
|
6.97
|
%
|
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index (VBMFX)
|
|
|
6.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Fixed Rate Option 5.80% rate is based on guaranteed
contractual returns from the insurance ITT provider. |
|
* |
|
The returns shown in the model portfolio are not subsidized by
ITT, but represent returns for a managed portfolio based on
funds available to deferred compensation participants. |
Potential
Post-Employment Compensation
The Potential Post-Employment Compensation tables below reflect
the amount of compensation payable to each of the NEOs in the
event of employment termination under several different
circumstances, including voluntary termination, termination for
cause, death, disability, termination without cause or
termination in connection with a change of control.
Ms. McClain, Mr. Jimenez and Ms. Buonocore are
covered under the Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan (applicable to
change of control) described in Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Post-Employment
Compensation Severance Plan Arrangements.
Mr. Speetzen is covered under the ITT Severance Policy or
the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan (applicable to
change of control). The ITT Severance Policy provides for
severance based on grade level and years of service.
Mr. Loranger is covered under the Steven R. Loranger
Employment Agreement, described in Compensation
Tables Specific Compensation Arrangements, and
does not participate in any severance plans.
130
The amounts shown in the potential post-employment compensation
tables are estimates (or the estimated present value of the ITT
Excess Pension Plan which may be paid in continuing annuity
payments), assuming that the triggering event was effective as
of December 31, 2010, including amounts which would be
earned through such date (or that would be earned during a
period of severance), and where applicable, are based on the ITT
closing stock price on December 31, 2010, the last trading
day of 2010, which was $52.11.
The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the
time of such executives separation from ITT. For purposes
of calculating the estimated potential payments to our officers
under the ITT Excess Pension Plan, as reflected in the tables
below, we have used the same actuarial factors and assumptions
described in note (1) to the 2010 Pension Benefits table
and those used for financial statement reporting purposes as
described in Note 13 to the Combined Financial Statements
in this Information Statement. The calculations assume a
discount rate of 5.75% and take into account the UP 1994
Mortality Table projected to 2010, except as noted in the
footnotes.
Payments and Benefits Provided Generally to Salaried
Employees. The amounts shown in the tables below
do not include payments and benefits to the extent these
payments and benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis
to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment.
These include:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued salary and vacation pay;
|
|
|
|
Regular pension benefits under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan;
|
|
|
|
Health care benefits provided to retirees under the ITT Salaried
Retirement Plan, including retiree medical and dental insurance.
Employees who terminate prior to retirement are eligible for
continued benefits under COBRA; and
|
|
|
|
Distributions of plan balances under the ITT Salaried Investment
and Savings Plan and amounts currently vested under the ITT
Excess Savings Plan.
|
No perquisites are available to any NEOs in any of the
post-employment compensation circumstances. With respect to the
ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, benefits under such plan may be
deferred to age 65, but may become payable at age 55
or, if the participant is eligible for early retirement, the
first of the month immediately following the last day worked
without regard to the period of the severance payments. Benefits
under the ITT Excess Pension Plan must commence as soon as
possible but generally would be payable seven months following
such date, retroactive to the date the ITT Excess Pension Plan
benefit became payable.
Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. The
amount of severance pay under this plan depends on the
executives base pay and years of service. The amount will
not exceed 24 months of base pay or be greater than two
times the executives total annual compensation during the
year immediately preceding termination. ITT considers these
severance pay provisions appropriate transitional provisions
given the job responsibilities and competitive market in which
senior executives function. ITTs obligation to continue
severance payments stops if the executive does not comply with
ITTs Code of Corporate Conduct. ITT considers this
cessation provision to be critical to ITTs emphasis on
ethical behavior. ITTs obligation to continue severance
payments also stops if the executive does not comply with
non-competition provisions of the ITT Severance Policy or Senior
Executive Severance Pay Plan. These provisions protect the
integrity of our businesses and are consistent with typical
commercial arrangements. Ms. McClain, Mr. Jimenez and
Ms. Buonocore are covered under this plan.
Mr. Loranger is covered under the terms of the Steven R.
Loranger employment agreement as described in Compensation
Tables Specific Compensation Arrangements.
Mr. Speetzen is covered under the ITT Severance Policy.
If a covered executive receives or is entitled to receive other
compensation from another company, the amount of that other
compensation could be used to offset amounts otherwise payable
under the ITT Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan. During the
severance payment period, the executive will have a limited
right to continue to be eligible for participation in certain
benefit plans. Severance pay will start within sixty days
following the covered executives scheduled termination
date.
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay
Plan. This plan provides two levels of benefits
for covered executives, based on their position within ITT. The
Committee considered two levels of benefits appropriate
131
based on the relative ability of each level of employee to
influence future ITT performance. (Senior Vice Presidents
receive the higher level and Vice Presidents and employees in
Band B receive the lower level). Under the Special Senior
Executive Severance Pay Plan, if a covered executive is
terminated within two years after an acceleration event in a
change of control or in contemplation of an acceleration in a
change of control event that ultimately occurs or if the covered
executive terminates his or her employment for good reason
within two years after an acceleration event in the event of a
change of control, he or she would be entitled to:
|
|
|
|
|
any accrued but unpaid base salary, bonus (AIP payment),
unreimbursed expenses and employee benefits, including vacation;
|
|
|
|
two or three times the highest annual base salary rate during
the three fiscal years immediately preceding the date of
termination and two or three times the highest AIP payment paid
or awarded in the three years preceding an acceleration event or
termination;
|
|
|
|
continuation of health and life insurance benefits and certain
perquisites at the same levels for two or three years;
|
|
|
|
a lump-sum payment equal to the difference between the total
lump-sum value of his or her pension benefit under ITTs
pension plans, or any successor pension plans (provided such
plans are no less favorable to the executive than the ITT
pension plans), and the total lump-sum value of his or her
pension benefit under the pension plans after crediting an
additional two or three years of age and eligibility and benefit
service using the highest annual base salary rate and bonus for
purposes of determining final average compensation under the
pension plans;
|
|
|
|
credit for an additional two or three years of age and two or
three years of eligibility service under the retiree health and
retiree life insurance benefits;
|
|
|
|
a lump-sum payment equal to two or three times the highest
annual base salary rate during the three years preceding
termination or an acceleration event times the highest
percentage rate of ITTs contributions to the ITT Salaried
Investment and Savings Plan and the ITT Excess Savings Plan,
such payment not to exceed 3.5% per year; and
|
|
|
|
tax gross-up
for excise taxes imposed on the covered employee; and
|
|
|
|
one year of outplacement.
|
Mses. McClain and Buonocore are covered at the highest level of
benefits. Messrs. Speetzen and Jimenez are covered at the
lower level of benefits. Mr. Loranger does not participate
in this plan.
Mr. Loranger. Mr. Lorangers
entitlement to severance pay and benefits upon a termination
from ITT during the two-year period following a change of
control was a negotiated provision of the Steven R. Loranger
Employment Agreement, which is described in Compensation
Tables Specific Compensation Arrangements.
The Potential Post-Employment Compensation tables below provide
additional information.
Change of
Control Arrangements
The payment or vesting of awards or benefits under each of the
plans listed below would be accelerated upon the occurrence of a
change of control of ITT. The reasons for the change of control
provisions in these plans are to put the executive in the same
position he or she would have been in had the change of control
not occurred. Executives then can focus on preserving value for
shareholders when evaluating situations that, without change of
control provisions, could be personally adverse to the
executive. There would be a change of control of ITT if one of
the following acceleration events occurred:
1. A report on Schedule 13D was filed with the SEC
disclosing that any person, other than ITT or one of its
subsidiaries or any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by
ITT or a subsidiary, had become the beneficial owner of 20% or
more of ITTs outstanding stock;
132
2. A person other than ITT or one of its subsidiaries or
any employee benefit plan that is sponsored by ITT or a
subsidiary purchased ITTs shares in connection with a
tender or exchange offer, if after consummation of the offer the
person purchasing the shares is the beneficial owner of 20% or
more of ITTs outstanding stock;
3. The shareholders of ITT approved:
(a) any consolidation, business combination or merger of
ITT other than a consolidation, business combination or merger
in which the shareholders of ITT immediately prior to the merger
would hold 50% or more of the combined voting power of ITT or
the surviving corporation of the merger and would have the same
proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving
corporation that they held in ITT immediately prior to the
merger; or
(b) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or
substantially all of the assets of ITT;
4. A majority of the members of the Board of Directors of
ITT changed within a
12-month
period, unless the election or nomination for election of each
of the new Directors by ITTs stockholders had been
approved by two-thirds of the Directors still in office who had
been Directors at the beginning of the
12-month
period or whose nomination for election or election was
recommended or approved by a majority of Directors who were
Directors at the beginning of the
12-month
period; or
5. Any person other than ITT or one of its subsidiaries or
any employee benefit plan sponsored by ITT or a subsidiary
became the beneficial owner of 20% or more of ITTs
outstanding stock.
At the time of an acceleration event, any unfunded pension plan
obligations will be funded using a Rabbi Trust. Pre-2005 awards
and benefits will be paid if the 20% threshold described above
is reached. For awards or benefits earned since January 1,
2005, payment of awards or benefits would be made if a person
other than ITT, its subsidiaries or any employment benefit plan
sponsored by ITT becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of
ITTs outstanding stock.
The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan was approved by shareholders at
ITTs 2011 Annual Meeting, change of control under the 2011
Omnibus Incentive Plan requires consummation of the transactions
described in 3(a) and (b) above.
The following ITT plans have change of control provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan;
|
|
|
|
the 1996 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors;
|
|
|
|
the 1997 Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers;
|
|
|
|
the 1997 Annual Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan;
|
|
|
|
the Enhanced Severance Pay Plan;
|
|
|
|
the Deferred Compensation Plan;
|
|
|
|
the Excess Savings Plan;
|
|
|
|
the Excess Pension Plans;
|
|
|
|
the Salaried Retirement Plan; and
|
|
|
|
the Steven R. Loranger Employment Agreement.
|
133
Potential post-employment compensation arrangements are more
fully described for the NEOs in the tables on below.
Potential
Post-Employment Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause or
|
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
With Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Reason After
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cause $
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
Cash Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,333
|
|
|
|
1,590,000
|
|
AIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606,800
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,333
|
|
|
|
3,196,800
|
|
Unvested Non-Equity Units(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 11 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
2010 12 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/10/08 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/10/08 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,376
|
|
|
|
246,376
|
|
|
|
246,376
|
|
|
|
246,376
|
|
3/5/09 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,060
|
|
|
|
570,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,060
|
|
3/5/09 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,244,838
|
|
|
|
3,244,838
|
|
|
|
2,085,319
|
|
|
|
3,244,838
|
|
3/5/10 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/10 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,981
|
|
|
|
390,981
|
|
|
|
249,794
|
|
|
|
390,981
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,452,255
|
|
|
|
4,452,255
|
|
|
|
2,581,489
|
|
|
|
4,452,255
|
|
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan(4)
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
105,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
1,057,111
|
|
ITT Excess Savings Plan(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,650
|
|
Total
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
105,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
1,112,761
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Health & Welfare(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,465
|
|
|
|
8,910
|
|
IRC 280(g) Tax
Gross-Up(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,747,791
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,465
|
|
|
|
2,831,701
|
|
Total
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
193,588
|
|
|
|
4,557,567
|
|
|
|
4,452,255
|
|
|
|
3,471,875
|
|
|
|
11,953,517
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ms. McClain is covered under ITTs Senior Executive
Severance Pay Plan. Under that plan, described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Post-Employment Compensation Severance Plan
Arrangements, ITT will pay a severance benefit equal to
14 months of base salary if terminated other than for cause
unless termination occurs after the normal retirement date. In
the event of a change of control, Ms. McClain is covered
under ITTs Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan,
described in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Post-Employment Compensation
Severance Plan Arrangements and, under the terms of the
plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of three
times her highest annual salary and three times the highest AIP
award paid in the three years preceding a change of control.
Further information regarding Ms. McClains post
employment compensation is provided in the Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation and Pension Tables above. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on total shareholder return performance through
December 31, 2010, outstanding TSR awards would not earn a
payout. Should Ms. McClain resign or be terminated for
cause, she would receive no TSR payment. In the event of death
or disability, she would receive payment, if any, for
outstanding TSR awards and in the event of termination without
cause she would receive payment, if any, based on a pro- |
134
|
|
|
|
|
rata portion of the outstanding TSR awards as of the termination
date, based on ITTs performance during the three-year
period, in accordance with Section 409A. TSR awards provide
that in the event of a change of control, a pro-rata portion of
outstanding awards will be paid through the date of the change
of control based on actual performance and the balance of the
award will be paid at target (100%). |
|
(3) |
|
Equity awards vest according to the terms described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program. Unvested equity awards reflect
the market value of restricted stock and
in-the-money
value of options based on ITTs December 31, 2010
closing stock price of $52.11. |
|
(4) |
|
Column (a) and column (b) amounts reflect the present
value of the annual vested benefit payable under the ITT Excess
Pension Plan, as of December 31, 2010 assuming a retirement
at age 65. Column (c) provides the value of the
benefit payable to Ms. McClains beneficiary upon
death. Column (d) is inapplicable because disability would
not affect retirement benefits. Column (e) provides the
present value of the benefit payable by ITT after imputing
24 months of eligibility service in the determination of
the benefit. Column (f) provides the lump sum payable by
ITT in accordance with the Special Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan in the event of a change of control. |
|
(5) |
|
No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the
event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination
for cause. In the case of death or disability, to the extent not
already vested, the participant becomes 100% vested in the ITT
match. Ms. McClain was fully vested in the ITT match as of
December 31, 2010. Column (f) reflects the additional
cash payment representing ITT contributions, which would be made
following a change of control as described in the Special Senior
Executive Severance Pay Plan in Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Post-Employment Compensation
Severance Plan Arrangements. |
|
(6) |
|
ITTs Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year
of outplacement services. Amounts shown in columns (e) and
(f) are based on a current competitive bid. |
|
(7) |
|
In the event of termination not for cause, ITT will pay the
companys portion of medical and life insurance premiums
for fourteen months ( $2,352 and $1,113 respectively) and in the
event of a change of control, ITT will pay medical and life
insurance premiums for three years ($6,048 and $2,862
respectively). |
|
(8) |
|
Amounts in column (f) assume termination occurs immediately
upon a change of control based on ITTs December 31,
2010 closing stock price of $52.11. |
135
Potential
Post-Employment Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or with Good
|
|
|
|
Michael Speetzen
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
After Change
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Not For Cause
|
|
|
of Control
|
|
|
|
$(a)
|
|
|
$(b)
|
|
|
$(c)
|
|
|
$(c)
|
|
|
$(e)
|
|
|
$(f)
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
624,000
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,860
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
1,034,860
|
|
Unvested Non-Equity Awards(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 11 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
2010 12 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,667
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/09 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,175
|
|
|
|
125,175
|
|
|
|
62,587
|
|
|
|
125,175
|
|
3/5/09 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,518
|
|
|
|
137,518
|
|
|
|
103,139
|
|
|
|
137,518
|
|
3/5/10 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/10 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,477
|
|
|
|
525,477
|
|
|
|
218,949
|
|
|
|
525,477
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788,170
|
|
|
|
788,170
|
|
|
|
384,675
|
|
|
|
788,170
|
|
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,471
|
|
ITT Excess Savings Plan(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,678
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,149
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Health & Welfare(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
12,736
|
|
IRC 280(g) Tax
Gross-Up(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
87,736
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789,147
|
|
|
|
789,147
|
|
|
|
544,390
|
|
|
|
2,198,916
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Speetzen is covered under the ITT Severance Pay Policy.
Under that policy, described in Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Post-Employment
Compensation Severance Plan Arrangements, ITT
will pay a severance benefit equal to 26 weeks of base
salary if terminated other than for cause unless termination
occurs after the normal retirement date. In the event of a
change of control, Mr. Speetzen is covered under ITTs
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Post-Employment Compensation Severance Plan
Arrangements and, under the terms of the plan, would be
paid a lump sum payment equal to the sum of two times his
highest annual salary and two times the highest AIP award paid
in the three years preceding a change of control. Further
information regarding Mr. Speetzens post employment
compensation is provided in the Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation and Pension Tables above. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on total shareholder return performance through
December 31, 2010, outstanding TSR awards for the
2009-11 and
the 2010-12
performance periods would not earn a payout. Should
Mr. Speetzen resign or be terminated for cause, he would
receive no TSR payment. In the event of death or disability, he
would receive payment, if any, for outstanding TSR awards and in
the event of termination without cause he would receive payment,
if any, based on a pro-rata portion of the outstanding TSR
awards as of the termination date, based on ITTs
performance during the three-year period, in accordance with
Section 409A. TSR awards provide that in the event of a
change of control, a pro-rata portion of outstanding awards will
be paid through the date of the change of control based on
actual performance and the balance of the award will be paid at
target (100%). |
136
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Equity awards vest according to the terms described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program. Unvested equity awards reflect
the market value of restricted stock and
in-the-money
value of options based on ITTs December 31, 2010
closing stock price of $52.11. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Speetzen has not yet accrued a vested pension benefit.
Column (f) provides the lump sum payable by ITT in
accordance with the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan
in the event of a change of control. |
|
(5) |
|
No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the
event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination
for cause. In the case of death or disability, the participant
becomes 100% vested in the ITT match. Column (f) reflects
the additional cash payment representing ITT contributions,
which would be made following a change of control as described
in the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan in
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Post-Employment Compensation
Severance Plan Arrangements. |
|
(6) |
|
The Severance Policy includes outplacement services. Amounts
shown in columns (f) are based on a current competitive bid. |
|
(7) |
|
In the event of termination not for cause, ITT will pay the
companys portion of medical and life insurance premiums
($3,388 and $327, respectively) for seven months and in the
event of a change of control, ITT will pay medical life
insurance premiums ($11,616 and $1,120, respectively) for two
years. |
|
(8) |
|
Amounts in column (f) assume termination occurs immediately
upon a change of control based on ITTs December 31,
2010 closing stock price of $52.11. |
137
Potential
Post-Employment Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for Cause
|
|
|
|
Steven R. Loranger
|
|
|
or with Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Reason After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not For
|
|
|
Change of
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
|
($)(a)
|
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
|
($)(f)
|
|
|
Cash Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,320,000
|
|
|
|
3,480,000
|
|
AIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,016,000
|
|
|
|
7,602,075
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,336,000
|
|
|
|
11,082,075
|
|
Unvested Non-Equity Units(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 11 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
|
1,320,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
2010 12 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,320,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,000
|
|
Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/10/08 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/10/08 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
1,355,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478,361
|
|
|
|
1,478,361
|
|
|
|
1,478,361
|
|
|
|
1,478,361
|
|
3/5/09 Stock Option
|
|
|
1,828,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,134,855
|
|
|
|
3,134,855
|
|
|
|
3,134,855
|
|
|
|
3,134,855
|
|
3/5/09 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
1,588,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,722,383
|
|
|
|
2,722,383
|
|
|
|
2,722,383
|
|
|
|
2,722,383
|
|
3/5/10 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/10 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
537,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,150,423
|
|
|
|
2,150,423
|
|
|
|
1,971,221
|
|
|
|
2,150,423
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,309,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,486,022
|
|
|
|
9,486,022
|
|
|
|
9,306,820
|
|
|
|
9,486,022
|
|
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan(4)
|
|
|
2,017,943
|
|
|
|
2,017,943
|
|
|
|
1,060,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,017,943
|
|
|
|
3,329,785
|
|
Special Pension Arrangement(5)
|
|
|
10,689,765
|
|
|
|
10,689,765
|
|
|
|
10,689,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,689,765
|
|
|
|
13,741,918
|
|
ITT Excess Savings Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,800
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,707,708
|
|
|
|
12,707,708
|
|
|
|
11,749,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,707,708
|
|
|
|
17,193,503
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
IRC 280(g) Tax
Gross-Up(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,017,200
|
|
|
|
12,707,708
|
|
|
|
23,215,930
|
|
|
|
11,471,014
|
|
|
|
27,355,520
|
|
|
|
39,749,088
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Since Mr. Loranger is eligible to retire under the Steven
R. Loranger Special Pension Arrangement, unvested equity award
amounts assume that a resignation by Mr. Loranger would be
treated as a retirement under the Steven R. Loranger Special
Pension Arrangement and that a pro-rata portion of his
restricted stock and non-qualified option awards would vest. |
|
(b) |
|
If Mr. Loranger voluntarily terminates without good reason
or is terminated for cause prior to the normal retirement age of
65 under the ITT Salaried Retirement Plan, he is entitled only
to his base salary through the date of termination. He has no
further rights to any compensation or any other benefits not
vested prior to his termination date. Mr. Loranger is
eligible to retire under the Steven R. Loranger Special Pension
Arrangement. Further information regarding
Mr. Lorangers post employment compensation is
provided in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation and Pension
Tables above. |
|
(c) |
|
and (d) If Mr. Loranger terminates due to death or
disability, Mr. Loranger, or his estate, is entitled to
receive his 1) base salary and 2) any earned but
unpaid AIP award payment for any calendar year preceding the
year of termination plus 3) a pro-rata payment of the
target AIP and outstanding TSR award based |
138
|
|
|
|
|
on the number of days elapsed during the applicable performance
period or a greater amount as may be provided under the TSR. |
|
(e) |
|
Termination not for cause includes termination by
Mr. Loranger for good reason as described in
Compensation Tables Specific Compensation
Arrangements Mr. Loranger. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
With respect to columns (e) and (f), ITT will pay
Mr. Loranger in accordance with the Steven R. Loranger
Employment Agreement, as amended to conform to Section 409A
requirements as to timing and payments as described in
Compensation Tables Specific Compensation
Arrangements Mr. Loranger. Each payment
is subject to Section 409A timing and payment requirements.
If Mr. Loranger is terminated for cause, any AIP award is
forfeited. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on total shareholder return performance through
December 31, 2010, outstanding TSR awards for the
2009-11 and
2010-12
performance periods would not earn a payout. Should
Mr. Loranger resign or be terminated for cause, he would
receive no TSR payment. In the event of death or disability, he
would receive a pro-rated payment, if any, for outstanding TSR
awards at target and in the event of termination without cause
he would receive payment, if any, based on pro-rata portion of
the outstanding TSR awards as of the termination date, based on
ITTs performance during the three-year period, in
accordance with Section 409A. In the event of a change of
control, a pro-rata portion of outstanding awards will be paid
through the date of the change of control based on actual
performance and the balance of the award will be paid at target
(100%). |
|
(3) |
|
Equity awards vest according to the terms described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program. Unvested equity awards reflect
the market value of restricted stock and
in-the-money
value of options based on ITTs December 31, 2010
closing stock price of $52.11. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Loranger became vested in the ITT Excess Pension Plan
benefit effective January 1, 2008 because of the plan
change described in Compensation Tables ITT
Pension Benefits ITT Salaried Retirement Plan.
Mr. Loranger continues to be covered by the Special Pension
Arrangement described in Compensation Tables
ITT Pension Benefits Special Pension
Arrangement. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Loranger vested in the Special Pension Arrangement in
2010. Amounts in this table reflect the present value of 42% of
the benefit payable at age 58, the special pension amounts
in columns (a), (b), (c), and (e). The Special Pension
Arrangement is described in more detail in Compensation
Tables ITT Pension Benefits Special
Pension Arrangement. In the event of a change of control,
Mr. Loranger is entitled to an immediate lump-sum payment
equal to the actuarial present value of the special pension upon
his termination of employment by ITT without cause or by
Mr. Loranger with good reason in either case upon or
following a change of control. |
|
(6) |
|
No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the
event of voluntary or involuntary termination or termination for
cause. In the case of death or disability, to the extent not
already vested, the participant becomes 100% vested in the ITT
match. Mr. Loranger was fully vested in the ITT match as of
December 31, 2010 under the terms of the Steven R. Loranger
Employment Agreement. ITT Excess Savings Plan amounts reflect
credits in addition to any currently vested amount. |
|
(7) |
|
In accordance with the Steven R. Loranger Employment Agreement,
in the event of total disability or termination by ITT without
cause, ITT will pay medical and life insurance premiums for two
years ($1,392 and $3,600 respectively) and, in the event of a
change of control, ITT will pay medical and life insurance
premiums for three years ($2,088 and $5,400 respectively). |
|
(8) |
|
Amounts in column (f) assume termination occurs immediately
upon a change of control based on ITTs December 31,
2010 closing stock price of $52.11. |
139
Potential
Post-Employment Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for Cause
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
or with Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Reason After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
Change of
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
Cash Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,000
|
|
|
|
830,000
|
|
AIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,000
|
|
|
|
1,454,000
|
|
Unvested Non-Equity Units(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 11 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,567
|
|
2010 12 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,133
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,700
|
|
Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/9/09 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,445
|
|
|
|
69,445
|
|
|
|
34,722
|
|
|
|
69,445
|
|
6/9/09 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,524
|
|
|
|
189,524
|
|
|
|
157,937
|
|
|
|
189,524
|
|
3/5/10 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/09 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,030
|
|
|
|
181,030
|
|
|
|
105,601
|
|
|
|
181,030
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439,999
|
|
|
|
439,999
|
|
|
|
298,260
|
|
|
|
439,999
|
|
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,661
|
|
ITT Excess Savings Plan(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,050
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,711
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Health & Welfare(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
IRC 280(g) Tax
Gross-Up(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,821
|
|
|
|
78,642
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,036
|
|
|
|
444,036
|
|
|
|
790,081
|
|
|
|
2,632,052
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Jimenez is covered under the Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan. Under that plan, ITT will pay a severance benefit
equal to 12 months of base salary if terminated other than
for cause unless termination occurs after the normal retirement
date. In the event of a change of control, Mr. Jimenez is
covered under ITTs Special Senior Executive Severance Pay
Plan, described in Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Severance Plan Arrangements
Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan and, under the
terms of the plan, would be paid a lump sum payment equal to two
times his current salary plus two times the highest AIP award
paid in the three years prior to a change of control. Further
information regarding Mr. Jimenezs post employment
compensation is provided in the Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation and Pension Tables above. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on total shareholder return performance through
December 31, 2010, outstanding TSR awards for the
2009-11 and
2010-12
performance periods would not earn a payment. Should
Mr. Jimenez resign or be terminated for cause, he would
receive no TSR payment. In the event of death or disability, he
would receive payment, if any, for outstanding TSR awards and in
the event of termination without cause he would receive payment,
if any, based on a pro-rata portion of the outstanding TSR
awards as of the termination date, based on ITTs
performance during the three-year period, in accordance with
Section 409A. The TSR awards, in the event of a change of
control, provide that a pro-rata portion of outstanding awards
will be paid through the date of the change of control based on
actual performance and the balance of the award will be paid at
target (100%). |
140
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Equity awards vest according to the terms described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program. Unvested equity awards reflect
the market value of restricted stock and
in-the-money
value of options based on ITTs December 31, 2010
closing stock price of $52.11. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Jimenez has not yet accrued a vested pension benefit.
Column (f) provides the lump sum payable by ITT in
accordance with the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan
in the event of a change of control. |
|
(5) |
|
No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the
event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination
for cause. In the case of death or disability, the participant
becomes 100% vested in the ITT match. Amounts in column
(f) reflect the additional cash payment representing ITT
contributions, which would be made following a change of control
as described in the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan
in Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Severance Plan Arrangements Special Senior Executive
Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(6) |
|
ITTs Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year
of outplacement services. Amounts shown in columns (e) and
(f) are based on a current competitive bid. |
|
(7) |
|
In the event of termination not for cause, ITT will pay the
companys portion of medical and life insurance premiums
for one year ($1,074 and $747 respectively) and in the event of
a change of control, ITT will pay medical and life insurance
premiums for two years ($2,148 and $1,494 respectively). |
|
(8) |
|
Amounts in column (f) assume termination occurs immediately
upon a change of control based on ITTs December 31,
2010 closing stock price of $52.11. |
141
Potential
Post-Employment Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for Cause
|
|
|
|
Angela Buonocore
|
|
|
or with Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Reason After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
Change of
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
1,020,000
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
2,175,000
|
|
Unvested Non-Equity Awards (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 11 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
2010 12 TSR Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
Unvested Equity Awards (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/7/07 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,440
|
|
|
|
208,440
|
|
|
|
208,440
|
|
|
|
208,440
|
|
3/10/08 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/10/08 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,781
|
|
|
|
100,781
|
|
|
|
100,781
|
|
|
|
100,781
|
|
3/5/09 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,516
|
|
|
|
142,516
|
|
|
|
71,258
|
|
|
|
142,516
|
|
3/5/09 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,616
|
|
|
|
185,616
|
|
|
|
170,148
|
|
|
|
185,616
|
|
3/5/10 Stock Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/5/10 Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,638
|
|
|
|
146,638
|
|
|
|
85,539
|
|
|
|
146,638
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783,991
|
|
|
|
783,991
|
|
|
|
636,166
|
|
|
|
783,991
|
|
Non-Qualified Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT Excess Pension Plan(4)
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
61,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
630,762
|
|
ITT Excess Savings Plan(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,800
|
|
Total
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
65,048
|
|
|
|
3,391
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
654,562
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outplacement(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Health & Welfare(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
7,692
|
|
IRC 280(g) Tax
Gross-Up(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,493,206
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
|
|
1,575,898
|
|
Total
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
113,340
|
|
|
|
849,039
|
|
|
|
787,382
|
|
|
|
1,092,070
|
|
|
|
5,324,451
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ms. Buonocore is covered under the Senior Executive
Severance Pay Plan. Under that plan, Ms. Buonocore will
receive a severance benefit equal to 12 months base salary
if terminated other than for cause unless termination occurs
after the normal retirement date. In the event of a change of
control, Ms. Buonocore is covered under ITTs Special
Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Severance
Plan Arrangements Special Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan and, under the terms of the plan, would be paid a
lump sum payment equal to the sum of three times her highest
annual salary and three times the highest AIP award paid in the
three years preceding a change of control. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on total shareholder return performance through
December 31, 2010, outstanding TSR awards for the
2009-11 and
2010-12
performance periods would not earn a payout. Should
Ms. Buonocore resign or be terminated for cause, she would
receive no TSR payment. In the event of death or disability, she
would receive payment, if any, for outstanding TSR awards and in
the event of termination not for cause she would receive
payment, if any, based on a pro-rata portion of the outstanding
TSR awards as of the termination date, based on ITTs
performance during the three-year period, in accordance with
Section 409A. TSR awards provide that in the event of a
change of control, a pro-rata portion of outstanding awards will |
142
|
|
|
|
|
be paid through the date of the change of control based on
actual performance and the balance of the award will be paid at
target (100%). |
|
(3) |
|
Equity awards vest according to the terms described in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Long-Term
Incentive Awards Program. Unvested equity awards reflect
the market value of restricted stock and
in-the-money
value of options based on ITTs December 31, 2010
closing stock price of $52.11. |
|
(4) |
|
Column (a) and column (b) amounts reflect the present
value of the annual vested benefit payable under the ITT Excess
Pension Plan, as of December 31, 2010 assuming a retirement
age at 65. Column (c) provides the value of the benefit
payable to Ms. Buonocores beneficiary upon death.
Column (d) is inapplicable because disability would not
affect retirement benefits. Column (e) provides the present
value of the benefit payable by ITT after imputing
24 months of eligibility service in the determination of
the benefit. Column (f) provides the lump sum payable by
ITT in accordance with the Special Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan in the event of a change of control. |
|
(5) |
|
No additional ITT Excess Savings Plan payments are made in the
event of voluntary or involuntary termination, or termination
for cause. In the case of death or disability, the participant
becomes 100% vested in the ITT match. Column (f) reflects
the additional cash payment representing ITT contributions,
which would be made following a change of control as described
in the Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan in
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Severance
Plan Arrangements Special Senior Executive Severance
Pay Plan. |
|
(6) |
|
ITTs Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan includes one year
of outplacement services. |
|
(7) |
|
In the event of termination not for cause, ITT will pay the
companys portion of medical and life insurance premiums
for one year ($1,950 and $614 respectively) and in the event of
a change of control, ITT will pay medical and life insurance
premiums for three years ($5,850 and $1,842 respectively). |
|
(8) |
|
Amounts in column (f) assume termination occurs immediately
upon a change of control based on ITTs December 31,
2010 closing stock price of $52.11. |
143
Appendix A
List of Companies from the
S&P®
Industrials Companies used in the Towers Watson Compensation
Data Bank Analyses:
Abbott Laboratories
Advanced Micro Devices
Agilent Technologies
Air Products and Chemicals
Alcoa
Allergan
Amazon.com
Amgen
Apollo Group
Applied Materials
AT&T
Automatic Data Processing
Avery Dennison
Avon Products
Ball
Baxter International
Best Buy
Big Lots
Biogen Idec
Boeing
Boston Scientific
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brown-Forman
CA
Cameron International
Cardinal Health
Caterpillar
Celgene
Cephalon
CIGNA
Coca-Cola
Enterprises
Colgate-Palmolive
ConAgra Foods
Convergys
CVS Caremark
Dean Foods
Dentsply
DIRECTV
Dow Chemical
Dr Pepper Snapple
DuPont
Eastman Chemical
Eastman Kodak
Eaton
eBay
Ecolab
Eli Lilly
El Paso Corporation
EMC
Emerson
Equifax
Fiserv
Fluor
Ford
Forest Laboratories
Fortune Brands
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold
Gannett
Gap
General Dynamics
General Electric
General Mills
Genzyme
Gilead Sciences
Goodrich
Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Google
Harley-Davidson
Harman International Industries
Hershey
Hess
Honeywell
Hormel Foods
Hospira
Humana
IBM
IMS Health
Intel
International Flavors & Fragrances
International Game Technology
International Paper
Jacobs Engineering
Johnson Controls
Johnson & Johnson
KB Home
Kellogg
Kimberly-Clark
KLA-Tencor
Kohls
Leggett and Platt
Lexmark International
Life Technologies
Limited
Lockheed Martin
Lorillard Tobacco
L-3 Communications
Marriott International
Masco
Mattel
McDonalds
McKesson
MeadWestvaco
Medco Health Solutions
Medtronic
Merck & Co
Microsoft
Millipore
Molson Coors Brewing
Monsanto
Motorola
Newmont Mining
New York Times
NIKE
Northrop Grumman
Novell
Occidental Petroleum
Office Depot
Owens-Illinois
Parker Hannifin
PepsiCo
Pfizer
Pitney Bowes
PPG Industries
Praxair
Pulte Homes
QUALCOMM
Quest Diagnostics
Qwest Communications
Raytheon
Rockwell Automation
Rockwell Collins
R.R. Donnelley
Sara Lee
Schering-Plough
Schlumberger
Sealed Air
Sherwin-Williams
Spectra Energy
Sprint Nextel
Staples
Starbucks
Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Sun Microsystems
Sunoco
Target
Tellabs
Tenet Healthcare
Teradata
Textron
3M
Time Warner
Time Warner Cable
UnitedHealth
United States Steel
United Technologies
Valero Energy
Verizon
VF
Viacom
Vulcan Materials
Walt Disney
Waste Management
Watson Pharmaceuticals
Western Digital
Western Union
Weyerhaeuser
Whirlpool
Whole Foods Market
Williams Companies
W.W. Grainger
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
Wyndham Worldwide
Xerox
Yum! Brands
144
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Agreements
with ITT and DCO Related to the Spin-Off
This section of the Information Statement summarizes material
agreements between us and ITT that will govern the ongoing
relationships between the two companies after the spin-off and
are intended to provide for an orderly transition to our status
as an independent, publicly traded company. Additional or
modified agreements, arrangements and transactions, which will
be negotiated at arms length, may be entered into between
us and ITT after the spin-off. The summaries below of each of
these agreements set forth the terms that we believe are
material. These summaries are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the full text of the applicable agreements, which
are incorporated by reference into this Information Statement.
Following the spin-off, we and ITT will operate independently,
and neither will have any ownership interest in the other. In
order to govern certain ongoing relationships between us and ITT
after the spin-off and to provide mechanisms for an orderly
transition, we, DCO and ITT intend to enter into agreements
pursuant to which certain services and rights will be provided
for following the spin-off, and we, DCO and ITT will indemnify
each other against certain liabilities arising from our
respective businesses. The following is a summary of the terms
of the material agreements we expect to enter into with ITT and
DCO.
Distribution
Agreement
We intend to enter into a Distribution Agreement with ITT and
DCO prior to the distribution of our shares of common stock to
ITT shareholders. The Distribution Agreement will set forth our
agreements with ITT and DCO regarding the principal actions
needed to be taken in connection with our spin-off from ITT. It
will also set forth other agreements that govern certain aspects
of our relationship with ITT and DCO following the spin-off.
Transfer of Assets and Assumption of
Liabilities. The Distribution Agreement will
provide for those transfers of assets and assumptions of
liabilities that are necessary in connection with our separation
from ITT so that each of WCO, DCO and ITT retains the assets
necessary to operate its respective business and retains or
assumes the liabilities allocated to it in accordance with the
separation plan. The Distribution Agreement will also provide
for the settlement or extinguishment of certain liabilities and
other obligations between and among WCO, DCO and ITT. See
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements.
Representations and Warranties. In general,
neither we nor ITT will make any representations or warranties
regarding any assets or liabilities transferred or assumed, any
consents or approvals that may be required in connection with
such transfers or assumptions, the value or freedom from any
lien or other security interest of any assets transferred, the
absence of any defenses relating to any claim of either party or
the legal sufficiency of any conveyance documents, or any other
matters. Except as expressly set forth in the Distribution
Agreement or in any ancillary agreement, all assets will be
transferred on an as is, where is basis.
The Distribution. The Distribution Agreement
will govern the rights and obligations of the parties regarding
the proposed distribution and certain actions that must occur
prior to the proposed distribution, such as the election of
officers and directors and the adoption of the amended and
restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated
by-laws.
Conditions. The Distribution Agreement will
provide that the distribution is subject to several conditions
that must be satisfied or waived by ITT in its sole discretion.
For further information regarding these conditions, see
The Spin-Off Conditions to the Spin-Off.
ITT may, in its sole discretion, determine the distribution date
and the terms of the distribution and may at any time prior to
the completion of the distribution decide to abandon or modify
the distribution.
Termination. The Distribution Agreement will
provide that it may be terminated by ITT at any time in its sole
discretion prior to the distribution date.
145
Release of Claims. We, DCO and ITT will agree
to broad releases pursuant to which we will each release the
others and certain related persons specified in the Distribution
Agreement from any claims against any of them that arise out of
or relate to events, circumstances or actions occurring or
failing to occur or any conditions existing at or prior to the
time of the distribution. These releases will be subject to
certain exceptions set forth in the Distribution Agreement.
Indemnification. We, DCO and ITT will agree to
indemnify each other and certain related persons specified in
the Distribution Agreement against breaches of the Distribution
Agreement and certain liabilities in connection with our
respective businesses and as otherwise allocated to each of us
in the Distribution Agreement.
The amount of each partys indemnification obligations will
be subject to reduction by any insurance proceeds received by
the party being indemnified. The Distribution Agreement will
also specify procedures with respect to claims subject to
indemnification and related matters.
Employee
Matters Agreement
We intend to enter into an Employee Matters Agreement with ITT
and DCO that will govern the respective rights, responsibilities
and obligations of ITT, DCO and us after the spin-off with
respect to transferred employees, defined benefit pension plans,
defined contribution pension plans, non-qualified pension plans,
employee welfare benefit plans, incentive plans, corporate-owned
life insurance, stock options, foreign benefit plans, director
plans and collective bargaining agreements.
Intellectual
Property License Agreements
We intend to enter into an ITT Transitional Trademark License
Agreement with ITT pursuant to which we will license on a
non-exclusive basis from ITT the ITT name and trademark for a
transitional period until we phase-out the use of such trademark
in the operation of our business. We also intend to enter into a
Goulds Trademark License Agreement pursuant to which we will
have a perpetual license to use the Goulds trademark
in connection with the operation of our pump business and share
the exclusive right with ITT in a segment that overlaps with
ITTs pump business. We also intend to enter into a
Trademark License Agreement with ITT pursuant to which we will
have a license to use the AC trademark. We also
intend to enter into a Technology License Agreement with ITT and
DCO pursuant to which we will license on a non-exclusive basis
certain of our intellectual property (excluding trademarks)
existing as of the distribution date to ITT and DCO and their
respective affiliates and in turn, both ITT and DCO and their
respective affiliates will grant reciprocal licenses to us, each
for use in our respective businesses. We also intend to enter
into several license agreements with ITT for certain technology
related to turbine and other pumps.
Tax
Matters Agreement
We intend to enter into a Tax Matters Agreement with ITT that
will govern the respective rights, responsibilities and
obligations of ITT, DCO and us after the spin-off with respect
to tax liabilities and benefits, tax attributes, tax contests
and other tax sharing regarding U.S. Federal, state, local
and foreign income taxes, other tax matters and related tax
returns. As a subsidiary of ITT, we have (and will continue to
have following the spin-off) several liability with ITT to the
IRS for the consolidated U.S. Federal income taxes of the
ITT consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which
we were part of that group. However, the Tax Matters Agreement
will specify the portion, if any, of this tax liability for
which we will bear responsibility, and ITT and DCO will agree to
indemnify us against any amounts for which we are not
responsible. The Tax Matters Agreement will also provide special
rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the
spin-off is not tax-free. The Tax Matters Agreement will provide
for certain covenants that may restrict our ability to pursue
strategic or other transactions that otherwise could maximize
the value of our business and may discourage or delay a change
of control that you may consider favorable. Though valid as
between the parties, the Tax Matters Agreement will not be
binding on the IRS.
146
Real
Estate Matters
We intend to enter into a Master Assignment and Assumption of
Lease Agreement pursuant to which ITT, or certain of its
subsidiaries, will assign lease agreements currently held in the
name of ITT or certain of its subsidiaries to the party
occupying and operating the relevant leased premises.
We intend to enter into a Master Lease Agreement pursuant to
which ITT, or certain of its subsidiaries, will lease certain
real estate to or from WCO, or certain of its subsidiaries, that
is currently owned by ITT, or certain of its subsidiaries, but
currently occupied and operated by one or both parties, in each
case for a limited term to help ensure an orderly transition
following the distribution.
We intend to enter into a Master Sublease Agreement pursuant to
which ITT, or certain of its subsidiaries, will sublease certain
real estate to or from WCO, or certain of its subsidiaries, that
is currently leased by ITT, or certain of its subsidiaries, but
currently occupied and operated by one or both parties, in each
case for a limited term to help ensure an orderly transition
following distribution.
Transition
Services Agreements
We intend to enter into a Master Transition Services Agreement
with ITT and DCO, under which each of ITT and DCO or their
respective affiliates will provide us with certain services, and
we or certain of our affiliates will provide each of ITT and DCO
certain services, for a limited time to help ensure an orderly
transition for each of WCO, ITT and DCO following the
distribution.
We anticipate that under the Master Transition Services
Agreement, WCO will receive certain services (including
information technology, financial, procurement and human
resource services, benefits support services and other specified
services) from ITT and DCO, respectively, and WCO will provide
certain services (including information technology, human
resources services and other specified services) to ITT and DCO,
respectively. We expect these services will be initially
provided at cost with scheduled, escalating increases to up to
cost plus 10% and are planned to extend for a period of 3 to
24 months in most circumstances.
Other
Agreements
Effective upon the distribution, we intend for certain
intercompany work orders
and/or
informal intercompany commercial arrangements to be converted
into third-party contracts based on ITTs standard terms
and conditions.
147
DESCRIPTION
OF MATERIAL INDEBTEDNESS
From and after the spin-off, we, DCO and ITT will, in general,
each be responsible for the debts, liabilities, rights and
obligations related to the business or businesses that it owns
and operates following consummation of the spin-off, except as
set forth below. See Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Agreements with ITT and DCO
Related to the Spin-Off.
The loan agreements, indentures and guaranties, as defined
below, have been filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement
on Form 10 of which this Information Statement is a part.
You should read the more detailed provisions of the loan
agreements, indentures and the guaranties, including the defined
terms, for provisions that may be important to you.
Senior
Notes
At or prior to the distribution, we expect to raise indebtedness
in an amount of $1,200 million, the net proceeds of which
are expected to fund a cash transfer of approximately
$833 million to ITT with the balance to be used in
connection with the YSI acquisition and for general corporate
purposes. The notes will be our senior unsecured obligations and
will rank equally with all of our existing and future senior
unsecured indebtedness. The notes initially will be guaranteed
on a senior unsecured basis by ITT (the ITT
Guarantee). The ITT Guarantee will terminate upon the
completion of the spin-off. It is expected that the indenture
governing the notes will include covenants that restrict our
ability to, subject to exceptions, incur indebtedness secured by
liens or engage in sale and leaseback transaction. In addition,
we expect that the indenture will provide that we may redeem
some or all of the notes at any time at a redemption price that
includes a make-whole premium and that if a change of control
triggering event occurs, we will be required to make an offer to
repurchase the notes in cash from the holders at a price equal
to 101% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and
unpaid interest. The actual terms of the notes, including
interest rate, principal amount, redemption provisions and
maturity, will depend on market conditions at the time of
pricing.
Credit
Facility
At or prior to the separation, we expect to enter into a
new -year
unsecured senior revolving credit facility. The commitment under
the new credit facility is $ . The
interest rate for borrowings under the new credit facility is
expected to be generally based on the London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR), plus a spread, based upon our debt rating. The
senior revolving credit facility will replace, in part, the
existing credit facility of ITT, and be used for working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
purposes. ITT initially will guarantee the new credit facility,
and we will assume the obligations of ITT in connection with the
distribution. The actual terms of the new credit facility,
including interest rate, commitment, covenants and maturity,
will depend on market conditions at the time we enter into the
new credit facility.
148
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
As of the date of this Information Statement, all of the
outstanding shares of our common stock are beneficially owned by
ITT. After the spin-off, ITT will not own any shares of our
common stock.
The following table provides information with respect to the
anticipated beneficial ownership of our common stock by:
|
|
|
|
|
each of our shareholders who we believe (based on the
assumptions described below) will beneficially own more than 5%
of WCOs outstanding common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our current directors and the directors following the
spin-off;
|
|
|
|
each officer named in the summary compensation table; and
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers following the
spin-off as a group.
|
Except as otherwise noted below, we based the share amounts on
each persons beneficial ownership of ITT common stock
on ,
2011, giving effect to a distribution ratio
of shares
of our common stock for each share of ITT common stock held by
such person.
To the extent our directors and executive officers own ITT
common stock at the record date of the spin-off, they will
participate in the distribution on the same terms as other
holders of ITT common stock.
Except as otherwise noted in the footnotes below, each person or
entity identified in the tables below has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the securities owned by such
person or entity.
Immediately following the spin-off, we estimate
that shares of our common
stock will be issued and outstanding, based on the number of
shares of ITT common stock expected to be outstanding as of the
record date. The actual number of shares of our common stock
outstanding following the spin-off will be determined
on ,
2011, the record date.
Stock
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
We anticipate, based on information to our knowledge as of
June 30, 2011, that the following entities will
beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock after the
spin-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
|
7.09
|
%(a)
|
2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX
75201-2761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As reported on Schedule 13G dated filed on
February 11, 2011, Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney &
Strauss, LLC has sole voting power with respect
to shares,
shared voting power with respect
to shares,
and sole dispositive power with respect
to shares. |
149
Stock
Ownership of Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
to Option
|
|
|
Equivalents
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis J. Crawford
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Hamre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surya N. Mohapatra
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markos I. Tambakeras
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gretchen W. McClain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven A. Loranger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Speetzen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank R. Jimenez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angela A. Buonocore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
( persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
Prior to the distribution date, our Board of Directors and ITT,
as our sole shareholder, will approve and adopt the amended and
restated articles of incorporation and the amended and restated
by-laws. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation
authorize us to
issue shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
and shares
of preferred stock. The following is a description of our
capital stock. This description is not complete, and we qualify
this description by referring to our amended and restated
articles of incorporation and our amended and restated by-laws,
which are attached as exhibits to our Registration Statement on
Form 10 under the Exchange Act, and to the laws of the
state of Indiana.
Common
Stock
Dividend Rights. Under our amended and
restated articles of incorporation, holders of our common stock
are entitled to receive any dividends our Board of Directors may
declare on the common stock, subject to the prior rights of the
preferred stock. The Board of Directors may declare dividends
from funds legally available for this purpose.
Voting Rights. Our common stock has one vote
per share. The holders of our common stock are entitled to vote
on all matters to be voted on by shareholders. Our amended and
restated articles of incorporation do not provide for cumulative
voting. This could prevent directors from being elected by a
relatively small group of shareholders.
Liquidation Rights. After provision for
payment of creditors and after payment of any liquidation
preferences to holders of the preferred stock, if we liquidate,
dissolve or are wound up, whether this is voluntary or not, the
holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive on a pro
rata basis all assets remaining.
Other Rights. Our common stock is not liable
to further calls or assessment. The holders of our common stock
are not currently entitled to subscribe for or purchase
additional shares of our capital stock. Our common stock is not
subject to redemption and does not have any conversion or
sinking fund provisions.
Preferred
Stock
Our Board of Directors has the authority, without other action
by shareholders, to issue up
to shares of preferred stock
in one or more series. The holders of our preferred stock do not
have the right to vote, except as our Board of Directors
establishes, or as provided in our amended and restated articles
of incorporation or as determined by state law.
The Board of Directors has the authority to determine the terms
of each series of preferred stock, within the limits of our
amended and restated articles of incorporation, our amended and
restated by-laws and the laws of the state of Indiana. These
terms include the number of shares in a series, the
consideration, dividend rights, liquidation preferences, terms
of redemption, conversion rights and voting rights, if any.
Effects
on Our Common Stock if We Issue Preferred Stock
If we issue preferred stock, it may negatively affect the
holders of our common stock. These possible negative effects
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
affecting the market price of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
delaying or preventing a change in control of WCO;
|
|
|
|
making removal of our present management more difficult; or
|
|
|
|
restricting dividends and other distributions on our common
stock.
|
151
Provisions
of Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and
Amended and Restated By-Laws That Could Delay or Prevent a
Change in Control
Certain provisions of our amended and restated articles of
incorporation and amended and restated by-laws may delay or make
more difficult unsolicited acquisitions or changes of control of
the Company. We believe that such provisions will enable us to
develop our business in a manner that will foster our long-term
growth without disruption caused by the threat of a takeover not
deemed by our Board of Directors to be in the best interests of
the Company, our shareholders and certain other constituents.
Such provisions could have the effect of discouraging third
parties from making proposals involving an unsolicited
acquisition or change of control of the Company, although a
majority of our shareholders might consider such proposals, if
made, desirable. Such provisions may also have the effect of
making it more difficult for third parties to cause the
replacement of our current management without the concurrence of
our Board of Directors. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
the availability of capital stock for issuance from time to time
at the discretion of our Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our Board of Directors to increase the size of
the board and to appoint directors to fill newly created
directorships;
|
|
|
|
prohibitions against shareholders calling a special meeting of
shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
requirements for advance notice for raising business or making
nominations at shareholders meetings.
|
Classified
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors will be divided into three classes that
will be, as nearly as possible, of equal size. Initially,
Class I directors will serve for a one-year term,
Class II directors for a two-year term, and Class III
directors for a three-year term. The terms of the Class I,
Class II and Class III directors will expire at the
annual meeting in 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Upon the
expiration of each initial term, directors will subsequently
serve three-year terms if renominated and reelected. The
proposed Class I directors will
include , the proposed
Class II directors will
include and the proposed
Class III directors will
include .
Authorized
But Unissued Capital Stock
The authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and
preferred stock will be available for future issuance without
shareholder approval. Indiana law does not require shareholder
approval for any issuance of authorized shares. However, the
listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, which would
apply to us so long as our common stock remains listed on the
New York Stock Exchange, require shareholder approval of certain
issuances equal to or exceeding 20% of the then outstanding
voting power or then outstanding number of shares of our common
stock. We may issue additional shares for a variety of corporate
purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional
capital or to facilitate corporate acquisitions.
Our board may be able to issue shares of unissued and unreserved
common or preferred stock to persons friendly to current
management. This issuance may render more difficult or
discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a
merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and thereby
protect the continuity of our management. This could possibly
deprive our shareholders of opportunities to sell their shares
of our stock at prices higher than prevailing market prices. Our
board could also use these shares to dilute the ownership of
persons seeking to obtain control of the Company.
Number
of Directors; Filling of Vacancies
Our amended and restated by-laws provide that the Board of
Directors will have at least 3 and at most 25 directors.
The size of the board may be changed by a majority vote of the
Board of Directors. A majority of the board determines the exact
number of directors at any given time. The board fills any new
directorships it creates and any vacancies, subject to the
requirement provided in the amended and restated by-laws that
the
152
majority of directors holding office immediately after such
election be independent directors, as defined in the amended and
restated by-laws. Accordingly, our board may be able to prevent
any shareholder from obtaining majority representation on the
board by increasing the size of the board and filling the newly
created directorships with its own nominees.
Special
Meetings
Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended
and restated by-laws provide that only the chairman of the board
or a majority of our board may call a special meeting of
shareholders. This provision may delay or prevent a shareholder
from removing a director from the board or from gaining control
of the board.
Advance
Notice Provisions
Our amended and restated by-laws require that for a shareholder
to nominate a director or bring other business before an annual
meeting, the shareholder must give written notice, in proper
form, to the Secretary of WCO not less than 90 days and no
more than 120 days prior to the date corresponding to the
date on which we first mailed our proxy materials for the prior
years annual meeting.
Only persons who are nominated by, or at the direction of, our
Board of Directors, or who are nominated by a shareholder who
has given timely written notice, in proper form, to the
Secretary of WCO prior to a meeting at which directors are to be
elected, will be eligible for election as directors of WCO. The
notice of any nomination for election as a director must set
forth:
|
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the
nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated;
|
|
|
|
a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of
our stock entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear
in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or
persons specified in the notice;
|
|
|
|
a description of all arrangements or understandings between the
shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons,
naming such person or persons, pursuant to which the nomination
or nominations are to be made by the shareholder;
|
|
|
|
such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such
shareholder as would have been required to be included in a
proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission had each nominee been
nominated, or intended to be nominated, by our board;
|
|
|
|
the consent of each nominee to serve as a director if so
elected; and
|
|
|
|
if the shareholder intends to solicit proxies in support of such
shareholders nominee(s), a representation to that effect.
|
The notice to bring any other matter a shareholder proposes to
bring before an annual meeting must also set forth:
|
|
|
|
|
a brief description of the proposal and the reasons therefor;
|
|
|
|
if the proposal involves an amendment to our amended and
restated articles of incorporation or amended and restated
by-laws, the language of the amendment;
|
|
|
|
any material interest of the shareholder in the
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
if the shareholder intends to solicit proxies with respect to
the proposal, a representation to that effect.
|
Our amended and restated by-laws limit the business that may be
conducted at a special meeting to the purposes stated in the
notice of the meeting.
153
The advance notice provisions may delay a person from bringing
matters before a shareholder meeting. The provisions may provide
enough time for us to begin litigation or take other steps to
respond to these matters, or to prevent them from being acted
upon, if we find it desirable.
Certain
Provisions of the Indiana Business Corporation Law
As an Indiana corporation, we are governed by the Indiana
Business Corporation Law, or the IBCL. Under specified
circumstances, the following provisions of the IBCL may delay,
prevent or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions or
changes of control of the Company. These provisions also may
have the effect of preventing changes in our management. It is
possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to
accomplish transactions which shareholders may otherwise deem to
be in their best interest.
Control Share Acquisitions. Under
Sections 23-1-42-1
to
23-1-42-11
of the IBCL, an acquiring person or group who makes a
control share acquisition in an issuing public
corporation may not exercise voting rights on any
control shares unless these voting rights are
conferred by a majority vote of the disinterested shareholders
of the issuing corporation at a special meeting of those
shareholders held upon the request and at the expense of the
acquiring person. If control shares acquired in a control share
acquisition are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring
person has acquired control shares with a majority or more of
all voting power, all shareholders of the issuing public
corporation have dissenters rights to receive the fair
value of their shares pursuant to
Section 23-1-44
of the IBCL.
Under the IBCL, control shares means shares acquired
by a person that, when added to all other shares of the issuing
public corporation owned by that person or in respect to which
that person may exercise or direct the exercise of voting power,
would otherwise entitle that person to exercise voting power of
the issuing public corporation in the election of directors
within any of the following ranges:
|
|
|
|
|
one-fifth or more but less than one-third;
|
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority; or
|
|
|
|
a majority or more.
|
Control share acquisition means, subject to
specified exceptions, the acquisition, directly or indirectly,
by any person of ownership of, or the power to direct the
exercise of voting power with respect to, issued and outstanding
control shares. For the purposes of determining whether an
acquisition constitutes a control share acquisition, shares
acquired within 90 days or under a plan to make a control
share acquisition are considered to have been acquired in the
same acquisition. Issuing public corporation means a
corporation which is organized in Indiana and has (i) 100
or more shareholders, (ii) its principal place of business,
its principal office or assets having a fair market value of
more than $1,000,000 within Indiana and (iii) (A) more than
10% of its shareholders resident in Indiana, (B) more than
10% of its shares owned by Indiana residents or
(C) 1,000 shareholders resident in Indiana.
The above provisions do not apply if, before a control share
acquisition is made, the corporations articles of
incorporation or
by-laws,
including a board adopted by-law, provide that they do not
apply. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and
amended and restated
by-laws do
not currently exclude us from the restrictions imposed by the
above provisions.
Certain Business
Combinations. Sections 23-1-43-1
to
23-1-43-24
of the IBCL restrict the ability of a resident domestic
corporation to engage in any combinations with an
interested shareholder for five years after the date
the interested shareholder became such, unless the combination
or the purchase of shares by the interested shareholder on the
interested shareholders date of acquiring shares is
approved by the Board of Directors of the resident domestic
corporation before that date. If the combination was not
previously approved, the interested shareholder may effect a
combination after the five-year period only if that shareholder
receives approval from a majority of the disinterested shares or
the offer meets specified fair price criteria. For purposes of
the above provisions, resident domestic corporation
means an Indiana corporation that has 100 or more shareholders.
Interested shareholder means any person, other than
the resident domestic corporation or its subsidiaries, who is
(1) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or
more of the
154
voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the resident
domestic corporation or (2) an affiliate or associate of
the resident domestic corporation, which at any time within the
five-year period immediately before the date in question, was
the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of
the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the resident
domestic corporation. The above provisions do not apply to
corporations that so elect in an amendment to their articles of
incorporation approved by a majority of the disinterested
shares. That amendment, however, cannot become effective until
18 months after its passage and would apply only to share
acquisitions occurring after its effective date. Our amended and
restated articles of incorporation do not exclude us from the
restrictions imposed by the above provisions.
Directors Duties and Liability. Under
Section 23-1-35-1
of the IBCL, directors are required to discharge their duties:
|
|
|
|
|
in good faith;
|
|
|
|
with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position
would exercise under similar circumstances; and
|
|
|
|
in a manner the directors reasonably believe to be in the best
interests of the corporation.
|
However, the IBCL also provides that a director is not liable
for any action taken as a director, or any failure to act,
unless the director has breached or failed to perform the duties
of the directors office and the action or failure to act
constitutes willful misconduct or recklessness.
The exoneration from liability under the IBCL does not affect
the liability of directors for violations of the federal
securities laws.
Section 23-1-35-1
of the IBCL also provides that a Board of Directors, in
discharging its duties, may consider, in its discretion, both
the long-term and short-term best interests of the corporation,
taking into account, and weighing as the directors deem
appropriate, the effects of an action on the corporations
shareholders, employees, suppliers and customers and the
communities in which offices or other facilities of the
corporation are located and any other factors the directors
consider pertinent. Directors are not required to consider the
effects of a proposed corporate action on any particular
corporate constituent group or interest as a dominant or
controlling factor. If a determination is made with the approval
of a majority of the disinterested directors of the board, that
determination is conclusively presumed to be valid unless it can
be demonstrated that the determination was not made in good
faith after reasonable investigation.
Section 23-1-35-1
specifically provides that specified judicial decisions in
Delaware and other jurisdictions, which might be looked upon for
guidance in interpreting Indiana law, including decisions that
propose a higher or different degree of scrutiny in response to
a proposed acquisition of the corporation, are inconsistent with
the proper application of the business judgment rule under the
IBCL.
155
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed a Registration Statement on Form 10 with the
SEC with respect to the shares of common stock that ITT
shareholders will receive in the distribution. This Information
Statement does not contain all of the information contained in
the Registration Statement on Form 10 and the exhibits and
schedules to the Registration Statement on Form 10. Some
items are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations
of the SEC. For additional information relating to us and the
spin-off, reference is made to the Registration Statement on
Form 10 and the exhibits to the Registration Statement on
Form 10, which are on file at the offices of the SEC.
Statements contained in this Information Statement as to the
contents of any contract or other document referred to are not
necessarily complete and in each instance, if the contract or
document is filed as an exhibit, reference is made to the copy
of the contract or other documents filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form 10. Each statement is
qualified in all respects by the relevant reference.
You may inspect and copy the Registration Statement on
Form 10 and the exhibits to the Registration Statement on
Form 10 that we have filed with the SEC at the SECs
Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330 for further information on the Public
Reference Room. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site
at www.sec.gov, from which you can electronically access the
Registration Statement on Form 10, including the exhibits
and schedules to the Registration Statement on Form 10.
Our Internet site and the information contained on that site, or
connected to that site, are not incorporated into the
Information Statement or the Registration Statement on
Form 10.
As a result of the distribution, we will be required to comply
with the full informational requirements of the Exchange Act. We
will fulfill our obligations with respect to these requirements
by filing periodic reports and other information with the SEC.
We plan to make available, free of charge, on our Internet site
our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
reports filed pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act
and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file or furnish such
materials to the SEC.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
Information Statement or to which we have referred you. We have
not authorized any person to provide you with different
information or to make any representation not contained in this
Information Statement.
156
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Page
|
|
The Water Equipment and Services Businesses of ITT
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
(Financial Statements of a Significant Acquired Business
provided pursuant to the Securities and Exchange
Commissions
Regulation S-X
Rule 3-05)
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-58
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
ITT Corporation
White Plains, New York
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the
Water Equipment and Services Businesses of ITT Corporation (the
Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
the related combined statements of operations, cash flows,
parent company equity and comprehensive income for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such combined financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
As described in Note 1 to the combined financial
statements, the accompanying combined financial statements have
been derived from the accounting records of the water equipment
and services businesses of ITT Corporation. The combined
financial statements include expense allocations for certain
corporate functions historically provided by ITT Corporation.
These allocations may not be reflective of the actual expense
which would have been incurred had the Company operated as a
separate entity apart from ITT Corporation. Included in
Note 18 to the combined financial statements is a summary
of transactions with related parties.
/s/
Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
July 8, 2011
F-2
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-3
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, net
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARENT COMPANY EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company investment
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent company equity
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and parent company equity
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-4
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
Non-cash adjustments to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Loss from sale of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Payments for restructuring
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in receivables
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Change in inventories
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Change in accounts payable
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Change in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Change in accrued taxes
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Operating activities
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Investing activities
|
|
|
(1,093
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer from / (to) parent
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Financing activities
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents End of Year
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (net of refunds received)
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-5
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
Net change in postretirement benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Net foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) in parent company investment
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
Net change in postretirement benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) in parent company investment
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,272
|
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
Net change in postretirement benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Net foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in parent company investment
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,361
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the combined
financial statements.
F-6
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
SEPARATION
FROM ITT CORPORATION, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Separation
from ITT Corporation
On January 12, 2011, ITT Corporation (ITT) announced a plan
to separate its water equipment and services businesses (Water
Co) from the remainder of its businesses through a pro rata
distribution of the common stock of an entity holding the assets
and liabilities associated with its water equipment and services
business. Water Co is in the business of designing and
manufacturing highly engineered technologies with a wide-range
of application in the water industry and includes the following
divisions of ITT: Water & Wastewater (which includes
the Analytical Instrumentation business),
Residential & Commercial Water, and Flow Control. ITT
WCO, Inc. was incorporated in Indiana on May 4, 2011 to be
the entity to hold such businesses subject to approval by the
Board of Directors of ITT and other conditions described below.
Under the plan, ITT would also distribute its Defense and
Information Solutions business (ITT DCO, Inc.).
The distribution of our common stock to ITT shareholders is
conditioned on, among other things, final approval of the
distribution plan by the ITT Board of Directors; the receipt of
a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
substantially to the effect that, among other things, the
contribution by ITT of the assets and liabilities of the water
equipment and services business to Water Co, or the
contribution, and the distribution will qualify as a transaction
that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax
purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code); the receipt of opinions from external legal counsel
to ITT, to the effect that the contribution and distribution
will qualify as a transaction that is described in the Code; the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declaring
effective our Registration Statement on Form 10; and the
completion of the financing necessary for a cash distribution
from Water Co to ITT prior to the distribution.
Unless the context otherwise indicates, references in these
notes to Combined Financial Statements to we,
us, our and the Company
refer to Water Co. References in the notes to the Combined
Financial Statements to ITT or parent
refers to ITT Corporation, an Indiana corporation, and its
consolidated subsidiaries (other than Water Co), unless the
context otherwise requires.
Basis
of Presentation
These Combined Financial Statements have been prepared on a
stand-alone basis and are derived from the consolidated
financial statements and accounting records of the water
equipment and services businesses of ITT. The Combined Financial
Statements reflect our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows as we were historically managed, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, or GAAP.
All intracompany transactions have been eliminated. All
intercompany transactions between us and ITT have been included
in these Combined Financial Statements and are considered to be
effectively settled for cash in the Combined Financial
Statements at the time the transaction is recorded. The total
net effect of the settlement of these intercompany transactions
is reflected in the combined statements of cash flow as a
financing activity and in the combined balance sheets as
Parent company investment.
Our Combined Financial Statements include expense allocations
for: (1) certain corporate functions historically provided
by ITT, including, but not limited to, finance, legal,
information technology, human resources, communications, ethics
and compliance, and shared services; (2) employee benefits
and incentives; and (3) share-based compensation. These
expenses have been allocated to us on the basis of direct usage
when identifiable, with the remainder allocated on a pro rata
basis of consolidated sales, headcount or other measures of
Water Co and ITT. Both we and ITT consider the basis on which
the expenses have been allocated to be a reasonable reflection
of the utilization of services provided to or the benefit
received by us
F-7
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
during the periods presented. The allocations may not, however,
reflect the expense we would have incurred as an independent,
publicly traded company for the periods presented. Actual costs
that may have been incurred if we had been a stand-alone company
would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen
organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or
performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas
such as information technology and infrastructure. Following our
separation from ITT, we will perform these functions using our
own resources or purchased services. For an interim period,
however, some of these functions will continue to be provided by
ITT under transition services agreements, which are planned to
extend for a period of 3 to 24 months in most
circumstances. In addition to the transition services
agreements, effective upon the distribution, we intend for
certain intercompany arrangements to be converted into
third-party contracts.
ITT uses a centralized approach to cash management and financing
of its operations, excluding debt where we are the legal
obligor. The majority of our cash is transferred to ITT daily
and ITT funds our operating and investing activities as needed.
Cash transfers to and from ITTs cash management accounts
are reflected in Parent company investment.
The Combined Financial Statements include certain assets and
liabilities that have historically been held at the ITT
corporate level but are specifically identifiable or otherwise
allocable to us. The cash and cash equivalents held by ITT at
the corporate level are not specifically identifiable to Water
Co and therefore were not allocated to us for any of the periods
presented. Cash and cash equivalents in our combined balance
sheets primarily represent cash held locally by entities
included in our Combined Financial Statements. ITT third-party
debt, and the related interest expense has not been allocated to
us for any of the periods presented as we were not the legal
obligor of the debt and the ITT borrowings were not directly
attributable to our business.
The Combined Financial Statements exclude the allocation of
liabilities, assets, and costs reported by ITT related to
asbestos product liability matters. These matters were not
allocated to us for any period presented as ITT will continue as
the legal obligor for those liabilities, ITT is expected to pay
any associated settlements, judgments, or legal defense costs,
and such matters were not historically managed by us. See
Note 17 for additional information.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the Combined Financial Statements and
accompanying notes. Such estimates include, but are not limited
to, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation,
goodwill and intangible asset impairment, postretirement
benefits, income taxes and the allocation of purchase price to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination. Estimates are revised as additional information
becomes available.
Consolidation
Principles
Water Co combines companies in which it has a controlling
financial interest or when Water Co is considered the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. We account for
investments in companies over which we have the ability to
exercise significant influence, but do not hold a controlling
interest under the equity method, and we record our
proportionate share of income or losses in the Combined
Statement of Operations. Equity method investments are reviewed
for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the
investment may be
other-than-temporarily
impaired. This requires significant judgment, including an
assessment of the investees financial condition, the
possibility of subsequent rounds of financing, and the
investees historical and projected results of operations
and cash flows. If the actual results of operations or cash
flows for the investee are significantly different from
projections, we may incur future charges for the impairment of
these investments.
F-8
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The results of companies acquired or disposed of during the
fiscal year are included in the Combined Financial Statements
from the effective date of acquisition or up to the date of
disposal.
Business
Combinations
We allocate the purchase price of acquisitions to the tangible
and intangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and
non-controlling interests acquired based on their estimated fair
value at the acquisition date. Changes to the acquisition date
fair values prior to the expiration of the measurement period, a
period not to exceed 12 months from date of acquisition,
are recorded as an adjustment to the associated goodwill.
Changes to the acquisition date fair values after expiration of
the measurement period are recorded in earnings. The excess of
the acquisition price over those estimated fair values is
recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related expenses and
restructuring costs are recognized separately from the business
combination and are expensed as incurred.
Fair
Value Measurements
We determine fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
We use a hierarchical structure to prioritize the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad
levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (Level 1), then to quoted market prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets
(Level 2) and gives the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Cash
Equivalents
We consider all liquid investments purchased with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Receivables
Trade receivables primarily comprise uncollected amounts owed to
us from transactions with customers and are presented net of
allowances for doubtful accounts and cash discounts.
We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts using a
combination of factors to reduce our trade receivable balances
to their estimated net realizable amount. We maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts based on a variety of factors;
including the length of time receivables are past due,
macroeconomic trends and conditions, significant one-time
events, historical experience and the financial condition of
customers. We record a specific reserve for individual accounts
when we become aware of specific customer circumstances, such as
in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the
customers operating results or financial position. The
past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the
contractual payment terms of the receivable. If circumstances
related to the specific customer change, we adjust estimates of
the recoverability of receivables as appropriate. We determine
our allowance for cash discounts primarily based on historical
experience with customers.
Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally
diversified due to the large number of entities comprising Water
Cos customer base and their dispersion across many
different geographical regions. Water Co performs ongoing credit
evaluations of the financial condition of its third-party
distributors, resellers and other customers and requires
collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in
certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 we
do not believe we have any significant concentrations of credit
risk.
F-9
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories
Inventories, which include the costs of material, labor and
overhead, are stated at either the lower of cost or market using
either the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method or the
last-in,
last-out (LIFO) method. Certain inventories are accounted under
the LIFO method primarily because this method was elected for
tax purposes. Inventories valued under the LIFO method represent
8% and 11% of total 2010 and 2009 inventories, respectively. If
inventories valued using the LIFO method had been valued under
the FIFO method, they would have been higher by $6 at both
December 31, 2010 and 2009. Estimated losses from obsolete
and slow-moving inventories are recorded to reduce inventory
values to their estimated net realizable value.
Our manufacturing operations recognize costs of sales using
standard costs with full overhead absorption, which generally
approximates actual cost.
Plant,
Property and Equipment
Plant, property and equipment, including capitalized interest
applicable to major project expenditures, are recorded at cost.
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the
economic useful lives of the assets involved as follows:
buildings and improvements five to 40 years,
machinery and equipment two to 10 years,
furniture and office equipment three to seven years,
and other five to 40 years. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the life of the lease or the
asset, whichever is shorter. Fully depreciated assets are
retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until
disposal. We expense repairs and maintenance expenditures as
incurred.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents purchase consideration paid in a business
combination that exceeds the values assigned to the net assets
of acquired businesses. Intangible assets include customer
relationships, proprietary technology, brands and trademarks,
patents and other intangible assets. Intangible assets with a
finite life are amortized on a straight-line basis over an
estimated economic useful life which ranges from 10 to
40 years. Certain of our intangible assets have an
indefinite life and are not amortized; namely certain brands and
trademarks.
Long-Lived
Asset Impairment
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite
lives, are amortized and tested for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may
not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of long-lived
assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow the assets are
expected to generate and recognize an impairment loss when
estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from
the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition
of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the
asset. When an impairment is identified, we reduce the carrying
amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a
discounted cash flow approach or, when available and
appropriate, to comparable market values.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not
amortized, but rather are tested for impairment annually (or
more frequently if impairment indicators arise, such as changes
to the reporting unit structure, significant adverse changes in
the business climate or an adverse action or assessment by a
regulator). We conduct our annual impairment testing on the
first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. For goodwill, the
impairment test is a two-step test. In the first step, the
estimated fair value of each reporting unit is compared to the
carrying value of the net assets assigned to that reporting
unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds
its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and the second step
of the impairment test is not performed. If the carrying value
of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the
second step of the impairment test is performed in order to
measure the impairment loss to be recorded, if any. If the
F-10
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeds its
implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to
the difference. We estimate the fair value of our reporting
units and indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income
approach. Under the income approach, we estimate fair value
based on the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Commitments
and Contingencies
We record accruals for commitments and loss contingencies for
those which are both probable and the amount can be reasonably
estimated. In addition, legal fees are accrued for cases where a
loss is probable and the related fees can be reasonably
estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine both
probability and the estimated amount of loss. We review these
accruals quarterly and adjust the accruals to reflect the impact
of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel,
and other current information.
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded on a site by
site basis when it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated, based on current law and existing technologies. Our
estimated liability is reduced to reflect the anticipated
participation of other potentially responsible parties in those
instances where it is probable that such parties are legally
responsible and financially capable of paying their respective
shares of the relevant costs. These accruals are reviewed
quarterly and are adjusted as assessment and remediation efforts
progress or as additional technical or legal information become
available. Actual costs to be incurred at identified sites in
future periods may vary from the estimates, given inherent
uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures. Accruals
for environmental liabilities are primarily included in other
non-current liabilities at undiscounted amounts and exclude
claims for recoveries from insurance companies or other third
parties.
Parent
Company Investment
Parent company investment in the combined balance sheets
represents ITTs historical investment in us, our
accumulated net earnings after taxes, and the net effect of the
transactions with and allocations from ITT. See Basis of
Presentation above and Note 18 for additional information.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The national currencies of our foreign companies are generally
the functional currencies. Balance sheet accounts are translated
at the exchange rate in effect at the end of each period; income
statement accounts are translated at the average rates of
exchange prevailing during the period. Gains and losses on
foreign currency translations are reflected in the cumulative
translation adjustments component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in parent company equity. Net gains or
losses from foreign currency transactions are reported in
selling, general and administrative expenses.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, the price is fixed or determinable, collectability is
reasonably assured and delivery has occurred or services have
been rendered. For product sales we recognize revenue at the
time title and risks and rewards of ownership pass, which is
generally when products are shipped. Certain customer contracts
with customers may require delivery, installation, testing,
certification or other acceptance provisions to be satisfied
prior to revenue being recognized. We recognize revenue on
product sales to channel partners, including resellers,
distributors or value-added solution providers at the time of
sale when the channel partners have economic substance apart
from us and we have completed our obligations related to the
sale. Service revenue is recognized as services are performed.
For agreements that contain multiple deliverables, we recognize
revenue for a delivered element when it has stand-alone value to
the customer, there is objective and reliable evidence of fair
value of
F-11
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the undelivered elements, and, in arrangements that include a
general right of return relative to the delivered element,
performance of the undelivered element is considered probable
and substantially in our control.
We record a reduction in revenue at the time of sale for
estimated product returns, rebates and other allowances, based
on historical experience and known trends.
Revenue is reported net of any required taxes collected from
customers and remitted to government authorities, with collected
taxes recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the
relevant government authority.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are recorded as a component of costs
of sales.
Product
Warranties
We accrue for the estimated cost of product warranties at the
time revenue is recognized and record it as a component of cost
of sales. Our product warranty liability reflects our best
estimate of probable liability under the terms and conditions of
our product warranties offered to customers. We estimate the
liability based on our standard warranty terms, the historical
frequency of claims and the cost to replace or repair our
products under warranty. Factors that impact our warranty
liability include the number of units sold, the length of
warranty term, historical and anticipated rates of warranty
claims and cost per claim. We assess the adequacy of our
recorded warranty liabilities quarterly and adjust amounts as
necessary.
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
Except as described separately below, certain of our employees
participate in defined benefit pension and other postretirement
benefit plans (the Shared Plans) sponsored by ITT
which include participants of other ITT subsidiaries. We account
for Shared Plans as multiemployer benefit plans. Accordingly, we
do not record an asset or liability to recognize the funded
status of the Shared Plans. We recognize a liability only for
any required contributions to the Shared Plans that are accrued
and unpaid at the balance sheet date. The related pension and
other postretirement expenses are allocated to Water Co based
primarily on pensionable compensation of active participants and
are reported within Selling, general and administrative expenses
in the Combined Statements of Operations.
Plans that are direct to or sponsored by Water Co (Direct
Plans) are accounted for as defined benefit pension or
other postretirement plans. Accordingly, the funded or unfunded
position of each plan is recorded on our Combined Balance Sheet.
Actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs or credits
that have not yet been recognized through income are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income within parent company
equity, net of taxes, until they are amortized as a component of
net periodic postretirement cost. The determination of benefit
obligations and the recognition of expenses related to Direct
Plans are dependent on various assumptions. The major
assumptions primarily relate to discount rates, long-term
expected rates of return on plan assets, rate of future
compensation increases, mortality, termination, health care
inflation trend rates and other factors. Management develops
each assumption using relevant company experience in conjunction
with market-related data for each individual country in which
such plans exist. All actuarial assumptions are reviewed
annually with third-party consultants and adjusted as necessary.
For the recognition of net periodic postretirement cost, the
calculation of the long-term expected return on plan assets is
generally derived using a market-related value of plan assets
based on yearly average asset values at the measurement date
over the last five years. Actual results that differ from our
assumptions are accumulated and amortized over the estimated
future working life of the participants. The fair value of plan
assets is determined based on market prices or estimated fair
value at the measurement date. See Note 13 for further
information.
F-12
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Research
and Development
We conduct research and development (R&D) activities, which
consist primarily of the development of new products, product
applications, and manufacturing processes. R&D costs are
charged to expense as incurred.
Share-Based
Compensation
ITT maintains several share-based incentive plans, which we
refer to collectively as the Plans, for the benefit
of certain officers, directors, and employees, including Water
Co employees.
Share-based awards issued to employees include non-qualified
stock options, restricted stock awards and certain
liability-based awards. Compensation costs resulting from
share-based payment transactions are recognized primarily within
selling, general and administrative expenses, at fair value over
the requisite service period (typically three years) on a
straight-line basis. The calculated compensation cost is
adjusted based on an estimate of awards ultimately expected to
vest. The fair value of a non-qualified stock option is
determined on the date of grant using a binomial lattice pricing
model incorporating multiple and variable assumptions over time,
including assumptions such as employee exercise patterns, stock
price volatility and changes in dividends. The fair value of
restricted stock awards is determined using the closing price of
the ITTs common stock on date of grant. The fair value of
certain liability-based awards, including cash awards under our
Long-Term Incentive Plan, is remeasured at the end of each
reporting period.
Restructuring
We periodically initiate management approved restructuring
activities to achieve cost savings through reduced operational
redundancies and to strategically position ourselves in the
market in response to prevailing economic conditions and
associated customer demand. Costs associated with restructuring
actions can include severance, infrastructure charges to vacate
facilities or consolidate operations, contract termination costs
and other related charges. For involuntary separation plans, a
liability is recognized when it is probable and reasonably
estimable. For voluntary separation plans, a liability is
recognized when the employee irrevocably accepts the voluntary
termination. For one-time termination benefits, such as
additional severance pay or benefit payouts, and other exit
costs, such as lease termination costs, the liability is
measured and recognized initially at fair value in the period in
which the liability is incurred, with subsequent changes to the
liability recognized as adjustments in the period of change.
Income
taxes
Our income taxes as presented are calculated on a separate tax
return basis and may not be reflective of the results that would
have occurred on a standalone basis. Our operations have
historically been included in ITTs U.S. federal and
state tax returns or
non-U.S. jurisdictions
tax returns.
With the exception of certain dedicated foreign entities, we do
not maintain taxes payable to/from our parent and we are deemed
to settle the annual current tax balances immediately with the
legal tax-paying entities in the respective jurisdictions. These
settlements are reflected as changes in parent company
investment.
We determine the provision for income taxes using the asset and
liability approach. Under this approach, deferred income taxes
represent the expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets
and liabilities.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. In
assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we look to the
future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences,
taxable income in carryback years, the feasibility of tax
planning
F-13
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
strategies and estimated future taxable income. The valuation
allowance can be affected by changes to tax laws, changes to
statutory tax rates and changes to future taxable income
estimates.
We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if
it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in
the Combined Financial Statements from such positions are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Recently
Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) provided investors a practical expedient for measuring
the fair value of investments in certain entities that calculate
net asset value per share (NAV). This ASU is effective for
periods ending after December 15, 2009. Adoption did not
have a material effect on our Combined Financial Statements.
In August 2009, the FASB provided additional guidance on the
application of fair value techniques to liabilities. The
guidance clarifies that the quoted price for the liability when
traded as an asset in an active market is a Level 1
measurement, when no adjustment to the quoted price is required.
In the absence of a Level 1 (quoted price) measurement, an
entity must use one or more valuation techniques to estimate
fair value in a manner consistent with the principles of fair
value measurements. The requirements under this guidance were
effective for our fourth quarter period beginning
October 1, 2009. Adoption did not have a material effect on
our Combined Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the accounting and disclosure
requirements related to the consolidation of variable interest
entities (VIE(s)). The amendments include replacing the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest
in VIE(s) with an approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has the power to direct the activities of VIE(s) that
most significantly impact the entitys economic performance
and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or
(2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. In
addition, the amendments require an ongoing assessment of
whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE(s)
and requires additional disclosures about an enterprises
involvement in VIE(s). The adoption of these amendments on
January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on our
Combined Financial Statements.
In January 2009, the FASB amended the requirements pertaining to
the method of applying the acquisition method of accounting for
business combinations. These amendments included that
acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred;
noncontrolling interests will be valued at fair value at the
acquisition date; in-process research and development will be
recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset
at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated with a
business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to
the acquisition date; and changes in deferred tax asset
valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the
acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. These
amendments have been applied prospectively to business
combinations with an acquisition date subsequent to
January 1, 2009. While the new business combination
accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our
Combined Financial Statements on adoption, the effects on future
periods will depend upon the nature and significance of future
business combinations.
Pronouncements
Not Yet Adopted
In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance intended to achieve common
fair value measurements and related disclosures between
U.S. GAAP and international accounting standards. The
amendments primarily clarify existing fair value guidance and
therefore the amendments are not intended to change the
application of existing fair value measurement guidance.
However, the amendments include certain instances where a
F-14
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or
disclosing information about fair value measurements has
changed. This guidance is effective for the periods beginning
after December 15, 2011 and early application is
prohibited. We will adopt these amendments on January 1,
2012; however, the requirements are not expected to have a
material effect on the Companys Combined Financial
Statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued additional guidance applicable
to the testing of goodwill for potential impairment.
Specifically, for reporting units with zero or negative carrying
amounts, an entity is required to perform the second step of the
goodwill impairment test (a comparison between the carrying
amount of a reporting units goodwill to its implied fair
value) if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment
exists, considering any adverse qualitative factors. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. As
of the date of our most recent goodwill impairment test, none of
our reporting units would have been affected by the application
of this guidance as each reporting unit had a carrying amount
that exceeded zero.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance permitting
use of the milestone method of revenue recognition for research
or development arrangements that contain payment provisions or
consideration contingent on the achievement of specified events.
On January 1, 2011, we adopted the new guidance on a
prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance on the
accounting for revenue arrangements that contain multiple
elements by eliminating the criterion that objective and
reliable evidence of fair value for undelivered products or
services needs to exist in order to be able to account
separately for deliverables and eliminating the use of the
residual method of allocating arrangement consideration. The
amendments establish a hierarchy for determining the selling
price of a deliverable and will allow for the separation of
products and services in more instances than previously
permitted.
We adopted the new multiple element guidance effective
January 1, 2011 for new arrangements entered into or
arrangements materially modified on or after that date on a
prospective basis. In connection with the adoption of the
revised multiple element arrangement guidance, we revised our
revenue recognition accounting policies. For multiple
deliverable arrangements entered into or materially modified on
or after January 1, 2011, we recognize revenue for a
delivered element based on the relative selling price if the
deliverable has stand-alone value to the customer and, in
arrangements that include a general right of return relative to
the delivered element, performance of the undelivered element is
considered probable and substantially in the Companys
control. The selling price for a deliverable is based on
vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (VSOE), if
available, third-party evidence of selling price (TPE), if VSOE
is not available, or best estimated selling price (BESP), if
neither VSOE nor TPE is available.
The deliverables in our arrangements with multiple elements
include various products and may include related services, such
as installation and
start-up
services. For multiple element arrangements entered into or
materially modified after adoption of the revised multiple
element arrangement guidance, we allocate arrangement
consideration based on the relative selling prices of the
separate units of accounting determined in accordance with the
hierarchy described above. For deliverables that are sold
separately, we establish VSOE based on the price when the
deliverable is sold separately. We establish TPE, generally for
services, based on prices similarly situated customers pay for
similar services from third party vendors. For those
deliverables for which we are unable to establish VSOE or TPE,
we estimate the selling price considering various factors
including market and pricing trends, geography, product
customization, and profit objectives. Revenue allocated to
products and services is generally recognized as the products
are delivered and the services are performed, provided all other
revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. The adoption
of the new multiple element guidance did not result in a
material change in either the units of accounting or the pattern
or timing of revenue recognition. Additionally, the adoption of
the revised multiple element arrangement guidance did not have a
material impact on our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
F-15
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In October 2009, the FASB amended the accounting requirements
for software revenue recognition. The objective of this update
is to address the accounting for revenue arrangements that
contain tangible products and software. Specifically, products
that contain software that is more than incidental
to the product as a whole will be removed from the scope of the
software revenue recognition literature. The amendments align
the accounting for these revenue transaction types with the
amendments described for multiple element arrangements above. We
adopted the provisions of this guidance for new or materially
modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1,
2011 on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on our financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
During 2010, we spent an aggregate of approximately
$1 billion, net of cash acquired, primarily on the
acquisitions of Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin
Holdings Limited (collectively referred to as Godwin) and Nova
Analytics Corporation (Nova). The results of operations and cash
flows from our 2010 acquisitions have been included in our
Combined Financial Statements prospectively from their date of
acquisition. With the exception of Godwin, pro forma results of
operations for acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2009 have not
been presented because they are not significant, either
individually or in the aggregate. Due to the significant nature
of the Godwin acquisition, pro forma results of operations are
presented below as if Godwin was acquired on January 1,
2009.
Godwin
Pumps
On August 3, 2010, we acquired 100% of the privately held
stock of Godwin for a purchase price of $580, net of cash
acquired. Godwin is a supplier and servicer of automatic
self-priming and on-demand pumping solutions serving the global
industrial, construction, mining, municipal, oil and gas
dewatering markets.
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair values at the
date of acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 3, 2010
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
56
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
Plant, property and equipment
|
|
|
82
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1
|
|
Intangible assets(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
107
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
46
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible and intangible assets
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Trademarks are indefinite-lived intangibles. Customer
relationships and proprietary technology are amortized over
weighted average lives of 10 years and 20 years,
respectively. |
The excess of the acquisition date fair value of the total
purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net tangible
and intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill represents the value expected to be obtained from the
ability to be more competitive through the offering of a more
complete dewatering pumps portfolio and from leveraging our
current Water & Wastewater divisions sales,
distribution and service network. The goodwill related to this
acquisition is recorded in the Water Infrastructure segment, a
significant portion of which is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes.
Subsequent to August 3, 2010, the sales and expenses of
Godwin have been included in our combined statements of
operations. Our 2010 results of operations include sales and
pre-tax operating income from Godwin of $125 and $16,
respectively. Godwin generated approximately $145 and $26 in
sales and pre-tax operating income from January 1 through
August 2, 2010.
The following unaudited pro-forma information assumes that the
acquisition of Godwin was completed as of January 1, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Acquisition
|
|
Depreciation and
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co As
|
|
Godwin
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Costs
|
|
Income
|
|
Water Co Pro
|
2009
|
|
Reported
|
|
Operations(a)
|
|
Expense(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Taxes(d)
|
|
Forma
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,046
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Acquisition
|
|
Depreciation and
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co As
|
|
Godwin Operations
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Costs
|
|
Income
|
|
Water Co Pro
|
2010
|
|
Reported
|
|
(a)
|
|
Expense(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Taxes(d)
|
|
Forma
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,347
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Godwin recognized sales of $197 and $270 during 2009 and 2010,
respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Incremental depreciation and amortization expense associated
with the purchase price allocation to plant, property and
equipment and finite lived intangible assets recognized as a
result of the acquisition. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects the reversal of transaction costs directly related to
the acquisition of Godwin. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects income tax impact of pro-forma adjustments and change
in income tax status of Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. |
Nova
On March 23, 2010, we acquired 100% of the outstanding
stock of Nova, for a purchase price of $385, net of cash
acquired. Nova provides us with analytical instrumentation
brands and technologies, which when combined with the
Water & Wastewater division of the Water
Infrastructure segment (WI), provides our customers the ability
to procure, from a single source, a full suite of transport,
treatment and testing products and solutions.
F-17
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair values at the
date of acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nova
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2010
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
Plant, property and equipment
|
|
|
14
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Intangible assets(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributor relationships
|
|
|
112
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
42
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible and intangible assets
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Trademarks are indefinite-lived intangibles. Customer
relationships and proprietary technology are amortized over
weighted average lives of 20 years and 10 years,
respectively. |
The excess of the acquisition date fair value of the total
purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net tangible
and intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The
goodwill arising from this acquisition consists largely of the
planned expansion of the Nova footprint to new geographic
markets, synergies and economies of scale. The goodwill related
to this acquisition has been assigned to our Analytical
Instrumentation division within the Water Infrastructure
segment. Goodwill attributable to Nova is not expected to be
deductible for income tax purposes.
Subsequent to March 23, 2010, the sales and expenses of
Nova have been included in our combined statements of
operations. Our 2010 results of operations include revenues and
operating income of $111 and $12, respectively.
2009
Acquisitions
During 2009, we spent $33, net of cash acquired, on acquisitions
that were not material individually or in the aggregate to our
results of operations or financial position. The most
significant of these acquisitions was Laing GmbH (Laing), which
we acquired in May of 2009. Laing, a privately held producer of
energy-efficient circulator pumps primarily used in residential
and commercial plumbing and heating, ventilating and air
conditioning systems, was fully integrated into the Applied
Water segment during 2009.
2008
Acquisitions
There were no material acquisitions completed during 2008.
F-18
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 4
|
SHARE-BASED
PAYMENTS
|
ITT maintains several share-based incentive compensation plans,
for the benefit of certain officers, directors, and employees,
including Water Co employees. Share-based awards issued to
employees include non-qualified stock options (NQO), restricted
stock awards (RS) and a target cash award (TSR). NQO and RS
awards are accounted for as equity-based compensation. TSR
awards are cash settled and accounted for as liability-based
compensation. These compensation costs are recognized primarily
within selling, general and administrative expenses.
Total share-based compensation costs recognized for 2010, 2009
and 2008 were $7, $9 and $16, respectively. A significant
component of these charges relates to costs allocated to Water
Co for ITT Corporate employees as well as other ITT employees
not solely dedicated to Water Co. As of December 31, 2010,
2009, and 2008 there were approximately 1.0, 1.1, and 1.0,
respectively, NQO and RS shares outstanding related to Water Co
specific employees. These awards and related amounts are not
necessarily indicative of awards and amounts that would have
been granted if we were an independent, publicly traded company
for the periods presented. The following table provides further
detail related to share-based compensation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Cost
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
2010 Total
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
2009 Total
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
2008 Total
|
|
|
Equity based awards
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Liability based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of
grant using the binomial lattice pricing model which
incorporates multiple and variable assumptions over time,
including assumptions such as employee exercise patterns, stock
price volatility and changes in dividends. The following are
weighted-average assumptions for 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
27.06
|
%
|
|
|
38.77
|
%
|
|
|
28.69
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Risk-free rates
|
|
|
3.06
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
14.50
|
|
|
$
|
9.60
|
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
Expected volatilities are based on ITTs stock price
history, including implied volatilities from traded options on
our stock. ITT uses historical data to estimate option exercise
and employee termination behavior within the valuation model.
Employee groups and option characteristics are considered
separately for valuation purposes. The expected life represents
an estimate of the period of time options are expected to remain
outstanding. The expected life provided above represents the
weighted average of expected behavior for certain groups of
employees who have historically exhibited different behavior.
The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect at the time of option grant.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
RESTRUCTURING
CHARGES, NET
|
We have initiated various restructuring activities throughout
the business during the past three years, of which only the work
force reduction in the fourth quarter of 2008 is considered
individually significant.
F-19
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of all restructuring costs incurred during each
of the previous three years ended are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
By component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other charges
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Reversal of restructuring accruals
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(-
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net restructuring charge
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Corporate and other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents amounts allocated to Water Co |
The following table displays a rollforward of the restructuring
accruals, presented on our Combined Balance Sheet within accrued
liabilities, for the each of the previous two years ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Restructuring accruals 1/1
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Severance and other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accruals 12/31
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By accrual type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance accrual
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Facility carrying and other costs accrual
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
By segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Corporate and other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents amounts allocated to Water Co |
The following is a rollforward of employee position eliminations
associated with restructuring activities through 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Planned reductions 1/1
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Additional planned reductions
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
Actual reductions
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned reductions 12/31
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter 2008 Reductions in Force Activities
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated an action to
reduce headcount across our businesses in response to declining
economic conditions. The fourth quarter 2008 reduction in force
activities resulted in
F-20
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$29 of total restructuring charges, primarily consisting of
severance charges. The charges by segment were: Water
Infrastructure $16, Applied Water $12, and Corporate and Other
$1. This action has resulted in a total headcount reduction of
689, including 405 factory workers, 276 office workers and 8
management employees. During 2009, we made cash payments of $22
related to this action, which reduced the remaining
restructuring accrual to $2. There is no remaining balance as of
December 31, 2010.
Our operating results have been included in ITTs
consolidated U.S. federal and state income tax returns as
well as included in many of ITTs tax filings for
non-U.S. jurisdictions.
Amounts presented in these combined financial statements related
to income taxes have been determined on a separate tax return
basis, and our contribution to ITTs net operating losses
and tax credits have been included in these financial
statements. These amounts may not reflect tax positions taken or
to be taken by ITT and have been available for use by ITT and
may remain with ITT after the separation from ITT.
The source of pre- tax income and the components of income tax
expense are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Income components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
United States state and local
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current income tax provision
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States federal
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
United States state and local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax provision
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the income tax provision at the
U.S. statutory rate to the effective income tax rate as
reported is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Foreign restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
Effect of repatriation of foreign earnings, net of foreign tax
credits
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
All other
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Loss carryforwards
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Foreign tax credit
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
Plant, property, and equipment
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, a valuation allowance of
approximately $68 had been established to reduce the deferred
income tax asset related to certain U.S. state and foreign
net operating losses and U.S. capital loss carryforwards.
During 2010, the valuation allowance decreased by $3 resulting
from the following: an increase of $1 attributable to
U.S. federal capital loss carryforwards and net operating
losses which we acquired in 2010 and a decrease of $4
attributable to foreign net operating loss carryforwards and
foreign investments.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax
bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which we expect the differences will
reverse. Deferred taxes are classified in the Combined Balance
Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60
|
)
|
F-22
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2010, we have not provided for deferred
taxes on the excess of financial reporting over the tax bases of
investments in certain foreign subsidiaries in the amount of
$1,265 because we plan to reinvest such earnings indefinitely
outside the U.S. While the amount of federal income taxes,
if such earnings are distributed in the future, cannot be
determined, such taxes may be reduced by tax credits and other
deductions.
Our tax attributes available to reduce future taxable income
begin to expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attribute:
|
|
Amount
|
|
First Year of Expiration
|
|
U.S. net operating loss
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
State net operating loss
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2022
|
|
Federal and state capital loss
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
US tax credits
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
Foreign net operating loss
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if
it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in
the Combined Financial Statements from such positions are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010, 2009,
and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits 1/1
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Additions for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year tax positions
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Prior year tax positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Business combinations
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year tax positions
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits 12/31
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate is $43, $19, and $20, respectively.
We do not believe that the unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change within twelve months of the reporting date.
F-23
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In many cases, unrecognized tax benefits are related to tax
years that remain subject to examination by the relevant taxing
authorities. The following table summarizes the earliest open
tax years by major jurisdiction:
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
Earliest Open Year
|
|
Austria
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2000
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
2005
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
2008
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2007
|
|
We classify interest relating to tax matters as a component of
interest expense and tax penalties as a component of income tax
expense in our Combined Statement of Operations. During 2010,
2009, and 2008 we recognized net interest expense of $1, net
interest income of $2, and net interest expense of $2 related to
tax matters, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, 2009,
and 2008, we had $5, $4, and $6 of interest accrued for tax
matters, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, gross
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Allowance for cash discounts
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table displays an aggregate rollforward of the
allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts 1/1
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Additions charged to expense
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Write-offs
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts 12/31
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 9
|
PLANT,
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
Equipment held for lease or rental
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Construction work in progress
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, gross
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense of $63, $51, and $55 was recognized in
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 by business segment are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Goodwill 1/1/2009
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
935
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill 12/31/2009
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill 12/31/2010
|
|
$
|
873
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill acquired during 2010 primarily relates to the Godwin
and Nova acquisitions. Goodwill acquired during 2009 primarily
relates to the Laing acquisition. Amounts reported as
Other relate primarily to goodwill associated with
an immaterial business divestiture occurring during 2009.
Based on the results of annual impairment tests, we determined
that no impairment of goodwill existed as of the measurement
date in 2010 or 2009. However, future goodwill impairment tests
could result in a charge to earnings. We will continue to
evaluate goodwill on an annual basis as of the beginning of our
fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in
circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment.
F-25
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Intangible Assets, Net
Information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net Intangibles
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net Intangibles
|
|
|
Customer and distributor relationships
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Patents and other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles consist of brands and trademarks.
Based on the results of its annual impairment tests, we
determined that no impairment of the indefinite-lived
intangibles existed as of the measurement date in 2010 or 2009.
However, future impairment tests could result in a charge to
earnings. We will continue to evaluate the indefinite-lived
intangible assets on an annual basis as of the beginning of our
fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in
circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment.
Customer and distributor relationships, proprietary technology,
trademarks, patents and other are amortized over weighted
average lives of approximately 14 years, 21 years,
16 years and 10 years, respectively.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for 2010, 2009
and 2008 was $21, $10 and $8, respectively. Estimated
amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12
|
ACCRUED
AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Compensation and other employee-benefits
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
Customer-related liabilities
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 13
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
ITT and the Company sponsor various defined contribution savings
plans, which allow employees to contribute a portion of their
pre-tax
and/or
after-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines.
Several of the plans require us to match a percentage of the
employee contributions up to certain limits, generally between
2.5% 3.0% of employee base pay. Matching
contributions charged to income amounted to $21, $4 and $4 for
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The ITT Stock Fund, an investment option under the ITT Salaried
Investment and Savings Plan in which Company employees
participate is considered an Employee Stock Ownership Plan. As a
result, participants in the ITT Stock Fund may receive dividends
in cash or may reinvest such dividends into the ITT Stock Fund.
Company employees held approximately 1.0 shares of ITT
common stock in the ITT Stock Fund at December 31, 2010.
Defined
Benefit Plans
Company employees participate in numerous defined benefit plans,
including hourly and union plans as well as salaried plans,
which generally require up to 5 years of service to be
vested and for which the benefits are determined based on years
of credited service and either specified rates, final pay, or
final average pay. As of December 31, 2010, of our total
projected benefit obligation, U.S. plans represented 26%
and international pension plans represented 74%. Company
employees also participate in other post-retirement benefit
plans such as health care and life insurance plans.
Balance
Sheet Information
Amounts recognized in the Combined Balance Sheets for pension
and other employee-related benefit plans (collectively,
postretirement benefit plans) reflect the funded status of the
postretirement benefit plans. The following table provides a
summary of the funded status of our postretirement benefit plans
and the presentation of such balances within our Combined
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reported within:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
F-27
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A portion of our projected benefit obligation includes amounts
that have not yet been recognized as expense in our results of
operations. Such amounts are recorded within accumulated other
comprehensive loss until they are amortized as a component of
net periodic postretirement cost. The following table provides a
summary of amounts recorded within accumulated other
comprehensive loss at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
$(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
|
$(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a rollforward of the projected
benefit obligations for our U.S. and international pension
plans for the years ended 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 1/1
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Amendments /other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain)/loss
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Liabilities assumed through acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 12/31
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a rollforward of the projected
benefit obligations for our other employee-related benefit plans
for the years ended 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 1/1
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation 12/31
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a rollforward of the pension plan
assets and the ending funded status for our U.S. and
international pension plans for the years ended 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets 1/1
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Assets acquired through acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets 12/31
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit
pension plans was $213 and $166 at December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. The following table provides information for
pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess
of plan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
F-29
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Statement Information
The following table provides the components of net periodic
benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive
income for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008, as they pertain to our
defined benefit pension plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations
recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (gain)/loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact from net periodic benefit cost and changes in other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the components of net periodic
benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive
loss for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008, as they pertain to other
employee-related benefit plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized
in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes recognized in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact from net periodic benefit cost and changes in other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides the estimated net actuarial loss
and prior service cost that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost during
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
Plan Assumptions
The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions
used to determine projected benefit obligations and net periodic
benefit cost, as they pertain to our defined benefit pension
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Intl
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Intl
|
|
Obligation Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
Rate of future compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
Cost Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.79
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.20
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.97
|
%
|
Rate of future compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions
used to determine projected benefit obligations and net periodic
benefit cost, as they pertain to other employee-related benefit
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Obligation Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of future compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Cost Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
Rate of future compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Management develops each assumption using relevant company
experience in conjunction with market-related data for each
individual country in which plans exist. Assumptions are
reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary.
The expected long-term rate of return on assets reflects the
expected returns for each major asset class in which the plans
invest, the weight of each asset class in the target mix, the
correlations among asset classes and their expected
volatilities. The majority of our plan assets relate to
U.S. plans and are managed by ITT on a commingled basis in
a master investment trust. With respect to plan assets in the
master investment trust, our expected return on plan assets is
estimated by evaluating both historical returns and estimates of
future returns. Specifically, ITT analyzes the plans
actual historical annual return on assets, net of fees, over the
past 15, 20 and 25 years; estimates future returns based on
independent estimates of asset class returns; and evaluates
historical broad market returns over long-term timeframes based
on our asset allocation range. Based on this approach, the
long-term annual rate of return on assets for plan assets in the
master investment trust is estimated at 9.0%. For reference, our
actual geometric average annual return on plan assets in the
master
F-31
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
investment trust as of December 31, 2010 was 8.8%, 10.1%
and 10.3%, for the past 15, 20, and 25 year periods,
respectively.
The table below provides the actual rate of return generated on
plan assets during each of the years presented, as they pertain
to plan assets in the master investment trust, as compared to
the expected long-term return utilized in calculating the net
periodic benefit costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Expected rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Actual rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)%
|
The assumed rate of future increases in the per capita cost of
health care (the health care trend rate) is 7.8% for 2011,
decreasing ratably to 5.0% in 2019. An increase or decrease in
the health care trend rates by one percent per year would not
have a material effect on the benefit obligation or the
aggregate annual service and interest components. To the extent
that actual experience differs from these assumptions, the
effect will be amortized over the average future service of the
covered active employees.
The determination of the assumptions related to postretirement
benefit plans are based on the provisions of the applicable
accounting pronouncements, the review of various market data and
discussion with our actuaries. Changes in these assumptions
could materially affect the financial position and results of
operations.
Investment
Policy
The investment strategy for managing worldwide postretirement
benefit plan assets is to seek an optimal rate of return
relative to an appropriate level of risk for each plan.
Investment strategies vary by plan, depending on the specific
characteristics of the plan, such as plan size and design,
funded status, liability profile and legal requirements.
With respect to the master investment trust, ITT allows itself
broad discretion to invest tactically to respond to changing
market conditions, while staying reasonably within the asset
allocation ranges prescribed by its investment guidelines. In
making these asset allocation decisions, ITT takes into account
recent and expected returns and volatility of returns for each
asset class, the expected correlation of returns among the
different investments, as well as anticipated funding and cash
flows. To enhance returns and mitigate risk, ITT diversifies its
investments by strategy, asset class, geography and sector. ITT
engages a large number of managers to gain broad exposure to the
markets, while generating
excess-of-market
returns and mitigating manager-concentration risk.
The following table provides the actual asset allocations of
U.S. plan assets held in the master investment trust, as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related asset
allocation ranges by asset category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Range
|
|
Domestic equities
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
25%-75%
|
|
Alternative investments
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
20%-45%
|
|
International equities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
10%-45%
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0%-60%
|
|
Cash and other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0%-30%
|
|
The strategies and allocations of plan assets outside of the
U.S. are managed locally and may differ significantly from
those in the U.S. In general and as of December 31,
2010,
non-U.S. plans
are managed closely to their strategic allocations.
F-32
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Plan Assets
In measuring plan assets at fair value, a fair value hierarchy
is applied which categorizes and prioritizes the inputs used to
estimate fair value into three levels. The fair value hierarchy
is based on maximizing the use of observable inputs and
minimizing the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. Classification within the fair value hierarchy is based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs are other than quoted prices included within
level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices (in non-active markets or in active markets for
similar assets or liabilities), inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable, and inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or
other means.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or
liabilities.
|
In certain instances, fair value is estimated using quoted
market prices obtained from external pricing services. In
obtaining such data from the pricing service, ITT has evaluated
the methodologies used to develop the estimate of fair value in
order to assess whether such valuations are representative of
fair value, including net asset value (NAV). Additionally, in
certain circumstances, the NAV reported by an asset manager may
be adjusted when sufficient evidence indicates NAV is not
representative of fair value.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
and inputs used to measure fair value for major categories of
investments.
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities Equities (including common and
preferred shares, domestic listed and foreign listed, closed end
mutual funds and exchange traded funds) are generally valued at
the closing price reported on the major market on which the
individual securities are traded at the measurement date. As all
equity securities held by the Company are publicly traded in
active markets, the securities are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
Open ended mutual funds, collective trusts and commingled
funds Open ended mutual funds, collective trusts and
commingled funds are measured at NAV. These funds are generally
classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
Private equity The valuation of limited partnership
interests in private equity funds may require significant
management judgment. The NAV reported by the asset manager is
adjusted when it is determined that NAV is not representative of
fair value. In making such an assessment, a variety of factors
are reviewed, including, but not limited to, the timeliness of
NAV as reported by the asset manager and changes in general
economic and market conditions subsequent to the last NAV
reported by the asset manager. These funds are generally
classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
Absolute return (hedge funds) The valuation of
limited partnership interests in hedge funds may require
significant management judgment. The NAV reported by the asset
manager is adjusted when it is determined that NAV is not
representative of fair value. In making such an assessment, a
variety of factors are reviewed, including, but not limited to,
the timeliness of NAV as reported by the asset manager and
changes in general economic and market conditions subsequent to
the last NAV reported by the asset manager. Depending on how
these investments can be redeemed and the extent of any
adjustments to NAV, hedge funds are classified within either
Level 2 (redeemable within 90 days) or Level 3
(redeemable beyond 90 days) of the fair value hierarchy.
|
F-33
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides the fair value of plan assets held
by our pension benefit plans, at December 31, 2010 and
2009, by asset class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Private equity(a)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Absolute return (hedge funds)(b)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Commodities, fixed income and other
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Private equity includes a diversified range of strategies,
including buyout funds, distressed funds, venture and growth
equity funds and mezzanine funds. |
|
(b) |
|
Absolute return hedge funds primarily include fund of funds that
invest in a diversified portfolio of other hedge funds that
employ a range of investment strategies and fixed
income/multi-strategy absolute return funds, which invest in
multiple investment strategies with the intent of diversifying
risk and reducing volatility. |
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances of fair value measurement within our pension
plans using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Private
|
|
|
Absolute
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Return
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 3 balance 12/31/08
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Unrealized gains, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Purchases/(sales), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Transfers out, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 balance 12/31/09
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Realized gains, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Transfers out, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 balance 12/31/10
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
Funding requirements under Internal Revenue Service rules are a
major consideration in making contributions to our
postretirement plans. With respect to qualified pension plans,
we intend to contribute annually not less than the minimum
required by applicable law or regulation. We made contributions
of $2 and $4 to pension plans during 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We currently anticipate making contributions to
our pension plans in the range of $8 to $10 during 2011, of
which $1 is expected to be made in the first quarter.
F-34
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments
The following table provides the projected timing of payments
for benefits earned to date and the expectation that certain
future service will be earned by current active employees for
our pension and other employee-related benefit plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2013
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2014
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2015
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2016 2020
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Multiemployer
Plans
Company employees participate in defined benefit pension and
other postretirement plans sponsored by ITT Corporation, which
include participants of other ITT Corporation subsidiaries
(collectively, Shared Plans). The Company has
recorded expense of $24, $14 and $8 for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to record
its allocation of pension and other postretirement benefit costs
related to Shared Plans. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
there were no required contributions outstanding.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, such multiemployer
defined benefit pension plans were approximately 80% funded. The
most significant shared defined benefit pension plan is the ITT
U.S. Salaried Retirement Plan (USSRP). Company employees
and former employees represent 12% and 4% of total active and
retired participants in the USSRP, respectively. ITT Corporation
made contributions to the USSRP of $50 and $100 during 2010 and
2009, respectively, all of which were voluntary. ITT currently
does not anticipate making contributions to the USSRP during
2011.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the other multiemployer
postretirement benefit plans were approximately 50% funded. The
ITT Salaried Postretirement Medical and Life Plans and the
Goulds Postretirement Medical Plan represent the most
significant shared other postretirement benefit plans. Company
employees and former employees represent 15% and 7% of active
and retired participants in the ITT Salaried Postretirement
Medical and Life Plans, respectively, and 0% and 15% of active
and retired participants in the Goulds Postretirement Medical
Plan, respectively. There were no contributions made to the
plans during 2010 and 2009. There are currently no contributions
expected in 2011.
We do not currently intend to withdraw from the Shared Plans.
F-35
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 14
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
The following table provides the components of comprehensive
income for the years 2010, 2009, and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Net change in postretirement benefit plans, net of tax
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in postretirement benefit plans, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost from plan amendment, net of tax benefit of $1
in 2010
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss arising during the period, net of tax benefit
of $2, $2 and $7, respectively
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Unrealized changes in postretirement benefit plans, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization from accumulated other comprehensive income
into net periodic benefit cost, net of tax
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in postretirement benefit plans, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net of
tax, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Post retirement benefit plans
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We lease certain offices, manufacturing buildings, machinery,
computers and other equipment. Such leases expire at various
dates through 2047 and may include renewal and payment
escalation clauses. We often pay maintenance, insurance and tax
expense related to leased assets. Rental expenses under
operating leases were $54, $47 and $47 for 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Future minimum operating lease payments under
non-cancellable operating leases with an initial term in excess
of one year as of December 31, 2010 are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Minimum rental payments
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
We warrant numerous products, the terms of which vary widely. In
general, we warrant products against defect and specific
non-performance. Our product warranty liability reflects
managements best estimate of
F-36
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
probable liability under our product warranties for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The table below provides
changes in the product warranty accrual over each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Warranty accrual 1/1
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Accruals for product warranties issued in the period
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Changes in pre-existing warranties
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual 12/31
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17
|
CONTINGENCIES
AND OTHER LEGAL MATTERS
|
General
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings that are
incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these
proceedings seek remedies relating to environmental matters,
product liability, personal injury claims, employment and
pension matters, and commercial or contractual disputes,
sometimes related to acquisitions or divestitures. We will
continue to defend vigorously against all claims.
While no claims have been asserted against ITT WCO, Inc.
alleging injury caused by a Water Co product resulting from
asbestos exposure, it is possible that claims could be filed in
the future. Should asbestos product liability claims be asserted
against ITT WCO, Inc. in the future, we believe there are
numerous legal defenses available and would defend ourselves
vigorously against such a claim. As part of the separation, ITT
will indemnify ITT WCO, Inc. for asbestos product liability
matters, including settlements, judgments, and legal defense
costs associated with all pending and future claims that may
arise from past sales of ITTs legacy products. We believe
ITT remains a substantive entity with sufficient financial
resources to honor its obligations to us.
Although the ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be
predicted with certainty, based on present information,
including our assessment of the merits of the particular claim,
we do not expect that any asserted or unasserted legal claims or
proceedings, individually or in aggregate, will have a material
adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations, or
financial condition.
Indemnifications
As part of the separation, ITT will provide for certain
indemnifications and cross-indemnifications among ITT, ITT DCO,
Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc. The indemnifications address a variety of
subjects, including asserted and unasserted product liability
matters (e.g., asbestos claims, product warranties), which
relate to products sold prior to the Separation Date. The
indemnifications are absolute and indefinite. The
indemnification associated with pending and future asbestos
claims does not expire. ITT WCO, Inc. expects ITT and ITT DCO,
Inc. to fully perform under the terms of the Distribution
Agreement and therefore has not recorded a liability for matters
for which we will be indemnified. In addition, we are not aware
of any claims or other circumstances that would give rise to
material payments to ITT or ITT DCO, Inc. under the indemnity
that we will provide.
Environmental
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to federal,
state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations. We
are responsible, or are alleged to be responsible, for ongoing
environmental investigation and remediation of sites in various
countries. These sites are in various stages of investigation
and/or
remediation and in many of these proceedings our liability is
considered de minimis. We have received notification from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and from similar
state and foreign environmental
F-37
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
agencies, that a number of sites formerly or currently owned
and/or
operated by Water Co, and other properties or water supplies
that may be or have been impacted from those operations, contain
disposed or recycled materials or wastes and require
environmental investigation
and/or
remediation. These sites include instances where we have been
identified as a potentially responsible party under federal and
state environmental laws and regulations.
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded on a site by
site basis when it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated, based on current law and existing technologies. Our
accrued liabilities for these environmental matters represent
the best estimates related to the investigation and remediation
of environmental media such as water, soil, soil vapor, air and
structures, as well as related legal fees. These estimates, and
related accruals, are reviewed quarterly and updated for
progress of investigation and remediation efforts and changes in
facts and legal circumstances. Liabilities for these
environmental expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis.
It is difficult to estimate the final costs of investigation and
remediation due to various factors, including incomplete
information regarding particular sites and other potentially
responsible parties, uncertainty regarding the extent of
investigation or remediation and our share, if any, of liability
for such conditions, the selection of alternative remedial
approaches, and changes in environmental standards and
regulatory requirements. In our opinion, the total amount
accrued is appropriate based on existing facts and circumstances.
|
|
NOTE 18
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND PARENT COMPANY EQUITY
|
The Combined Financial Statements have been prepared on a
stand-alone basis and are derived from the consolidated
financial statements and accounting records of ITT.
During 2010, 2009 and 2008 we sold inventory to other ITT
businesses in the aggregate amount of $11, $10, and $9,
respectively which is included in Net sales in our combined
statements of operations. We also purchase inventories from
other ITT businesses. We recognized cost of sales from the
inventory purchased from ITT of $12, $15, and $13 in 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The aggregate inventory on hand of
purchases from other ITT businesses as of December 31, 2010
and 2009 was not significant.
Allocation
of General Corporate Expenses
The Combined Financial Statements include expense allocations
for certain functions provided by ITT as well as other ITT
employees not solely dedicated to Water Co, including, but not
limited to, general corporate expenses related to finance,
legal, information technology, human resources, communications,
ethics and compliance, shared services, employee benefits and
incentives, and share-based compensation. These expenses have
been allocated to us on the basis of direct usage when
identifiable, with the remainder allocated on the basis of
revenue, headcount or other measure. During 2010, 2009 and 2008,
we were allocated $108 million, $105 million and
$104 million, respectively, of general corporate expenses
incurred by ITT which is included within selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Combined Statements of Operations.
The expense allocations have been determined on a basis that we
consider to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of
services provided or the benefit received by us during the
periods presented. The allocations may not, however, reflect the
expense we would have incurred as an independent, publicly
traded company for the periods presented. Actual costs that may
have been incurred if we had been a standalone company would
depend on a number of factors, including the chosen
organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or
performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas
such as information technology and infrastructure.
F-38
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Parent
Company Equity
Net transfers from/(to) parent are included within parent
company investment on the Combined Statements of Parent Company
Equity and Comprehensive Income. The components of the net
transfers from/(to) parent as of December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Intercompany sales and purchases, net
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Intercompany dividends
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Cash pooling and general financing activities
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
Cash transfers for acquisitions, divestitures and investments
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Corporate allocations including income taxes
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net transfers from/(to) parent
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
$
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT uses a centralized approach to U.S. cash management and
financing of its operations, excluding debt directly incurred by
any of its businesses, such as debt assumed in an acquisition.
The majority of our cash is transferred to ITT daily and ITT
funds our operating and investing activities as needed.
The Combined Financial Statements include certain assets and
liabilities that have historically been held at the ITT
corporate level but which are specifically identifiable or
otherwise allocable to us. The cash and cash equivalents held by
ITT at the corporate level are not specifically identifiable to
Water Co and therefore were not allocated to us for any of the
periods presented. Cash and equivalents in our combined balance
sheets primarily represent cash held locally by entities
included in our Combined Financial Statements. Transfers of cash
to and from ITTs cash management system are reflected as a
component of Parent company investment on the Combined Balance
Sheets.
All significant intercompany transactions between us and ITT
have been included in these Combined Financial Statements and
are considered to be effectively settled for cash in the
Combined Financial Statements at the time the transaction is
recorded. The total net effect of the settlement of these
intercompany transactions is reflected in the combined
statements of cash flow as a financing activity and in the
Combined Balance Sheets as Parent Company Investment.
We recorded sales to unconsolidated affiliates during 2010, 2009
and 2008 totaling $14, $12 and $20, respectively. Additionally,
we purchased $22, $15 and $18 of products from unconsolidated
affiliates during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 19
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
The Companys segments are reported on the same basis used
internally for evaluating performance and allocating resources.
Our business is organized into two segments: Water
Infrastructure and Applied Water. Water Infrastructure,
comprising our Water & Wastewater and Analytics
operating segments, focuses on the transportation, treatment and
testing of water, offering a range of products including water
and wastewater pumps, treatment and testing equipment and
controls and systems. Applied Water, comprising of our
Residential & Commercial Water and Flow Control
operating segments, encompasses all the uses of water and
focuses on the residential, commercial industrial and
agricultural markets, offering pumps, valves, heat exchangers,
controls, and dispensing equipment. Our business is not
dependent on any single customer or a
F-39
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
few customers, the loss of which would have a material adverse
effect on us as a whole. No individual customer accounted for
more than 10% of our combined revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Eliminations/Other(a)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other consists of allocated ITT corporate office expenses
including compensation, benefits, occupancy, depreciation, and
other administrative costs, as well as charges related to
certain matters, such as environmental liabilities, that are
managed at a corporate level and are not included in the
business segments in evaluating performance or allocating
resources. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
2,377
|
|
|
$
|
1,278
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other consists of allocated ITT corporate assets, which
principally consist of deferred tax assets, certain property,
plant and equipment, and other assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, Property &
|
|
|
|
Revenue(A)
|
|
|
Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
1,104
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Other
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Revenue to external customers is attributed to individual
regions based upon the destination of product or service
delivery. |
F-40
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates revenue by product category, net
of intercompany balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pumps, accessories, parts and service
|
|
$
|
2,671
|
|
|
$
|
2,376
|
|
|
$
|
2,738
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other includes treatment equipment, analytical instrumentation,
valves, heat exchangers, and controls |
We evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure
through July 8, 2011, the date the combined financial
statements were available to be issued.
On July 5, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire YSI Incorporated (YSI) for an aggregate
purchase price of $310. YSI is a leading developer and
manufacturer of sensors, instruments, software, and data
collection platforms for environmental water monitoring. YSI
reported 2010 global revenues of $101 (unaudited) and employs
390 people at several facilities in the United States, Europe
and Asia. The transaction is expected to close in the third
quarter of 2011, pending customary closing conditions and
approval of YSIs shareholders.
F-41
UNAUDITED
INTERIM CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010
PREFACE
The preparation of the unaudited interim Condensed Combined
Financial Statements requires management to make use of
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of
assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and certain
financial statement disclosures. Estimates in these unaudited
interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements include, but are
not limited to, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory
valuation, goodwill and intangible asset impairment,
postretirement benefits, income taxes and the allocation of
purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
a business combination. Estimates are revised as additional
information becomes available.
The unaudited interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and
balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 included herein have not
been audited by an independent registered public accounting
firm, but in our opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to make a fair statement
of the financial position at March 31, 2011 and the results
of operations and the cash flows for the periods presented
herein have been made. The results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative
of the operating results expected for the full fiscal year.
The unaudited interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements
included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
or SEC. Although we believe the disclosures made are adequate to
make the information presented not misleading, certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules or regulations. These interim Condensed
Combined Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited combined financial statements and notes thereto
included in this Information Statement.
F-42
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Restructuring, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Combined financial statements.
F-43
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, net
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARENT COMPANY EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Dividend payable to ITT
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company investment
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent company equity
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2831
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and parent company equity
|
|
$
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
3,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
combined financial statements.
F-44
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Non-cash adjustments to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Restructuring charges, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Payments for restructuring
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in receivables
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Change in inventories
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Change in accounts payable
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Change in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Change in accrued taxes
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Operating activities
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Investing activities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer (to)/from parent
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Financing activities
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents End of Year
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (net of refunds received)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
combined financial statements.
F-45
THE WATER
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BUSINESSES OF ITT CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
combined financial statements.
F-46
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
SEPARATION
FROM ITT CORPORATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
Separation
from ITT Corporation
On January 12, 2011, ITT Corporation (ITT) announced a plan
to separate its water equipment and services businesses (Water
Co) from the remainder of its businesses through a pro rata
distribution of the common stock of an entity holding the assets
and liabilities associated with its water equipment and services
business. Water Co is in the business of designing and
manufacturing highly engineered technologies with a wide range
of applications in the water industry and includes the following
divisions of ITT: Water & Wastewater (which includes
the Analytical Instrumentation business),
Residential & Commercial Water, and Flow Control. ITT
WCO, Inc. was incorporated in Indiana on May 4, 2011 to be
the entity to hold such businesses subject to approval by the
Board of Directors of ITT and other conditions described below.
Under the plan, ITT would also distribute its Defense and
Information Solutions business (ITT DCO, Inc.).
The distribution of our common stock to ITT shareholders is
conditioned on, among other things, final approval of the
distribution plan by the ITT Board of Directors; the receipt of
a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
substantially to the effect that, among other things, the
contribution by ITT of the assets and liabilities of the water
equipment and services business to Water Co, or the
contribution, and the distribution will qualify as a transaction
that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax
purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code); the receipt of opinions from external legal counsel
to ITT, to the effect that the contribution and distribution
will qualify as a transaction that is described the Code; the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declaring
effective our Registration Statement on Form 10; and the
completion of the financing necessary for a cash distribution
from Water Co to ITT prior to the distribution.
Unless the context otherwise indicates, references in these
notes to Condensed Combined Financial Statements to
we, us, our and the
Company refer to Water Co. References in the notes to the
Combined Financial Statements to ITT or
parent refers to ITT Corporation, an Indiana
corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries (other than Water
Co), unless the context otherwise requires.
Basis
of Presentation
The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements presented
herein, and discussed below, have been prepared on a standalone
basis and are derived from the consolidated financial statements
and accounting records of the water equipment and services
businesses of ITT. The interim Condensed Combined Financial
Statements reflect our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows as we were historically managed, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, or GAAP. All intracompany transactions
between our businesses have been eliminated. All intercompany
transactions between us and ITT have been included in these
interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements and are
considered to be effectively settled for cash in the condensed
combined financial statements at the time the transaction is
recorded. The total net effect of the settlement of these
intercompany transactions is reflected in the condensed combined
statements of cash flow as a financing activity and in the
combined balance sheets as Parent company investment.
Our interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements include
expense allocations for (1) certain corporate functions
historically provided by ITT, including, but not limited to,
finance, legal, information technology, human resources,
communications, ethics and compliance and shared services,
(2) employee benefits and incentives, and
(3) share-based compensation. These expenses have been
allocated to us on the basis of direct usage when identifiable,
with the remainder allocated on the basis of revenue, headcount
or other measures. Both we and ITT consider the basis on which
the expenses have been allocated to be a reasonable reflection
of the utilization of services provided to or the benefit
received by us during the periods presented. The allocations may
not, however, reflect the expense we would have incurred as an
independent,
F-47
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
publicly traded company for the periods presented. Actual costs
that may have been incurred if we had been a standalone company
would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen
organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or
performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas
such as information technology and infrastructure. Following our
separation from ITT, we will perform these functions using our
own resources or purchased services. For an interim period,
however, some of these functions will continue to be provided by
ITT under the transition services agreements, which are planned
to extend for a period of 3 to 24 months in most
circumstances. In addition to the transition services
agreements, effective upon the distribution, we intend for
certain intercompany arrangements to be converted into
third-party contracts.
ITT uses a centralized approach to cash management and financing
of its operations, excluding debt where we are the legal
obligor. The majority of our cash is transferred to ITT daily
and ITT funds our operating and investing activities as needed.
Cash transfers to and from ITTs cash management accounts
are reflected in Parent company investment.
The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements include
certain assets and liabilities that have historically been held
at the ITT corporate level but are specifically identifiable or
otherwise allocable to us. The cash and cash equivalents held by
ITT at the corporate level are not specifically identifiable to
Water Co and therefore were not allocated to us for any of the
periods presented. Cash and cash equivalents in our combined
balance sheets primarily represent cash held locally by entities
included in our Combined Financial Statements. ITT third-party
debt, and the related interest expense has not been allocated to
us for any of the periods presented as we were not the legal
obligor of the debt and the ITT borrowings were not directly
attributable to our business.
The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements exclude the
allocation of liabilities, assets, and costs reported by ITT
related to asbestos product liability matters. These matters
were not allocated to us for any period presented as ITT will
continue as the legal obligor for those liabilities. ITT is
expected to pay any associated settlements, judgments, or legal
defense costs, and such matters were not historically managed by
us.
The unaudited interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements
have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments (which include normal
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for
the periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures
normally included financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC
rules. We believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make
the information presented not misleading. We consistently
applied the accounting policies described in the Combined
Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this Information
Statement with the exception of the accounting standards updates
described in Note 2 which were adopted on January 1,
2011.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the interim Condensed Combined
Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates
include, but are not limited to, allowance for doubtful
accounts, inventory valuation, goodwill and intangible asset
impairment, postretirement benefits, income taxes and the
allocation of purchase price to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination. Estimates are
revised as additional information becomes available.
Additionally, our interim Condensed Combined Financial
Statements may not be indicative of our future performance and
do not necessarily reflect what the results of operations,
financial position and cash flows would have been had we
operated as an independent, publicly traded company during the
periods presented. These interim Condensed Combined Financial
Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
combined financial statements and notes thereto included
elsewhere in this Information Statement.
F-48
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our quarterly financial periods end on the Saturday closest to
the last day of the calendar quarter, except for the last
quarterly period of the fiscal year, which ends on
December 31st. For ease of presentation, the quarterly
financial statements included herein are described as ending on
the last day of the calendar quarter.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Balance Sheet for ITT Contribution
In connection with the separation from ITT, the Company expects
to raise $1,200 of indebtedness, which includes indebtedness to
be raised in connection with the YSI acquisition. Proceeds of
$833 received in connection with these borrowings are expected
to be transferred to ITT. The accompanying unaudited pro forma
balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 gives effect to the $833
contribution expected to be paid to ITT.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Recently
Adopted Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued additional guidance applicable to the testing of
goodwill for potential impairment. Specifically, for reporting
units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity is
required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment
test (a comparison between the carrying amount of a reporting
units goodwill to its implied fair value) if it is more
likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, considering
any adverse qualitative factors. This guidance is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
after December 15, 2010. As of the date of our most recent
goodwill impairment test, none of our reporting units would have
been affected by the application of this guidance as each
reporting unit had a carrying amount that exceeded zero.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance permitting
use of the milestone method of revenue recognition for research
or development arrangements that contain payment provisions or
consideration contingent on the achievement of specified events.
On January 1, 2011, we adopted the new guidance on a
prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance on the
accounting for revenue arrangements that contain multiple
elements by eliminating the criteria that objective and reliable
evidence of fair value for undelivered products or services
needs to exist in order to be able to account separately for
deliverables and eliminating the use of the residual method of
allocating arrangement consideration. The amendments establish a
hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable and
will allow for the separation of products and services in more
instances than previously permitted.
We adopted the new multiple element guidance effective
January 1, 2011 for new arrangements entered into or
arrangements materially modified on or after that date on a
prospective basis. In connection with the adoption of the
revised multiple element arrangement guidance, we revised our
revenue recognition accounting policies. For multiple
deliverable arrangements entered into or materially modified on
or after January 1, 2011, we recognize revenue for a
delivered element based on the relative selling price if the
deliverable has stand-alone value to the customer and, in
arrangements that include a general right of return relative to
the delivered element, performance of the undelivered element is
considered probable and substantially in the Companys
control. The selling price for a deliverable is based on
vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (VSOE), if
available, third-party evidence of selling price (TPE), if VSOE
is not available, or best estimated selling price (BESP), if
neither VSOE nor TPE is available.
The deliverables in our arrangements with multiple elements
include various products and may include related services, such
as installation and
start-up
services. For multiple element arrangements entered into or
materially modified after adoption of the revised multiple
element arrangement guidance, we allocate arrangement
consideration based on the relative selling prices of the
separate units of accounting determined in accordance with the
hierarchy described above. For deliverables that are sold
separately, we establish VSOE based on the price when the
deliverable is sold separately. We establish TPE, generally for
services, based on
F-49
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
prices similarly situated customers pay for similar services
from third party vendors. For those deliverables for which we
are unable to establish VSOE or TPE, we estimate the selling
price considering various factors including market and pricing
trends, geography, product customization, and profit objectives.
Revenue allocated to products and services is generally
recognized as the products are delivered and the services are
performed, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have
been satisfied. The adoption of the new multiple element
guidance did not result in a material change in either the units
of accounting or the pattern or timing of revenue recognition.
Additionally, the adoption of the revised multiple element
arrangement guidance did not have a material impact on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Pronouncements
Not Yet Adopted
In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance intended to achieve common
fair value measurements and related disclosures between
U.S. GAAP and international accounting standards. The
amendments primarily clarify existing fair value guidance and
therefore the amendments are not intended to change the
application of existing fair value measurement guidance.
However, the amendments include certain instances where a
particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or
disclosing information about fair value measurements has
changed. This guidance is effective for the periods beginning
after December 15, 2011 and early application is
prohibited. We will adopt these amendments on January 1,
2012; however, the requirements are not expected to have a
material effect on the Companys Combined Financial
Statements.
We did not engage in any acquisitions during the first quarter
of 2011. During the first quarter of 2010, we spent $391, net of
cash acquired. The substantial majority of the first quarter
2010 aggregate purchase price pertained to the acquisition of
Nova Analytics Corporation (Nova) on March 23, 2010 for
$385. Nova provides us with analytical instrumentation brands
and technologies, which when combined with the Water &
Waste Water Division of the Water Infrastructure segment,
provides our customers the ability to procure, from a single
source, a full suite of transport, treatment and testing
products and solutions.
Additionally, in the third quarter of 2010, we completed the
acquisitions of Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin
Holdings Limited (collectively referred to as Godwin) for $580.
Godwin is a supplier and servicer of automatic self-priming and
on-demand pumping solutions serving the global industrial,
construction, mining, municipal, oil and gas dewatering markets.
The Godwin acquisition expands our dewatering market presence in
the United States.
The results of operations and cash flows from our 2010
acquisitions have been included in our Condensed Combined
Financial Statements prospectively from their date of
acquisition.
Effective
Tax Rate
Our quarterly provision for income taxes is measured using an
estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items
within periods presented. The comparison of our effective tax
rate between periods is significantly impacted by the level and
mix of earnings and losses by tax jurisdiction, foreign income
tax rate differentials and amount of permanent
book-to-tax
differences.
For the three month period ended March 31, 2011, we
recorded an income tax provision of $23 or 22.8% of income
before income taxes compared to $11 or 16.4% during the prior
period. For 2011, the effective tax rate is lower than the
federal statutory rate of 35% due principally to a lower rate
incurred on foreign earnings and the favorable impact of
interest not subject to income taxes. For 2010, the effective
tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% due
principally to a lower rate incurred on foreign earnings and the
favorable impact of the repatriation of foreign earnings net of
foreign tax credits.
F-50
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Uncertain
Tax Positions
We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only
if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. As of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, we had $44 and $43, respectively, of
total unrecognized tax benefits recorded. The amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax
rate is $39 and $38, as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
We classify interest relating to tax matters as a component of
interest expense and tax penalties as a component of income tax
expense in our Condensed Combined Income Statement. For both
periods presented, we had $5 of interest accrued for tax matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, gross
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Allowance for cash discounts
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
|
PLANT,
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
Equipment held for lease or rental
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Construction work in progress
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, gross
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense of $22 and $14 was recognized in the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
F-51
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 8
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 by business segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Goodwill 12/31/2010
|
|
$
|
873
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill 3/31/2011
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
|
$
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the results of its annual impairment tests, we
determined that no impairment of goodwill existed as of the
measurement date in 2010. However, future goodwill impairment
tests could result in a charge to earnings. We will continue to
evaluate goodwill on an annual basis as of the beginning of our
fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in
circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment.
Other
Intangible Assets
Information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Customer and distributor relationships
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
Patents and other
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
$
|
498
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the results of its annual impairment tests, we
determined that no impairment of the indefinite-lived
intangibles existed as of the measurement date in 2010. However,
future impairment tests could result in a charge to earnings. We
will continue to evaluate the indefinite-lived intangible assets
on an annual basis as of the beginning of our fourth fiscal
quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances
indicate there may be a potential impairment.
Amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets
for the first quarter 2011 and 2010 was $8, and $3, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 10
|
ACCRUED
AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Compensation and other employee-benefits
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
Customer-related liabilities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11
|
POSTRETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
The following table provides the components of net periodic
benefit cost for pension plans, disaggregated by U.S. and
International plans, and other employee-related benefit plans
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Intl
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We contributed approximately $1 to our various plans during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and made no contributions
during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Additional
contributions ranging between $7 and $9 are expected during the
remainder of 2011.
Certain Company employees participate in defined benefit pension
and other postretirement benefit plans sponsored by ITT
Corporation, which include participants of other ITT Corporation
subsidiaries. We recorded approximately $6 and $7 of expense
related to such multiemployer plans during the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 12
|
SHARE-BASED
PAYMENTS
|
ITT maintains several share-based incentive plans, for the
benefit of certain officers, directors, and employees, including
Water Co employees. Share-based awards issued to employees
include non-qualified stock options (NQO), restricted stock
awards (RS) and a target cash award (TSR). NQO and RS awards are
accounted for as equity-based compensation. TSR awards are cash
settled and accounted for as liability-based compensation. These
compensation costs are recognized primarily within selling,
general and administrative expenses.
Total share-based compensation costs recognized were $3 for both
the three months ended March 31 2011 and 2010. A significant
component of these charges relates to costs allocated to Water
Co for ITT Corporate employees as well as other ITT employees
not solely dedicated to Water Co. As of March 31, 2011,
there were approximately 0.7 NQO and 0.3 RS shares outstanding
related to Water Co specific employees. These awards and related
amounts are not necessarily indicative of awards and amounts
that would have been
F-53
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
granted if we were an independent, publicly traded company for
the periods presented. The following table provides further
detail related to share-based compensation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water Co
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Cost
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
2011 Total
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
2010 Total
|
|
|
Equity-based awards
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Liability-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We warrant numerous products, the terms of which vary widely. In
general, we warrant products against defect and specific
non-performance. The table below provides changes in the product
warranty accrual over each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Warranty accrual 1/1
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
Accruals for product warranties issued in the period
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty accrual 3/31
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND PARENT COMPANY EQUITY
|
The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements have been
prepared on a standalone basis and are derived from the
consolidated financial statements and accounting records of ITT.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we sold
inventory to other ITT businesses in the aggregate amount of $4
and $1, respectively which is included in net sales in our
combined statements of operations. We also purchase inventories
from other ITT businesses. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, we recognized cost of sales from
the inventory purchased from ITT of $3 and $3, respectively. The
aggregate inventory on hand of purchases from other ITT
businesses as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
was not significant.
Allocation
of General Corporate Expenses
The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements include
expense allocations for certain functions provided by ITT,
including, but not limited to, general corporate expenses
related to finance, legal, information technology, human
resources, communications, ethics and compliance, shared
services, employee benefits and incentives, and share-based
compensation. These expenses have been allocated to us on the
basis of direct usage when identifiable, with the remainder
allocated on the basis of revenue, headcount or other measure.
During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, and
2010, we were allocated $26 and $26, respectively, of general
corporate expenses incurred by ITT which is included within
SG&A expenses in the combined statements of operations.
The expense allocations have been determined on a basis that
both we and ITT consider to be a reasonable reflection of the
utilization of services provided or the benefit received by us
during the periods presented. The allocations may not, however,
reflect the expense we would have incurred as an independent,
publicly traded company for the periods presented. Actual costs
that may have been incurred if we had been a stand-alone company
would depend on a number of factors, including the chosen
organization structure, what functions were outsourced or
performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas
such as information technology and infrastructure.
F-54
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Parent
Company Equity
ITT uses a centralized approach to cash management and financing
of its operations, excluding debt directly incurred by any of
its businesses, such as debt assumed in an acquisition. The
majority of our domestic cash is transferred to ITT daily and
ITT funds our operating and investing activities as needed.
The interim Condensed Combined Financial Statements also include
the push down of certain assets and liabilities that have
historically been held at the ITT corporate level but which are
specifically identifiable or otherwise allocable to us. The cash
and cash equivalents held by ITT at the corporate level were not
allocated to us for any of the periods presented. Cash and
equivalents in our combined balance sheets primarily represent
cash held locally by entities included in our combined financial
statements. Transfers of cash to and from ITTs cash
management system are reflected as a component of Parent company
investment on the combined balance sheets.
All significant intercompany transactions between us and ITT
have been included in these combined financial statements and
are considered to be effectively settled for cash in the
combined financial statements at the time the transaction is
recorded. The total net effect of the settlement of these
intercompany transactions is reflected in the combined
statements of cash flow as a financing activity and in the
combined balance sheets as parent company investment.
|
|
NOTE 15
|
CONTINGENCIES
AND OTHER LEGAL MATTERS
|
General
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings that are
incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these
proceedings seek remedies relating to environmental matters,
product liability, personal injury claims, employment and
pension matters, and commercial or contractual disputes,
sometimes related to acquisitions or divestitures. We will
continue to defend vigorously against all claims.
While no claims have been asserted against ITT WCO, Inc.
alleging injury caused by a Water Co product resulting from
asbestos exposure, it is possible that claims could be filed in
the future. Should asbestos product liability claims be asserted
against ITT WCO, Inc. in the future, we believe there are
numerous legal defenses available and would defend ourselves
vigorously against such a claim. As part of the separation, ITT
will indemnify ITT WCO, Inc. for asbestos product liability
matters, including settlements, judgments, and legal defense
costs associated with all pending and future claims that may
arise from past sales of ITTs legacy products. We believe
ITT remains a substantive entity with sufficient financial
resources to honor its obligations to us.
Although the ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be
predicted with certainty, based on present information,
including our assessment of the merits of the particular claim,
we do not expect that any asserted or unasserted legal claims or
proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a
material adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations,
or financial condition.
Indemnifications
As part of the separation, ITT will provide for certain
indemnifications and cross-indemnifications among ITT, ITT DCO,
Inc. and ITT WCO, Inc. The indemnifications address a variety of
subjects; including asserted and unasserted product liability
matters (e.g., asbestos claims, product warranties), which
relate to products sold prior to the Separation Date. The
indemnifications are absolute and indefinite. The
indemnification associated with pending and future asbestos
claims does not expire. ITT WCO, Inc. has not recorded a
liability for matters for which we will be indemnified by ITT or
ITT DCO, Inc. through the Distribution Agreement and we are not
aware of any claims or other circumstances that would give rise
to material payments from us under such indemnifications.
F-55
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Environmental
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to federal,
state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations. We
are responsible, or are alleged to be responsible, for ongoing
environmental investigation and remediation of sites in various
countries. These sites are in various stages of investigation
and/or
remediation and in many of these proceedings our liability is
considered de minimis. We have received notification from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and from similar
state and foreign environmental agencies, that a number of sites
formerly or currently owned
and/or
operated by Water Co., and other properties or water supplies
that may be or have been impacted from those operations, contain
disposed or recycled materials or wastes and require
environmental investigation
and/or
remediation. These sites include instances where we have been
identified as a potentially responsible party under federal and
state environmental laws and regulations.
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded on a site by
site basis when it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated, based on current law and existing technologies. Our
accrued liabilities for these environmental matters represent
the best estimates related to the investigation and remediation
of environmental media such as water, soil, soil vapor, air and
structures, as well as related legal fees. These estimates, and
related accruals, are reviewed quarterly and updated for
progress of investigation and remediation efforts and changes in
facts and legal circumstances. Liabilities for these
environmental expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis.
It is difficult to estimate the final costs of investigation and
remediation due to various factors, including incomplete
information regarding particular sites and other potentially
responsible parties, uncertainty regarding the extent of
investigation or remediation and our share, if any, of liability
for such conditions, the selection of alternative remedial
approaches, and changes in environmental standards and
regulatory requirements. In our opinion, the total amount
accrued is appropriate based on existing facts and circumstances.
|
|
NOTE 16
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
The Companys segments are reported on the same basis used
internally for evaluating performance and allocating resources.
Our business is organized into two segments: Water
Infrastructure and Applied Water. Water Infrastructure,
comprising our Water & Wastewater and Analytics
operating segments, involves the core water processes that
distribute water to users and return the wastewater back to the
environment. Specifically, this involves public utility and
industrial transport, treatment and test applications related to
the supply of earths water resources. Products include
transport and treatment products and solutions for water and
waste water, including pumps, filtration and disinfection
equipment, and analytical instruments. Applied Water, comprising
our Residential & Commercial Water and Flow Control
operating segments, revolves around the usage of water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Water Infrastructure
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
Applied Water
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
NOTES TO
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure
through July 8, 2011, the date the combined financial
statements were available to be issued.
On July 5, 2011, we entered into a definitive agreement to
acquire YSI Incorporated (YSI) for an aggregate
purchase price of $310. YSI is a leading developer and
manufacturer of sensors, instruments, software, and data
collection platforms for environmental water monitoring. YSI
reported 2010 global revenues of $101 and employs 390 people at
several facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia. The
transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2011,
pending customary closing conditions and approval of YSIs
shareholders.
F-57
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS REPORT
To the Shareholder of
Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying combined consolidated
statements of income and retained earnings and of cash flows of
Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
subsidiary (collectively, the Company) for the
period January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010. These
combined consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined
consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the combined consolidated
statements of income and retained earnings and of cash flows are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined
consolidated statements of income and retained earnings and of
cash flows, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall combined consolidated financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit of the combined
consolidated statements of income and retained earnings and of
cash flows provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such combined consolidated statements of income
and retained earnings and of cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of
the Company for the period January 1, 2010 to
August 2, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 13, 2011
F-58
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
For the
period from January 1, 2010 to August 2,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
69,658
|
|
Rental and service revenue
|
|
|
75,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
145,217
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
44,472
|
|
Cost of rental and service revenues
|
|
|
26,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
71,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
74,027
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
47,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
26,195
|
|
Other expense:
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
290
|
|
Interest and other expense, net
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
25,663
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
24,831
|
|
Retained earnings, beginning
|
|
|
144,305
|
|
Shareholders distributions
|
|
|
(37,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, ending
|
|
$
|
131,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-59
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
For the
period from January 1, 2010 to August 2,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
24,831
|
|
Non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,221
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Payments less than expense for retirement plan
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Loss on foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
290
|
|
Change in:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivables
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
121
|
|
Accounts payables and accrued expense
|
|
|
928
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
630
|
|
Proceeds from settlement of foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
40,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
$
|
(11,103
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment to third parties
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment to related party
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(7,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders distributions
|
|
$
|
(33,769
|
)
|
Repayments of borrowings to related parties
|
|
|
(2,411
|
)
|
Repayments of borrowings to unrelated parties
|
|
|
(3,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(39,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,849
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of net assets to Shareholders
|
|
$
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forgiveness of related party debt, recognized as a distribution
to shareholders
|
|
$
|
9,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-60
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business and Basis of Presentation
|
The combined consolidated financial statements reflect the
combined results of operations and cash flows of Godwin Pumps of
America, Inc. (GPA) and Godwin Holdings, Ltd.
(Holdings) (collectively referred to as
Godwin or the Company) for the period
from January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010. From
January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010, GPA and Holdings
were entities under common control of one individual
(Controlling Shareholder). GPA, a subchapter
S-corporation incorporated in New Jersey, is engaged in the
business of assembling, selling, renting and servicing
industrial and contractors pumps, as well as the sale and
rental of other industrial products. Holdings is a holding
company with no operations of its own and whose primary asset is
its wholly owned subsidiary, Godwin Pumps, Ltd.
(GPL). GPL manufactures and sells pumps and pump
components and is a major supplier to GPA. GPL also sells
directly and through independent distributors in the United
Kingdom, Europe, Middle East, and Africa. Both Holdings and GPL
are incorporated in the United Kingdom. Operations in the United
Kingdom contributed 13% of combined net sales for the period
from January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010. In addition,
approximately 19% of the combined net assets were located in the
United Kingdom at August 2, 2010.
On August 3, 2010, ITT Corporation (ITT)
acquired all of the privately held stock of GPA, Holdings and
its wholly owned subsidiary, GPL, as of that date. These
combined consolidated financial statements have been prepared
for purposes of complying with the filing requirements under
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Regulation S-X,
Rule 3-05,
for significant acquired businesses, as well as other applicable
SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, these combined
consolidated financial statements do not include a balance
sheet, a statement of changes in shareholders equity, and
note disclosures related to assets, liabilities and equity.
Furthermore, they reflect the results of operations for GPA and
Holdings solely for the period prior to acquisition by ITT in
2010. Excluding the aforementioned matters, the accompanying
combined consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (US GAAP) and include the accounts of
GPA and Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiary, GPL. All
intercompany transactions, accounts and profits have been
eliminated.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Principles
|
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the combined consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Foreign
Currency
The functional currency of Holdings and GPA are the British
pound and US dollar, respectively. Holdings revenues and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the
period presented. Translation adjustments have no effect on net
income.
Some transactions of the Company are conducted in currencies
different from their functional currency. Gains and losses from
these foreign currency transactions are included in income as
they occur and were not material to the results of operations
during the period from January 1, 2010 to August 2,
2010.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the
Companys results of operations to credit risk consist
primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.
The Company maintains cash accounts, which, at times, may exceed
federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any
losses from maintaining cash accounts in excess of federally
insured limits. Management believes that it is not exposed to
any significant credit risk on its cash accounts. The Company
performs credit evaluations of its customers and
F-61
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
Notes to
Combined Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
generally does not require collateral. The Company provides for
losses from uncollectible accounts based on an analysis of
historical data trends and specific higher risk accounts. The
past-due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the
contractual payment terms of the receivable.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories
Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Components and finished equipment actual cost
|
|
|
|
Spare parts average cost (approximates the
first-in,
first-out method)
|
Estimated losses from obsolete and slow-moving inventories are
recorded to reduce inventory values to their estimated net
realizable value.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Significant replacements and improvements are
capitalized, while maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets, as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
50 years
|
Machinery and equipment Rental
|
|
5 to 10 years
|
Hose, pipe and fittings Rental
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
Plant machinery and equipment
|
|
7 years
|
Vehicles
|
|
5 years
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
10 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lease term
|
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized and earned when all of the following
criteria are satisfied: (a) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (b) price is fixed or determinable;
(c) collectibility is reasonably assured; and
(d) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered.
Delivery occurs when the title and the risks and rewards of
ownership have substantially transferred to the customer.
Equipment and parts sales are recognized when risk and title to
the product transfers to the customer, which is usually on
delivery. Rental revenue is recognized over the term of the
rental period based on the terms of the rental contract. Service
revenue is recognized on completion of the service. All revenue
is presented net of applicable sales tax.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenues.
Related shipping and handling income is included in revenues.
Advertising
and Promotion
The Company expenses advertising as incurred. Advertising
expense was $451,000 for the period from January 1, 2010 to
August 2, 2010.
F-62
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
Notes to
Combined Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Income
Taxes
GPAs federal income taxes are payable personally by the
Controlling Shareholder pursuant to an election to be taxed as a
subchapter S-corporation under the Internal Revenue Code. A
similar election was made in New Jersey, the state of
incorporation of GPA, and all other applicable states that allow
for such an election. Therefore, the income tax provision
recognized by GPA include only those applicable states which do
not recognize this election or which still maintain corporate
level taxes.
Holdings and GPL account for income taxes using the asset and
liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of
uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not, based
on the technical merits of the position, that the position will
be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. The
Company accrues for other tax contingencies when it is probable
that a liability to a taxing authority has been incurred and the
amount of the contingency can be reasonably estimated. Interest
accrued related to unrecognized tax and income tax related
penalties are included in the provision for income taxes. The
Company has not recognized any uncertain tax positions in the
combined financial statements.
Product
Warranties
Warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are
estimated based on product warranty terms and estimates of costs
to be incurred to fulfill the claim based on historical
experience. The Company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities
and revises its estimates, as necessary, based on known or
anticipated warranty claims, or as new information becomes
available.
Other
Comprehensive Income
The components of total comprehensive income for the Company
consist of the Companys net income, foreign currency
translation adjustments and pension liability adjustments. For
the period from January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010,
total comprehensive income (loss) was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
24,831
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
Pension liability adjustments
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
22,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-13,
which amended the accounting for revenue arrangements that
contain multiple elements. The objective of this amendment is to
address the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to
enable vendors to account for products or services
(deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The
amendments establish a hierarchy for determining the selling
price of a deliverable and will allow for the separation of
products and services in more instances than previously
permitted. The guidance provided within ASU
2009-13 is
effective for new or materially modified arrangements in fiscal
years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and allows for
either prospective or retrospective application, with early
adoption permitted. The Company will adopt the provisions of
this ASU on January 1, 2011. Although the Company continues
to evaluate the effects adoption of this ASU will have, it
currently does not believe its results of operations, financial
position or liquidity will be adversely affected.
F-63
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
Notes to
Combined Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Derivative
Financial Instrument
|
During 2009, the Company entered into forward contracts to
purchase British pounds and Euros. The objective of the forward
contracts was to minimize foreign currency risk associated with
inventory purchases from foreign vendors by reducing the impact
of changes in foreign currency on cash flows. The forward
contracts were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes.
The Company does not utilize the forward contracts or other
financial instruments for trading purposes.
The Company settled its forward contracts during the period from
January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010 and received net
proceeds of $1 million. The decline in the fair value of
the contracts from January 1, 2010 through the various
settlement dates was $290,000. This loss on settlement of
foreign currency forward contracts is recognized in other income
(expense) in the combined consolidated statement of income and
retained earnings.
There were no derivative contracts outstanding at August 2,
2010.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows
for the period from January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Current income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
910
|
|
Deferred income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total taxes
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective income tax rate differs from the
statutory Federal income tax rate on ordinary income due
principally because of the Companys domestic subchapter
S-corporation election and lower foreign tax rates.
F-64
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
Notes to
Combined Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan
The Company, through GPL, maintains a defined benefit pension
plan which covers substantially all employees in the United
Kingdom. The plans benefits are based primarily on years
of service and employee compensation near retirement. The net
periodic pension cost, employer contributions, participant
contributions, benefits paid and weighted average discount rate
for the period from January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
427,000
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
$
|
404,000
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
$
|
139,000
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
$
|
389,000
|
|
Related to net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Expected rate of salary increases
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
The estimated benefit payments for the Companys pension
plan range from $473,000 to $610,000 for each of the next five
years and $5.8 million in aggregate for the five years
thereafter. The Company expects to make contributions of
approximately $1 million in 2011.
Profit
Sharing Retirement Plan
The Company, through GPA, sponsors a trustee profit sharing
retirement plan, which covers all eligible employees and allows
for employee contributions (401(k) option). Contributions to the
profit sharing retirement plan and the matching employer
contributions to the 401(k) option are at the discretion of the
Board of Directors. Currently, GPAs matching portion is
50% of the employees contribution up to a maximum of 6% of
employee eligible wages. The Companys contribution to the
profit sharing retirement plan and the matching portion of the
401(k) was $865,000 for the period from January 1, 2010 to
August 2, 2010.
|
|
6.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Leases
The Company rents its corporate office in Bridgeport, New
Jersey, and other office buildings, warehouses and commercial
real estate in the United States and United Kingdom under
operating leases with affiliates of the Controlling Shareholder.
Under the terms of these leases, the Company is responsible for
real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance. Rent
expense for these related party facility leases for the period
from January 1, 2010 to August 2, 2010 was
$2.5 million in aggregate, of which $1.9 million and
$600,000 is included in cost of sales and selling, general and
administrative expenses, respectively. On August 3, 2010 in
conjunction with ITTs acquisition of the Company, certain
provisions of these leases, mainly the lease term, were amended.
Future minimum lease payments under these revised lease
agreements are included in the amounts disclosed in Note 7.
The Company also leased airplanes from an affiliate of the
Controlling Shareholder. Under the terms of these leases, the
Company was responsible for all operating expenses associated
with use of the airplanes while the airplanes were being used by
the Company as well as an hourly rental charge for each flight
hour used. Rent expense for the aircraft recognized in the
combined consolidated statement of income and retained earnings
was $625,000 for the period from January 1, 2010 to
August 2, 2010.
F-65
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
Notes to
Combined Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Related
Party Guarantees
The Company has guaranteed the debt of two of the affiliated
lessors discussed above related to the property and equipment
leased by the Company. The affiliated lessors were current in
their mortgage payments as of August 2, 2010. The aggregate
guaranteed mortgage balances at August 2, 2010 were
approximately $9.9 million. The guarantee agreements were
terminated in connection with ITTs acquisition of the
Company on August 3, 2010.
Distributions
In June 2010, GPA sold City Lights Home LLC, a wholly owned
subsidiary consisting primarily of a condominium in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to affiliates controlled by the
Controlling Shareholder for cash proceeds of $1.7 million.
The book value of City Lights Home, LLC was $1.8 million at
the time of the sale. The Company recorded the resulting loss of
$100,000 as a reduction of retained earnings and accordingly did
not recognize any gain or loss from this transaction.
In June and July 2010, Holdings distributed two legal entities
to affiliates controlled by the Controlling Shareholder. These
entities primarily held real estate leased to GPL. The book
value of these entities was $3.4 million at the time of
distribution. The Company recorded this distribution at book
value as a reduction of retained earnings and accordingly did
not recognize any gain or loss from this transaction.
|
|
7.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Total rent expense under non-cancellable operating leases
excluding those with related parties (see Note 6) was
$342,000 for the period from January 1, 2010 to
August 2, 2010.
The future minimum payments under non-cancellable operating
lease agreements including those with related parties, as of
August 2, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Period from August 3 to December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,239
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,256
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,453
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
2015
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities are recorded for various contingencies arising in
the normal course of business, including litigation and
administrative proceedings, environmental matters, product
liability, product warranty, workers compensation and
other claims. The Company has recorded the estimated costs for
these contingencies in the combined consolidated financial
statements based on assumptions including those developed using
input derived from actuarial estimates and historical and
anticipated experience data depending on the nature of the
liability, and in certain instances with consultation of legal
counsel, internal and external consultants and engineers.
Subject to the uncertainties inherent in estimating future costs
for these types of liabilities, the Company believes the
estimates are reasonable and does not believe the final
determination of the cost associated with these liabilities
would have a material effect on the combined consolidated
results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Until its acquisition by ITT, the Companys workers
compensation and general liability insurance was provided by a
related multi-party captive insurance company incorporated in
the Cayman Islands. The Company owns one voting common share of
the captive insurer with a carrying value of one hundred dollars
and the Controlling Shareholder owns one non-voting redeemable
preferred share. Initial premiums paid by the
F-66
Godwin
Pumps of America, Inc. and Godwin Holdings, Ltd. and
Subsidiary
Notes to
Combined Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Company have been sufficient to cover any losses incurred and no
additional premiums have been required to date. Premium expense
was $1.6 million for the period from January 1, 2010
to August 2, 2010.
The Company evaluated subsequent events for recognition or
disclosure through June 13, 2011, the date the combined
consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.
As discussed in Note 1, ITT acquired all of the privately
held stock of GPA, Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiary,
GPL, on August 3, 2010. As a result of the acquisition, the
Companys guarantee of the debt of the lessors affiliated
with the Controlling Shareholder discussed in Note 6 was
terminated. Further, the Company will no longer lease airplanes
from an affiliate of the Controlling Shareholder. As discussed
in Note 6, the terms of certain leases with affiliates of
the Controlling Shareholder were modified. The future minimum
lease payments under the revised leases are included in
Note 7.
F-67